|
|
|
Transaction Oracle— A Timely Look at Transactions as They Happen
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Braves - DLed Chipper
Atlanta Braves - Placed 3B Chipper Jones on the 15-day DL; recalled 3B Andy Marte.
This will probably be Marte’s early cup of Joe, not his permanent addition to the 25-man roster. This could change, however, depending on the seriousness of Chipper’s foot; if he’s only going to miss a couple of weeks, Betemit will get the starts, but if he needs surgery, which could result in him missing a couple of months, the Braves will probably use the opportunity to give Marte more of a look as the starting 3B. Luckily for Marte, a prospect like him is good enough that he can survive a weak first 50 MLB at-bats.
2005 ZiPS Projection - Andy Marte ——————————————————————————————————
Period AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB BA OBP SLG ——————————————————————————————————
Actual ‘05* 194 18 50 14 1 8 31 23 42 0 .258 .336 .464
Rest ‘05 299 37 78 18 1 12 44 37 71 3 .261 .346 .448
* - Includes MLEs
Dan Szymborski
Posted: June 07, 2005 at 12:32 AM | 24 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News:
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
2012 ZiPS Projections, Final Edition (23 - 11:21am, May 31)Last: craigsaboe2012 ZiPS/RBI Baseball (20 - 10:58am, May 03)Last: tjans2012 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheets, v. 1 (62 - 4:38pm, Apr 10)Last: nemodomi2012 ZiPS Projections - Oakland A's (69 - 5:57am, Apr 10)Last: Athletic Supporter gangnam style2012 ZiPS Projections - Kansas City Royals (31 - 1:51pm, Mar 23)Last: hokieneerPirates - Acquire Burnett (10 - 12:09am, Feb 21)Last: YR Misses Reggie Bars2012 ZiPS Projections - Pittsburgh Pirates (41 - 11:02am, Feb 20)Last: Dangerous Dean2012 ZiPS Projections - Minnesota Twins (31 - 9:53pm, Feb 17)Last: A Random 8-Year-Old Eskimo2012 ZiPS Projections - Boston Red Sox (46 - 5:41pm, Feb 17)Last: Jose Can Still Seabiscuit2012 ZiPS Projections - San Diego Padres (29 - 3:33pm, Feb 17)Last: Dan Szymborski2012 ZiPS Projections - Arizona Diamondbacks (31 - 3:03am, Feb 14)Last: Dan Szymborski2012 ZiPS Projections - Texas Rangers (21 - 1:43pm, Feb 10)Last: DEF: NPW (WWRJD)2012 ZiPS Projections - Miami Marlins (31 - 9:16pm, Feb 07)Last: Misirlou is bad, he's nationwide2012 ZiPS Projections - Cleveland Indians (19 - 11:18pm, Feb 02)Last: DevinM2012 ZiPS Projections - Atlanta Braves (28 - 7:25pm, Jan 31)Last: Gern Blanston
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. zonk Posted: June 07, 2005 at 12:58 AM (#1385847).......
Why the disdain for Wilson Betemit?
I think Marte is a fine prospect, but overrated (I keep thinking K-Mart Scott Rolen).
The sample size is ludicrously small - but Betemit hitting 333/455/593, and maybe most impressively, 12 BBs and 9 K in 66 trips to the dish.
Marte has option years left - Betemit has to stick, so why not see if Betemit can play? Either to become a regular member somewhere in an admittedly crowded infield, or, as a trade bait?
It wasn't that long ago that Betemit was one of the top prospects in all of baseball -- BA's #8 in '02, 29 in 01, and 49 in 03.
I'm not saying that because I already ditched useful pieces like Antonio Perez, Felipe Lopez, and several other astute April waiver claims -- and have only Betemit left.
I was under the impression that the Braves had pretty much decided Betemit didn't have the range to play SS.... but I might be thinking of Kelly Johnson.
They also said that surgery hasn't been ruled out for Chipper Jones. One has to wonder how long his career is going to be. He's 33 and he had injury problems last year. He's having injury problems this year as well. It doesn't look good.
I don't think Chipper gives a rats ass about HOF and that stuff, so I would not be surprised to see him retire young.
Once upon a time, Betemit, Johnson, and ???? were quite a SS troika of prospects, but I'm drawing a blank on the third - I might be thinking of Furcal, but somehow I thought all 3 were of the "offensive upside, but might not stick at SS" variety.
At the very least, this is going to be a very interesting year for us Braves fans. The question is if they can manage to win while undergoing a full-blown youth movement. On Friday, they had five rookies start the game - you might see more than that next time Davies starts. Giles, Andruw, Adam and the rest rookies - especially if Estrada has to miss a few games.
Fair enough...
I do have to admit, Marte's minor league numbers look better than I had pre-supposed before checking - though bbcube seems to be missing the 04 Greenville numbers.
It's different scale of prospectdom, but I just remember thinking how stupid the Cubs were when they didn't give Julio Zuleta a legitimate look in the season between Grace's departure and Choi's missed opportunity/regression/whatever.
I didn't think Zuleta would amount to much - but if he had gotten 400 at-bats, he might have put together an empty 25 HR season; maybe enough to make worthy of middling prospect in a swap... rather than just fading to oblivion.
Marte is only 21, and this would be his first full season in AAA - the Braves have always done a wonderful job working in their kids even while contending, but it's not like he's tearing up AAA to the point of it being a waste of his time.
Minor quibble with an organization that's probably earned the benefit of the doubt on such transactions, but I guess I wouldn't have been so eager to gets Marte's service time clock ticking....
The Braves worry less about service time than a lot of organizations, anyway. I think their philosophy is something like "there's always more". Plus, the classy way they treat players makes it easier to find those veterans to fill the gaps.
(Example A: When Mondesi was released, everything the Braves said about him was positive. How hard he worked, how disappointed everyone was that it just hadn't worked out, etc. Think the next faded vet will remember that?)
Betemit will get plenty of at bats. I think Cox and company are starting to think of him as next year's shortstop. I hope so, since option B seems to be Tony Pena, Jr. Pena will make a fine coach one day, I think, but not a fine major league player.
Just ask anyone who has followed a Dusty Baker managed team. ;)
I too am starting to think of Betemit as next year's starting SS for the Braves. He's looked good playing there - maybe not as good as Furcal has appeared for much of this year, but Betemit has made all the plays thus far.
The Braves are just shell-shocked at the moment. It's tough to get fired up about a chance to see the kids play when there's a good deal of despondence from the rest of the club. They just need to win a few games and things will get better.
I wouldn't be surprised to see some kind of a move to shore up at least the bullpen after the draft is over.
As for Betemit, I expect to see him at SS next year, and I expect him to do a good enough job. The Braves front office is again talking about their budget, which they're unwilling to break. Given their new cost-consciousness, I don't expect them to give Furcal the kind of money that he could get elsewhere.
In any case, I'm a lot more excited watching Langerhans, Johnson, LaRoche, and Brayan Pena than Jordan, Mondesi, Franco, and Eddie Perez.
And if this is the way the string of division titles ends, so be it. It's been a hell of a ride, and at least the future looks promising. I'd rather have the Braves roster, farm system, and budget than the Yankees right now.
I mostly agree. However, I'd take the Yanks budget (in which I include willingness to spend). The Braves aren't going to spend their money for the forseeable future.
Actually, they'd probably be OK if George was willing to punt 2005 and 2006. But that won't happen.
As a writer, I'm not sure I like this phrase. My understanding is service time is simply measured in days on the major league roster, so, IOW, if a player gets 30 days on the roster in May it is no different than getting those same 30 days on the roster in August. In other words, the clock ticks for 30 days in either case, and then that's it. Is there something else that I'm missing, something that makes an earlier call-up more costly?
I know that an earlier call-up can allow a player to gain more service time in a single year because it may work out that way, that's just common sense. I guess my larger point is that I think this is a bad metaphor unless there is something about this that I'm not understanding.
erstad is MF-ing dick...someone needs to drill some sense into his frickin football ass! and not the Mike Piazza kind!
Seriously, if that was Marcus Giles doing the exact same thing to one of the Molina boys, I suspect you wouldn't be nearly as angry.
Generally, 3B don't last very long. Maybe it's a curse. Maybe it's a lot harder on the body than we realize. Chipper's had only 1100 games there, but I think I'd move him to 1B soon if I were the Braves.
33 was Brett's last year at 3B. Santo was done after 33. Mathews' last full year at 3B was 34 and he was done after 35. Brooks lasted forever, but he had only one good hitting season after 34. Plenty of guys aged well (Schmidt, Boggs, Brett as a hitter) so it's not a death sentence.
The curse will get AROD eventually unless he moves soon.
If Chipper's out for the year, as is now being rumored, he may have played his last game at third. If he can hit like he did the second half of last year, and in between injuries this year, he'll still be plenty valuable at first base.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main