User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1600 seconds
40 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: May 28, 2011 at 12:16 PM (#3839973)Grounders: 188/203 down from 292/306
Flies: 175/400 down from 232/663
Liners: 619/714 down from 715/979
And now Crawford is at:
Grounders: 203/215 down from 292/306
Flies: 250/654 from 232/663
Liners: 679/857 down from 715/979
Crawford's poor numbers in 2011 can now be blamed mostly on how few ground ball singles he's hit compared to expectations. If Crawford were hitting .290 on grounders rather than .200, his overall line would be 285/325/440. That's still light in walks and a tiny bit light in hits and power, but it would be a perfectly normal line.
So Phil should be about the only one who can actually watch this game.
Just keep an eye on chatter eyes for your usual Phil Coorey updates....
It will be better than watching the game!
:)
"Ahh GD Ellsbury!! Useless! Now watch Pedroia strike-out! DAMNIT!!"
And me. Sucks to be you though.
Also: I looked at the standings, and apparently we have a 1.5 game lead right now. WTH?!
Probably for the best!!
They only have the implied oral consent of Major League Baseball.
Remember, last year the Red Sox started off 4-9 and then went 45-23 to get to 49-32 on a 98 W pace. The rest is history.
It would have been great if he bought in Bard at 3-3 with two outs and maybe give the Sox a chance to stay in the game...
I guess we should be surprised 2 pitchers with elbow problems, one of who was abused in japan (and missed most of 2002 with an elbow problem) and has been on the DL often the past 2 years, and another who has a clause in his contract that requires him to play an extra year at the league minimum if he misses significant time due to his previous injury history, are on the DL with elbow problems.
Personally, I am not convinced Lackeys problem is entirely his elbow, and Daisuke has not been effective since 2008.
What game are you talking about Phil? None of that really fits the Sox loss to the White Sox. Wake was still pitching at 3-3, but he gave up a solo homer with one out and we tied it up in the bottom. And Albers-Hill already surrendered the lead with one out in the seventh.
And BTW, I was disappointed that you, of all people, missed my post in the most recent Goldman thread.
Shouldn't those expectations be tempered given he no long plays half his games on the Trops turf? Also, those few GB singles do not explain the SLG% drop from 495 to 362.
What game are you talking about Phil? None of that really fits the Sox loss to the White Sox. Wake was still pitching at 3-3,Check the date of Phil's post--5/30 Lester game.
The question was whether they projected to be effective SP. I don't think there's any doubt that they did. Sure, they were injury risks, but the default projection was for them to be effective, just as Lackey has been for the past decade and Matsuzaka was in 2007, 2008, and 2010 (sorry, I just don't feel 2002 is really important in this discussion).
In fact, it was worse than losing players to the DL because these guys stayed on the roster and sucked. They would have been better off--more fortunate if you will--if both of these guys had gone on the DL weeks before they did.
In addition, the Red Sox have also lost Jenks and Wheeler, who were 2 of their setup men, to injury (they also followed the same pattern of sucking before being DL'ed).
Thanks. I thought I had stayed up to date on this thread.
What was it?!
It was here.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main