User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.5527 seconds
53 querie(s) executed
|
Blogpen
— Our Blogs and Nothing But Our Blogs Hall of Merit: New Eligibles for 1900The 20th Century is almost upon us (that starts in 1901). William McKinley will be facing off with Williams Jenning Bryan in the Presidential Election. Some other facts about our nation this year: - 76 million people Oh yeah, we’ll be electing 2 new members to the Hall of Merit. The top newcomers: Elton Chamberlain JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 28, 2003 at 10:53 PM | 122 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: 1899 Results - Jim O’Rourke and King Kelly Elected to the Hall of MeritJim O’Rourke and King Kelly have been elected by an overwhelming majority to the Hall of Merit. O’Rourke, 48, will be at the ceremony, Kelly died in 1894 and will be honored posthumously. Buck Freeman, Dan McGann, Gus Weyhing, Bill Dinneen and the Washington Senators will face John McGraw, Wilbert Robinson, Jimmy Sheckard, Joe McGinnity and the Baltimore Orioles in the Hall of Merit game this year. Tim Keefe, who finished 4th, was the only player besides the electees to be named on all 31 ballots. Twelve players received at least one first or second place ballot, but Wright and the electees were the only ones to receive more than 3 such votes. RK LY Player Pts Bal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. -- J.O'Rourke 699 31 21 4 3 2 1 2. -- K.Kelly 625 31 4 12 5 7 1 2 3. 6 G.Wright 505 30 1 6 5 2 2 8 2 1 2 1 4. -- T.Keefe 480 31 2 6 4 6 3 3 2 2 1 2 5. -- H.Stovey 410 30 2 1 3 3 5 3 3 2 1 1 2 2 2 6. 5 C.Radbourn 401 29 2 1 3 2 2 1 1 5 3 2 4 2 1 7. 8 H.Richardson 378 29 1 5 1 2 1 4 6 4 1 1 2 1 8. 7 E.Sutton 370 27 1 3 2 6 4 2 2 1 2 2 2 9. 9 A.Spalding 307 23 1 1 3 2 2 2 3 1 3 2 1 1 1 10. 11 J.Start 286 24 1 2 2 1 2 5 2 4 2 1 1 1 11. -- B.Caruthers 279 23 1 1 2 3 2 2 1 4 4 1 1 1 12. -- C.Bennett 272 25 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 2 1 3 2 4 13. -- P.Browning 271 25 2 1 2 3 1 5 3 2 2 2 2 14. 10 E.Williamson 250 25 3 1 3 3 3 6 3 3 15. 13 C.McVey 163 15.5 1 1 3 1 2 1 3 1 2.5 16. 12 P.Galvin 141 13 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 17. 15 L.Pike 91 11 1 3 1 6 18. 14 T.O'Neill 69 7 1 1 1 2 2 19. 18 F.Dunlap* 59 7 1 1 4 1 20. 17 M.Welch 59 7 1 1 1 1 3 21. 19 J.McCormick 41 5 1 1 1 2 22. 31 D.Pearce 32 3 1 1 1 23. 16 C.Jones 30 4 1 3 24. 22 J.Whitney 24 2 1 1 25. 23 T.York 20 3 1 2 26. -- H.Larkin 10 1.5 1 .5 27. 28 B.Mathews 8 1 1 28. 24 T.Bond 7 1 1 29. 20 D.Orr 6 1 1 * won tiebreaker, ahead 7-6 on individual ballots naming either player. Dropped Out: A.Dalrymple (21), H.Wright (25), J.Creighton (26), L.Meyerle (27), J.Clapp (29), Hugh Nichol (30), B.Sunday (32), C.Cummings (33).
JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 28, 2003 at 10:00 PM | 13 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: 1899 BallotFor those of you that avoided the token appearances debate, we’ll stick with what’s in our Constitution for the time being, meaning that Pete Browning IS ELIGIBLE for this election. If we decide to re-write the rule in the future, we’ll make sure it covers Browning being eligible for 1899. Let the games begin . . . balloting will close some time Monday morning (April 28), after I’ve had a cup of coffee and get a minute to announce it. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 21, 2003 at 11:45 PM | 67 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: Centennial Commission?The short Dickey Pearce bio on the other thread inspired this. Would you guys think it’d be reasonable to maybe open up 3 or 4 extra spots for guys that played primarily before the NA? I’m thinking guys like Creighton, Harry Wright, Dickey Pearce (are there any others?). These spots would not impact the other elections. Obviously we can’t quantify them, and most of us are already pulling our hair out. But maybe if there’s a subset of this group that’s interested in doing the research, we could let them go out and pick 3 or 4 guys to add on to the list. It’d be kind of our own Centennial Commission . . . but we make it short and quick and something on the side, and then we get rid of it, it won’t become a Veteran’s Committee. Again, I’m think about guys that starred pre-NA and don’t have much else to offer. For the guys like Joe Start and George Wright, I think we still include them in the normal elections, but the Committee could give us some extra ‘guidance’ with regard to their pre-NA days. But for a Creighton, a Pearce or a Harry Wright (he was a great player too, right?) this would make a lot of sense. And the rest of us don’t have to deal with it. If we do this, I’d initially say just 3 or 4 spots max, unless the Commission would come back and give convincing evidence that a few others are worthy. Again, if we’re doing this, we may as well be complete, but if there isn’t any interest, that’s fine too. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 17, 2003 at 04:25 PM | 120 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: Token appearancesLet’s discuss token appearances here, I’ll lead off with DanG’s post . . . JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 16, 2003 at 09:44 PM | 93 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: New Eligibles for 1899The notable newbies on the ballot (positional thread listing as well). We’ll be electing 2 new members for 1899. Charlie Bennett (C) I could have missed token appearances, my spreadsheet was set up when I wasn’t worried about token appearances, so I definitely could have missed some, please let me know if we need to fix something. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 15, 2003 at 03:32 AM | 100 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: 1898 Results - Deacon White, Paul Hines, George Gore and Ross Barnes Elected to the Hall of MeritThe Class of 1898 is . . . Deacon White, Paul Hines, George Gore and Ross Barnes. All are alive in January 1898 and expected to be in at the induction ceremony this August. The Hall of Merit game between the Cleveland Spiders and Louisville Colonels should be entertaining as well. Louisville has a 24 OF-2B named Wagner that looks like he might turn out okay and Cleveland features Cy Young, who won his 200th game last year. Here is the full balloting, let’s hope the formatting comes out well smallest text on your browser will help . . . Player Pts Bal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1. D.White 657 29 13 10 2 2 1 1 2. P.Hines 654 29 11 13 2 2 1 3. G.Gore 553 29 1 1 10 6 3 3 3 1 1 4. R.Barnes 476 28 3 2 6 6 1 2 5 1 1 1 5. C.Radbourn 427 28 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 8 1 1 6. G.Wright 420 25 2 2 5 4 4 3 3 2 7. E.Sutton 380 27 1 2 4 6 4 2 1 3 1 1 2 8. H.Richardson 366 28 1 2 2 4 2 3 5 2 2 2 2 1 9. A.Spalding 339 25 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 5 3 1 1 1 10. E.Williamson 328 28 1 1 2 1 4 8 2 3 3 1 2 11. J.Start 297 24 2 1 4 6 1 2 3 2 1 1 1 12. P.Galvin 209 21 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 6 3 13. C.McVey 198 19 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 7 1 14. T.O'Neill 132 13 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 3 15. L.Pike 123 14.5 1 2 3 3 4 1.5 16. C.Jones 96 11 2 1 3 1 3 1 17. M.Welch 95 11.17 1 1 1 1 3 2 1.17 18. F.Dunlap 87 10 2 5 1 2 19. J.McCormick 70 7.17 2 2 1 1 1.17 20. D.Orr 49 6 2 3 1 21. A.Dalrymple 31 4 1 2 1 22. J.Whitney 24 2 1 1 23. T.York 22 3 1 2 24. T.Bond 21 3.5 3.5 25. H.Wright 16 1.67 1 .67 26. J.Creighton 12 2 2 27. L.Meyerle 7 1.17 1.17 28. B.Mathews 7 1 1 29. J.Clapp 6 1 1 30. H.Nichol 6 1 1 31. D.Pearce 6 1 1 32. B.Sunday 4 .67 .67 33. C.Cummings 1 .17 .17 JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 15, 2003 at 02:18 AM | 43 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: 1898 BallotLet’s do it. Post your ballots here, with a full explanation please. For a good example of what it might look like (other formats are good too, this is just one that I liked), look here, Andrew Siegel’s post of 11:08 a.m. on April 1, 2003. Please do not tabulate the other votes before posting your ballot, and if you calc them after your ballot, please don’t post them here. If as the week moves on, you realize you want to change your ballot, i.e., you’ve been convinced the John Doe really was better than Jim Smith, note that on this thread, along with the time and date of your original ballot. Please post any comments on ballots on the discussion thread, try to keep this thread clean for just ballots. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: April 07, 2003 at 03:41 PM | 37 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: 1898 Ballot DiscussionThe general tone of the discussion seems to be that we’ll be moving the first election back to 1898. There haven’t been any major objections or anything, so I figured I’d get this thread up quick to give as much time as possible for discussion. I’m posting this thread to allow for new discussions of provisional ballots, because . . . the players discussed will be quite different and that other thread was getting very long. Please don’t add the totals and score them this time . . . if you want to add them up and post a top 10 or something that’s fine (alphabetically, without the total points) that’s fine, but I’d rather not open that can of worms, if people want to do it individually that’s fine, but I don’t think it should be posted. A top 10 accomplishes the goal of seeing the consensus without the other concerns. The discussion of the merits of moving the ballot back to 1898 is on the First Ballot Schedule thread. Our new start date will start the with the old opening day most of us grew up with, about a week into April, not the last day or two of March, if that’s any solace to the people who were pumped about starting on opening day :-) JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: March 27, 2003 at 12:15 AM | 104 comment(s)
Related News: Hall of Merit: Provisional BallotsAs requested . . . feel free to start discussing your ballots . . . I will probably not be able to check back in until Monday, I may pop in at some point before then, but it’s unlikely. Rob Wood has as good of an understanding of this as anyone, he should be able to answer most questions. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: March 20, 2003 at 01:03 AM | 57 comment(s)
Related News: Page 172 of 177 pages ‹ First < 170 171 172 173 174 > Last › | Features Archive | Site Archive
|
Hot Topics |
|||||||||
|
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.5527 seconds |