User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.5707 seconds
43 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Hall of Merit > Discussion
| ||||||||
Hall of Merit — A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best Tuesday, December 16, 20082009 Results: Henderson, McGraw and Smith are Now Immortalized in the Hall of Merit!Legendary speedster and leadoff batter Rickey Henderson became the 15th player to earn a place in Hall of Merit unanimously (past unanimous selections include Hank Aaron, Wade Boggs, Joe DiMaggio, Lou Gehrig, Lefty Grove, Walter Johnson, Mickey Mantle, Stan Musial, Willie Mays, Babe Ruth, Mike Schmidt, Honus Wagner, Ted Williams and Cy Young). Fiery Baltimore Oriole third baseman John McGraw finally made it after a near-record 100 previous attempts (Pete Browning entered the HoM on his 107th try). He had 31% of all possible points. Last but not least, excellent switch-hitting outfielder Reggie Smith cracked the HoM on his 22nd try with 30% of all possible points. Rounding out the top-ten were: Phil Rizzuto (first time in the top-ten!), David Cone (him, too!), Gavvy Cravath (another one!), Tommy Leach, Bucky Walters, Luis Tiant (another top-ten newbie!) and Cannonball Dick Redding (slipped a little this year). Thanks to OCF and Ron with the tally, as well as Joe for creating the whole experience. See all of you next year! RK LY Player PTS Bal 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 n/e Rickey Henderson 960 40 40 2 7 John McGraw 297 16 4 4 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 Reggie Smith 292 20 2 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 13 Phil Rizzuto 245 18 2 2 3 4 1 1 1 2 2 5 15 David Cone 241 18 1 2 1 4 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 6 11 Gavvy Cravath 240 22 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 3 7 6 Tommy Leach 237 18 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 3 2 8 5 Bucky Walters 232 17 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 5 1 9 12 Luis Tiant 231 18 1 1 1 2 2 4 1 1 2 2 1 10 8 Cannonball Dick Redding 227 13 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 9 Kirby Puckett 202 14 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 12 10 Bob Johnson 194 15 1 2 3 3 2 1 2 1 13 29 Rick Reuschel 189 12 4 2 1 1 2 1 1 14 14 Hugh Duffy 185 13 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 15 23 Don Newcombe 183 15 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 1 1 16 22 Dave Concepción 161 12 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 17 17 Tony Perez 146 10 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 18 19 Dizzy Dean 144 10 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 19 25 George Van Haltren 133 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 20 20 Vic Willis 131 9 1 1 2 2 1 2 21 46 Johnny Pesky 126 10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 22 33 Bobby Bonds 122 10 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 23 24 Burleigh Grimes 120 10 1 2 1 3 2 1 24 27 Mickey Welch 119 9 1 3 1 1 2 1 25 28 Dale Murphy 113 9 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 26 18 Bus Clarkson 113 8 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 27T 44 Bill Monroe 105 8 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 27T 16 Ken Singleton 105 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 29 30 Albert Belle 103 10 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 30 21 Tommy Bridges 103 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 31 31 Elston Howard 99 10 1 1 3 1 2 2 32 43 Ben Taylor 87 8 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 33 34 Bob Elliott 81 6 1 2 1 1 1 34 40 Ed Williamson 81 5 1 1 1 1 1 35 47 Bert Campaneris 80 5 2 1 2 36 26 Lou Brock 79 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 37 42 Pie Traynor 75 7 1 1 2 1 1 1 38 32 Norm Cash 72 7 1 1 2 1 2 39 35 Tommy John 66 5 2 1 1 1 40 37 Rusty Staub 61 5 1 1 2 1 41 38 Lee Smith 61 4 1 1 1 1 42 55 Fred Dunlap 60 5 1 1 1 1 1 43 52 Urban Shocker 58 6 1 2 1 1 1 44 60 Frank Tanana 57 4 1 1 1 1 45 45 Vern Stephens 56 4 2 1 1 46 51 Sal Bando 53 4 1 1 1 1 47 39 Carl Mays 52 4 1 1 1 1 48 36 Larry Doyle 47 3 1 1 1 49T 67 Addie Joss 46 3 1 1 1 49T 41 Wally Schang 46 3 1 2 51 56T Ed Cicotte 44 3 1 1 1 52 -- Babe Adams 39 2 1 1 53 53T Chuck Klein 35 3 1 1 1 54 78 Sam Rice 34 3 1 1 1 55 86T Don Mattingly 33 2 1 1 56 53T Leroy Matlock 31 2 1 1 57 48 Dave Bancroft 29 4 1 1 2 58 65 Jimmy Ryan 29 2 1 1 59 68T Jack Quinn 27 2 1 1 60T 73T Jim Rice 26 3 1 1 1 60T 73T Rabbit Maranville 26 3 1 1 1 62T 50T Ernie Lombardi 26 2 1 1 62T 91 Dizzy Trout 26 2 2 64T 58 Lefty Gomez 25 2 1 1 64T 71 Jim Kaat 25 2 1 1 66T 56T Wilbur Cooper 24 2 1 1 66T 89T Sam Leever 24 2 1 1 66T 62 Bruce Sutter 24 2 1 1 69T 73 George J. Burns 23 2 1 1 69T 49 Orlando Cepeda 23 2 1 1 71T 72 Dwight Gooden 22 2 1 1 71T 79 Dave Parker 22 2 2 73 68T Thurman Munson 21 3 1 2 74T 96T Tommy Bond 21 2 1 1 74T 76T Tony Oliva 21 2 1 1 74T 80 Bobby Veach 21 2 1 1 77 61 Al Rosen 20 2 1 1 78 -- Hack Wilson 18 2 1 1 79 n/e Kevin Appier 17 2 1 1 80 83 Chuck Finley 17 1 1 81 70 Buddy Bell 16 2 1 1 82 66 Frank Chance 14 1 1 83 64 Tony Mullane 13 1 1 84 101T Ron Cey 12 2 2 85T 92T Fielder Jones 12 1 1 85T -- Deacon Phillipe 12 1 1 87T 94T Elmer Smith 10 1 1 87T 96T Jack Fournier 10 1 1 87T -- Hilton Smith 10 1 1 87T 59 Lance Parrish 10 1 1 91T 101T Dom DiMaggio 9 1 1 91T 81 Frank Howard 9 1 1 91T -- George Kell 9 1 1 91T 94T Jack Morris 9 1 1 95T 86T Tony Lazzeri 8 1 1 95T -- Bill Madlock 8 1 1 97T 99T Charlie Hough 7 1 1 97T -- Al Oliver 7 1 1 99 -- Billy Nash 6 1 1 Dropped Out: Luis Aparicio (75), Luke Easter (76T), Jim McCormick (82), Brian Downing (84), Jose Canseco (85), Jack Clark (88), Carlos Morán (89T), Gene Tenace (92T), Virgil Trucks (96T), Mickey Vernon (99T), Jim Fregosi (101T), Orel Hershiser (101T). Ballots Cast: 40
John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy
Posted: December 16, 2008 at 12:19 AM | 158 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: |
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsMock Hall of Fame Ballot 2024
(13 - 11:23pm, Dec 08) Last: Space Force fan 2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (191 - 7:43pm, Dec 07) Last: Howie Menckel 2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Ballot (4 - 3:10pm, Dec 07) Last: Jaack Hall of Merit Book Club (17 - 10:20am, Dec 07) Last: cookiedabookie Mock Hall of Fame 2024 Contemporary Baseball Ballot - Managers, Executives and Umpires (28 - 10:54pm, Dec 03) Last: cardsfanboy Most Meritorious Player: 2023 Results (2 - 5:01pm, Nov 29) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 2023 Ballot (12 - 5:45pm, Nov 28) Last: kcgard2 Most Meritorious Player: 2023 Discussion (14 - 5:22pm, Nov 16) Last: Bleed the Freak Reranking First Basemen: Results (55 - 11:31pm, Nov 07) Last: Chris Cobb Mock Hall of Fame Discussion Thread: Contemporary Baseball - Managers, Executives and Umpires 2023 (15 - 8:23pm, Oct 30) Last: Srul Itza Reranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Results (7 - 9:28am, Oct 17) Last: Chris Cobb Ranking the Hall of Merit Pitchers (1893-1923) - Discussion (68 - 1:25pm, Oct 14) Last: DL from MN Reranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Ballot (13 - 2:22pm, Oct 12) Last: DL from MN Reranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Discussion (39 - 10:42am, Oct 12) Last: Guapo Reranking Shortstops: Results (7 - 8:15am, Sep 30) Last: kcgard2 |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.5707 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Some individual consensus scores:
Bleed the Freak: -5
Dan R: -6
DL from MN: -6
mulder & scully: -6
TomH: -7
Chris Cobb: -7
...
Joe Dimino: -12
dan b: -12 (medians
...
OCF: -14
John Murphy: -14
...
Adam Schafer: -16
SWW: -17
Daryn: -19
Patrick W: -19
karlmagnus: -22
yest: -23
A listing of those who voted in at least one of 2006, 2007, or 2008 but not
in 2009:
Andrew M.
Andrew Siegel
DanG
David Foss
Don F (Pedro Feliz Navidad)
Eric Chalek (Dr. Chaleeko)
EricC
favre
Got Melky
Jim Sp
KJOK
rico vanian
Tom D
Craig K
fra paolo
Mark S. (jschmeagol)
Thane of Bagarth
Trevor P
Last year's top leftovers were Smith, Walters, Leach, McGraw
So McGraw not as big a surprise
Very happy to see Rizzuto this close. Cravath with a nice bump too.
We lost some very recognizable names this year, good list OCF.
To those of you on that list, any reason why you didn't vote? Anything we could have done differently that might have helped you send one in, that we could do for 2010?
electees are not in caps
in a way, these are most-oft debated candidates
Redding passes Waddell for 8th, and 3rd among pitchers
Cravath grabs 21st
McGraw passes Pearce, McVey and Grant to retire at No. 36
Reggie Smith was in top 50 actives, now retired, I need a replacement, also did anyone catch Poles and/or Bancroft?
TOP 50, ALL-TIME
DUFFY...... 27018.5
VAN HALTREN 26786.5
Beckley.... 25856
Browning... 24502.5
Childs..... 18484
WELCH...... 18447
Griffith... 17924
REDDING.... 17765
Waddell.... 17596
Jennings... 16976
CJones..... 15875
TLEACH..... 15378
Bresnahan.. 14965
Sisler..... 13892
Pike....... 13399
Sewell..... 12769
RYAN....... 12641.5
Mendez..... 12555
Thompson... 12349
Roush...... 12005
CRAVATH.....11684
Bennett.... 11503
WALTERS.....11296
Moore...... 10904
Rixey...... 10789
Caruthers.. 10704
Beckwith.... 9896
DOYLE....... 9718
HStovey......9576
GRIMES.......9389
BJOHNSON.....9279
Mackey.......8930
AOms.........8385
Start........8378.5
McGinnity....8232
McGraw.......8145
DPearce......8073
McVey........7985.5
FGrant.......7969.5
Kiner........7746
BMONROE......7722
Suttles......7690
NFox.........7587
Trouppe......7494
WFerrell.....7259
CBell........6968
SCHANG.......6767
Galvin.......6585
WILLIAMSON...6502
Keller.......6424
Others in active top 50
Willis 5877, Dean 5618, Elliott 4979, Bridges 4689, Joss 4666, BTaylor 4351, Rizzuto 4121, TPerez 4013, FChance 3684, CMays 3633, Traynor 3601, NCash 3573, Cepeda 3428, (ReSmith 3397), Tiant 3279, SRice 3219, McCormick 3194X, Cicotte 3171, Brock 3053, EHoward 2719, Tiernan 2692X, FJones 2618, Singleton 2568, Klein 2529, BoBonds 2484, VStephens 2435, Veach 2389, GJBurns 2361, Staub 2309, Mullane 2274, BClarkson 2240, Lombardi 2155, Dunlap 2144, Bancroft 1988, Poles 1842X
Nice grab in getting Berra and White to join HOM.
- We have elected these players to the Hall of Merit who are on the current Hall of Fame ballot - Blyleven, Dawson, Henderson, McGwire, Raines, and Trammell.
- All but Dawson were rather easily elected; we're not strongly endorsing Dawson, I'd say.
- We have ignored PEDs/steroids in McGwire's case.
- We are seriously looking at Cone, Murphy gets some support, and Tommy John gets a few votes. We've rejected the rest almost entirely.
- We are not heartily endorsting players like John McGraw (player only) or Reggie Smith or Dawson (or even Cone, who got close this year). Rather, we are saying that if we are to produce a matching number of HOMers to the HOF cast, these are the 'end-gamers' who would replace the mindless crony picks of HOF, basically.
WARP1: Rabbit Maranville 134.9 (133.5)
Pitcher: Frank Tanana 109 (112.5)
WARP3: Tanana 106.5 (111.3)
Non-Pitcher: Tony Perez 106.4 (Dave Concepcion 109.7)
And with McGraw's induction, there are new leaders for OBP, single-season and career
OBP: Hugh Duffy, 1894 .502 (18th overall)/Bill Joyce .435 (7th)
Well, that was 1894. BB-ref gives a ballpark-adjusted league average OBP as .405. Or in other words, Duffy's .440/.502/.694 was an OPS+ of 172, which is essentially the same OPS+ as Yaz's 1968 .301/.426/.495. BB-ref gives an "AIR" factor of 138 for Duffy's 1894, as opposed to 86 for Yaz 1968.
The .435 for Joyce is his career OBP. Fun fact about Bill Joyce: he had fewer than 1000 career hits and more than 500 career errors.
I stopped voting after 'phase I' of the HOM project. I thought about voting this time, but didn't because I didn't think it was necessarily 'fair' for me to jump back in, having not kept up with all that has gone on, and being such as big McGraw backer all of these years - glad he got in without my help....
I would not have had any issue with you voting, even though you didn't keep up.
I assume a voter would catch up a bit, review the recent threads over the last month or so, etc.. Becoming a part of the current discussion, especially with a 3 week ballot, I'm sure you (and others) would have been fine.
I do not expect every voter to keep constant pace with everything that happens here over the course of the year, it's certainly not a pre-requisite for voting.
And in your specific case, I'm quite sure you would still be able to make a very well informed ballot even if you read nothing on the threads the entire year :-)
Looks like the ballot counter is not working properly, since that shouldn't have happened. Oh, well.
So, in last years' results thread, I listed the leaders in eligible non-HoMers in a bunch of categories (basically, everything at b-r.com) And I threw in the highest WARPs I had in my spreadsheet, although it's not impossible I could be missing someone.
What Daven-WARP data do you have in a spreadsheet?
A couple of months ago, Dan Greenia (who did not vote here but chimed in many times) mentioned to me that he checks a batch of players manually during every baseball offseason. We exchanged a few notes to the effect maybe we should cooperate this year (I think I said maybe December).
Yesterday Joe Dimino mentioned that he would like to get some data automatically, I think he means at least NRA and DERA at the season level. That makes me wonder, does anyone already get some data from DT cards automatically?
(That conversation is over at "Pitchers for the Hall of Merit".)
No, because I feel like slighting you, karlmagnus.
Alright, I'll give him a BoSox cap anyway. ;-)
BTW, I'll have the plaques posted within the week. It'll give you something to anticipate.
Thanks, Joe!
Red Sox: 46%
Dodgers: 36%
Cardinals: 13%
Giants: 4%
A little bit closer of a call than I would have thought, but still clearly Red Sox.
This doesn't count his time in Japan. And it gives all of his credit for 1976 to the Dodgers, but since he was pretty terrible for the Cards that year, it's close enough for government work.
John McGraw didn't approve that nickname so he gets these two lines under his given name.
He raises eyebrows
but he doesn't raise floodgates.
(Complete this haiku.)
He was one of my favorite players, he filled the gap as my favorite player once Dawson, Raines, Righetti and Randolph got old. But, he's not as slam-dunkish as I thought. I'd still make him a strong favorite, he'll be in the upper-middle of my ballot probably (and better on most others I imagine), but I don't think he'll get all 'elect me' votes or anything.
Anyway, this is what I have for his hat; first number is value, second is PT:
Blue Jays: 34% (32%)
Indians: 29% (19%)
Orioles: 22% (17%)
Padres: 14% (19%)
Mets: 0.4% (9%)
White Sox: 0% (3%) (below replacement level)
Diamondbacks: 0% (1%) (below replacement level)
He had 3 straight 6th place MVP finishes with the Jays (and two rings); but he also was 3rd and 4th while with the Indians.
That looks right.
Top 5 WARP1
134.9 R. Maranville
124.8 T. Leach
114.5 T. Perez
114.1 L. Cross
113.4 D. Bancroft
Top 5 Pitchers WARP1
109.0 F. Tanana
108.9 T. John
106.2 J. Kaat
106.0 L. Tiant
101.3 R. Reuschel
Top 5 WARP3
106.4 T. Perez
106.2 T. Fernandez
106.1 B. Bell
105.2 D. Concepcion
101.9 B. Campaneris
Top 5 Pitchers WARP3
106.5 F. Tanana
103.8 T. John
101.2 R. Reuschel
100.6 L. Tiant
99.2 C. Finley
2010
Roberto Alomar
Rod Beck
Dave Burba
Ellis Burks
Doug Glanville
Juan Gonzalez*
Tom Goodwin
Ricky Gutierrez
Pat Hentgen
Mike Jackson
Eric Karros
Ray Lankford
Barry Larkin
Edgar Martinez
Brent Mayne
Fred McGriff
Mark McLemore
Benito Santiago*
David Segui
Robin Ventura
Fernando Vina
Todd Zeile
Also with the lapse of a year and the selective list of voters, changes from last year were inevitable. Supporters of Leach and Walters have no one to blame but themselves for not showing up. Supporters of Rizzuto, Cone and Cravath, well, the same thing can happen to you a year hence.
I'm OK with McGraw. But Smith over Puckett? No. Reggie is in my PHoM, but over Puckett? No.
Converting Dan's old WARP (I don't have the new WARP for 1987-2005 in my DB yet) to Pennants Added; with historically similar players in parenthesis:
1.33 Larkin (Robin Yount, Alan Trammell)
0.93 Alomar (Graig Nettles, Willie Stargell, Joe Sewell)
------------
0.86 Edgar (Reggie Smith, Hernandez)
0.83 Ventura (Norm Cash, Bobby Bonds)
0.75 Salmon (Bobby Veach, Paul O'Neill)
0.73 McGriff (Jack Clark, Dale Murphy, George Burns)
0.61 Lankford (Augie Galan, David Justice, Johnny Callison)
0.60 Burks (Babe Herman, Dave Parker)
0.60 JuanGone (Jim Bottomley, Ken Williams)
0.41 Higginson (Ted Kluszewski, Sixto Lezcano)
0.41 Santiago (Manny Sanguillen, Bob O'Farrell)
The line is where my ballot cutoff was this year.
I'll update the new WARP later . . . but that is somewhat interesting to me.
Edgar and McGriff against the backlog will be interesting. I see Edgar as eventually making it, if he doesn't go immediately. McGriff ending up in the close-but-not-quite bag with Tony Perez.
I think the pitcher positional rankings will be highly beneficial for building consensus on pitchers for the 2010 ballot: we'll hash through a lot of methodological improvements that have been on the back-burner for the ten elections or so while we focused more on the implications of Dan R's work for position player rankings.
I guessed correctly. Reggie Smith had a decent lead over the rest of the backlog (a couple of ballots and thirty points) and I didn't see that going away. Plus, he was doing well in elect-me spots and in just making the ballot spots. The extra elect me votes and the lack of no vote penalties meant Smith would sail in. I figured he would be an easy second (even though he didn't make my ballot). I was right about him getting in, but wrong about his placement.
I also thought that John McGraw would get elected in another Dan R led charge. We've previously seen Graig Nettles and Dick Lundy make big jumps thanks to Dan's numbers, advocacy and persistence (I was an even earlier supporter of the one, and the other is scheduled to make my PHoM next year). I had a feeling it would happen again. The one thing that could have prevented it was voter turnout. McGraw relied heavily on high ballot support from a few voters. If those voters didn't show up, McGraw might not have made it. As it was, the low turnout actually helped McGraw as it gave those few voters a greater percentage of the total.
I thought that Bucky Walters had a chance to pull off the upset of McGraw, depending on turnout. However, one of the things working against Walters was being the top ballot candidate. A lot of times the guy who's at the top of the returnee list will face intense opposition. People argue against him because he's so close to getting in, which diminishes his support and occasionally allows a lesser player to leapfrog him without facing the same scrutiny. That wasn't the case here (McGraw has faced plenty of scrutiny in 100 elections). But I think it does partially explain why Walters was leapfrogged by four other guys (and nearly a fifth in Tiant) despite the fact that so many were advocating for the induction of a pitcher.
I was still pulling for the increasingly unlikely Dick Redding induction. He actually did very well with early voting but slowly lost his lead as the balloting progressed. It wasn't just the extra week that killed him. I think he lost his lead on the original final weekend.
While I feel I have a very solid framework, including adjusting for things like team defense, relief pitching support, expansion and some other things; I plan on making some strong tweaks to my system as well, including trying to account for chaining of leverage.
Yes, I wonder whether Chris Cobb's comparison of all eligible pitchers to Walters had any effect on anyone's vote. (It convinced me to drop Walters, but he had no longer been on my ballot anyway, so that wouldn't have affected the voting.)
Karl, unless the defensive metrics really evolve in the next decade, and they paint Manny's defense to be equal to Bill Bergen offense, I think Manny just sails in.
This isn't the BBWAA, and unless Manny gets caught actually taking payments for throwing games, I can't see any scenario where he has to wait more than one year. McGwire had no problems with us. Rose and Joe Jackson no real problems either.
Sheffield, now there is an argument :)
1. HoM cap - Cleveland or Boston?
2. Which positional list does he go on - LF or RF?
The LF/RF question might also be decided by the same thing. Again, this is just from my impression of him, without looking at the numbers.
I cannot imagine he'll be a questionable HoMer.
Sheffield for me is pretty easily in as well.
Heck, I've got Sheffield ahead of Reggie Jackson, just through his 2005 numbers. He should sail in.
Of course, picking a cap for Sheffield would be even harder.
Eyeballing it.... Marlin or Dodger, trending towards the former.
Actually, jaking it the way he did is quite appropriate and constitutional for a protest.
Bridges will be #2 on my ballot next year (unless I rip apart my system in the next year) even with Alomar and Edgar to choose from.
WARP1
48.7 Cle 45.5%
53.0 Bos 49.5%
5.3 LAD 5.0%
WARP3
54.8 Cle 46.9%
56.4 Bos 48.2%
5.6 LAD 4.8%
Very close but Boston
umm, sorry. I can be an idiot at times, or drunk. Right now its more drunk than idiot. Earlier, more idiot than drunk.
And Cone should have a Royals cap, if they hadn't had about 15 years (and possibly counting, we'll see) being run by drunks or idiots.
Take off the Yankee Reggie Jackson model sunglasses Joe!
When you can't even remember which friggin' leg to limp on, you are jaking it.
Or you are and idiot. Or Drunk. Or both.
Zeroing out negative seasons, giving '94 *1.5 for strike, and '95 *1.15 on to WARP 1
WARP 1
51.6 Cle Total, 25.5 Top 3, 40.3 Top 5, 51.6 Top 7
53.0 Bos Total, 24.2 Top 3, 37.9 Top 5, 48.5 Top 7
WARP 3
55.1 Cle Total, 27.6 Top 3, 43.6 Top 5, 55.1 Top 7
56.4 Bos Total, 24.2 Top 3, 38.9 Top 5, 51.2 Top 7
Unless WARP is docking Manny's defense too harshly, I'd go with Cleveland by WARP measures
I know a few baseball fans in KC - someone else here may know quite a bit more - and the impression I get isn't that the team is run by incompetents. The problem is Ewing Kaufmann's will. Apparently, it says that the Royals cannot be sold except to an ownership from KC itself. Otherwise, it has to be run by some sort of bizarre trust, which doesn't have enough money to actually own a Major League baseball team. So far, no giant millionaires have appeared in KC wanting to own a baseball club. The result is that, whenever a Royals players gets any good, they have to dump him, because the trust can't afford even medium level good player salaries. Now, as I said, there may be someone here who knows a lot more than I do, and I'm quite willing to be corrected. But that's what I have as of now. Also, if any of this is true, it probably results in their having to underpay people like the GM and other front office types, so they don't get the best people in there. So, doesn anyone here know more?
Thanks, Brock
Mike, I am an idiot, unfortunately, I'm not drunk.
But basically if the guy plays like a champ, and takes two days off after being bad-mouthed by his boss all year, I'm not really going to have much issue with that.
Most of us have called in sick for much less.
Barry Larkin -- easy #1.
Roberto Alomar -- #4, about even with the top of the backlog, which for me is Campaneris, Concepcion, and Rizzuto.
Edgar Martinez -- #12, about even with Urban Shocker, Tommy John, David Cone, Buddy Bell, who are the bottom 4 on my ballot. My all-time in-out line is around 120 points in my system. Edgar is at 122.7.
Fred McGriff -- somewhere around 80, most similar in merit and career shape to guys like Harry Hooper and Jerry Koosman. Solid HoVG but not borderline HoM.
Robin Ventura is certainly a top candidate as well -- missed him in the quick skim of the list. He will certainly merit discussion, and should make some ballots.
He looks to be around #35-36 on my 2010 preliminary ballot.
Edgar/McGriff - Somewhere near the top to mid ballot.
Ventura may make sneak on the ballot. I had Buddy Bell #17, I have to see how he compares.
How about a 2010 discussion thread? It's never too early to get started!
That's it for me, Mike. If your leg hurts, there is no way that you can forget which one. Trust me on this, guys.
Joe, I believe Mike was referring to Manny, not you.
Sure, it matters, but not enough to make up the difference in quality between Larkin and Alomar, which is large.
Look at it this way. My system sees Larkin's peak rate (his rate of wins above replacement during his best five or more consecutive seasons) as 8.22 WAR/162 games. That is a top-5-of-generation total. Roberto Alomar's peak rate was 5.47. That's excellent, a typical peak rate for a solid HoMer in the 1980s and 1990s. But it's not close to Larkin's. If Alomar played 162 games in a year during his peak, Larkin would have to play 108 games to add a similar amount of value to his teams, because Larkin was as good a hitter as Alomar and a great defensive shortstop and a great baserunner during his peak, where Alomar was as good a hitter as Larkin, but was merely a very good defensive second baseman and a good baserunner. So if Larkin misses a month and a half of the season, it matters to this extent: it means that he is no more valuable than Alomar, if Alomar is in the lineup every day for his teams.
When Larkin was healthy for a full season, he was far more valuable than Alomar. That's part of why he has an MVP, and Alomar doesn't.
If you want to see a full rundown of the numbers on them from Dan R's WAR, I can provide them.
As with a number of modern shortstops, Larkin is underrated because a lot of his value is in baserunning and defense. Unlike Dave Concepcion and Bert Campaneris, who were good hitters for their position but not good hitters by the standard of all position players, Larkin was a good hitter by any standard. Thus, Larkin will easily be elected, where they are only gradually gaining traction in the backlog. But Larkin should be an obvious no-doubt top of ballot player this year, but he probably won't be.
I ask because I don't think the fielding metrics work (yet!) in Boston. I'm not trying to argue that Manny is an average fielder, I think he is probably below average BUT I don't think he is as bad as some of the systems rate him.
Chris, Alomar has nearly double (1.9) the MVP award shares of Larkin (1.1). Alomar was a little unlucky in the MVP voting (he easily could have won it in 1999 or 2001) and Larkin was a little lucky (Dante Bichette was #2 the year Larkin won his), that's why he has an MVP Award and Alomar doesn't.
Larkin played as a regular for 18 years, Alomar just 16, that helps Larkin make up for some of his in-season durability issues, when comparing him to Alomar.
I still like Larkin much better, but Alomar was top 6 in the MVP voting 5 times, and generally did much better than Larkin, I wouldn't use that as a point in Larkin's favor. Larkin only had one other top 10 finish in his career.
Humorous but sad Larkin stats, combined with his MVP finish:
Year AB ... R .. H 2B 3B HR RBI SB CS BB SO BA OBP SLG *OPS+ MVP voting
1995 496 . 98 158 29 .6 15 . 66 .51 .5 . 61 49 .319 .394 .492 133 .... FIRST
1996 517 117 154 32 .4 33 . 89 .36 10 .96 52 .298 .410 .567 154 . TWELFTH
The team falls apart in 96, so obviously Larkin wasn't nearly as 'valuable' :)
I'd probably bet money on the latter, unfortunately.
Yeah, right. :-)
The Reds really didn't fall off the cliff until 2001, when Larkin himself did also.
They really don't like to give back to back MVPs, unless you have an incredible 2nd year, or, like you said, the team wins again.
If they really gave the MVP to the most valuable player every year, they wouldn't care, Joe. Not that you disagree with that, of course.
1. Alomar had an outstanding defensive reputation, with a bunch of Gold Gloves. Our defensive statistics, which are extremely reliable for seasons after 1987 (r of .85 or better with a weighted average of UZR, Plus/Minus, and PMR, thanks to the availability of SFR with hit type data and Zone Ratings), most definitely do not support this notion. They show him as below average in the field for his career, with a mix of good and bad fielding seasons during his prime. If he were a +100 guy instead of -50 guy (or -10 if you ignore seasons after 2001), he'd be an easy no-brainer HoM'er. But quantitatively, he wasn't.
2. Alomar's entire career was played after the 2B/3B convergence of the mid-1980's, when 2B stopped being a "middle infield" position second only to SS in difficulty and evolved into its modern role as a mid-spectrum position comparable to 3B and CF. The 2B on the scrap heap were far better in the days of Alomar, Biggio, and Knoblauch than they were when Grich, Morgan, and Carew patrolled the keystone.
3. Larkin played during a transitional era for shortstops, one that began when the likes of Alfredo Griffin and Rafael Ramírez still roamed major league infields, and ended when you weren't going to do much worse than a César Izturis or Royce Clayton (the occasional '02 Neifi Pérez or '05 Cristian Guzman aside). During the first half of Larkin's career, SS looked a lot like C does now, a "feast or famine" position, where you either have a star (Ripken/Larkin/Trammell/Tony Fernández in those days; Mauer/McCann/Posada/VMartínez/Soto/Martin now) or you have an absolute sinkhole. The baseline for SS offense was REALLY low when Cincinnati won the World Series. You can't think of Larkin as a fully modern SS; his contextual value was strongly magnified in his early years.
4. Larkin had TREMENDOUS value above and beyond his position-adjusted offense. He was a world-class baserunner and a slick fielder, clocking in at 7 wins above average in each of those categories. Those contributions are worth an extra 12 points of OPS+. Alomar was also a plus runner, albeit not as good as Larkin, but his value in the field just doesn't compare from a quantitative standpoint.
They are extremely consistent, in that they all point in the same direction. Whether they are reliable - whether they accurately measure what they purport to measure - is another beast all together.
-- MWE
Age and, hopefully, wisdom lead me to concur with Mike on this matter.
Ah! That's why I posted up so hesitantly. I wasn't sure the trust hadn't sold the club. Obviously, the team now has money. Do you know offhand when this particular owner bought the club? My hunch is that he will have to take some time to build the organization back up to something reasonable. If he's had it for a few years, things are probably looking up. If he's only had it for a year or two, he may still be rebuilding the front office.
Thanks for the info! - Brock
Let's take 1991 - the year of Alomar's 1st gold glove. According to Dan R's WARP the best 2B defenders were:
Jose Oquendo
Ryne Sandberg
Mike Gallego
Jose Lind
Luis Sojo
Lance Blankenship
Bip Roberts
Donnie Hill
Jody Reed
Mark Lemke
Alomar grades out as average. Worst 2B were Bill Doran, Delino DeShields, Gregg Jeffries and Julio Franco.
Jump to 1995 - Alomar is -0.6
Mark Lemke
Jody Reed
Bret Barberie (BAL)
Dave Howard (KC)
Brian Gates
Rex Hudler
Chuck Knoblauch
Jose Oquendo
Worst players are Craig Biggio, Ray Durham, Carlos Garcia and Joey Cora.
1998 - one of Roberto's best defensive seasons (+1.0) he's 3rd behind Mike Benjamin and Miguel Cairo and followed by Craig Counsell and Mark Lemke (the system loves Lemke). Jose Vidro and
Todd Walker bring up the rear.
So, although there are some seasons where Alomar is a top 5 defender, he never tops the list and is never consistently in that top 5 (although rarely far below average). I have no reason to seriously doubt this. Lemke and Oquendo certainly made their share of highlight reel plays.
(We should really be discussing this in another thread)
This is true except for the occasional odd season, but it's partially luck. Lankford came up at the same time as two other really hot prospects (all listed in everyone's list of the top 20 prospects in all of baseball): Geronimo Pena and Todd Zeile. Of the three, Lankford was probably the weakest, coming into the majors. But Zeile got moved off of catcher, due to one of Joe Torre's very worst managerial moves (which is saying something), and Pena, the best hitter of the three and a great defensive second baseman, simply could not stay healthy. At all. There is one half of one season when Pena got to show what he really had in terms of talent, but other than that, he was always out of the lineup or playing hurt. Since the Cardinal farm system dried up right after those three made the big club, Lankford continued to be the best player on the roster for years. But I'd still like to see what the team could have done if Pena had stayed healthy, Zeile had stayed at catcher, and the management had been just a wee tad better. The lineup would have been something like Lankford leading off, either Jose Oquendo or Luis Alicea playing third and hitting second, Pena hitting third, and Zeile cleanup, and you've still got two corner outfield spots and first base to fill. With decent management, that could have been one heck of a lineup.
- Brock
Except your eyes are not always perfect either.
If we didn't have batting stats during the '70s, how many of us would have voted for Dave Kingman for the HOF judged by the distance of his clouts? Maybe Danny Heep could have played for 20+ years and made it to Cooperstown based on his pretty swing, too.
What makes you think you can see everything that there is to see fielding wise? How can you tell that he got to balls other fielders wouldn't get to? Because he dove and made the play look tough? There's a lot more to fielding that just looking good on the balls you do get to.
For example, did you really pay attention to where he positioned himself relative to other fielders, for example? As John Dewan said in the Fielding Bible, Jeter looks great, he just doesn't get to about 30-40 balls a year others guys get to, because he has to cheat in 3-4 steps on every play to cover for his (relatively) lousy arm.
You guys must have an amazing set of eyes, I know I can't tell the difference by looking at fielders, other than telling who is fundamentally sound and who isn't.
I'm not saying the new metrics are perfect. I absolutely agree with Mike in post 83.
But to dismiss them out of hand and say, "I know what I saw," seems like folly to me. How much of that was colored by what you heard? If everyone tells you how great someone is, you are going to notice the brilliant plays and dismiss the bad ones as 'everyone drops one occasionally'. When he misses one, you'll just assume no one could have made that play, etc..
I think both sides should be open minded on the issue regarding how good a player's fielding is. I know Jeff Francouer looks like a heckuva hitter, but the numbers don't really prove that out. He hits .336 when he doesn't whiff. But he never walks and strikes out one in every 5 AB. Your eyes can't tell you everything.
I recall highlight reel plays and plenty of chatter from commentators about his prowess in the field.
Did he have plenty of flair in the field? Absolutely.
Was he a good defensive 2B, relative to his peers? I have no idea.
Mainly lack of time, partly a lack of motivation. I found the old schedule was too demanding (was it two ballots a month?), and annual elections have too big a gap so I get distracted. You should put up a 2010 ballot thread more or less straightaway on Jan 1st to help me out!
Which was probably a good thing, considering the value of his bat. He didn't need to ruin his career taking one for the team on a DP.
I was curious about one thing: given how much he struck out, what was he hitting when he didn't strike out? I went back and figured that: .372 BA and .653 SLG when not striking out. I guess he swung hard.
He got old as a player before he was 35. He didn't take it well when the Cardinals pushed him aside, although he did come back for a farewell fling a couple of years later. All told you have a 1700 game career, 1100 games of it in CF, with an OBP-heavy 122 career OPS+. That doesn't make the HoM, of course, but the list of better CF isn't all that long.
bjhanke's alternate universe plan has Zeile catching and batting cleanup. I'm not sure I see that - Zeile the 3b probably hit better and certainly played in more games than would have Zeile the catcher, but even with that, he doesn't look all that much like a cleanup hitter to me - in particular, he looks less like a cleanup hitter than Lankford.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main