Page rendered in 0.1447 seconds
40 querie(s) executed
— Where BTF's Members Investigate the Grand Old Game
Monday, November 19, 2001
Unfair Labor Practices: the Employer’s Duty to Bargain
The second of a series of articles about the basics of labor law.
Considering the MLBPA is unlikely to commit violations of the law during the ongoing collective bargaining since there is no strategic advantage for the Union to avoid bargaining, most of the questions we will visit involve Section 8(a) of the NLRA, Employer Unfair Labor Practices. There are parallel sections of the law in Section 8(b) and if there is any real interest I will explain them.
I will only give the definitions of the first five, since they are less likely to occur, and then go into Section 8(a)(5) in more detail since questions related to 8(a)(5) have already been raised in the proposed contraction plan, and since misjudgement of 8(a)(5) by the owners won the last strike for the players.
Section 8 (a) it shall be an Unfair Labor Practice for an employer-
(1) to interfere with, retrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7;
Section 7 provides employees rights to engage in protected concerted activity, or refrain there from. Basically, these are the rights to form, join, and participate in a union, or not to.
(2) to dominate or interfere with the formation or administration of any labor organization or contribute financial or other support to it;
This it the prohibition against employer dominated unions that were prevalent as a union avoidance strategy earlier in history.
(3) by discriminating in regard to hire or tenure of employment or any term or condition of employment to encourage or discourage membership in any labor organization;
This is a prohibition against the Employer discriminating against those who chose to be union members, or for that matter, those who chose not to.
(4) to discharge or otherwise discriminate against an employee because he has filed charges or given testimony under this Act;
This protects the sovereignty of the Act by protecting employees who engage in whistleblowing.
(5) to refuse to bargain collectively with the representatives of his employees, subject to the provisions of Section 9(a).
Section 9(a) provides that when a bargaining representative is properly selected, and without going in to detail, the MLBPA has been, that Union shall be the exclusive representative of all the employees for the purposes of collective bargaining in respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment.
These issues are more commonly referred to as wages, hours, and working conditions, or the mandatory subjects of bargaining.
The Supreme Court, in NLRB v. Wooster Division of Borg-Warner Corp., 356 U.S. 342, (1958), divided the subjects of bargaining into three categories: mandatory, those which we defined above, permissive, and illegal. The Court endorsed the idea that it would be an Unfair Labor Practice to insist that an illegal subject be part of a collective bargaining agreement or to use economic warfare, such as a lockout or strike in order to force such a demand. Those illegal subjects have been found to include a closed shop agreement, and violations of other labor and employment laws, like violations of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that protects against discrimination based upon race, sex, color, creed, religion, and national origin.
The permissive distinction is important because a party must withdraw all permissive subjects prior to declaring an impasse. I will get into impasse in a later article. Further, permissive subjects must be removed from the bargaining table if one party does not wish to negotiate over the subject. Items that have been found to be permissive subjects include: prices, internal union governance, ratification procedures, who represents the parties in bargaining, vote procedures before strikes, and the scope of the bargaining unit.
The mandatory subjects are the subjects that may be bargained to impasse and may lead to unilateral implementation of the final offer by the Employer, something Major League Baseball attempted to do during the last round of negotiations in 1994-5.
Wages includes compensation of any kind. Hours includes: schedules, breaks, shifts, and overtime. This is why the MLBPA always asserts that it has a right to negotiate over interleague play. It falls under work schedule. The same argument may be raised by the Union in attempting to block contraction. The media calls this participation over the schedule "final approval by the union." But, it really means that the union may ask to negotiate the schedule, and ask for management concessions in other areas to approve the schedule that management has proposed. Other terms and conditions of employment has been found to include: health and safety, pace and difficulty, discipline and employee behavior, and certain aspects of capital redeployment.
My next article will deal with this major issue of capital redeployment and plant closure decisions and how the law may be interpreted in the current contraction proposal. As you know the owners claim they have the unilateral right to fold franchises, but admit they must bargain over the aftereffects, such as dispersing players and the union has already filed a grievance under the previous agreement related to the owners’ late notice to the players of the contraction decision. Meanwhile, the Union is preparing their arguments related to whether or not contraction falls under the mandatory subjects of bargaining.
© 2001 Eugene Freedman
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Loser Scores 2014
(8 - 2:36pm, Nov 15)
Winning Pitcher: Bumgarner....er, Affeldt
(43 - 8:29am, Nov 05)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick
What do you do with Deacon White?
(17 - 12:12pm, Dec 23)
Last: Alex King
(15 - 12:05am, Oct 18)
Nine (Year) Men Out: Free El Duque!
(67 - 10:46am, May 09)
Who is Shyam Das?
(4 - 7:52pm, Feb 23)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Greg Spira, RIP
(45 - 9:22pm, Jan 09)
Last: Jonathan Spira
Northern California Symposium on Statistics and Operations Research in Sports, October 16, 2010
(5 - 12:50am, Sep 18)
Mike Morgan, the Nexus of the Baseball Universe?
(37 - 12:33pm, Jun 23)
Last: The Keith Law Blog Blah Blah (battlekow)
Sabermetrics, Scouting, and the Science of Baseball – May 21 and 22, 2011
(2 - 8:03pm, May 16)
Last: Diamond Research
Retrosheet Semi-Annual Site Update!
(4 - 3:07pm, Nov 18)
What Might Work in the World Series, 2010 Edition
(5 - 2:27pm, Nov 12)
Last: fra paolo
Predicting the 2010 Playoffs
(11 - 5:21pm, Oct 20)
SABR 40: Impressions of a First-Time Attendee
(5 - 11:12pm, Aug 19)
Last: Joe Bivens, Minor Genius
St. Louis Cardinals Midseason Report
(12 - 12:42am, Aug 10)