Trader Theo and the Redemption Plan
I see two basic directions that this offseason could take for the Red Sox. You can basically bring back everyone, trusting in the team’s third-order winning percentage and boosting them with better depth and perhaps new coaching and training staffs. If you don’t want this same basic club back, but you do want to compete for the AL East next year, that will require major, blockbuster trades.
The Redemption Plan is pretty simple. You give these players a chance to redeem themselves. The core MVP candidates are great players. Complementary pieces like Salty and Scutaro and Reddick should remain useful. Carl Crawford still projects as a good player. The front of the rotation and the set-up and closing core should be major assets again, and the offseason could be focused on acquiring the depth arms needed to support them and head off another September swoon. You find some improved pitching depth, you re-sign Papelbon and Papi as affordably as possible, and you head into 2012 with a club whose underlying stats – hits and walks and Ks and homers – projected them to win 99 games this year, not 90. Even with some regression to the mean, that’s a playoff club, and with a little bit of luck and some smart new additions to the rotation, there would be a good case for favoring them over the Yankees.
And what a story it’d be, right? These same players that accomplished one of the greatest choke jobs in the history of baseball, coming back again and winning the division, the pennant, maybe the series? Pretty cool, and there’s a more than cogent case for trying it.
There’s one further possible modification of the Redemption Plan. Say that John Henry, as he did after 2003, opens up his pocketbook for one more big acquisition. If you want to keep the same club basically in place, but want to add a few wins, the obvious choice is Jose Reyes. Reyes’ injury history obviously terrifies me, but a healthy Reyes could be the best acquisition of the offseason. Call it Redemption Plus. (Conceivably Redemption Plus could involve going after CC Sabathia, but I think CC is going to re-sign reasonably quickly with the Yankees and would not be worth the effort of bidding.)
Then there’s Trader Theo. (You can replace Theo with your imagined new GM if you feel like it.) As I argued in the other thread, “blow it up” is not a plan. You need to make the team better. If you are convinced that Carl Crawford or John Lackey is cooked as a player, you need to not merely get rid of them, you need to replace them with All-Star level production. That’s the hard part. Dumping bad players doesn’t make the club better - only good players can do that.
The simplest way to find a star is to pay him a truckload of money. Albert Pujols seems like the obvious target, given his status as by far the greatest player of his generation and currently the greatest player in baseball. The reason this is a Trader Theo plan is that with Gonzalez locked in at 1B and flashing a great glove there, the way to get value out of Pujols is to make a secondary trade. One option is to see if you could get real talent in trade for Gonzalez, and improve the team by adding Pujols plus the new talent from the Gonzalez trade. Another option would be to look into trading Crawford and considering Pujols for the newly open LF slot, or to look into playing Pujols at 3B, and seeing what kind of trade market exists for Youkilis. (I guess there’s another Redemption Plus option where you let Papi walk, you make it rain for Pujols, and you split 1B/3B/DH duties between Youks, Gonzalez, and Pujols.) Obviously this all would depend on Pujols’ interest in a positional shift - unless you trade Gonzalez - but Albert surely got the talent for it, so the question would simply be his interest.
The other path for Trader Theo is simply to make some blockbuster talent-for-talent trades. The terrible year down on the farm has left this club with very few trade chits, and the disaster at the back of the rotation was partly a function of this club trading away their best pitching prospects of the last few years. That leaves talent-for-talent blockbusters, which are as rare as they are impossible to predict. So I have no particular idea about what the Sox ought to go after or what they ought to offer – Reddick, Bard, and Middlebrooks for King Felix! /SoSH – but it should be noted that Trader Theo includes the option of just going crazy on the trade market.
Matt Clement of Alexandria
Posted: September 29, 2011 at 06:59 PM |
102 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News:
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
One of the reasons I tend more toward Trader Theo is chemistry. You can't know how 25 extremely talented, mostly extremely egotistical, mostly extremely rich young men will interact, and you can't really predict chemistry. But bringing back most of the same roster that lost it in September feels to me like a risk I'm not terribly interested in taking. Once bad dynamics have developed among a group of people, it's going to be difficult to change them. This is one of the main reasons I support replacing the manager and the coaching staff - it's going to be a lot easier to replace them than to replace the players. But I don't know if replacing the manager or coaching staff is sufficient change.
Call it Faith, Hope, and Blow it Up. That's a third option that doesn't really fit into either category.
EDIT: So, to modify the case in the post above, "blow it up" is sort of a plan. You need to be as confident in the club's third-order WP and the individual projections of almost all of the players as would be required for the Redemption Plan, but you also need to believe that the projections of Crawford or Lackey (or others) are just totally wrong. Then you ship those crappy players out and replace with affordable, complementary players.
One guy I think might be someone the Sox would target is Markakis. He is about to become expensive and there is reason to think he would be a bust. At the same time the contract and season he just had might make Baltimore feel that getting out from under him is the right call. I'll admit I'm a fanboy of Markakis so probably overvalue him but I think he is a guy who starts to look a lot better as a complimentary rather than "star" player.
If you don't buy into Reddick or Kalish as starters in RF (or at least the long side of the platoon with a guy like McDonald), then I think the path to upgrade RF is to sign Beltran.
How are you going to move Lackey and Crawford? Eats tons of money, or do a bad contract for bad contract swap?
I think both could use a change of scenery after this disaster, but what team matches up?
Reportedly, Peter Angelos is quite tickled to have a fellow Greek-American on his team. While King Peter is supposedly less involved in baseball matters, I'm not sure McPhail would want to tell him he'd traded his favorite player.
I agree totally.
This is a case where the Red Sox could probably take a strict Moneyball-ish approach and look for players who are likely to be undervalued. Their stars are good enough to carry them to a pennant so that they don't need to overpay to add one, and they can concentrate on players who they can get on the cheap and who have a good chance to perform league average or better - they maybe can wait for the non-tender list and see if the Giants, for example, non-tender Jonathan Sanchez (I think that's unlikely but it's been kicked around as a possibility) or the Marlins non-tender someone like Chris Volstad. (And it could be interesting to see what the Angels do with Kendry Morales.) I'm also still inclined to think there's some bounce for Delmon Young, another potential non-tender candidate.
-- MWE
If the problem was a lack of chemistry, you want to acquire guys players who are going to help build a better clubhouse. There's no reason to think the most able players are going to be the best leaders. The lack of chemistry could also be a result of poor management (Tito, the coaches), so that's another option if this is what you think went wrong.
Neither scenario calls for trading for Albert Pujols, especially on the off chance that he'll be willing and able to play a position other than 1B. The problem doesn't seem to be talent; adding talent therefore doesn't seem like it's the primary solution.
You could sign Pujols and trade Adrian, but I'm not sure all that many teams with large enough payrolls to afford him need a 1B, and anyway I think it's just asking for trouble... trading away a young, superstar player to whom you made a huge commitment just a few months ago, and who went on to have a great season? It's beyond horrible optics.
As the Red Sox (of whom I am not a fan), I think you go Redemption Plan. It is generally a well-constructed team that tore the doors off for four months and fell one game short. If next year brings a Crawford and a back end of the rotation that is less utterly horrendous, you're fine. Lavarnway replaces Varitek as the guy splitting time with Salty, Papi back unless his demand is ridiculous, Reddick RF. If you can sign Reyes or CC, great; if not, don't worry about it. Don't give big money to a non-star. Another OF body (Abreu? Willingham?) would be nice, but only if it's a good buy. Naturally, be Moneyballers* and try to identify some guys underrated by their current organizations who can help. (Logan Morrison?)
4th starter is Lackey, because you can't help it**. 5th starter is... somebody. Who? I have no clue. Get him off the scrap heap. The Yankees do it constantly, you guys can do it once. Wakefield gone.
Fire Francona and replace him with... who? I have no clue. Some young, driven guy who gives the right answers in the interview and seems to have his #### together.
(It is interesting to note, however, that according to Chris Jaffe, if Francona is fired, he'd be the first "collapse" manager immediately fired ever. Ever ever? Ever ever. But I'd still do it, and I'm getting the impression Theo will too.)
* Not trying to rip off Emeigh here; I was writing as he posted. BTW, don't sign Delmon Young.
** I don't think you can say both "I think we can trade this guy somewhere" and "we're not in a position to say whether or not anyone will want him." The latter is correct, we're not in a position to know... and I think the logical place to go from there is what we've surely all noted as fans over the years, which is that guys like this very rarely find takers. Before you even say it, four years of Vernon Wells looked a lot better last offseason than Lackey or Crawford's contracts do right now. In any event, it's real rare, and that's my point.
The RP would be a serious risk - if it goes badly again, Theo and the Boyz are gone. GONE. In addition would be the PR problem of selling the "despite what you've seen, this team is good enough to win" perception.
I know this is a completely unique situation, but I can't think of a single non-playoff team that has essentially got the band back together the following year. Maybe one of you can.
No incremental risk. If they don't make the playoffs and play well, Theo and the boys are GONE, regardless of the strategy.
Ih he signs Pujols to play 3B, Fielder to DH and trades Youkilis for Cliff Lee, if they don't make the playoffs and probably advance to the ALCS, he's gone.
Concur.
And Adrian Gonzalez is better than Miguel Cabrera.
I don't see how this is a larger risk than any other plan. Whatever Theo does, if the team falls short again, he's gone. Gone? gone. GONE? Yup, gone.
Well, it's three seasons now. He was in the 9 WAR range, then down to 7, and now 5.5.
I would think ARod decline would loom large as an example of the huge risk in giving Pujols 8/250 or something like it.
Pujols is obviously a risk. I'm not advocating his acquisition if they don't have a positive evaluation of his future. I think it's easy to imagine what a positive evaluation of his future might look like, though.
Pujols (31): 9.0-7.5-5.2
Gonzalez (29): 6.2-5.2-6.4
Miggy (28): 5.3-6.3-7.3
Votto (28): 4.7-7.3-6.8
I would say it's Votto-Miggy-Pujols-Gonzalez
EDIT: Numbers are from fangraphs
EDIT 2: Whatever, my vote for greatest is probably Longoria or Bautista.
As bad as this loss was, it shouldn't be the cause of a major overhaul of the Sox 40-Man. The team needs to work out the back end of the rotation, get a couple of bullpen arms, add a decent right-handed platoon outfielder, and add a decent shortstop option (a cheap Scutaro resigning would work). If they can get Ortiz resigned to a reasonable contract, do it; otherwise move on. Ultimately, those aren't huge holes to fill.
Of course, Red Sox Nation will demand a sacrifice. As painful as it may be they should eat most of Lackey's contract and try to get something usable for him. As much as I love Terry Francona, I can't see how the team weathers this mess without him losing his head.
6.9 Pujols
6.5 Miggy
6.4 Votto
6.0 Gonzalez
Same for B-Ref WAR:
6.9 Pujols
6.6 Gonzalez
6.5 Miggy
5.8 Votto
And the average of the two:
6.9 Pujols
6.5 Miggy
6.3 Gonzalez
6.1 Votto
You can make various age discounts, but if you discount Pujols' 2011 much at all, he still leads the pack, I think.Those are both probably better candidates than Pujols, though Longoria too needs a bit of a babip adjustment.
I'll count you in for the Redemption Plan. My fear about that is a bit inchoate - something went really, really wrong in this clubhouse, as confirmed today by Tito and Theo, and I worry whether it's a risk to bring back basically the same players with the same interpersonal dynamics. Maybe new management would be enough of a change, but I don't know.
He sounds like our kind of player!
I will take Jason Varitek's legacy as my sacrifice. How is he escaping being excremented on during all of this? He couldn't hit anything this season, my fat lumbering ass could have stolen a base on him, and how about "the captain" taking some responsibility for the locker room cacophany?
I agree. We need to find one of those guys whose age is going down.
is quite a bit of hyperbole, I think.
ARod became a full-time player in '96; since then, fangraphs says he's accumulated 112.9 WAR. Pujols was a full-timer immediately in '01; he has 87.9 fWAR - if he's now a 5 WAR player, that would make them equal. BBRef has the difference at just 105.6-89.1, or a little over 3 WAR for each of those extra seasons.
Is someone only 4 years older, who's played 5 more seasons, of a different baseball "generation"?
I think the problem with the approach the Red Sox have taken the last few years is that they forgot what has made them a contender in the first place. The most valuable commodities in baseball are the really good pre-arbitration players. In the mid to late aught's, the Sox did a really good job of developing these types: Pedroia, Ellsbury. Lester, Papelbon, Youkilis etc.
But I think the front office got kind of jumpy and wanted instant gratification and started signing costly free agents and traded for established stars with promising young players. I wonder where they would be now if they still had Masterson, for instance? And signing these free agents is costing them draft picks, so the farm system isn't in particularly good shape right now. it kind of reminds me of Duquette's last year. It's goiing to be tough to turn things around with the millstone contracts the underperformers have.
Your overall point may have some merit, though. The Crawford and Lackey signings seemed kind of uninspired.
A league commissioner fully focused on hindering the Yankees?
A league commissioner fully focused on hindering the Yankees?
What are you doing here? This is Sox Therapy; you're welcome, always, to make a contribution to the conversation. What you don't need to do is troll around and make unfunny jokes.
I have to say I kind of agree with this, although Varitek actually hit ok for a backup. What's the point of having a captain? They should have had a formal "de-captainization" ceremony at the end of the game where that stupid 'C' was ripped off of Varitek's uniform and stomped on the floor.
This year will give the Sox an excuse to not bring him back though, if they want one. Lavarnway looks like he might be a player.
(If I had to speculate, I would guess that Varitek, Papi, and Lackey will be the three guys who come out of this story looking the worst.)
Wow.
Although I can see how--on the surface--the answers seem innocuous enough, if you're used to flat, stock responses Tito and Theo normally give to questions... this was about 165 degrees from their usual approach.
Theo, in reference to the clubhouse: "I respect almost everyone down there..."
This speaks volumes. A purge is coming. Now it may not be a purge in a public sense (it could be guys are just let go who are FA, or not offered arb, etc... and so the reasons will never be made clear), but I do think if Theo/Tito remain at the helm there will be a purging of the 40-man to root out the clubhouse cancers alluded to today.
Honestly, I cannot ever recall either guy saying the sort of stuff they were saying today--not even in 2005, not in 2006, not in 2010... There's got to be something horribly rotten in there that they feel has to be purged to answer questions the way they did today.
I don't think there'll be any Redemption Plan. I think there will be blood in the streets.
Now, also, by the sound of it--unless it was all spin, and perhaps it was--I'd say they have no plans to trade/dump Lackey/Crawford. But this may just be because they no there is zero market for either of them unless you get even worse contracts/players back in return for a dump.
The only thing that somewhat heartened me--but also really frustrated me--is that I think to some extent Theo and Tito have identified problem areas in the clubhouse... but (probably because of how late in the season they figured it out) could do nothing to fix it. At least they may have a plan--or at least know who they'll dump. That's a start.
Did anyone else find the press conference remarkable? I can't ever recall Francona speaking out about anything of consequence like he did today. Of course this may just mean it's his parting shot before stepping aside...
1.Let Papi/Papelbon/Scutaro/Drew walk.
2. Move Lackey to bullpen, attempting to salvage value.
3. Sign Prince & Reyes/Rollins The money works out to be around the same. I'm penciling Prince in around 21M, Reyes at 17, and Rollins around 10. That's 31M or 38M. Papelbon made 12M, Drew made 14M, Scutaro made 6M, and Papi made 13M. The Red Sox have 45M coming off the books. This leaves 7M or 14M to spend on spare parts, or for the midseason upgrade fund.
But, Krusty! What about the staff? Bard moves to closer, and.... you still have Beckett-Lester-Bucholz at the front of the rotation. That's plenty good enough, especially in the first half, and allowing for some Garcia/Colon/Capuano style experimentation. Dice-K falls off the books after next season, and I'm certain insurance picks up a part of his tab. Come midseason, there will likely be an upgrade worth getting. In the meantime, this sets the lineup for the foreseeable future, and Prince slots in nicely as a younger, better Papi.
/had a little wine tonight.
I think Rollins is headed into a situation not unlike what Johnny Damon faced in 2009. I just don't see anybody offering him more than something like 3/30ish.
2. Move Lackey to bullpen, attempting to salvage value.
3. Sign Prince & Reyes/Rollins The money works out to be around the same. I'm penciling Prince in around 21M, Reyes at 17, and Rollins around 10. That's 31M or 38M. Papelbon made 12M, Drew made 14M, Scutaro made 6M, and Papi made 13M. The Red Sox have 45M coming off the books. This leaves 7M or 14M to spend on spare parts, or for the midseason upgrade fund.
A $15M RP has very little value, unless he's an elite closer. Lackey's value lies in rebounding to be a league average innings eater.
Is Rollins any better than Scutaro at this point? Not enough that I'd give him a multi-year deal rather than pay 1/6 for Scutaro.
Is Fielder really going to want to be a full time DH at his age? Is he really enough of an upgrade over Ortiz to spend the extra $100M?
As a Yankee fan, I fully endorse your strategy for the Red Sox. It should leave them financially crippled and w/o the pitching to compete for the division for 3 or 4 years.
This. Except for your Yankee fandom, everything here is good.
Last time I checked pitching was the key requirement. Not sure where it's coming from, but they need to find some decent pitching and hopefully get value out of Lackey as an innings eater. I don't think Crawford is this bad. But then again he should've caught that ball yesterday...easily.
Really???
My take on Tek was that he's like the Queen of England. Passive with no real power. Captain in name only.
I think the only possible way you could move Crawford would be a challenge trade with the Nationals for Werth. The Sox would probably have to kick in the money to cover the salary difference, but it would be an interesting "your disappointment for our disappointment" move. I'm not sure it would be a good idea, but I think it's about the only reasonable way that he's going anywhere.
CJ Wilson had a great year. He's pitched a lot this year and is going to pitch even more. I'd be concerned that we pay for day-old goods.
Edwin Jackson's been passed around more than a bong at Bonnaroo; there's something not right.
Beckett, Lester, Buchh, Bedard and Lackey might be enough.
eff no.
Fat ass and injury-prone
Fine
Fine
Mr. Glass
And the worst pitcher in baseball.
Get Jackson and Wang*, stick Lackey in the BP...if Bedard can make it through ST, then have whoever is the least healthy of Wang/Jackson/Bedard in the pen.
Sox don't need aces, the need 100 ERA+ pitchers.
That said, I like the Crawford for Werth idea.
It's an interesting one. Just eyeballing it, Crawford's BA collapse seems almost solely due to regression on BABIP--in 2009 and 2010 it was .342 and in 2011 it was .299. It was higher in some of his earlier years too, so perhaps his natural level is a bit higher than league average, but still, you'd think .342 isn't a level he's like to sustain going forward (but maybe .310 might be?)...
All of which is to say that I'm now rather worried with a league-average BABIP Crawford's a pretty average guy unless he's running wild and playing great defense--both of which we basically didn't see in 2011 so who knows if it'll be in there for 2012 & beyond.
Werth, on the other hand, has generally not ever strayed too far above league average with his BABIP, and retained a great walk rate. Even with his foibles, he still had a 97 OPS+ (Crawford's was 85).
Werth is also a bit cheaper the next couple of years, so while the time horizon is the same the $ in the short run is a bit lower.
Look I wanted them to sign Werth over Crawford last year. He's basically an older JD Drew, I guess, with perhaps a bit more power and a bit less fluid afield. But he fits more with a workmanlike attitude and from what I can tell was a good clubhouse guy in Philly.
I'd lean towards "yes" to the trade... But I wonder if the Nats would even entertain the offer...
That said, I wouldn't pass on a reasonable deal to move Crawford. He looked like there was something mentally wrong with him. There are 10,000 people in the country who would've turned Andino's hit into an out. It was not a difficult play.
The rules of arbitration are that players in their final year of team control can use FA contracts as comparison.
Yes, as per COTs he's at 5 years 49 days service time. He had 3 years pre-arb, and his current contract bought out 2 arb years. 2012 is his final arb year.
Crawford is about as untradeable as a player can be, which is perversely probably a good thing for the Red Sox, because you never want to trade a guy when his value is at its lowest.
Crawford and Gonzalez get to leave the failed experiment behind and forge a sunny new start. Kemp gets his deal a year early.
LA gets a Mexican hero for marketing and, if the deal is done right, a player with some potential to rebound fairly cheap.
Crawford and Gonzalez get to leave the failed experiment behind and forge a sunny new start. Kemp gets his deal a year early.
LA gets a Mexican hero for marketing and, if the deal is done right, a player with some potential to rebound fairly cheap.
How much cash? $150M? Because that's probably the salary difference over the next 6 years.
Colletti should be shot if he accepted that.
Not sure about that last part. There were rumors of him sleeping with Utley's wife. Who knows if that was true and if so, what kind of effect it had on the clubhouse but if "chemistry" is a concern for the Sox, this is definitely something they would want to learn more about.
Well, as long as they don't trade for Utley, should be OK. Right?
Utley would make a fine Roger Dorn (or Ryno)
---
@49 Snapper:
I guess it comes down to your opinion of Lackey. Frankly, I think he desperately needs a change of scenery and since that's not going to happen, it could well be worth it to see if he can reinvent himself as a high end bullpen piece. A different role will be the closest to a fresh start Lackey is going to come by, unless the Red Sox can dump him off in a challenge trade.
I think Fielder would probably become a full time DH provided the money was there, and something like 6/126 or 7/147 would probably be more than enough to persuade him. One thing I'd forgotten about was Youkilis: he may not be capable of playing 3B full time anymore. If that's the case, then this is moot and the Red Sox might be better served moving him to DH. Or just trading him.
Rollins is still a better player than Scutaro. 24M better? No. 2M better? Definitely. However, as someone said above, it's like the Phillies bring him back unless someone overpays.
---
WRT to a potential rotation of Beckett-Lester-Bucholz-4?/5?, well, the Yankees did just fine with a ton of bats and something weaker than that this year. So, that's basically where I was coming from. Embrace your Yankee-hood, Boston. Just get a Murderer's Row together (and no doubt, Gonzo/Fielder/Ellsbury/Pedroia/Youk qualifies even without a Crawford bounce back.)
Yes. They should also not trade for other players with slutty wives.
I understand Cashman is on the phone to the Phillies as we type.
I guess it comes down to your opinion of Lackey. Frankly, I think he desperately needs a change of scenery and since that's not going to happen, it could well be worth it to see if he can reinvent himself as a high end bullpen piece. A different role will be the closest to a fresh start Lackey is going to come by, unless the Red Sox can dump him off in a challenge trade.
I think Fielder would probably become a full time DH provided the money was there, and something like 6/126 or 7/147 would probably be more than enough to persuade him. One thing I'd forgotten about was Youkilis: he may not be capable of playing 3B full time anymore. If that's the case, then this is moot and the Red Sox might be better served moving him to DH. Or just trading him.
Rollins is still a better player than Scutaro. 24M better? No. 2M better? Definitely. However, as someone said above, it's like the Phillies bring him back unless someone overpays.
If you really believe that, then you trade Lackey. Kick in enough cash, or trade for another bad contract.
The Adam Dunn experience (following the Pat Burrell experience) should warn everybody off signing a big contract and converting a player to a full-time DH. Lot's of players don't adjust well to DHing.
Why wouldn't LA just sign Fielder or Pujols directly?
no-trade protection:
Crawford may block deals to two clubs
if traded, club acquiring Crawford may not subsequently trade him to NY Yankees
Nice of the Red Sox to look out for the Yankees' interests like that.
Is that like the BBTF Lackey-Wakefield 3-way rumor, or is this National Inquirer level solid?
An MLB team's credit is rock solid. MLB stands behind the players' contracts.
It is a googleable enough rumor.
After hearing about all this clubhouse nonsense, I don't think I would be quite as conservative as I described earlier. Papi and Paps should go. Not that either of them is primarily responsible for the bad vibes (although I'm thinking Papi didn't help...), but because change is needed, and luckily both play positions that are easy to replace.
If Papi is leaving, I think the obvious new DH is Youkilis; asking him to play another 150 games at 3B would seem mighty risky. So, how about Aramis Ramirez? He's getting up there, so you wouldn't want to give him too many years, but he should be able to provide a couple big-hitting seasons in Fenway.
You could sign H. Bell, K-Rod, or Madson to close. Or, you could go with Bard. Personally, I'd do the latter, although I do like Madson a lot. If you do go Bard, you probably want to sign a setup man... could be a career setup guy like Joel Peralta, or an ex-closer like Frank Francisco, Joe Nathan or Jonathan Broxton. Or maybe you don't want to have anyone looking over Bard's shoulder like that... not sure.
In any event, freeing up Papi/Paps money gives you a lot of options. First you try to go all-in on Sabathia or Reyes, in which case you go cheap at closer and 3B. (The obvious cheap 3B would be Lowrie, especially if it's Reyes.) If and when the two big guns sign elsewhere, you should be able to replace the 3B/closer and still have money left over to add someone like Abreu or Willingham for depth.
I'm not advocating for him, just thinking he has qualities the front office may be looking for.
The truth is that on talent this team should still be playing. They don't need a reboot or big FA signings; they need a change in attitude. If they don't grab one of the marquee guys off the market, I'd expect to see a few "character" signings. Varitek's gone, so they'll want a veteran clubhouse leader. Casey Blake might be a good fit - good reputation in the clubhouse, can give Youkilis days off at 3B and get ABs in LF/RF against LHP.
I wonder if Ryne Sandberg will get a look as manager.
Anyway, Crawford isn't going anywhere; he can't possibly be as bad next year. The team is pretty much also locked in with Gonzalez-Pedroia-Youkilis-Ellsbury-Salty. I would be fine letting Ortiz walk, but I imagine he'll be re-signed (Papelbon won't). For me, the question is what can be done at SS and RF? If they decline Scutaro's option, he's walking... it's a $4.5 million decision, so I'm not sure how they decline. It isn't as if having Scutaro in the fold would impede them in finding a longer-term option (2012-?). I have zero confidence that Reddick can produce enough to play RF full-time, so where do they look?
A rotation fronted by Beckett, Buchholz, and Lester has a leg up on just about any team outside of Philly; some combination of Lackey, Doubront,Weiland and one FA acquisition will fill out the rest.
It would be a lot more fun to blow things up, but, really, this team has an excellent core, plus a couple of bad contracts that are more or less immovable. A few minor FA acquisitions, a few internal promotions (Lavarnway, Alex Wilson), and it's a 92-94 win team with upside. Boo-who.
I don't think I am on a limb here...Gonzalez is not going anywhere; Crawford is staying; Pujols won't be coming to Boston.
Yup. He's OK, but otherwise occupied.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main