|
|
|
Primate Studies— Where BTF's Members Investigate the Grand Old Game
Monday, September 16, 2002
Win Values: Updated for 1969, 1974-1977
More Win Values to sink your teeth into.
Introduction
The wonderful Retrosheet volunteers have recently released additional
seasons of play-by-play data.? Thus, I am now able to extend my win value
analysis for the 1969 & 1974-1977 seasons, in addition to the 1978-2001
seasons I reported in a previous article.
Yearly Results for 1969, 1974-1977
In this section I will report the top 10 Win Values for each league for
each of the newly released seasons by Retrosheet.[1]
Table 57A: 1969 AL Win Value Leaders
| |
W-L |
ERA+ |
WAA |
Win Value |
|
Denny McLain |
24-9 |
134 |
4.2 |
5.56 |
|
Mike Cuellar |
23-11 |
150 |
4.8 |
4.54 |
|
Mel Stottlemyre |
20-14 |
123 |
2.9 |
3.67 |
|
Sam McDowell |
18-14 |
128 |
3.3 |
3.57 |
|
Fritz Peterson |
17-16 |
137 |
3.7 |
3.39 |
|
Jim Perry |
20-6 |
130 |
3.0 |
3.28 |
|
Blue Moon Odom |
15-6 |
118 |
1.7 |
2.80 |
|
Andy Messersmith |
16-11 |
138 |
3.5 |
2.71 |
|
Jim Palmer |
16-4 |
153 |
3.1 |
2.46 |
|
Dick Bosman
|
14-5 |
158 |
3.6 |
2.23 |
Denny McLain and Mike Cuellar tied for the 1969 AL Cy Young award.?
McLain had the better W-L record while Cuellar had the better ERA.? Win values
indicate that McLain actually contributed more to his team.? McLain was coming
off his stellar 31-win 1968 season.? The Cy Young tie led to a change in the
balloting.? Starting in 1970 voters designated 1st, 2nd, 3rd place pitchers, whereas
previously they just voted for number one.? With this change, there hasn?t been
a Cy Young tie since 1969.
Table 57B: 1969 NL Win Value Leaders
> | | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value | |
Bob Gibson
| 20-13 | 164 | 6.2 | 6.60 | |
Tom Seaver
| 25-7 | 166 | 5.5 | 6.32 | |
Juan Marichal
| 21-11 | 167 | 5.9 | 5.94 | |
Jerry Koosman
| 17-9 | 161 | 4.6 | 5.33 | |
Steve Carlton
| 17-11 | 165 | 4.7 | 4.69 | |
Bill Singer
| 20-12 | 142 | 4.7 | 4.39 | |
Bill Hands
| 20-14 | 162 | 6.1 | 4.30 | |
Phil Niekro
| 23-13 | 141 | 4.1 | 3.85 | |
Larry Dierker
| 20-13 | 152 | 5.4 | 3.78 | |
Fergie Jenkins
| 21-15 | 126 | 3.3 | 3.18 |
|
1969 was a great year for starting pitchers in the NL.? Gibson, Seaver,
and Marichal all had great seasons.? Seaver was the runaway winner of the Cy
Young award (remember the Miracle Mets), but both WAA and win values indicate
that Gibson was the best pitcher in the league.? Like Denny McLain, Gibson
followed up his stellar 1968 season with a great season of his own.? Of course,
this was not the first nor would be the last year in which Cy Young voters were
overly impressed by a pitcher?s W-L record (though I am not saying that Seaver
was not a deserving Cy Young winner).
Table 58A: 1974 AL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 21-13 | 144 | 5.1 | 5.30 |
|
Fergie Jenkins
| 25-12 | 126 | 3.5 | 4.77 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 22-13 | 132 | 3.9 | 4.71 |
|
Catfish Hunter
| 25-12 | 134 | 4.0 | 3.72 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 22-16 | 119 | 2.6 | 3.62 |
|
Jim Kaat
| 21-13 | 128 | 3.1 | 3.61 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 17-17 | 140 | 4.3 | 3.21 |
|
Al Fitzmorris
| 13-6 | 137 | 2.6 | 3.16 |
|
Steve Busby
| 22-14 | 113 | 1.7 | 3.15 |
|
Bart Johnson
| 10-4 | 136 | 1.6 | 2.94 |
Catfish Hunter edged Fergie Jenkins for the 1974 AL Cy Young award.?
Actually, according to both WAA and win values, Gaylord Perry was the league?s
best pitcher.? Perry had another very good year for the Indians after
previously winning the 1972 Cy Young award with Cleveland.? Note that this
was Jenkins? first year in the AL after being traded by the Cubs to Texas.? So the top two
pitchers in the AL in 1974 (according to win values) were both formerly stars in the NL.
Table 58B: 1974 NL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Phil Niekro
| 20-13 | 159 | 5.8 | 4.71 |
|
Jon Matlack
| 13-15 | 148 | 4.4 | 3.95 |
|
Jim Barr
| 13-9 | 139 | 3.5 | 3.77 |
|
Buzz Capra
| 16-8 | 166 | 4.5 | 3.77 |
|
Lynn McGlothen
| 16-12 | 133 | 3.0 | 3.41 |
|
Andy Messersmith
| 20-6 | 132 | 3.5 | 3.30 |
|
Larry Dierker
| 11-10 | 120 | 1.9 | 2.66 |
|
Jim Lonborg
| 17-13 | 118 | 2.2 | 2.48 |
|
Tommy John
| 13-3 | 132 | 1.8 | 2.43 |
|
Jim Rooker
| 15-11 | 125 | 2.5 | 1.87 |
Phil Niekro comfortably led the NL in both WAA and win values in 1974 .?
But Knucksie was destined never to come close to winning a Cy Young award.?
Mike Marshall and his 106 relief appearances copped the Cy Young for the pennant-winning
Dodgers.? We see that Jon Matlack had a losing record for the disappointing
Mets despite a great ERA.? Also, we see the remnants of the very promising
season in which Tommy John hurt his arm in mid-July.
Table 59A: 1975 AL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Jim Palmer
| 23-11 | 168 | 6.6 | 7.12 |
|
Jim Kaat
| 20-14 | 125 | 3.1 | 3.44 |
|
Catfish Hunter
| 23-14 | 143 | 4.9 | 3.42 |
|
Steve Busby
| 18-12 | 125 | 2.7 | 3.07 |
|
Frank Tanana
| 16-9 | 136 | 3.4 | 2.89 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 15-10 | 128 | 3.2 | 2.41 |
|
Dennis Eckersley
| 13-7 | 146 | 3.0 | 2.25 |
|
Mike Torrez
| 20-9 | 115 | 1.7 | 2.15 |
|
Roger Moret
| 14-3 | 113 | 0.9 | 2.12 |
|
Ed Figueroa
| 16-13 | 122 | 2.2 | 1.90 |
Jim Palmer won the 1975 AL trifecta: winning the Cy Young award and leading the
league in WAA and win values.? This actually doesn?t happen very often.?
Palmer?s season was the 7th best win value figure since 1974 (including 1969).?
Actually, he edged out Catfish Hunter for the Cy Young award as the voters
continue to be obsessed with a pitcher?s win total, especially getting to 20
wins.? Not to mention that this was Hunter?s first year pitching for the
Yankees during which he received tremendous notoriety.? The Frank Tanana listed
above threw very hard (unlike his later self), and led the league with 269
strikeouts.
Table 59B: 1975 NL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Tom Seaver
| 22-9 | 146 | 4.4 | 4.73 |
|
Andy Messersmith
| 19-14 | 149 | 5.3 | 4.49 |
|
John Montefusco
| 15-9 | 132 | 3.1 | 4.31 |
|
Randy Jones
| 20-12 | 155 | 5.1 | 3.81 |
|
Jerry Reuss
| 18-11 | 140 | 3.5 | 3.75 |
|
Don Sutton
| 16-13 | 119 | 2.0 | 2.99 |
|
Don Gullet
| 15-4 | 149 | 2.6 | 2.76 |
|
Burt Hooton
| 18-9 | 112 | 1.9 | 2.49 |
|
Doug Rau
| 15-9 | 110 | 1.1 | 1.93 |
|
Bob Forsch
| 15-10 | 132 | 2.9 | 1.86 |
Tom Seaver edged Randy Jones for the 1975 NL Cy Young award.? I look
forward to Retrosheet eventually releasing all of the seasons covering Seaver?s
illustrious career since I am very curious in seeing how Seaver compares to the
other pitching greats of the modern era.? In our historical journey, we see
that Andy Messersmith had a great 1975 season for the Dodgers, the year before
he was declared a free agent (after which injuries allowed him to win only 18
games for the rest of his career).
Table 60A: 1976 AL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Mark Fidrych
| 19-9 | 159 | 4.9 | 5.95 |
|
Vida Blue
| 18-13 | 143 | 4.4 | 5.81 |
|
Frank Tanana
| 19-10 | 137 | 3.9 | 4.79 |
|
Jim Palmer
| 22-13 | 130 | 3.6 | 4.63 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 13-16 | 125 | 2.4 | 4.05 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 21-12 | 128 | 3.2 | 3.51 |
|
Mike Torrez
| 16-12 | 134 | 3.4 | 2.48 |
|
Wayne Garland
| 20-7 | 123 | 2.1 | 2.19 |
|
Bill Travers
| 15-16 | 124 | 2.4 | 1.88 |
|
Dock Ellis
| 17-8 | 107 | 0.7 | 1.87 |
Jim Palmer won the 1976 AL Cy Young award.? Runner-up Mark Fidrych had
his moment in the sun, leading the league in WAA and win values.? Palmer won 22
games in 40 starts whereas Fidrych won 19 games in only 29 starts.? Maybe
Fidrych would have won the Cy Young had he gotten to 20 wins.? Vida Blue had
another very good year, despite only an 18-13 record.? Blue?s career prospects
might have never looked better than after his 27 year-old season; for his
career to date he was 110-67 with a very good 129 ERA+.?
Table 60B: 1976 NL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Don Sutton
| 21-10 | 111 | 1.3 | 3.74 |
|
Doug Rau
| 16-12 | 132 | 2.8 | 3.65 |
|
Jerry Koosman
| 21-10 | 123 | 2.2 | 3.62 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 14-11 | 127 | 2.8 | 3.40 |
|
Ray Burris
| 15-13 | 124 | 2.5 | 3.22 |
|
John Montefusco
| 16-14 | 128 | 2.8 | 3.12 |
|
Randy Jones
| 22-14 | 120 | 2.5 | 2.87 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 20-7 | 113 | 1.4 | 2.50 |
|
John Denny
| 11-9 | 140 | 3.0 | 2.44 |
|
J.R. Richard
| 20-15 | 116 | 1.9 | 2.35 |
1976 was a down year for NL starting pitchers.? Randy Jones won the Cy
Young award in a fairly close vote over Jerry Koosman.? John Denny (and his
11-9 record) led the league in WAA and Don Sutton (gasp) led the league in win
values.? If I were a Cy Young voter I may have looked for a relief pitcher, but
this was the year before Bruce Sutter broke on to the scene.
Table 61A: 1977 AL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Jim Palmer
| 20-11 | 131 | 3.7 | 5.50 |
|
Frank Tanana
| 15-9 | 155 | 4.4 | 4.13 |
|
Dennis Leonard
| 20-12 | 133 | 3.7 | 3.60 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 19-16 | 142 | 4.5 | 3.48 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 14-12 | 150 | 4.1 | 3.34 |
|
Ron Guidry
| 16-7 | 140 | 3.1 | 3.23 |
|
Dennis Eckersley
| 14-13 | 112 | 1.3 | 2.53 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 15-12 | 122 | 2.2 | 2.40 |
|
Doyle Alexander
| 17-11 | 112 | 1.3 | 2.39 |
|
Dave Rozema
| 15-7 | 139 | 3.3 | 2.35 |
Sparky Lyle edged Jim Palmer (along with Nolan Ryan and Dennis Leonard)
for the 1977 AL Cy Young award.? I guess the voters were tired of voting for
Palmer every year; he had won 3 of the previous 4 Cy Youngs.? Palmer is another
pitcher for whom I would love to see the complete record of win value figures.?
We are currently missing the 1970-1973 seasons, in each of which Palmer had a
great season.
Table 61B: 1977 NL Win Value Leaders
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
John Candelaria
| 20-5 | 170 | 5.0 | 6.43 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 20-10 | 158 | 5.0 | 5.67 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 21-6 | 150 | 4.6 | 5.12 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 23-10 | 152 | 5.1 | 4.35 |
|
Tommy John
| 20-7 | 138 | 3.1 | 3.28 |
|
J.R. Richard
| 18-12 | 120 | 2.2 | 3.26 |
|
Bob Forsch
| 20-7 | 111 | 1.1 | 2.95 |
|
Don Sutton
| 14-8 | 120 | 2.1 | 2.51 |
|
Burt Hooton
| 12-7 | 146 | 3.7 | 2.33 |
|
Steve Rogers
| 17-16 | 123 | 2.8 | 2.17 |
John Candelaria?s 170 ERA+ is the highest among this new batch of seasons
(1969, 1974-1977).? Of course, there have been numerous seasons with higher
ERA+ since 1977; in addition, there were five instances of a higher ERA+ in the
intervening 1970-1973 seasons (Seaver, Wood, and Blue in 1971, Carlton in 1972,
and Seaver again in 1973).? Steve Carlton easily won the 1977 NL Cy Young
award; he had a great season and the voters loved his 23 wins.? Carlton is
another modern pitcher for whom I?d love to have the complete win value
record.? Tom Seaver had another great year, despite being shockingly traded in
mid-June from the Mets to the Reds.
Top Starters
In this section I will present the partial season-by-season Win Value records for several of the top
starting pitchers of the 1970?s (whom I did not include in the previous
article).? In all cases, their entire careers to date will be presented.[2]?
I tried to include any pitcher who started a significant number of games in
their career in seasons for which we have win values data (1969, 1974-2001) and
had either 200 wins or 450 starts in their career.
Along with Win Values, I will
report the pitcher?s W-L, ERA+, and WAA figures.? We will then be able to see
if some pitchers? career Win Value significantly exceed their WAA.? In such a
case, the pitcher can be said to be under-valued by traditional sabermetric
methods.
Table 62: Win Values for Top Stars since 1973[3]
>| | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Roger Clemens (a)
| 280-145 | 145 | 65.2 | 66.56 |
|
Greg Maddux (a)
| 257-146 | 145 | 58.0 | 56.92 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 311-205 | 127 | 51.5 | 54.91 |
|
Jim Palmer
| 268-152 | 125 | 39.7 | 44.90 |
|
Randy Johnson (a)
| 200-101 | 141 | 41.8 | 42.36 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 287-250 | 118 | 38.3 | 38.12 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 314-265 | 117 | 39.1 | 37.33 |
|
Pedro Martinez (a)
| 132-59 | 169 | 36.8 | 35.09 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 329-244 | 115 | 35.1 | 35.02 |
|
Fergie Jenkins
| 284-226 | 115 | 29.4 | 33.63 |
|
Mike Mussina (a)
| 164-92 | 131 | 28.7 | 31.59 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 324-292 | 112 | 26.1 | 31.05 |
|
Kevin Brown (a)
| 180-118 | 131 | 33.6 | 30.64 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 318-274 | 115 | 36.3 | 30.56 |
|
Tom Glavine (a)
| 224-132 | 122 | 28.3 | 30.53 |
|
Bret Saberhagen
| 167-117 | 125 | 27.0 | 28.30 |
|
Don Sutton
| 324-256 | 108 | 19.0 | 28.21 |
|
David Cone
| 193-123 | 119 | 25.1 | 27.45 |
|
Tommy John
| 288-231 | 110 | 23.6 | 26.69 |
|
Kevin Appier (a)
| 147-115 | 125 | 23.8 | 26.64 |
|
Jimmy Key
| 186-117 | 122 | 23.8 | 25.31 |
|
Curt Schilling (a)
| 132-101 | 126 | 23.1 | 25.07 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 229-172 | 114 | 20.4 | 24.49 |
|
Ron Guidry
| 170-91 | 119 | 19.9 | 24.28 |
|
Chuck Finley (a)
| 189-158 | 116 | 21.3 | 23.49 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 214-191 | 114 | 21.9 | 22.87 |
|
Dave Stieb
| 176-137 | 122 | 27.2 | 22.84 |
|
John Smoltz (a)
| 160-116 | 122 | 22.0 | 22.73 |
|
Orel Hershiser
| 204-150 | 111 | 17.3 | 21.23 |
|
Jack Morris
| 254-186 | 105 | 7.4 | 18.79 |
|
Dwight Gooden
| 194-112 | 110 | 13.9 | 18.60 |
|
Vida Blue
| 209-161 | 108 | 12.6 | 18.55 |
|
Bob Welch
| 211-146 | 106 | 8.9 | 17.82 |
|
Frank Viola
| 176-150 | 112 | 16.0 | 17.14 |
|
Jerry Koosman
| 222-209 | 110 | 17.2 | 16.47 |
|
Dennis Martinez
| 245-193 | 106 | 10.7 | 14.17 |
|
David Wells (a)
| 166-114 | 110 | 11.1 | 14.12 |
|
Frank Tanana
| 240-236 | 106 | 10.4 | 11.44 |
|
Charlie Hough
| 216-216 | 106 | 10.4 | 9.22 |
|
Dave Stewart
| 168-129 | 100 | -1.0 | 7.84 |
|
Catfish Hunter
| 224-166 | 104 | 7.1 | 7.46 |
|
Doyle Alexander
| 194-174 | 103 | 3.0 | 7.38 |
|
Mike Torrez
| 185-160 | 97 | -4.1 | 1.31 |
|
Jerry Reuss
| 220-191 | 100 | -0.3 | -0.49 |
|
Joe Niekro
| 221-204 | 97 | -4.9 | -2.88 |
We will now turn to a season-by-season review of each of these top starting
pitchers.[4]
Table 63: Win Values for Tom Seaver
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1967 | 16-13 | 123 | 2.3 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1968 | 16-12 | 137 | 3.0 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1969 | 25-7 | 166 | 5.5 | 6.32 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1970 | 18-12 | 143 | 4.5 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1971 | 20-10 | 194 | 7.0 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1972 | 21-12 | 115 | 1.7 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1973 | 19-10 | 174 | 6.3 | n.a. |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1974 | 11-11 | 112 | 1.3 | 1.70 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1975 | 22-9 | 146 | 4.4 | 4.73 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1976 | 14-11 | 127 | 2.8 | 3.40 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1977 | 21-6 | 150 | 4.6 | 5.12 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1978 | 16-14 | 124 | 2.4 | 1.52 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1979 | 16-6 | 119 | 1.7 | 2.20 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1980 | 10-8 | 98 | -0.2 | 0.40 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1981 | 14-2 | 140 | 2.4 | 2.55 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1982 | 5-13 | 67 | -2.7 | -2.13 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1983 | 9-14 | 103 | 0.2 | -0.85 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1984 | 15-11 | 105 | 0.5 | 1.56 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1985 | 16-11 | 136 | 3.4 | 2.81 |
|
Tom Seaver
| 1986 | 7-13 | 105 | 0.4 | 0.78 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 311-205 | 127 | 51.5 | 54.91 |
70% of Seaver?s career is covered by win values (as another reminder, the
career win value figure in the table above uses the WAA figures for any seasons
for which win values are currently unavailable).? Tom Seaver is clearly an
all-time great.? Seaver falls just a little short of Clemens and Maddux in
career win values according to the table above.? But we will have more to say
about where Seaver belongs in the next section.
Table 64: Win Values for Jim Palmer
| |
Year |
W-L |
ERA+ |
WAA |
Win Value |
|
Jim Palmer |
1965 |
5-4 |
93 |
-0.1 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1966 |
15-10 |
96 |
-0.7 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1967 |
3-1 |
107 |
0.1 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1968 |
Dnp |
- |
- |
- |
|
Jim Palmer |
1969 |
16-4 |
153 |
3.1 |
2.46 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1970 |
20-10 |
134 |
3.9 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1971 |
20-9 |
125 |
2.8 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1972 |
21-10 |
149 |
4.3 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1973 |
22-9 |
156 |
5.5 |
n.a. |
|
Jim Palmer |
1974 |
7-12 |
106 |
0.4 |
0.63 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1975 |
23-11 |
168 |
6.6 |
7.12 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1976 |
22-13 |
130 |
3.6 |
4.63 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1977 |
20-11 |
131 |
3.7 |
5.50 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1978 |
21-12 |
142 |
4.4 |
4.02 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1979 |
10-6 |
122 |
1.4 |
1.36 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1980 |
16-10 |
100 |
-0.1 |
0.63 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1981 |
7-8 |
97 |
-0.2 |
0.10 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1982 |
15-5 |
129 |
2.6 |
3.34 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1983 |
5-4 |
94 |
-0.3 |
0.15 |
|
Jim Palmer |
1984 |
0-3 |
42 |
-1.3 |
-0.84 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Career |
|
268-152 |
125 |
39.7 |
44.90 |
67% of career covered by win values.? Jim Palmer was one of the very best pitchers
throughout the 1970?s, winning 20 games eight times.? Palmer?s win values are
moderately higher than WAA, and we are missing some of his best seasons (1970-1973).
Table 65: Win Values for Bert Blyleven
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1970 | 10-9 | 117 | 1.2 | n.a. |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1971 | 16-15 | 126 | 3.0 | n.a. |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1972 | 17-17 | 118 | 2.1 | n.a. |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1973 | 20-17 | 157 | 6.3 | n.a. |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1974 | 17-17 | 140 | 4.3 | 3.21 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1975 | 15-10 | 128 | 3.2 | 2.41 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1976 | 13-16 | 125 | 3.0 | 4.05 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1977 | 14-12 | 150 | 4.1 | 3.34 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1978 | 14-10 | 122 | 2.2 | 2.02 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1979 | 12-5 | 108 | 0.8 | 0.72 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1980 | 8-13 | 95 | -0.5 | -0.10 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1981 | 11-7 | 126 | 1.7 | 2.01 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1982 | 2-2 | 84 | -0.2 | -0.48 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1983 | 7-10 | 109 | 0.6 | 0.21 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1984 | 19-7 | 143 | 3.8 | 3.06 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1985 | 17-16 | 134 | 4.0 | 2.70 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1986 | 17-14 | 108 | 0.9 | 1.20 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1987 | 15-12 | 116 | 1.9 | 2.48 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1988 | 10-17 | 75 | -3.7 | -2.44 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1989 | 17-5 | 140 | 3.5 | 4.12 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1990 | 8-7 | 73 | -2.6 | -2.08 |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1991 | Dnp | - | - | - |
|
Bert Blyleven
| 1992 | 8-12 | 84 | -1.3 | -0.91 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 287-250 | 118 | 38.3 | 38.12 |
82% of career is covered by win values.? I am confident that most people
reading this will already be familiar with the puzzling case of Bert Blyleven.?
By all sabermetric measures I have ever seen, Blyleven is a solid Hall of
Famer.? There are reasons why Bert is having so much trouble getting into Cooperstown,
but they are all crappy reasons.
Table 66: Win Values for Gaylord Perry
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1962 | 3-1 | 73 | -0.6 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1963 | 1-6 | 79 | -0.6 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1964 | 12-11 | 130 | 1.6 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1965 | 8-12 | 86 | -0.9 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1966 | 21-8 | 123 | 2.1 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1967 | 15-17 | 126 | 2.8 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1968 | 16-15 | 120 | 2.0 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1969 | 19-14 | 141 | 4.6 | 2.52 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1970 | 23-13 | 124 | 3.3 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1971 | 16-12 | 123 | 2.6 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1972 | 24-16 | 168 | 6.8 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1973 | 19-19 | 116 | 2.4 | n.a. |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1974 | 21-13 | 144 | 5.1 | 5.30 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1975 | 18-17 | 117 | 2.2 | 1.87 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1976 | 15-14 | 111 | 1.3 | 1.47 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1977 | 15-12 | 122 | 2.2 | 2.40 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1978 | 21-6 | 122 | 2.3 | 1.99 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1979 | 12-11 | 116 | 1.6 | 1.95 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1980 | 10-13 | 106 | 0.6 | -0.32 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1981 | 8-9 | 91 | -0.6 | 0.33 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1982 | 10-12 | 97 | -0.5 | 0.05 |
|
Gaylord Perry
| 1983 | 7-14 | 90 | -1.2 | -1.73 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 314-265 | 117 | 39.1 | 37.33 |
55% of career covered by win values.? Gaylord Perry really was a great
pitcher, despite the reputation that has surrounded him for years.? He will
look even better when account is taken of his longevity in the next section.
Table 67: Win Values for Steve Carlton
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1965 | 0-0 | 153 | 0.2 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1966 | 3-3 | 115 | 0.4 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1967 | 14-9 | 110 | 0.9 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1968 | 13-11 | 97 | -0.1 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1969 | 17-11 | 165 | 4.7 | 4.69 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1970 | 10-19 | 111 | 1.2 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1971 | 20-9 | 101 | 0.2 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1972 | 27-10 | 182 | 8.2 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1973 | 13-20 | 98 | -0.4 | n.a. |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1974 | 16-13 | 118 | 2.2 | 1.11 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1975 | 15-14 | 105 | 0.6 | 1.09 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1976 | 20-7 | 113 | 1.4 | 2.50 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1977 | 23-10 | 152 | 5.1 | 4.35 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1978 | 16-13 | 126 | 2.5 | 0.98 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1979 | 18-11 | 106 | 0.7 | 1.47 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1980 | 24-9 | 162 | 6.0 | 5.85 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1981 | 13-4 | 150 | 3.3 | 2.69 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1982 | 23-11 | 118 | 2.4 | 4.09 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1983 | 15-16 | 115 | 1.7 | 1.47 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1984 | 13-7 | 102 | 0.1 | 0.23 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1985 | 1-8 | 111 | 0.5 | -0.50 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1986 | 9-14 | 83 | -2.8 | -2.79 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1987 | 6-14 | 80 | -2.3 | -2.55 |
|
Steve Carlton
| 1988 | 0-1 | 24 | -1.6 | -0.26 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 329-244 | 115 | 35.1 | 35.02 |
71% of career covered by win values.? Steve Carlton was a tremendous
pitcher.? I am very curious to see how win values evaluates Carlton?s fantastic
1972 season (27-10 for the woeful 59-97 Phillies).? Like many players, he
undoubtedly hung on too long but it is extremely difficult for any major
leaguer, and especially stars, to pick just the right time to retire.
Table 68: Win Values for Fergie Jenkins
| |
Year |
W-L |
ERA+ |
WAA |
Win Value |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1965 |
2-1 |
158 |
0.3 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1966 |
6-8 |
111 |
0.4 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1967 |
20-13 |
127 |
3.0 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1968 |
20-15 |
120 |
2.2 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1969 |
21-15 |
126 |
3.3 |
3.18 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1970 |
22-16 |
133 |
4.2 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1971 |
24-13 |
142 |
5.2 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1972 |
20-12 |
119 |
2.4 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1973 |
14-16 |
102 |
0.2 |
n.a. |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1974 |
25-12 |
126 |
3.5 |
4.77 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1975 |
17-18 |
96 |
-0.8 |
0.67 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1976 |
12-11 |
120 |
1.8 |
1.70 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1977 |
10-10 |
122 |
1.9 |
0.92 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1978 |
18-8 |
124 |
2.4 |
3.26 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1979 |
16-14 |
102 |
0.0 |
0.71 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1980 |
12-12 |
103 |
0.3 |
1.47 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1981 |
5-8 |
77 |
-1.5 |
-0.90 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1982 |
14-15 |
119 |
1.8 |
0.49 |
|
Fergie Jenkins |
1983 |
6-9 |
88 |
-1.2 |
-0.54 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Career |
|
284-226 |
115 |
29.4 |
33.63 |
60% of career covered by win values.? Fergie Jenkins was a consistent
20-game winner for the Cubs in the late 1960?s/early 1970?s.? One key to his
success was that Jenkins did not walk many batters (a key to winning in a
hitter?s ballpark).
Table 69: Win Values for Nolan Ryan
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1966 | 0-1 | 24 | -0.6 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1967 | Dnp | - | - | - |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1968 | 6-9 | 98 | -0.5 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1969 | 6-3 | 104 | 0.1 | -0.02 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1970 | 7-11 | 118 | 1.0 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1971 | 10-14 | 86 | -1.3 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1972 | 19-16 | 128 | 2.9 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1973 | 21-16 | 124 | 3.1 | n.a. |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1974 | 22-16 | 119 | 2.6 | 3.62 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1975 | 14-12 | 103 | 0.2 | 0.87 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1976 | 17-18 | 99 | 0.0 | 1.62 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1977 | 19-16 | 142 | 4.5 | 3.48 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1978 | 10-13 | 97 | -0.5 | 0.07 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1979 | 16-14 | 114 | 1.3 | 1.05 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1980 | 11-10 | 98 | -0.2 | 0.22 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1981 | 11-5 | 195 | 3.5 | 2.66 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1982 | 16-12 | 105 | 0.6 | 1.53 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1983 | 14-9 | 114 | 1.2 | 2.10 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1984 | 12-11 | 109 | 0.8 | 0.68 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1985 | 10-12 | 91 | -1.2 | -0.38 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1986 | 12-8 | 108 | 0.7 | 0.77 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1987 | 8-16 | 142 | 3.2 | 2.41 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1988 | 12-11 | 95 | -0.6 | -0.43 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1989 | 16-10 | 124 | 2.3 | 2.80 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1990 | 13-9 | 114 | 1.2 | 1.01 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1991 | 12-6 | 139 | 2.4 | 3.20 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1992 | 5-9 | 102 | 0.1 | 0.14 |
|
Nolan Ryan
| 1993 | 5-5 | 85 | -0.7 | -0.95 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 324-292 | 112 | 26.1 | 31.05 |
80% of career covered by win values.? There is almost no way to
accurately capture Nolan Ryan?s career.? He is the most extreme in many
dimensions, so if there is any slight ?bias? in a stat, it will be magnified
the most for Ryan.? Win values indicate that Ryan truly was a great pitcher
during his career (note that win values are moderately higher than WAA).?
Remember that win values looks at run prevention in its totality; that is, it
does not consider whether the pitcher was a strikeout artist or a control
pitcher who relies on his defense.? I guess that means that win values may
undervalue Ryan.
Table 70: Win Values for Phil Niekro
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1964 | 0-0 | 73 | -0.1 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1965 | 2-3 | 122 | 0.5 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1966 | 4-3 | 88 | -0.3 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1967 | 11-9 | 178 | 3.8 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1968 | 14-12 | 116 | 1.5 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1969 | 23-13 | 141 | 4.1 | 3.85 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1970 | 12-18 | 101 | 0.0 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1971 | 15-14 | 125 | 2.7 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1972 | 16-12 | 124 | 2.9 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1973 | 13-10 | 119 | 2.0 | n.a. |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1974 | 20-13 | 159 | 5.8 | 4.71 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1975 | 15-15 | 118 | 2.2 | 1.61 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1976 | 17-11 | 115 | 1.8 | 2.13 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1977 | 16-20 | 110 | 1.7 | -0.41 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1978 | 19-18 | 141 | 5.1 | 2.76 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1979 | 21-20 | 120 | 3.0 | 1.06 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1980 | 15-18 | 103 | 0.4 | 1.06 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1981 | 7-7 | 116 | 1.0 | 0.47 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1982 | 17-4 | 104 | 0.5 | 0.50 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1983 | 11-10 | 98 | -0.3 | 0.67 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1984 | 16-8 | 123 | 2.0 | 2.03 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1985 | 16-12 | 98 | -0.3 | 0.64 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1986 | 11-11 | 96 | -0.6 | -2.11 |
|
Phil Niekro
| 1987 | 7-13 | 73 | -3.1 | -1.41 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 318-274 | 115 | 36.3 | 30.56 |
70% of career covered by win values.? Phil Niekro racked up a ton of
innings in his career.? In the middle of his career, he started over 40 games
three seasons in a row (and over 300 innings).? Note that Niekro?s win values
seems significantly lower than WAA.? I am not sure why.? Possibly Niekro gave
up a lot of unearned runs in his career, which would be reflected in his win
values (but not his WAA).
Table 71: Win Values for Don Sutton
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Don Sutton
| 1966 | 12-12 | 110 | 1.0 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1967 | 11-15 | 79 | -2.7 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1968 | 11-15 | 106 | 0.5 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1969 | 17-18 | 96 | -0.6 | -0.37 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1970 | 15-13 | 94 | -0.9 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1971 | 17-12 | 127 | 2.7 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1972 | 19-9 | 160 | 5.2 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1973 | 18-10 | 142 | 3.7 | n.a. |
|
Don Sutton
| 1974 | 19-9 | 106 | 0.7 | 1.61 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1975 | 16-13 | 119 | 2.0 | 2.99 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1976 | 21-10 | 111 | 1.3 | 3.74 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1977 | 14-8 | 120 | 2.1 | 2.51 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1978 | 15-11 | 99 | -0.3 | -0.42 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1979 | 12-15 | 95 | -0.7 | -1.07 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1980 | 13-5 | 159 | 4.0 | 4.40 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1981 | 11-9 | 126 | 1.6 | 1.37 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1982 | 17-9 | 112 | 1.3 | 1.65 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1983 | 8-13 | 92 | -1.1 | -0.29 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1984 | 14-12 | 102 | 0.1 | 0.30 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1985 | 15-10 | 101 | 0.0 | 1.29 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1986 | 15-11 | 110 | 0.8 | 1.96 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1987 | 11-11 | 92 | -1.0 | -0.07 |
|
Don Sutton
| 1988 | 3-6 | 85 | -0.7 | -0.89 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 324-256 | 108 | 19.0 | 28.21 |
68% of career covered by win values.? Don Sutton was a notorious Hall of
Fame case a few years back, but win values is pretty kind to Sutton, especially
in comparison to WAA.
Table 72: Win Values for Tommy John
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Tommy John
| 1963 | 0-2 | 164 | 0.2 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1964 | 2-9 | 92 | -0.3 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1965 | 14-7 | 103 | 0.8 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1966 | 14-11 | 121 | 2.0 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1967 | 10-13 | 126 | 2.4 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1968 | 10-5 | 153 | 2.8 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1969 | 9-11 | 119 | 2.0 | 1.60 |
|
Tommy John
| 1970 | 12-17 | 119 | 2.2 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1971 | 13-16 | 100 | -0.1 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1972 | 11-5 | 115 | 1.3 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1973 | 16-7 | 111 | 1.1 | n.a. |
|
Tommy John
| 1974 | 13-3 | 132 | 1.8 | 2.43 |
|
Tommy John
| 1975 | Dnp | - | - | - |
|
Tommy John
| 1976 | 10-10 | 110 | 0.9 | 0.34 |
|
Tommy John
| 1977 | 20-7 | 138 | 3.1 | 3.28 |
|
Tommy John
| 1978 | 17-10 | 107 | 0.5 | -0.27 |
|
Tommy John
| 1979 | 21-9 | 138 | 3.9 | 3.92 |
|
Tommy John
| 1980 | 22-9 | 115 | 1.7 | 3.16 |
|
Tommy John
| 1981 | 9-8 | 136 | 2.0 | 1.56 |
|
Tommy John
| 1982 | 14-12 | 108 | 0.9 | 0.57 |
|
Tommy John
| 1983 | 11-13 | 93 | -1.0 | -0.68 |
|
Tommy John
| 1984 | 7-13 | 88 | -1.4 | -0.69 |
|
Tommy John
| 1985 | 4-10 | 72 | -1.8 | -1.08 |
|
Tommy John
| 1986 | 5-3 | 140 | 1.0 | 1.12 |
|
Tommy John
| 1987 | 13-6 | 109 | 0.7 | 0.54 |
|
Tommy John
| 1988 | 9-8 | 88 | -1.4 | 0.06 |
|
Tommy John
| 1989 | 2-7 | 67 | -1.7 | -1.57 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 288-231 | 110 | 23.6 | 26.69 |
65% of career covered by win values.? Tommy John missed a season in
mid-career, but more than made up for it by pitching until he was 46.? Tommy
John is a tough Hall of Fame call, though he is clearly greater than many HOF
pitchers.?
Table 73: Win Values for Luis Tiant
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1964 | 10-4 | 127 | 1.1 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1965 | 11-11 | 99 | -0.3 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1966 | 12-11 | 123 | 1.5 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1967 | 12-9 | 119 | 1.6 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1968 | 21-9 | 185 | 4.2 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1969 | 9-20 | 102 | 0.2 | -1.21 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1970 | 7-3 | 110 | 0.4 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1971 | 1-7 | 76 | -1.2 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1972 | 15-6 | 169 | 3.6 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1973 | 20-13 | 120 | 2.3 | n.a. |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1974 | 22-13 | 132 | 3.9 | 4.71 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1975 | 18-14 | 102 | 0.2 | 1.85 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1976 | 21-12 | 128 | 3.2 | 3.51 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1977 | 12-8 | 99 | -0.1 | 0.72 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1978 | 13-8 | 125 | 2.1 | 2.82 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1979 | 13-8 | 105 | 0.3 | 0.71 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1980 | 8-9 | 80 | -1.8 | -1.00 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1981 | 2-5 | 92 | -0.2 | -0.75 |
|
Luis Tiant
| 1982 | 2-2 | 70 | -0.6 | -0.07 |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Career
| | 229-172 | 114 | 20.4 | 24.49 |
58% of career covered by win values.? Luis Tiant also missed significant
time in mid-career with a bad arm.? His Hall of Fame case seems to be centered
on the fact that he was better than Catfish Hunter.
Table 74: Win Values for Rick Reuschel
>| | Year | W-L | ERA+ | WAA | Win Value |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1972 | 10-8 | 130 | 1.5 | n.a. |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1973 | 14-15 | 132 | 3.0 | n.a. |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1974 | 13-12 | 89 | -1.6 | -0.58 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1975 | 11-17 | 103 | 0.3 | -0.14 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1976 | 14-12 | 112 | 1.3 | 1.37 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1977 | 20-10 | 158 | 5.0 | 5.67 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1978 | 14-15 | 118 | 1.9 | 0.32 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1979 | 18-12 | 114 | 1.5 | 1.77 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1980 | 11-13 | 115 | 1.8 | 0.93 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1981 | 8-11 | 119 | 1.2 | 0.44 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1982 | Dnp | - | - | - |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1983 | 1-1 | 97 | 0.0 | 0.20 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1984 | 5-5 | 76 | -1.6 | -0.78 |
|
Rick Reuschel
| 1985 | 14-8 | 158 |
Rob Wood
Posted: September 16, 2002 at 06:00 AM | 3 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News:
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Ray (RDP) for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
What do you do with Deacon White? (17 - 1:12pm, Dec 23)Last: Alex KingLoser Scores (15 - 12:05am, Oct 18)Last: mkt42Nine (Year) Men Out: Free El Duque! (67 - 10:46am, May 09)Last: DanGWho is Shyam Das? (4 - 8:52pm, Feb 23)Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)Greg Spira, RIP (45 - 10:22pm, Jan 09)Last: Jonathan SpiraNorthern California Symposium on Statistics and Operations Research in Sports, October 16, 2010 (5 - 12:50am, Sep 18)Last: balamarMike Morgan, the Nexus of the Baseball Universe? (37 - 12:33pm, Jun 23)Last: The Keith Law Blog Blah Blah (battlekow)Sabermetrics, Scouting, and the Science of Baseball – May 21 and 22, 2011 (2 - 8:03pm, May 16)Last: Diamond ResearchRetrosheet Semi-Annual Site Update! (4 - 4:07pm, Nov 18)Last: SweatpantsWhat Might Work in the World Series, 2010 Edition (5 - 3:27pm, Nov 12)Last: fra paoloPredicting the 2010 Playoffs (11 - 5:21pm, Oct 20)Last: TomHSABR 40: Impressions of a First-Time Attendee (5 - 11:12pm, Aug 19)Last: Joe Bivens, Minor GeniusSt. Louis Cardinals Midseason Report (12 - 12:42am, Aug 10)Last: bjhankeNapoleon Lajoie: Definition of Grace (9 - 12:38am, Jul 01)Last: Hang down your head, Tom FoleyYouth Baseball Hitting Drills: Shine the Light (5 - 6:47am, Mar 11)Last: Pat Rapper's Delight
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. tangotiger Posted: September 17, 2002 at 12:47 AM (#606254)When you present a sound methodology, and data, with reasonable assumptions, with very little interpretation, there's very little to "debate". But, I just want to say thanks for the probably many countless hours you spent to run this.
ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=WinProb2(RS,Z,PN)-WinProb2(RS,Z,PF)
In a hitters' park (PF>100), WinProb2(RS,Z,PN)>WinProb2(RS,Z,PF) which makes ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)>0. When PF<100, ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)<0. That is what is reflected in Part 6, Table 8 and the text that follows. For instance, Wells' 4/8 game at Tex had a ParkAdder>0 and Wells' 4/24 game at Oak had a ParkAdder<0.
However, in Part 4, Eq. 7, ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF) is given as
ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=PAddPct(RS)*(2*(100-PF))*(Z/9)+
which produces the opposite sign. I believe Eq. 7 in Part 4 needs to be corrected to
ParkAdder(RS,Z,PF)=PAddPct(RS)*(2*(PF-100))*(Z/9)+
From the tables and the text it appears the calculations were correctly made using this last equation.
I fear that emancip8d has caught an error in one of the formulas. As he suggests, the error is only in the exposition and not in the analysis. Thanks for catching the error. I will see if the error can be corrected and the article re-posted.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main