User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.2677 seconds
58 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Mister High Standards Posted: March 10, 2007 at 08:19 PM (#2310000)880 runs
In any case, Pedroia seems destined for the 9-hole anyway, on account of his rookie status, and I think you're right that Francona will go with that 1-5 setup, even though I'm not the only one who would love to see Drew in the 2-hole.
After Drew... Lowell/Varitek/Crisp?
Pedroia hit .191 last season, and is only at .158 this spring. Plenty of players have started fine careers with less than stellar numbers, but it's hard to see Pedroia anywhere but 9th based on performance. A bad April by Pedroia may even have the Red Sox scrambling for a plan B.
900 runs? Are the stat people projecting them like that? I've been sorta projecting them as an ok-good offense, but that would put them in hte very top tier. I guess they look pretty good, but I feel a lot more hesitant with these hitters than I do with the starting pitchers.
Magglio ducks into a Beckett curveball later on and gets hit in the head.
Todd Jones throws two pitches behind JD Drews head. Benches clear.
Then they're terribly stupid. A couple months of bad results shouldn't sway your opinion about a guy who's been good for years.
I'd forgotten how rarely Pedroia strikes out. I was thinking of his seemingly all-or-nothing swing, and just imagining all-or-nothing results. Does he get a lot of singles?
Just glancing at MLB.com stats for the Sox from last year, they seem to have scored about 850 runs. (Anyone have the exact number?) They've upgraded from Alex Gonzalez to Julio Lugo, and from Trot Nixon & Co to JD Drew (& Co, no doubt). Manny might play more games than last year, and a healthy Crisp might improve. I think Varitek will improve some, too. Ortiz and Lowell might fall off somewhat. I see Youkilis providing more of the same.
900 runs doesn't seem out of the question. I think they'll be close to it, at least.
Isn't this what we said about Mark Loretta?
I mean, this guy beats his wife!
There are some interesting parallels to Loretta, but as with most of the players who remind us of Petunia, he didn't really do anything in the majors until his mid-20s.
Willie Harris did a lot of sucking
My guess is Varitek/Lowell/Crisp if we go by last year. Looking at '04, did Francona flip flop Ortiz and Manny depending on the opposing pitcher's handedness?
880 sounds about right, then.
However I disagree Darren, that if he has an ugly April, they probably will go to 1-year Plan B and put Petunia back in the minors.
Captainship, veteranness and intangibles, plus $10m/year, should really bump the catcher to the clean up spot.
How bad do you think he will have to do for that to happen? I assume that if they did give up on him after April, it would be Cora taking his place. They can't expect much more than a .650 OPS and decent defense out of him.
What I think is far more likely is that Pedroia starts the year playing 4-5 times a week, and Cora takes the rest. If Pedroia struggles, that goes up to a more even split. I think it's a lousy idea but that's what I think will happen.
The reason I think the Sox shouldn't panic after a month is twofold. First, Pedroia struggled in his first taste of AAA and then got much better. I wouldn't be surprised if his particular style (like Youks') tends to need an adjustment period. Second, as I've mentioned in other threads, you could argue that Pedroia didn't struggle much last year in the majors. From watching him, he seemed make good contact but hit the ball right at people at lot. PROPS backs this up, as it says he "should have" had an OPS of ~800.
That being said, if he really struggles this year in the majors, and the Sox need a plan B, they should consider trading for Orlando Hudson next offseason; he's got one year of arbitration and will cost about $6m or so. And he'll be worth every penny of it...
And there's no reasons Mirabelli (or whomever) needs to hit in the same spot as Varitek when he plays. Francona has mixed it up on occasion in the past.
He runs through the hitters in what seems to be a batting-order sequence:
Lugo 92, 94
Youk 107, 108
Papi 135, 164
MRam 157, 168
Drew 133, 125
Lowl 106, 109
'Tek 105, 85
Coco 97, 80
Pedr 44, 44
also:
Wily 104, 112
Cora 75, 58
Hnsk 100, 113
Mbel 90, 53
I think we can expect 1 through 6 to stay pretty close to last year. I don't think any of us would be surprised if Lugo and Youks and Drew did somewhat better, and Papi, Manny, and Lowell did somewhat worse.
The big questions, to me, are at the bottom. Are we going to get 85-80-44 (or Cora's 58) from Tek-Crisp-Pedroia? Or are we going to get something closer to 100-100-80? That's a big difference.
I like the lineup this year - I think it's stronger than last year's with the addition of Drew and Lugo, and I think Pena, Hinske and Cora are decent bench. Like McAdam says, the 1-5 hitters will do the most damage, but 4-9 shouldn't have a too many holes. It's still not as strong as the Yankees lineup, though, whom I expect to be a juggernaut in 2007.
Varitek 500 PA, .260/.340/.430
Youkilis 600, .280/.380/.450
Pedroia 550, .280/.350/.400
Lowell 600, .280/.330/.460
Lugo 650, .280/.345/.410
ManRam 550, .300/.400/.575
Crisp 550, .290/.340/.430
Drew 500, .280/.380/.500
Ortiz 600, .290/.400/.580
Mirabelli 150, .220/.290/.380
Pena 350, .280/.330/.500
Hinske 200, .260/.340/.420
Cora 200, .250/.330/.340
Chaff 300, .225/.270/.320
This adds up to .276/.353/.457, and about 890 runs scored.
Ha, well, it's an envelope that has Excel. :-) The projections themselves though are just off the top of my head, and I have a little Excel tool that takes PA, AVG, OBP, and SLG and turns it into a crude runs created estimate. This is what I do at work when there isn't work to do...
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main