|
|
Hall of Merit— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best
Monday, July 25, 2005
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (189 - 5:49pm, Dec 07)Last:  Eric J can SABER all he wants to2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Ballot (4 - 3:10pm, Dec 07)Last: JaackHall of Merit Book Club (17 - 10:20am, Dec 07)Last: cookiedabookieMock Hall of Fame 2024 Contemporary Baseball Ballot - Managers, Executives and Umpires (28 - 10:54pm, Dec 03)Last: cardsfanboyMost Meritorious Player: 2023 Results (2 - 5:01pm, Nov 29)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 2023 Ballot (12 - 5:45pm, Nov 28)Last: kcgard2Most Meritorious Player: 2023 Discussion (14 - 5:22pm, Nov 16)Last: Bleed the FreakReranking First Basemen: Results (55 - 11:31pm, Nov 07)Last: Chris CobbMock Hall of Fame Discussion Thread: Contemporary Baseball - Managers, Executives and Umpires 2023 (15 - 8:23pm, Oct 30)Last: Srul ItzaReranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Results (7 - 9:28am, Oct 17)Last: Chris CobbRanking the Hall of Merit Pitchers (1893-1923) - Discussion (68 - 1:25pm, Oct 14)Last: DL from MNReranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Ballot (13 - 2:22pm, Oct 12)Last: DL from MNReranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Discussion (39 - 10:42am, Oct 12)Last: GuapoReranking Shortstops: Results (7 - 8:15am, Sep 30)Last: kcgard2Reranking First Basemen: Ballot (18 - 10:13am, Sep 11)Last: DL from MN
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: July 25, 2005 at 01:59 PM (#1496140)To reiterate from the Gordon thread, neither of them exactly makes me froth. Doerr's right at the edge of my consideration set at his position, but probably just off it.
Love the man... one of the nicest people I ever met.
WARP1 -- by age
Gordon, Doerr, Herman, Evers, Childs, Dunlap
Note: no adjustments for season length or league quality
ยป August 7, 1951: Bobby Doerr suffers a severe sacroiliac pain that forces the future Hall of Famer into early retirement. The Red Sox regular 2B for 13 seasons, Doerr will become a Red Sox coach.
I'm starting to wonder if both Doerr AND Gordon deserve to be HOMers, rather than canceling each other out.
They have very similar career BWS numbers:
Evers 198.1 BWS in 1784 G, 18.0/G, A- fielder
Doerr 196.4 BWS in 1865 G, 17.1/G, A fielder
And WARP-1:
Evers 108.7 W1, 153 BRAA, 90 FRAA, 374 BRAR, 622 FRAR
Doerr 106.7 W1, 189 BRAA, 134 FRAA, 427 BRAR, 544 FRAR
OPS+ shows Doerr as a much better hitter:
Evers 106 career, top 10 144, 139, 118, 117, 115, 109, 107, 103, 94, 93
Doerr 115 career, top 10 165, 131, 128, 128, 117, 116, 116, 114, 114, 105
Also, WARP-2 and 3 clearly show that Doerr is better, if you accept the timeline and league quality adjustments.
Evers 67.7 W2, 69.4 W3
Doerr 96.4 W2, 98.8 W3
I think people voting for Doerr still need to look more closely at Evers.
Wouldn't comparing Evers and Doerr by WARP1 take these changes in defensive value into account?
I take Doerr over Evers by win shares and by quality of competition adjustments. Doerr ranks at #19 among 1940s players, Evers ranks at #23 among 1900s players. That's not a huge difference, but it shows Doerr as somewhat better among his peers. And when you figure that there are approximately three players between the two for every decade, that's around 25 spots on the ballot.
It doesn't appear to. Look at the difference between FRAA and FRAR. (Doerr has more games played so that's not the reason). The replacement level is lower for Evers than it is for Doerr.
My guesses at possible explanations:
1) BP doesn't account for the shift of 2B in the defensive spectrum
2) BP thinks the talent pool was weaker in Evers' day. The "AAAA" players of the day that define the replacement level were of lower quality relative to the regulars.
3) BP tilts the pitching/fielding split more in the fielders favor in Evers' day.
4) Something else :-)
It isn't that far fetched that Evers still had as much defensive value since fielding as a whole was more important.
There was a point, once upon a time, when I was actually voting for Evers. I backed off of that when it became clear that no one else was supporting him, and I doubt now that I could see putting him back.
I reread James' defense of the shift in the WS book the other day. None of the evidence he gives to support it is untrue, but much is carefully stated so that it implies more than it actually says.
OPS by position by decade:
Decade 1B LF RF CF 3B 2B Ca SS Pit
1870's +1 +4 -1 +4 +2 +2 +0 +1 -13
1880's 13 +6 +1 +5 +1 -1 -7 -2 -17
1890's +6 +9 +7 +7 +0 -2 -6 -2 -22
1900's +6 10 +9 +8 +0 +2 -9 -1 -29
1910's +6 +7 +9 10 +1 +1 -7 -4 -31
1920's +9 10 10 +8 -3 +1 -4 -7 -32
1930's 13 +8 10 +5 -1 -3 -3 -4 -36
1940's +8 11 +9 +7 +2 -3 -4 -4 -37
1950's +9 10 +7 +7 +4 -3 -1 -5 -40
1960's 11 +9 11 +7 +4 -5 -3 -6 -46
1970's 10 +8 +8 +5 +3 -5 -2 -11-45
1980's +8 +6 +6 +2 +3 -4 -4 -8 -48
1990's +9 +4 +6 +1 +1 -3 -4 -7 -50
Mean.. +9 +8 +7 +6 +1 -2 -4 -5 -36
The hitting evidence to support the shift is really only from the 1920's, plus a small amount in the 00's. The 19th century actually goes the other way against the shift; 3B hits somewhat more than 2B. (James does state "I have assumed that the defensive spectrum was the same throughout the late 19th century as it was in 1900, but this is an area in which we could benefit from additional research.")
Frankly, the evidence is stronger that 1B moved to the right of OF between 1893 and 1920, when compared to 3B shifting to the right of 2B.
The evidence supporting 2B == 3B before 1940 is very strong. The evidence supporting an actual flip-flop 2B < 3B is not strong at all.
Another advantage that Doerr has over Evers is durability. Although their careers are similar in terms of games played, Doerr's games were packed into fewer seasons. He played over 100 games 13 times, as compared to Evers' 10 (+ a 99-game season). Doerr played over 130 games 10 times to Evers' 6.
Doerr then has a season of war credit beyond that.
Doerr/Evers is the sort of comparison in which I start out saying, yes, they are similar players when looked at from a particular perspective. But when I start to look more closely, the little factors consistently favor one player over the other, so that I end up concluding that one, in this case Doerr, is significantly better.
Doerr/Gordon is not that sort of comparision.
I don't know for certain since I don't have my WS book with me, but didn't Evers play for a bunch of teams that hit the WS fielding cap like almost every year. Not sure if Doerr did also, but I kind of doubt it.
He is 23 FRAA in WARP2, 330 FRAR
When Doerr's 544 FRAR are adjusted for competition only and not to an "all-time" context, he is 541 FRAR.
He is 131 FRAA in WARP2, 459 FRAR
It appears that WARP sees the shift in defensive value from fielding to pitching between the aughts and the forties as outweighing the shift in fielding value to second base from other positions during that same time period.
As WARP sees it, Doerr is a better fielder relative to his contemporary second-basemen than Evers, but Evers' defense was quite a bit more valuable in context, and slightly more valuable than Doerr's even when his context is competition-adjusted.
Wouldn't comparing Evers and Doerr by WARP1 take these changes in defensive value into account?"
Only if WARP adjusts for the changing defensive spectrum. I don't know that it does or doesn't. From what I read above, I'd say it doesn't look like it does.
Interesting chart jim - I know you've shown us that before, but I didn't notice the 3B/2B thing.
I don't know how your data is organized, but would it be possible to only use the bottom end of regulars, the botton 20% and not everyone? When you use everyone star gluts (1B 1880's) and star droughts (SS 1970's) have way too much impact. Using the bottom end guys would show better what the true spectrum was, IMO.
That is a great chart, thanks!
Tinker .262/.308/.353/95 in 6850 PAs
And Tinker has a fair edge on defense.
WARP does not adjust much. A quick comparison of Johnny Evers to Harry Steinfeldt in 1906/07 and of Bobby Doerr to Johnny Pesky in 1948/49 shows the following:
In 1906+07 Evers was 31 FRAA and 123 FRAR in 305 games
In 1906+07 Steinfeldt was 3 FRAA and 66 FRAR in 303 games
Average play at second base was valued at .30 FRAR/g
Average play at third base was valued at .21 FRAR/g
Average play at 2B gets 50% more value above replacement than average play at third
In 1948+49 Doerr was 16 FRAA and 64 FRAR in 279 games
In 1948+49 Pesky was 20 FRAA and 51 FRAR in 291 games
Average play at second base was valued at .172 FRAR/g
Average play at third base was valued at .106 FRAR/g
Average play at second base gets 60% more value above replacement than average play at third.
Not much of a defensive spectrum shift in evidence here.
1B vs LF, 1870s-1880s
1B vs LF+RF, 1890s-1990s
<u>-3 +7 -2 -3 -2 -1 +4 -2</u> +0 +1 +2 +2 +4
If I squint ;-) i see no movement for 80 years (<u>underline</u>), only A-B-C in the 1880s and F-G in the 1930s (bold).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main