User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.4184 seconds
41 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Gonfalon Cubs > Discussion
| ||||||||
Gonfalon Cubs — Cubs Baseball for Thinking Fans Monday, October 03, 2016Five minute non-specific opponent playoff previewI’ll write a little more after the NL WC game on Wednesday, once we know who the Cubs are playing (quick thought - I don’t have a preference; both the Mets and Giants have obvious strengths and ways they could beat the Cubs, and also plenty of weaknesses and reasons the Cubs can beat them). In the meantime, here’s some quick thoughts about how things are looking. First though, 103 wins. Wow. I hope we can fully appreciate how great this season way, regardless of how this month turns out. This was easily the best Cubs team of my lifetime, and arguably my parents’ too. Reasons for Optimism: 1. Pitching and defense. The Cubs had the best pitching and defense in all of baseball this season (or at least the best combination of the two that doesn’t try to assign credit solely to one over the other). The rotation was deep and strong all year, though that matters less in the playoffs. Lester and Hendricks have been as good as any other teams’ top pair, and Arrieta could still easily put together a dominant stretch (even if that looks less likely today than it did a few months ago). Lackey had another solid year and has pitched in the playoffs plenty (I don’t know how much playoff experience really matters, just ask Lackey about last postseason). Chapman at the end of the pen has also really solidified that group. The Cubs likely have the on-paper advantage regardless of opponent. Defensively, the Cubs are strong up and down the lineup, with a couple of small exceptions (below average in LF when Bryant isn’t there, Montero is not great behind the plate, and Zobrist is solid though not as rangy as Baez). Maddon can put out a defensive group to compliment the pitcher and game situation. This is a nice perk in case of low scoring games. 2. Baserunning. I think the Cubs ran into a few more outs later in the season, but overall, they have a great baserunning team. Announcers will talk about their ability to “manufacture” runs, which can be overstated, but might be important on cold nights with the wind blowing in (both games 1 and 2 in the NLDS are night games). 3. Overall offense. The Cubs had one of the best offenses overall, and a lot of that is due to their patience at the plate. They take a lot of walks, and make pitchers work hard. They have power from just about every spot in the lineup (I’m looking at you, Heyward). They still strike out, but a bit less than last year, which will matter a lot. 4. Maddon. I think this roster will really give Joe the opportunity to shine, and hopefully wring out some advantages through these serieses. He tried a lot of different things this season, the Cubs are very flexible, and I think he’s going to have an advantage in almost every possible series. Reasons for Pessimism: 1. Bottom of the lineup. I’ve heard a couple of analysts talk about this, and it can be overstated, but if the Cubs are running out Heyward/Coghlan Montero in the 6/7/8 spots, it may make things easier on the other team. By the times the Cubs are facing the LOOGY brigades, the Cubs should have the ability to PH to get matchups they like. But I do fear what happens if guys like Bryant or Rizzo struggle at all and where the offense comes from. This is not a problem that is unique to the Cubs, and outside of Boston, every team has a weaker part that can be exploitable. 2. Middle relief. Rondon isn’t right, so that just means there’s a little less certainty when Maddon goes to the pen. There’s a lot of options down there, but every individual person has their own questions and none have been consistent reliable all season. Again, middle relief is usually the weakest part of every team, and I like the Cubs’ pen more than any other NL playoff team. So here’s just hoping Joe pushing the right buttons, but that he can go to the pen when/if the starters should be pulled. 3. Randomness of the playoffs. This is not meant to imply the Cubs “should” win, or if they lose it’s simply because the playoffs are a crapshoot. The Cubs have the best odds, and I’d rather this roster than any other, but things happen in short series. Here’s hoping luck is on their side for once. 4. Jinxes/Weight of expectations. I don’t believe in jinxes or curses, so I’m already throwing that out. I like to believe that the idea of pressure won’t be a problem; the Cubs are young, but they have guys who’ve won and who’ve played big games before. Even the young guys all got a taste of the atmosphere last season. Using some sort of intangible as a narrative crutch is appealing, but it’s really impossible to know if someone will or won’t come through in a big moment. Moses Taylor loves a good maim
Posted: October 03, 2016 at 05:14 PM | 27 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: |
Support BBTFThanks to BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsI guess we're still doing this?
(54 - 10:23am, Oct 07) Last: Brian C This all sucks (41 - 11:13pm, Sep 23) Last: Brian C Darvish Trade Rumors (2 - 10:26pm, Dec 28) Last: Swedish Chef Cubs Postseason Thoughts (12 - 12:27pm, Oct 03) Last: Moses Taylor loves a good maim 60 Second Season Preview (84 - 1:01pm, Sep 28) Last: McCoy Being cheap is not a plan (110 - 1:15pm, Jul 03) Last: Moses Taylor loves a good maim Regrets (160 - 10:25pm, Dec 18) Last: Walt Davis Approaching the Finish Line (137 - 11:53pm, Sep 29) Last: Brian C 2019 Season Predictions (164 - 10:45pm, Sep 24) Last: Itchy Row Taking the current temperature (387 - 11:24am, Sep 16) Last: Andere Richtingen That was fun (488 - 5:41pm, Jul 28) Last: Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Spring Training (86 - 2:15pm, Mar 26) Last: Moses Taylor loves a good maim Now what? (427 - 3:43pm, Feb 07) Last: Voodoo The Final Push (346 - 11:16am, Oct 03) Last: Moses Taylor loves a good maim The Third Third (296 - 6:20pm, Sep 04) Last: Moses Taylor loves a good maim |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.4184 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Andere RichtingenBut if we're going to talk about state of mind, there is nothing better for that than the late inning come back they managed on Sunday. So I am feeling pretty good about all of that. That should re-ring the confidence bell in everyone's head. The last time the Cubs had four days off following a bad stretch capped with a late inning win, they did pretty well.
I'm not too worried about any of the above negative factors, except for the "randomness of the playoffs" truism which every team faces. Heyward/Coghlan/Montero aren't going to play every day, but in the last couple of months, Coghlan has picked up from where he left off last season. I am interested in seeing what Heyward will do with the stat clocks all reset to zero. Montero, well, he has had some key hits lately as well. On any given day there is definitely room for one of Baez and Contreras to fill one of those spots. I don't worry about relief. It's a good bullpen overall, and they will have some good long guys to cover things if a starter falters.
How the Cubs Stack Up Within Baseball History
Maddon's playoff message
Hendicks in the playoffs (this seems to imply Hendricks will start game 2, which is something we've been speculating about here).
Feel free to drop in any other previews or news you find here.
Every time I think of that, I think of the 2000 Yankees. They lost their last 7, 15 of their last 18, and then went 11-5 in the playoffs.
One thing I cannot find on BBREF - or anywhere - the Cubs Wrigley night games record... I remember some pretty memorable wins - and I'm guessing it's probably pretty good, but wish I could find the numbers somewhere.
So far as opponents, I think I've decided I really want the Mets. I think they're both the easier team to get past -- and of course, there's vengeance for last year on the menu. Obviously, given the way 2015 went - the fact that the Cubs actually had their worst H2H record against the Mets scares me not in the least (in fact, the sweep came during the Times of Troubles... and I've written that period off as an aberration).
Have the Cubs announced the roster yet? I'm assuming they get to wait until they see the opponent -- though, I'm not exactly sure what would change.
In an ode to Vin Scully, they replayed his open from the 1989 NLCS -- it's worth the re-hearing...
When the Cubs had those 3 in the lineup together the last couple of weeks, Heyward hit 5, Russell 6, Coghlan 7, and Montero 8, which is somehow even worse since they meant Heyward was either coming up with guys on or leading off an inning (based on my faulty memory, so I can be proven wrong; this was the combo for at least 3 games). If they are going to play all 3 (and it looks likely in at least the Arrieta start), I'd consider going Montero 5, Russell 6, Coghlan 7 and Heyward 8.
By far the biggest criticism I have of Joe this year is how he's left Heyward up in the lineup. First, it was keeping him in the 2 hole: 306PAs with a .240/.325/.332 line; he's hit 6th for 189PAs and gone .247/.302/.368. He has 12PAs leading off, 39PAs hitting 5th, and 42PAs hitting 7th. He should undoubtedly be hitting 8th (or 9th, with the pitcher 8th), but I could live with 7th with Ross 8th on Lester days. Since we're talking about the lineup, it's a relatively minor complaint.
And yet, the Cubs went 3-2-1 in those games. The smart money is to always bet on the field against any specific team, but reading through the concerns here really just reinforces to me how strong the Cubs are. Everybody has weak links at the bottom of their lineup. Even the Red Sox have two starters listed at BB-Ref w/ OPS+ of 88 (Travis Shaw, 3B) and 84 (Brock Holt, LF). Everybody is concerned about their 4th and 5th relievers.
As for concerns specifically about Coghlan/Heyward/Montero, I don't see the Cubs running out a lineup that includes those three. There's no way Baez isn't starting somewhere in the infield, which moves either Bryant or Zobrist to the outfield, which only leaves one open corner outfield spot. And I wouldn't be at all surprised to see that spot filled by Contreras when Montero is catching and by Soler when Contreras is catching.
I'm really looking forward to the next few weeks. And I fully expect to be able to look back fondly on this season regardless of what happens from here on.
Ditto on the first, but it depends on the second... Certainly, a fun season. I also certainly recognize that even if you go in as the favorite, the odds are still against you vs the field come playoff time.
As I think we all said last year, while the NLCS sucked, it was certainly more than we expected and it was hard to feel too bad given both the fun and the future. The fun was there again this season and then some, and the future is still quite bright... but if it doesn't happen this year, it's gonna hurt bad.
I'd rather not find out where a theoretical 2016 heartbreak would rank, but even given the playoff crapshoot stuff, I'll be mightily disappointed with anything short of a title.
I am severely disappointed at the shoddiness of Montero's methodology.
It happened multiple times down the stretch, so we'll see, and I sure hope we don't. Some specifics though:
Lineup in the last Lester start: Fowler/Bryant(LF)/Rizzo/Zobrist/Russell/Heyward/Baez(3b)/Ross. Exact same lineup 3 previous Lester starts. This seems like a safe bet for game 1, and just about any Lester start, regardless of other SP handedness. Maybe, maybe Soler in LF with Bryant at 3rd, but Baez at 3rd has been really common for Lester starts most of the season (helps against the bunting).
Lineup in the last Hendricks start: Fowler/Bryant/Rizzo/Zobrist/Russell/Heyward/Soler/Contreras. Start before that was a Fowler/Russell day off, so Coghlan hit leadoff and Contreras 4th. Contreras is Hendricks' catcher. Start before that, Montero caught him (and hit right after Heyward), and Baez played 2nd. I'd assume it's most likely that group from the last game, with a chance of Coghlan over Soler depending on opposing pitcher.
Lineup in the last Arrieta start: Fowler/Bryant/Rizzo/Zobrist/Heyward/Russell/Coghlan/Montero; vs righty and no Soler available. Start before that was the same group, but Russell and Heyward were swapped so we had the 3 lefties 6/7/8. Soler didn't PH, so can't remember if he was around or not (I think not). Start before that was Rizzo/Fowler/Russell day off, Contreras caught, and Jake was bombed (which may have cemented the Montero as his catcher thing). Unless it's a lefty, I'd say we see Coghlan/Montero/Heyward Jake starts.
Lineup in the last Lackey start: Bryant/Russell/Heyward day off, Montero caught. Previous start was also Russell day off, but Montero caught and Heyward hit 5th, Baez 6th (SS), Montero 7, Coghlan 8. So no really clue here about the most likely group.
The random Buchanan start: Fowler/Bryant/Rizzo/Zobrist/Heyward/Russell/Coghlan/Montero; that was against a righty and Soler was unavailable, but yuck. That's the one that apparently is stuck in my head - both for Heyward 5th and Montero as the starter over Contreras (Federowicz started the day before in the scrub game, and Ross the day after, so it wasn't a rest thing). Not much to gleam from the Montgomery or Hammel starts, as there were random lineups (Contreras regularly caught him).
One aspect of the Cubs offense that offsets this fear is that the team is certainly quite adept at working counts and massaging BBs. I think we've seen a fair number of games this year where either the bats aren't firing early or the guy on the mound is throwing well and the team just grinds them out of the game, maybe breaking through late or getting to the bullpen.
Of course, with the dumpster fire masquerading as a bullpen in SF -- that's probably the best matchup... the Mets bullpen is a fair bit better.
---
Cool.
It is a cool cover though.
Official. No surprise there.
I think this curse will have to get in line behind the dozens of others that precede it.
Is SI still a thing?
Yeah, I was surprised. I thought it would only be an SI-at-the-top-of-the-homepage jinx by now.
and it appears it is 1989 that will be avenged, the even-year curse that will be broken, and the legend of Bumgarner that will be put to rest.
When it comes to the SP, we obviously dodge a huge bullet by only seeing Bumgarner once. If the Giants could start him twice, I think you'd honestly have to give the rotation edge to the Giants if only because the Postseason Jesus really puts you in a hole. As it stands -- Cueto is certainly a fine ace, but except for last year's WS winner, he's been rather pedestrian in the postseason. The Cubs have also, of course, seen him a lot going back to his Reds days. He beat the Cubs in his only start against them last month, but even while Lester isn't Bumgarner (because no one is), Lester has a pretty nifty postseason resume himself. Bullpen Jesus scares me not in the slightest - which I'm sure means he throws a no-hitter in game 2. If 2015 Jake can show up in the MB showdown - that would be great. All in all, it feels like the Cubs have a slight edge here thanks to schedule. Lester/Cueto is probably a wash, but I'll take Hendricks/Lackey over BPJ/Moore any day.
The bullpen really ought to be a massive Cubs advantage. Even if Romo managed to put out the conflagration over the last couple weeks, I have every confidence that our pen ought to be able to do a better job of either holding leads or keeping games close, while I think we can certainly get to their pen. I like our setup guys better, I like our middle relief a LOT better, I like our nominal LOOGYs better, and the closer is no contest. Optimally, the pens won't matter - but it's nice to have this advantage in our back pockets.
I do think the Giants lineup is a bit underrated -- but their propensity to put the ball in play also plays well into the Cubs defensive strengths. Our lineup goes deeper - and of their offensive core (Belt/Posey/Pence) -- only Belt is really any kind of hot right now. Posey has had a down year and Pence obviously missed a lot of time. I think the Giants do have a very underrated 2nd tier in their lineup -- Panik is a grinder, Crawford has legitimately learned out to hit, Span is sort of a discount brand Fowler, etc. It would be nice if Heyward suddenly came to life, but that ship seems to have sailed long ago for 2016. Still, our big bats are better than their big bats and I think our secondary weapons are also a smaller, but still measurable bit better than theirs.
The Giants are probably the 2nd best defensive team in the NL -- but the Cubs, of course, are probably the NL's best defensive team. Other than (NO JINX!) curse anomalies, hard for me to see how we don't at least fight them to a draw in the field. Baez, of course, also gives the Cubs a premier bench glove all over the IF. I suspect Crawford wins the NL GG, but Russell probably finishes 2nd.
I'd likewise give the Cubs' bench the edge -- we ought to have plenty of options from both the left and right. The bench is flexible - only enhanced by Bryant and Zobrist's ability to play all over, too. Szczur (assuming he's on the roster) gives you a PR. Baez alone constitutes a nice glove option wherever you want to use him. Finally, unlike most 3rd catcher options that teams decide to carry in the postseason -- the Cubs' trio doesn't really have a worthless, break-glass-in-emergency member since Montero remembered how to hit in September. It's a really nice thing when you've got three catchers, all of whom can hit and two of whom can play defense (or even all three, if you want to cancel out Montero's throwing problems with his pitch-framing).
I'm gonna say Cubs in four.
I'm hoping for a relatively anxiety-free series that goes according to script... Lester outduels Cueto and the Cubs win a game 1 squeaker. Game 2 is a laugher. Game 3 goes how you might expect a Bumgarner game to go (my hope would be that Jake duels him to a near-draw, if only to make me feel better about future Jake starts)... and game 4 wraps it up.
Let's hope it doesn't come to this but I'm fully prepared to hate that guy for the rest of my life.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main