User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1873 seconds
43 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. alkeiper Posted: December 12, 2006 at 03:00 AM (#2258394)Gagne is the best reliever in the game when healthy.
Well played.
Of course the Sox probably have the $6 mil available to take that risk.
Of course the Sox probably have the $6 mil available to take that risk.
Exactly. You can't expect anything of the sort, but it's a big risk/big reward deal. If you could expect that performance, you'd being paying twice that.
That's pretty much exactly what my reaction was when I looked at his stats a few minutes ago, only on the complete other side of the positive/negative feeling spectrum.
If the Sox do sign Gagne, they should learn from the Dotel signing last year, make it a team option or a multi year deal. I mean, if its six mil a year, it might be not be worth the risk to sign him to two years, but I would fighting for a team option, even if that team option is like 10 or 12 million.
BTW, I believe Dotel has know said he would pitch for two teams for free and is pitching for neither one of them this year.
But to be fair, he's not asking either of them to pay him either. So, if he spends the whole year on the DL again, it'll be the same as if he 'pitched' for those teams for free.
More seriously, I don't put much stock in statements like "I'll pitch for X for free next year" or "it's not about the money" or "size doesn't matter."
The Sox don't really have young pitching to trade (Hansen?), and I don't have any idea why the Rangers would trade one of their good pitchers. But he'd be a totally great option at closer if it weren't for all the reasons that the Sox won't get him.
How young? The Sox have a few very young pitchers in the minors and they've got Delcarmen. And Hansack!
What a mess this bullpen is. Sign DK and keep Super Bon Bon in the pen, where he belongs.
Boston's bullpen is always a mess, which is what explains the Drew/Gagne Disconnect. Epstein is very good at evaluating hitters. Epstein is horrible at evaluating relievers. Ergo, Epstein's bosses give him a lot more leeway in spending money on hitters than they do in spending money on relievers.
Which may be the exact wrong way to approach it. All though this wasn't a particularly good market for relievers, the SOx should just buy relievers and pay a premium because otherwise they get #### for production.
Two things to that:
1. Well, with THAT kind of attitude, we're pretty much doomed to failure.
2. That being said I agree with him.
With the mantra "it's all about the variance" audible in the background...
I agree w/ Darren it seems odd. In fact, it seems odder when you look at it this way: Drew is a high-variance player, and now you've committed major PT to him, and long-term at that. Granted that Wily Mo is still on the roster as a "hedge," I think you want to reserve your long-term, guaranteed, big-money deals for low-variance guys, in general, 'cause these contracts are difficult to dispose of if they go awry (see, e.g., Dreifort, Belle, etc.).
A one-year deal for a bullpen stud, OTOH, is a little different. You can pile up lots of high-variance guys for 'pen roles (while "stockpiling" position players is tougher and more expensive). The ones who are under-performing relative to expectations can be relegated to mop-up roles or, in some cases, discarded completely; the positive deltas can win you a pennant.
So, unless the Sox have an Ace up their sleeve (as Darren notes), walking away from Gagne might be the wrong move.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main