User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1777 seconds
58 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Joel W Posted: August 30, 2011 at 06:24 PM (#3912466)I think this is generally underappreciated, myself included. We should definitely expect the Sox to take two of three, and should be mildly disappointed by any worse outcome.
Appreciating that starting pitching fact means that we should also probably care more to face Detroit than Texas that "ZOMG Verlander twice" suggests. The Tigers give up 3 runs per game in Verlander starts, which I imagine is against about an average offense. The Red Sox are 25% better than average against right handers. Simplifying a bit (a lot), the Red Sox should expect to score about 4 runs in each of their games against Verlander. I think this probably overstates Verlander's ability a little bit, since Verlander is a) outperforming his FIP and b) our expectation of his true talent level shouldn't just include this year (though of course, the same can be said for the Sox lineup).
I didn't mean to turn this into a post about the playoffs, but instead just wanted to say that Detroit isn't *that* good even getting Verlander twice, Texas is a very good team, 4th best in baseball probably, and winning the division and facing Detroit with home-field rather than Texas on the road does matter, with some real probability, to the team's chances of winning the World Series. So, you know, go Sox.
The pitching matchups favor the Sox taking two of three, but I'm agreed with MCoA that pitching matchups tend to predict outcomes less often than I expect. The Yankees and Red Sox are probably about equal right now, I don't think you ever "expect" to win a three game series against a basically equivalent team. I'm less concerned about the wins and losses and just want to see the Red Sox play well. With Youkilis out for the Red Sox, and ARod and Jeter maybe out for the Yankees, I don't see these games as being predictive of much, even three blowout losses.
I'm finding myself surprisingly uninvested in the outcome of this series. I'm pretty confident in this Red Sox team.
And as much as I value the division, I can't seem to get worked up about this either. The Sox are a little banged up, they're still playing good baseball, and they don't seem to be treating games as exhibitions. If they end up falling behind this very good Yankee team, it won't kill me the way it would have in 2007.
The last time Boston went 40 games over .500 in a run of any length was 1949 (90-47, 43 games over .500). They've gone 39 games over .500 three times since: 1950 (86-47), 1978 (84-45) and this year.
I have fully accepted that the Red Sox will not sacrifice a mote or iota of playoff EV for the division, but I care about it anyway.
that right there is why neither manager is willing to put himself on the line for this series. there's a lot to lose, but not much to gain. both teams are virtually assured of a playoff spot, and while the division champs thing is important, only 1 of these teams will be that, so there's really no upside for either manager to profess the importance of it.
An unknowable "if," of course: with an imperative to beat the other club, either the Sox or Yankees might have pulled away by now.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main