Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Primate Studies > Discussion
Primate Studies
— Where BTF's Members Investigate the Grand Old Game

Wednesday, August 06, 2003

Bi-Weekly Review: N.L. East

The N.L. East through August 3rd.

I?ve spent the last three recaps being a smug, arrogant ass. I?ve done this for a couple of reasons. First, I enjoy playing up the “damned Braves fans and their presumptuous, ho-hum selves, always assuming they?ll win regardless, oh how I hate them” vibe. That amuses me. Secondly, there has been a very real context for playing that up. Since June, there?s been little actual divisional competition to speak of. Finally, I am, in point of fact, a smug, arrogant ass most of the time [most? - DS]. Still, it?s getting an old trip for me to write, which means it was probably an old trip for you to read last month. With that in mind, I?ve spent the last couple of weeks looking for another way into the subject of the NL East of 2003. Of course, before we get into all of that, we should probably reset ourselves as we always do. The division, as of end-of-games, Aug. 3:

Team

W

L

Avg.

GB

Home

Road

East

Cent.

West

L10

Strk

Atlanta

73

38

.658

-

40-17

33-21

29-22

19-7

15-4

6-4

L 1

Philadelphia

62

49

.559

11

34-25

28-24

25-25

13-8

16-10

5-5

L 2

Florida

60

51

.541

13

35-23

25-28

29-21

13-14

9-10

7-3

L 1

Montreal

58

54

.518

15?

36-22

22-32

23-28

15-12

11-5

6-4

W 4

N.Y. Mets

45

66

.405

28

23-35

22-31

20-30

13-17

7-9

3-7

W 1

 

Okay, now a divisional recap is more or less required to point out the standings in the division. That?s kind of what we?re here for. And the standings are what they are. Atlanta still holds a 10+ game lead on the competition, and that lead has shown a tendency to grow by roughly one game every week. New York still has an abysmal baseball team, falling so far out that it?s almost insulting to continue to list them in the standings. (That they?re at least being a crappy team of young players rather than a crappy team of old, washed up players gives them bonus points, but not enough to forget that they?re damned near 30 games out.) But we all knew that already, now didn?t we? I am hard put upon to believe that there is a Mets fan out there so devoted as to read this site that doesn?t know the status of his or her team. But it?s where we have to start, so it?s where we are. Being here, let?s go find something interesting to talk about now, okay?

Mystery standings grid #1:

W

L

GB

WP

RS

RA

1st

72

35

-

0.673

555

403

2nd

64

44

8.5

0.593

473

375

3rd

55

51

16.5

0.519

475

424

4th

54

51

17

0.514

446

434

5th

55

54

18

0.505

496

480

6th

41

66

31

0.383

437

499

7th

36

70

35.5

0.34

479

672

 

Look familiar? Not an exact replication, certainly, but not a bad comparison either. Much like the 2003 NL East, this division is being dominated by an offensive juggernaut with decent but questionable pitching. The second place team boasts a noticeably better stable of arms, a staff that was anchored by three young, promising and capable-of-dominating-on-any-given-day starters.

The big climactic reveal here is that mystery grid #1 are the standings of the NL West through Aug. 3, 1993. The first place team is the San Francisco Giants, year one of the Barry. The second place team is the Atlanta Braves. Of course, the Braves absolutely stormed back down the stretch for what many regard as the Last Great Pennant Race and won the division by a single game. All of which is supposed to be an object lesson for me regarding the possibilities of comebacks. The problem is that the Last Great Pennant Race occurred in the last year before the implementation of Bud?s First Abomination. To see a team make the kind of run the ?93 Braves made in the wild-card era would be shocking, in my honest opinion.

So maybe we should find another historical precedent. Which isn?t hard to do. August 3, 1997:

Atlanta		70 	42	—	

Florida		63	46	4.5

Things to keep an eye on:

Atlanta plays 22 of their next 32 against teams with losing records.

Philadelphia squares off for three against the Giants at the end of this week. (Marlon Byrd and Placido Palanco are on fire.)

Florida has been the division?s best team since the All-Star break, making up 5+ games in the wild-card standings. (Blame Luis Castillo and Miguel Cabrera for the offense, Josh Beckett, Mark Redman and Brad Penny from the hill.)

Joe McEwing is hitting 324/444/514 since the break. Jeff Duncan has an OPS of 594.

Montreal is still owned by the other 29 teams.

 

Rickey! On a blog from 1998. With the candlestick. Posted: August 06, 2003 at 06:00 AM | 3 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Related News:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. LVHCM Posted: August 06, 2003 at 02:32 AM (#612471)
So maybe we should find another historical precedent. Which isn?t hard to do. August 3, 1997:

Atlanta 70 42 --

Florida 63 46 4.5


Wouldn't that be 5.5? Is the joke that winning the division means nothing as long as there's a wildcard? HAHA, I get it!
   2. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: August 15, 2003 at 02:35 AM (#612626)
Hey, give Sam a break! He does a good job.

Even writers have "Dog Days" y'know...

What do I care that he hates my team? (j/k)
   3. Rickey! On a blog from 1998. With the candlestick. Posted: September 01, 2003 at 02:38 AM (#612819)
I don't hate the Mets, Charlie. I'm just amused by them. I *hate* the Cubs.

Also, if you're going to insult me and stuff, at least try to check the by-line to get the spelling correct. Jeez.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
BDC
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Syndicate

Page rendered in 0.2120 seconds
47 querie(s) executed