User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3090 seconds
59 querie(s) executed
You are here > Home > Hall of Merit > Discussion
| ||||||||
Hall of Merit — A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best Friday, October 20, 2006HousekeepingNot sure what else to call this - but let’s make this a catch all thread for ideas on how we run things. I really don’t like the new setup where we are posting individual threads two weeks early - 1989 eligibles as we start the 1988 discussion for example. I like the idea of starting the discussion early . . . but I don’t like how all of the new threads bump off of hot topics the guys that are actually coming up for election this year. This is a major issue for me. One - do others agree, or I am off base? Two - if others agree, how is this for a suggestion. We post the 1989 discussion thread at the start of 1988, and agree to use that to discuss the new eligibles only for the first week on that thread. Then the individual threads will go up when we are up to 1989, and anything really good from the discussion can be moved to the individual thread as appropriate. This would allow us to keep the focus on the people that are actually coming up that week, while allowing for a head start on the other guys. I’m open to other ideas too, but the main thing is that I’m not in love with this new setup. Thoughts? Comments? Questions? —Joe JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head
Posted: October 20, 2006 at 12:59 AM | 13 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Related News: |
BookmarksYou must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot Topics2023 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(168 - 1:46pm, Jul 13) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: Trophy Case (71 - 6:53pm, Jul 08) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1900 Results (6 - 6:28pm, Jul 08) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1900 Ballot (11 - 4:03pm, Jul 06) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1918 Results (6 - 8:58pm, Jun 29) Last: kenna Most Meritorious Player: 1920 Ballot (25 - 8:55pm, Jun 29) Last: kenna Most Meritorious Player: 1900 Discussion (9 - 1:14am, Jun 29) Last: Harmon Ripkowski Hall of Merit Book Club (6 - 12:45pm, Jun 28) Last: progrockfan Most Meritorious Player: 1899 Results (6 - 1:51pm, Jun 22) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1899 Ballot (10 - 9:54am, Jun 22) Last: TomH Most Meritorious Player: 1899 Discussion (9 - 9:04am, May 31) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1898 Results (4 - 3:22pm, May 06) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1898 Ballot (8 - 10:07am, May 05) Last: DL from MN Most Meritorious Player: 1898 Discussion (7 - 1:08am, May 02) Last: Harmon Ripkowski Most Meritorious Player: 1897 Results (2 - 4:29pm, Apr 06) Last: DL from MN |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3090 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. JoeD has the Imperial March Stuck in His Head Posted: October 20, 2006 at 01:27 AM (#2218597)because if not we should keep it the way it was
One can always use the handy bookmarking system to peg a thread one wants to watch.
So in the end, this is just a pointless thread cluttering up the Hot Topics section. People should ignore it.
Of course it isn't. Nothing on this website is rocket science. But it is a pain in the ass. That's the problem.
And the bookmarking gets cluttered up to easily also.
When John creates the yearly discussion thread could he use the candidate list to link to the individual player threads? That way the only thread that would need to be bumped would be the discussion thread, which provides access to the various candidate discussion without clogging a thread with copied arguments.
That's just too much work for me for something that's a luxury. But if someone wants to take care of it, that's fine by me.
I've never had a problem.
I happen to agree, Mark. I usually find a player thread takes no longer than 15 seconds to locate. As long as you know where the player thread is located (19th century players, 20th century players, NeLers, and Cuban Stars), it's easy, IMO.
Two - if others agree, how is this for a suggestion. We post the 1989 discussion thread at the start of 1988, and agree to use that to discuss the new eligibles only for the first week on that thread. Then the individual threads will go up when we are up to 1989, and anything really good from the discussion can be moved to the individual thread as appropriate
Do we have major objections over this? If not, I can post the '89 thread tomorrow.
We post the 1989 discussion thread at the start of 1988, and agree to use that to discuss the new eligibles only for the first week on that thread.
I think that's a good compromise.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main