Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Sox Therapy > Discussion
Sox Therapy
— Where Thinking Red Sox Fans Obsess about the Sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Steve Balboni's Personal Trainer Posted: October 12, 2016 at 12:45 PM (#5322721)
If the four main bench players are Chris Young, Brock Holt, Travis Shaw, and Christian Vazquez, that is a very good, youngish, inexpensive, versatile bench. If Shaw is starting next year, it is likely because neither Panda nor Moncada were ready coming out of spring training. I find it hard to believe neither of them will be comfortable options for the team coming out of ST.

Actually, unless the team makes a mega-move, there is very little real drama around the diamond this winter, right? Maybe 3B and C are uncertain as to who will be the starter, but in both cases, the team has legit options in-house. It's a deep, young team.
   2. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 12, 2016 at 01:13 PM (#5322752)
Yeah. I think we are all watching to see what happens at DH (likely nothing despite my hopes) and I think they will explore a trade for a top starter (Bradley and Swihart as center pieces) but again I think nothing will come of it. In the end I would not be at all surprised if what we see today is fundamentally what we see in April.

The lineup had eight players over 2 WAR and I'd bet that Benintendi will project similarly while the rotation has six reasonable starting pitcher options. If one of Buchholz or Pomeranz is your sixth best starter that's a decent place to begin.
   3. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: October 12, 2016 at 02:26 PM (#5322833)
If the four main bench players are Chris Young, Brock Holt, Travis Shaw, and Christian Vazquez, that is a very good, youngish, inexpensive, versatile bench.


This is one of the reasons I very much dislike not getting a very good bat for DH. Yes, Pedroia needs time off now and then. No, he does not need to be moved to DH so he can 'rest'. The Sox have decent enough players coming off the bench that removing someone like Pedroia from the line up does not screw them. It's hard to put together a 'Sunday lineup' of all the terrible backups from a few years ago.
   4. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 02:43 PM (#5322858)
I believe the versatility of a Shaw, Holt, Vazquez & Young bench is indeed what truly makes the rotating DH scenario a very viable option to keep the regulars fresh and minimize the impact of nagging injuries over the 162 game marathon season. I might add Josh Rutledge to that discussion, if healthy, as I really like him and consider him a very solid MLB'er. If anything, if we want to use money from Papi's departure to beef up the offense (recuperate from the loss of the Big guy) rather than strengthen or solidify the starting rotation I'd prefer the money to be spent on a starting 3B with some pop and let the DH duties fall to a rotating crew with Shaw and Hanley getting the majority of the DH AB's.
   5. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 02:53 PM (#5322873)
Is Joey Gallo a commodity the Rangers might consider trading for a reasonable package on the heels of his 1/25 2016 and a .204/.301/.417 debut in 2015? If so, I'd love to see what Chili Davis and maybe Jim Rice could do to get that kid MLB ready/productive. His bat has got to be able to play at Fenway. What a way to potentially replace departed power hitting than to add a kid like that. Could the Red Sox plate discipline rub off on this kid? Would Texas have any interest in Panda? Would you be willing to trade Travis Shaw in a deal for Gallo with the potential upside? It seems an intriguing discussion to me. I'm not certain Texas really values Gallo that high anymore and I think there is potential for somewhat low risk, high reward negotiations.
   6. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 12, 2016 at 02:58 PM (#5322880)
I doubt we could move Sandoval but a challenge trade of Shaw for Gallo is intriguing. It could go badly for the Sox as Shaw has proven he can play and Gallo hasn't but there is upside there. I think I might be inclined to take that shot. Gallo was a heroic disaster in 2016, the 1 for 25 doesn't quite explain how bad he was. 19 strikeouts in 25 at bats! Them's some Shaq Green-Thompson numbers. But his AAA numbers were good enough that I don't think you can write him off yet. He's only 23.

Yeah, I think I'd be willing to consider that. I like Shaw though.
   7. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:00 PM (#5322883)
btw, I would be remiss to not recognize Jose's reference to Sam Travis. Though I have never seen this kid in person, everything I have read and the data I have seen has me very (perhaps unrealistically and exceptionally) high on this kid. I envision a Pedroia type attitude and approach on a slightly larger, stronger athelete. That is very appealing to me. I agree that he could end up having a significant role in 2017 if healthy.
   8. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:06 PM (#5322892)
Yeah, I think I'd be willing to consider that. I like Shaw though.

Don't get me wrong, I like Shaw also. He was a very pleasant surprise to me over the 2016 season despite the streakiness. And I believe he has a fairly decent approach at the plate even when he is slumping a bit. I was also happy to see the way he responded on the field to potential loss of playing time to Moncada when they brought him up. But the potential power upside of a masher like Gallo does intrigue me a bit.
   9. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:07 PM (#5322894)
I got a brief look at him during a rain shortened game in Lowell a couple years ago. He's not a big guy for a first baseman and I think your description of him as a slightly larger Pedroia is a good one. BBRef has him at 6' even which is small for a big league first baseman. It's one of the reasons I think third base might be a spot to look at him. Actually looking him up he was a third baseman in college (and a teammate of Kyle Schwarber).
   10. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:13 PM (#5322905)
3B – Travis Shaw, Brock Holt, Pablo Sandoval, Yoan Moncada

How far away is Devers? What is his ETA? Any chance he can provide more pop to pick up some offensive loss? Any chance he is more appealing to Texas than Shaw and, if so, do you make that deal?
   11. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:18 PM (#5322913)
I would think a couple years, 2018 at the earliest. He was challenged at Salem this year and while he improved as the year went on I think he'll be in Portland most of the year in 2017. We've seen guys (Ellsbury, Benintendi) make their way through the system quickly at this point but he doesn't look as advanced as those guys. Ells and Benintendi both had college backgrounds so they were pretty advanced as players, Devers is turning 20 in a couple of weeks and while I've seen no data on this power hitters take a bit longer to progress.

What was interesting is that on the scoreboard Monday night they said that Devers was named the best defender in the system which suggests tremendous progress on that side of the ball. He's always looked off to me over there.

I wouldn't deal him for Gallo at all. I think he has considerably more value than that. He's probably a top 20 prospect this year (again) and I'd want to either ride that or get someone established.
   12. esturminator_CT Posted: October 12, 2016 at 03:46 PM (#5322953)
That makes sense. If you are going to trade young high ceiling guys, you want to be getting someone to have an impact now while the team appears ready to compete at the highest level. Gallo may be too much of a project still to warrant a trade of Devers.
   13. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 13, 2016 at 01:36 PM (#5323588)
So apparently Pedroia had knee surgery yesterday. He is "expected" to be ready for Spring Training.

And by the way, does NESN really need four ####### autoplay ads on the page?
   14. villageidiom Posted: October 17, 2016 at 11:14 AM (#5326137)
Sandoval is the 3B for this team to start the 2017 season. And you will be happy about it.
   15. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 17, 2016 at 11:22 AM (#5326146)
The first sentence may be true. The second sentence will certainly not be true on Opening Day and while I sincerely hope that it is true soon after that I am not hopeful.
   16. Dan Posted: October 22, 2016 at 02:48 PM (#5331635)
I'll be surprised if they don't eat some money and move Sandoval this winter. Potentially he could go back to SF, since they were reduced to a Nunez/Gillespie platoon after trading away Duffy?
   17. Jose is El Absurd Pollo Posted: October 22, 2016 at 03:02 PM (#5331645)
What's the rule that allowed them tote Craig and Castillo off the 40 man? They waive him and his contract comes off the luxury tax calculation but if another team wants him that team has to pay the contract, right?
   18. The Yankee Clapper Posted: October 22, 2016 at 04:11 PM (#5331660)
They waive him and his contract comes off the luxury tax calculation but if another team wants him that team has to pay the contract, right?

Wasn't that determined not to be the case when A-Rod was released?
   19. Nasty Nate Posted: October 22, 2016 at 05:03 PM (#5331669)
What's the rule that allowed them tote Craig and Castillo off the 40 man? They waive him and his contract comes off the luxury tax calculation but if another team wants him that team has to pay the contract, right?
I don't think that's right.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Marc Sully's not booin'. He's Youkin'.
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Syndicate

Page rendered in 0.3581 seconds
38 querie(s) executed