Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Sox Therapy > Discussion
Sox Therapy
— Where Thinking Red Sox Fans Obsess about the Sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. villageidiom Posted: January 13, 2017 at 07:31 AM (#5382811)
It is worth noting that Farrell also noted that there was no expectation of any delay for Rodriguez at the start of spring training.  I think he is getting a reputation for being injured regularly but I think it is early enough in his career that it probably would behoove us not to get too worked up yet.
Agreed. I'd go a bit further and say the way Rodriguez's injury "history" is one or both of these:

(a) Rodriguez is prone to injury.

(b) The Red Sox are being extra cautious with him about injury because he is young AND talented AND not desperately needed in the rotation. The time spent rehabbing is more a reflection of the team viewing him as valuable enough to warrant a more careful approach.

I think the Sox Therapy bylaws state that a supermajority shall believe the more pessimistic of two options, but at this stage of the offseason I find no harm in believing (b).
   2. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: January 13, 2017 at 08:35 AM (#5382823)
I suspect the time and energy spent by fans and blogs discussing the lineup is probably far in excess of what is warranted but it’s January 12th, what else are we going to talk about?


So, what IS the ideal line up? Does Betts stat at the top of the order or should he slide down to 3?

Betts - R
Benintendi - L
Pedroia - R
Ramirez - R
Bradley - L
Bogaerts - R
Fat Panda - S
Moreland - L
Swihart - S

Underwhelmed by the production from 3rd and 1st to say the least...

Unless you go with Pedroia at the top, Betts should be leading off. And while Pedroia is a very good hitter, I would caution giving him the extra AB's in the top spot and assuming he is going to miss time at some point, what does that do to the consistency of the lead off spot (or does that not matter)?

Pedroia - R
Benintendi - L
Betts - R
Ramirez - R
Bradley - L
Bogaerts - R
Fat Panda - S - If fatty is not so fat, and better with the bat, I could see him swapping with JBJ, assuming Jackie is not on one of his Ruthian runs
Moreland - L
Swihart - S

ETA:
Would it be a problem to get Betts to learn to switch hit? That would be ideal I think.

   3. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: January 13, 2017 at 08:42 AM (#5382827)
I think the Sox Therapy bylaws state that a supermajority shall believe the more pessimistic of two options, but at this stage of the offseason I find no harm in believing (b).


I think it's (c).

Someone has to be the sixth starter and with his options (Sox Prospects says he has two left) the Sox can let him get stretched out in Pawtucket

It's the same reason Swihart will start the year in AAA. Only when Sandy Leon flames out will the Sox bring up Blake. Same with E Rod - he needs one of the non-option guys to suck or get injured, which, let's be honest, is about the same chance as Leon sucking...high.
   4. Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo Posted: January 13, 2017 at 08:45 AM (#5382829)
Pedroia - R
Benintendi - L
Mookie - R
Hanley - R
Bogaerts - R
Sandoval - L
Bradley - L
Moreland - L
Vazquez - R/Leon - S

Ick, that gets thin fast doesn't it? I know Mookie has the power but I like him in the leadoff spot. The combination of power and speed is pretty potent there. Batting him 3rd/4th I think you minimize the impact of his speed a bit.
   5. villageidiom Posted: January 13, 2017 at 08:52 AM (#5382837)
I think it's (c).
If he were the perfect picture of health he'd still be in AAA because he can. I'm talking about how he always seems to be injured. It might not be so much that he's atypically injured as it is that they take extra precautions with him.
   6. villageidiom Posted: January 13, 2017 at 08:59 AM (#5382840)
Betts - R
Benintendi - L
Pedroia - R
Bogaerts - R
Sandoval - S
Hanley - R
Moreland - L
Vazquez - R/Leon - S
Bradley - L

I really like the idea of Pedroia hitting when he has a speedy guy on base, because either we're getting a stolen base or Pedroia's getting fastballs. But I like Benintendi hitting up there, and breaking up the platoon.

I'm higher on Sandoval than most. But I assure you I'm not high.
   7. Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo Posted: January 13, 2017 at 09:08 AM (#5382845)
The problem with Pedroia is he really has become a double play machine. I think leading off is the way to go for him.
   8. MHS Posted: January 13, 2017 at 09:32 AM (#5382856)
You hit your best players 1,2,4 and 5. That is more important than L/R issues generally. The exception is if 4th and 5th or 6th best hitters are generally close in quality and I don't think that is the case.

Hanley, Mookie, X and Dustin are the best hitters, in probably that order but I don't have projections handy. So they hit 1, 2, 3, 4 in.

Dustin
Mookie
Bradley
Hanley
X
Benintendi (could swap with Bradley I think)
Pablo (could also swap with Bradley if scouting is positive in the spring.
Moreland
Catcher

They won't do that, because teams don't like to win.
   9. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: January 13, 2017 at 09:56 AM (#5382870)
Betts - R
Pedroia - R
Hanley - R
Bogaerts - R

Anyone know if Farrell has said anything about preferring to break up similar handed bats? Pure hitting talent, and consistency, the top of the line up should probably go like this.

EDIT:
Missed a page refresh. Cokes around.
   10. MHS Posted: January 13, 2017 at 10:02 AM (#5382873)
Betts - R
Pedroia - R
Hanley - R
Bogaerts - R


Hitting Hanley third is a terrible decision. He is too good a hitter to bat with no one and two outs so frequently.

Also #7 is a stong reason to flip Dustin and Mookie.
   11. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: January 13, 2017 at 10:45 AM (#5382897)
Hitting Hanley third is a terrible decision.


I was more pointing out that the Sox are, talent-wise, a very RH hitting team.
   12. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: January 13, 2017 at 10:54 AM (#5382903)
Keep in mind Chris Young will probably be playing a good amount in place of Benintendi - and Farrell does seem to just slot in replacement guys in the same order. .329/.410/.589 vs lefties certainly works in the 2 spot.
   13. Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo Posted: January 13, 2017 at 11:48 AM (#5382953)
Minor contract news - JBJ signs a one year/3.6 million dollar deal avoiding arbitration.
   14. Nasty Nate Posted: January 13, 2017 at 12:11 PM (#5382975)
You guys have mentioned the best and plausible lineups, but I'll throw another one out there for fun that puts Xander in leadoff:

Bogaerts
Pedroia
JBJ
Betts
Ramirez
Benintendi
...and the rest
   15. the Hugh Jorgan returns Posted: January 17, 2017 at 07:48 PM (#5384791)
What is most concerning is that Moreland is in every lineup. A team like the Red Sox should never have a 1B like Moreland unless it's for late inning, fielding purposes only.

I'm hoping there's a trade for Votto in the wings? This is my ultimate Sox wet dream....
   16. Nasty Nate Posted: January 17, 2017 at 08:26 PM (#5384803)
What is most concerning is that Moreland is in every lineup.
okay here's one to use against lefties:

Bogaerts SS
Pedroia 2B
Benintendi LF
Betts RF
Ramirez 1B
Young DH
JBJ CF
Sandoval 3B
Leon C
   17. Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo Posted: January 21, 2017 at 09:02 PM (#5387479)
Couple of random thoughts;

1. Pablo Sandoval is apparently planning to play in the WBC. This is one of those things that as a practical matter is probably a net zero, maybe even a benefit because he will be facing live pitching trying to get him out. But the optics to use a politics term are horseshit.

2. Watched a bit of the Winter Weekend today. Benintendi was kind of bundled up but his hands and face looked a bit chunky to me. Just armchair stuff and apparently he HAS put on about 15-20 pounds (through workouts) but his facial chubbiness had me mildly concerned. I'm sure it's nothing though.
   18. Nasty Nate Posted: January 22, 2017 at 01:56 AM (#5387549)
It wouldn't be newsworthy except it's in the stupid month of January, but a former Sox pitcher says he thinks a former Sox player will play again...
   19. covelli chris p Posted: January 22, 2017 at 12:09 PM (#5387650)
maybe even a benefit because he will be facing live pitching trying to get him out.
eh. i think getting an early start facing live pitching is a good thing for him.
   20. Jose is El Absurd Bronson Y Pollo Posted: January 28, 2017 at 08:56 PM (#5391755)
Three guys in the top 100; Groome at 41, Devers at 17 and Benintendi #1.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Sheer Tim Foli
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Syndicate

Page rendered in 0.2941 seconds
38 querie(s) executed