|
|
|
Primate Studies— Where BTF's Members Investigate the Grand Old Game
Monday, August 19, 2002
Win Values: A New Method to Evaluate Starting Pitchers - Part 6
Predicting a Pitcher?s True Winning Percentage:
Part
1: Introduction
Part
2: Conceptual Framework
Part 3: High-Level Results
Part
4: Formulas
Part
5: Empirical Data for AL 2000
Part 6: Example: David Wells in AL 2000
Part
7: Yearly Results for 1978-2001
Part
8: Top Stars
Part
9: Concluding Remarks David Wells in AL 2000In this section I will provide the details of the Win Value calculation for
a specific pitcher.? Doing so will allow the reader to gain a greater appreciation
of the method.? David Wells in 2000 is the example I will use.? Wells went 20-8 for the Toronto Blue Jays and led the league in wins, despite
a 4.11 ERA.? WAA, based largely upon Wells? fairly high ERA, is 2.1.? Win
Values is able to evaluate Wells? season on a game-by-game basis, so is better
able to give a more accurate evaluation of Wells? contributions to the Blue
Jays that season.? Wells accumulated a 3.33 Win Value since he did a good
job of ?managing? the runs support he received each game. Table 8: David Wells? 2000 Game-by-Game
Win Values
>
Date
|
Opponent
|
IP* (Z)
|
Score when left game**
(RS-RA)
|
Win Prob1 (RS,RA;Z)
|
Win Prob2 (RS;Z)
|
Park Adder (RS,Z,PF)
|
Win Value
|
4/3
|
KCA
|
7
|
4-2
|
.776
|
.502
|
.013
|
.286
|
4/8
|
at TEX
|
9
|
4-0
|
.992
|
.443
|
.072
|
.621
|
4/14
|
SEA
|
1
|
0-6
|
.000
|
.436
|
.000
|
-.436
|
4/19
|
ANA
|
9
|
12-4
|
.952
|
.842
|
.000
|
.110
|
4/24
|
at OAK
|
7
|
3-1
|
.823
|
.431
|
-.029
|
.362
|
4/29
|
at NYA
|
5
|
1-1
|
.538
|
.357
|
-.024
|
.157
|
5/4
|
CLE
|
8
|
8-1
|
.974
|
.711
|
.006
|
.269
|
5/9
|
BAL
|
8
|
6-4
|
.677
|
.579
|
.013
|
.110
|
5/14
|
at TBA
|
9
|
3-2
|
.785
|
.360
|
.013
|
.438
|
5/20
|
CHA
|
4
|
0-6
|
.046
|
.333
|
.003
|
-.284
|
5/25
|
at BOS
|
8
|
11-4
|
.914
|
.810
|
.000
|
.104
|
5/31
|
MIN
|
9
|
4-2
|
.876
|
.443
|
.018
|
.451
|
6/5
|
at ATL
|
6
|
9-2
|
.911
|
.790
|
-.005
|
.116
|
6/11
|
MON
|
7
|
3-3
|
.525
|
.431
|
.006
|
.099
|
6/17
|
at BOS
|
7
|
11-10
|
.415
|
.830
|
.000
|
-.415
|
6/22
|
DET
|
7
|
5-2
|
.853
|
.587
|
.008
|
.275
|
6/28
|
at TBA
|
9
|
5-2
|
.891
|
.497
|
.016
|
.410
|
7/3
|
at BAL
|
6
|
6-3
|
.762
|
.669
|
-.029
|
.065
|
7/8
|
at MON
|
7
|
5-3
|
.755
|
.587
|
.022
|
.191
|
7/15
|
PHI
|
7
|
3-6
|
.152
|
.431
|
.010
|
-.270
|
7/20
|
TBA
|
5
|
3-5
|
.257
|
.513
|
.008
|
-.248
|
7/26
|
CLE
|
9
|
8-1
|
.991
|
.698
|
.007
|
.300
|
7/31
|
at OAK
|
8
|
1-6
|
.080
|
.281
|
-.010
|
-.210
|
8/5
|
TEX
|
7
|
7-4
|
.799
|
.719
|
.006
|
.086
|
8/10
|
at KCA
|
4
|
7-7
|
.400
|
.788
|
.000
|
-.388
|
8/15
|
ANA
|
5
|
3-6
|
.179
|
.513
|
.010
|
-.324
|
8/20
|
MIN
|
9
|
6-3
|
.875
|
.574
|
.014
|
.316
|
8/25
|
at TEX
|
8
|
0-0
|
.781
|
.220
|
.000
|
.561
|
8/30
|
at ANA
|
5
|
6-0
|
.936
|
.736
|
.000
|
.200
|
9/4
|
OAK
|
2
|
0-7
|
.000
|
.383
|
.000
|
-.383
|
9/9
|
DET
|
7
|
5-4
|
.621
|
.587
|
.011
|
.046
|
9/14
|
at NYA
|
8
|
1-1
|
.693
|
.281
|
-.034
|
.378
|
9/21
|
NYA
|
9
|
3-1
|
.917
|
.360
|
.013
|
.570
|
9/26
|
at BAL
|
8
|
1-2
|
.497
|
.281
|
-.010
|
.207
|
10/1
|
at CLE
|
3
|
2-7
|
.077
|
.535
|
.012
|
-.446
| |
*?? Z is the last inning David Wells appeared in;
so that partial innings, including facing one or more batters without recording
an out, count as a full inning.?
** The score is at
the conclusion of both halves of the Zth inning; my method evaluates performances
by the whole inning, not half-innings.
Let me describe Wells? first game to make sure the reader understands the
method and what is being reported in the table.? The first row indicates that
Wells started at home against Kansas City on April 3.? Wells lasted into the 7th inning,
and the score at the conclusion of the 7th inning was 4-2 in favor of Toronto.?
By using the empirical probabilities of winning when leading by a certain
number of runs at the conclusion of the 7th inning, together with the ?could
have been? run scored smearing probabilities, I estimate that Toronto had
a .776 chance of winning that game based upon the score at the conclusion
of the 7th inning.
The next column of the table asks what was the probability that Toronto would win a game given
that it had scored 4 runs at the conclusion of the 7th inning, with league
average pitching.? By using the empirical probabilities of winning when scoring
a certain number of runs at the conclusion of the 7th inning, together with
the ?could have been? run scored smearing probabilities, I estimate that Toronto
had a .502 chance of winning such a game with league average pitching.
The Park Adder is reported in the next column.? In 2000, Toronto?s home park was a
slight hitters park.? The Park Adder of .013 is based upon the park factor,
the number of innings Wells pitched, and the number of runs Toronto scored in those innings.?
As described above, the Park Adder is an estimate of the additional win probability
differential of Wells? contribution given that the game that day was in a
slight hitters park.
The final column gives the Win Value for each game.? It is the estimate
of the additional win probability that Wells contributed that day over what
a league average pitcher would have been expected to contribute.? Algebraically,
the .286 Win Value for the April 3 game is .776 (the win prob of the game
with Wells? performance if it were in a park-neutral setting) minus .502 (the
win prob of the game with league average pitching if it were in a park-neutral
setting), plus .013 (the additional win prob differential due to the effect
of the home park).? Wells? Win Value for the season is simply the sum of the
Win Values for each of his starts.
The game that Win Values deems to have been Wells? largest contribution
(.621) during the season was the April 8 game at Texas.? Wells pitched a complete game shutout
and the Blue Jays beat the Rangers 4-0.? The game that Win Values deems to
have been Wells? worst contribution (-.446) was his last start of the season
on October 1 at Cleveland.? Wells was knocked out in the third inning, at the conclusion of which
the score was 7-2 in favor of the Indians.?
It may be interesting to note that Wells also received a significant
negative Win Value (-.415) for a game in which he was the winning
pitcher.? On June 17, at Fenway Park the Blue Jays and Red Sox engaged in a classic slugfest.? Ramon Martinez started
for Boston but was knocked out in the 4th inning.? David Wells lasted a little longer,
but was knocked out in the 7th inning with Toronto leading 11-10, which turned out to be the
final score.? The Win Value approach penalizes Wells for almost squandering
what should have been a sure-win (11 runs of run support).?
Rob Wood
Posted: August 19, 2002 at 06:00 AM |
0 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News:
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
What do you do with Deacon White? (17 - 1:12pm, Dec 23)Last: Alex KingLoser Scores (15 - 12:05am, Oct 18)Last: mkt42Nine (Year) Men Out: Free El Duque! (67 - 10:46am, May 09)Last: DanGWho is Shyam Das? (4 - 8:52pm, Feb 23)Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)Greg Spira, RIP (45 - 10:22pm, Jan 09)Last: Jonathan SpiraNorthern California Symposium on Statistics and Operations Research in Sports, October 16, 2010 (5 - 12:50am, Sep 18)Last: balamarMike Morgan, the Nexus of the Baseball Universe? (37 - 12:33pm, Jun 23)Last: The Keith Law Blog Blah Blah (battlekow)Sabermetrics, Scouting, and the Science of Baseball – May 21 and 22, 2011 (2 - 8:03pm, May 16)Last: Diamond ResearchRetrosheet Semi-Annual Site Update! (4 - 4:07pm, Nov 18)Last: SweatpantsWhat Might Work in the World Series, 2010 Edition (5 - 3:27pm, Nov 12)Last: fra paoloPredicting the 2010 Playoffs (11 - 5:21pm, Oct 20)Last: TomHSABR 40: Impressions of a First-Time Attendee (5 - 11:12pm, Aug 19)Last: Joe Bivens, Minor GeniusSt. Louis Cardinals Midseason Report (12 - 12:42am, Aug 10)Last: bjhankeNapoleon Lajoie: Definition of Grace (9 - 12:38am, Jul 01)Last: Hang down your head, Tom FoleyYouth Baseball Hitting Drills: Shine the Light (5 - 6:47am, Mar 11)Last: Pat Rapper's Delight
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main