User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.2831 seconds
61 querie(s) executed
Dialed In — Monday, January 04, 20102009 AL OPD (Offense Plus Defense)The MVP voting went along the lines most people thought it should, and so it won’t be a surprise in who led the American League in OPD in 2009. People did want to claim that Joe Mauer didn’t spread his performance out over as many games as other candidates, like Derek Jeter or Mark Teixeira, but the amount he produced then increases the chances they win the games that he does play. That’s one of the aspects of analyzing data like this. Mauer was a catcher, which makes him very valuable in how well he hits the ball. It really allows the Twins to put better performers at other positions and win more games. Mauer (68.3 XR+AA, 0.8 DRS, 69.1 OPD) outpaced the rest of the AL by 20 runs. That’s huge. Typically, you’ll have a handful of hitters close enough to not quibble about the MVP, or at least there is an argument for another player. When a hitter is two full wins better, those arguments just don’t wash. In the analysis provided here, offense and defense are included, so that moves some of the better hitters down, which isn’t always apparent from looking at numbers generally. Last year, there was considerable discussion of how the calculation used for Extrapolated Runs (XR), that I use for calculating offensive contribution, was possibly off. The offensive portion is XR+AA, which is eXtrapolated Runs (XR), adjusted for park and outs (+), above average at position (AA). You can see how Defensive Runs Saved (DRS) is calculated here. The offensive statistics come from Baseball Reference and the defensive raw data comes from CNNSI.com. My park factors are based on a the last three seasons’ average, averaged with the last season. Please recall that all these are “Runs Against Average”, and the typical Replacement Level (RL) is in the 25-run range. So, if you want to compare these numbers to any other site’s Runs or Wins above RL, add 25 runs or so. Discussions with Tom Tango and other posters at his site (terpnats, I believe) led me to tweak the calculations a bit (doubles were too low, for example). Colin Wyers generously provided me with recent era values for the events in XR, and so I am using those this year (and going forward). I want to thank Tom and his readers and a special thanks to Colin, who helped with this, and generally is a big help in any research I am doing. The second best hitter in the AL, as measured as XR+AA, was Derek Jeter. Jeter had a wonderful season, and many thought of him as MVP with his clutchiness and captainhood. With traditional defensive stats, someone might say he should be MVP, but Jeter was only average defensively, and a little below (effectively average), and the two players that hit most similar to him snuck past with better defense. The Rays had three players in the top ten, and a fourth in the top fifteen. That’s a good number of good players. It turns out two were likely having career seasons, and won’t repeat, but still, the Rays had a good chance to do something. Unfortunately they were in the Yankees division, who had five players in the top 25. Leading the way for the Rays was Ben Zobrist (40.6, 6.0, 46.6), finishing second in OPD. Zobrist found a new power stroke in 2008, and hit a big handful of home runs in short order in a callup. In 2009, he played all over the field, primarily at second base, and played solid defense wherever he was penciled in. His +6 DRS on defense raised his overall performance past Jeter. In third was Teixeira (36.5, 6.5, 43), who also had +6.5 DRS, to sneak past Jeter. Jeter (44.7, -3, 41.7) was fourth in the league. Alex Rodriguez, Johnny Damon and Jorge Posada can be found in the top 25 as well. Looking at overall OPD, the Yankees were roughly twice as good as the next team - the Angels. It was a powerful team, but almost all of it was offense. They managed to stay near average defensively, and had solid pitching. Jason Bartlett (40, 1.5, 41.5) was just trailing behind Jeter, but had fewer PAs. Evan Longoria (22.9, 15.2, 38.1), the third Ray in the top ten, was seventh overall. Carl Crawford (22.7, 7.8, 30.5) was fifteenth in the league. In the sixth spot in OPD is the Indians’ right fielder Shin-Soo Choo (33.7, 4.8, 38.5). That type of quality says something to me about teh Indians ability to identify good outfielders. It isn’t clear they know how to keep them. The Angels’ top player finished 8th in OPD and is a free agent - Chone Figgins (19.7, 17.9, 37.6). They had other top performances from Kendry Morales (19.6, 5.8, 25.4) and Torii Hunter (22.5, 0.4, 22.9). Next on the list was Marco Scutaro (27.6, 9, 36.6). Last year he appeared on this list, and there was a bit of a hullabaloo because he wasn’t a full-time SS and his offense was compared to SS, and so on. Well, he’s back. Scutaro has really blossomed in Toronto, and he will probably be a solid player again next season. I don’t know about top ten, but he’ll be valuable. Rounding out the top ten is the Mariners Ichiro Suzuki (27.4 6.6, 34.0). Some surprises and some confirmations. You always have to consider offense, defense and position when you evaluate a player. On a final note, the Boston Red Sox Kevin Youkilis (29.9, 3.8, 33.6) was eleventh. The Red Sox defense, even allowing for the LF wall was not good. The Sox notably have moved in a more defensive direction this off-season. Here is a Google Doc spreadsheet of all the AL, with team, position, games, PAs, XR+AA, DRS and OPD. Here’s the 2008 OPD so you can compare.
|
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsSteve Austin is not a Baseball Player
(159 - 12:27am, Jul 07) Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter) Defensive Replacement Level Defined (41 - 1:20pm, Mar 14) Last: Foghorn Leghorn Reconciliation - Getting Defensive Stats and Statheads Back Together (30 - 1:42pm, Apr 28) Last: GuyM Handicapping the NL East (77 - 2:02pm, Oct 15) Last: The Interdimensional Council of Rickey!'s Landing Buerhle a Great Move (79 - 8:43am, Feb 04) Last: Foghorn Leghorn Weekly DRS Update (Defensive Stats Thru July 19, 2010) (3 - 2:47pm, Sep 27) Last: Home Run Teal & Black Black Black Gone! You Have Got To Be Kidding Me (8 - 3:52am, May 01) Last: Harris Weekly DRS Update (Defensive Stats Thru July 4, 2010) (2 - 4:05pm, Jul 11) Last: NewGrass Weekly DRS Update (Defensive Stats Thru Jun 29, 2010) (5 - 12:47pm, Jul 04) Last: Harveys Wallbangers Weekly DRS Update (Defensive Stats Thru Jun 13, 2010) (15 - 1:51am, Jun 16) Last: Chris Dial Weekly DRS Update (Defensive Stats through games of June 6, 2010) (17 - 7:08pm, Jun 14) Last: Foghorn Leghorn Daily Dose of Defense (41 - 8:31pm, Jun 04) Last: Tango 2009 NL OPD (Offense Plus Defense) (37 - 11:22pm, Feb 17) Last: Foghorn Leghorn NOT authorized by Major League Baseball or its Member Teams (40 - 7:32pm, Feb 16) Last: GregQ 2009 AL OPD (Offense Plus Defense) (35 - 9:05pm, Jan 05) Last: Foghorn Leghorn |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.2831 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. alilisd Posted: January 04, 2010 at 12:06 PM (#3426972)Data for last year, UZR from fangraphs, TZ is the Rtot column from Baseball Reference
Player POS UZR DRS TZ
Jason Bay LF -13.0 -21.51 7.9
Jacoby Ellsbury CF -18.6 -12.23 -9.3
JD Drew RF 10.5 1.33 21.0
Data for 2008
Player POS UZR DRS TZ
Jason Bay LF -8.0 -11.23 -10.7
Jacoby Ellsbury OF 16.5 -4.59 21.8
JD Drew RF 6.3 -7.69 -4.5
Manny Ramirez LF 1.5 -10.77 4.1
Coco Crisp CF -8.6 -14.94 -7.0
Except for Ellsbury 2009, DRS is the lowest of the three in every row.
The maximum amount of disagreement between two systems is for Ellsbury 2008, where TZ & DRS disagree by 26 runs. 26 runs!!!
If you want to give a mulligan because Jacoby was playing all 3 OF positions during that time, TZ & DRS disagree about JD Drew 2009's value by 20 runs.
It seems that whatever park adjustment DRS does for Boston is too strong.
I am not buying that Drew was anything close to that good this past season. He only played 1080 innings (77-80%).
Don't you only want to remove "wall balls" that hit higher than a normal wall (~8-10 ft)? Otherwise, you're taking out catchable balls.
Of course, I don't know if this is possible from the data.
I believe it also includes PB and errors.
I looked into this last year WRT to Scutaro (counting him at SS when he played all over). The time at DH for Mauer, and using those PAs with a higher baseline won't move his score but a run or two at most (depending on how he did during that time). I suppose for Catcher => DH that could be a few more runs. Accounting for three runs isn't worth the exercise though. It is substantially more work for a negligible gain, and many hitters get PAs at different positions (I don't adjust for pinch hitting PAs either). Overall, it just doesn't matter (IMO).
Okay, so I did a Q&D;version: Mauer vs Catchers is 68 runs (in 606 PAs). 28 games is 20% of his games played. Using that to estimate his PAs, and converting his XR+AA to 80% Catcher and 20% DH, I get 65.2 runs.
So, three runs in this extreme example (catcher with the lowest per out production, versus DH with the highest). It just doesn't matter, no longer IMO.
"Catchers are done as an amalgam of caught stealing per inning above average, stolen bases per inning above average, errors per inning above average and passed balls per inning above average, at an average base advancement of 0.31 runs per. I have vacillated between a couple of catcher run value calculations."
It doesn't include WPs, which I think is completely wrong due to the 95% standard that separates WPs and PBs. That's the C+ score, measuring traditional catcher defense. There is catcher ZR, albeit pointless (low is -1; high is 0.4 or so).
Does this explain Denard Span's curious defensive rating? He's ranked second defensively in the AL for CF (behind Gomez). Span is a very good defensive corner OF, and an ok CF, but not that nearly good. Does all the excellence in the corners get guesstimated into excellence in CF?
They are sometimes dependent on the official scorer. When I'm scoring a game, I *always* check the box score to see whether a pitch that elcudes the catcher is scored as a WP and PB, even when I'm 100% certain.
I agree that it doesn't matter much.
-- MWE
Wait - yes, he could have a high overall rating by dominating a corner OF, and those runs saved are added to his CF total. (Checking):
Yes, Span dominated LF: 6/3/-0.5
i think that would be the biggest improvement for outfield defense calculations. you may also want to consider it for other stadiums with tall walls (houston, seattle, etc).
Until I move that to video, it will be a while.
I suppose this is on the FAQ page...
65 plate attempts for Carp. 621 for Konerko. It's a sample size issue. Anyone can look good (or terrible) in small doses.
This, and the fact that Chris is measuring production above average. If you adjusted to runs above replacement, Konerko would get ~20 R's added for playing nearly a full season (621 PAs). Carp would only get 2 or 3 R's for his 65 PAs so Konerko would end up ~+25 RAR and Carp ~+7.
Being an average MLBer has a ton of value that doesn't show up directly in RAA.
Fault doesn't really matter. Say every wild pitch is the fault of the pitcher, and you've got a staff that throws 50 wild pitches on a season. Then Yadier Molina comes around, and somehow gets in front of enough of those terrible pitches to save 20 of them from being wild pitches. That's value.
The homerun is always the fault of a pitcher. But if a centerfielder like Torii Hunter can bring two of those back per season, he's providing value.
It should only be ignored if the catcher has nothing to do with it. Say a catcher has a very low percentage of wild pitches for a few years. Then he gets signed by a team that threw a lot of wild pitches. If he brings down the number of WP, he's shown a skill. If those pitchers keep throwing the same # of WP with the new catcher, then there is no skill, it's all on the pitchers and random noise as far as the catchers are concerned.
I think it's a skill, you don't, but I don't think either of us has the data. If I'm wrong, and there's no more evidence of a catcher's ability on WP than there is for catcher ERA being meaningful, I'll gladly revise my catcher ratings.
One thing I've noticed from the comment thread is that there are a few areas where OPD doesn't try to get something exactly right, because it's not worth the effort/complexity for a minor gain (for example, adjusting DRS for park, or counting PAs by position). I agree with Dial about the tradeoff, but I do want to point out that most of the top ten is within ten runs of each other. I don't think it's worth adjusting OPD to gain a run here or there in accuracy, but we should remember that uncertainty when using it to rank players or whatever.
I don't disagree that when players are within 5 runs or so, and maybe ten, we look a little more closely. However, I'd suggest hat the difference in the players isn't likely to be definitive anyway, as the error in the measures we have (offense or defense) are accurate to a run or two. There's enough difference in PFs use, specific run environment, situational events to say that, when players are within 5 runs (or so), they are "equal".
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main