|
|
Hall of Merit— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best
Saturday, September 29, 2007
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Don Malcolm for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
2023 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (168 - 1:46pm, Jul 13)Last:  DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: Trophy Case (71 - 6:53pm, Jul 08)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1900 Results (6 - 6:28pm, Jul 08)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1900 Ballot (11 - 4:03pm, Jul 06)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1918 Results (6 - 8:58pm, Jun 29)Last: kennaMost Meritorious Player: 1920 Ballot (25 - 8:55pm, Jun 29)Last: kennaMost Meritorious Player: 1900 Discussion (9 - 1:14am, Jun 29)Last: Harmon RipkowskiHall of Merit Book Club (6 - 12:45pm, Jun 28)Last: progrockfanMost Meritorious Player: 1899 Results (6 - 1:51pm, Jun 22)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1899 Ballot (10 - 9:54am, Jun 22)Last: TomHMost Meritorious Player: 1899 Discussion (9 - 9:04am, May 31)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1898 Results (4 - 3:22pm, May 06)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1898 Ballot (8 - 10:07am, May 05)Last: DL from MNMost Meritorious Player: 1898 Discussion (7 - 1:08am, May 02)Last: Harmon RipkowskiMost Meritorious Player: 1897 Results (2 - 4:29pm, Apr 06)Last: DL from MN
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: September 29, 2007 at 11:02 PM (#2550374)Oh yeah, a great pitcher at his peak.
Sutton 108
Wynn 106
Ruffing 109
etc...
Then again, nobody ever said this universe was sane.
Oh really?
Sutton 108
Wynn 106
Ruffing 109
etc...
They probably shouldn't be in the HOF either but - good point.
The funny thing about the Cowherd argument is that apparently he said that for 10 years Hershiser was the most unhittable guy in the game. I don't think there was a 3-year period in which Hershiser was the dominant pitcher in MLB.
Hershiser is a guy who never led the league in ERA or ERA+, never led it in WHIP innings, never led it in strikeouts. Maybe I'm dense but I'd think the most unhittable guy in the game would at least one time lead the league in a category like WHIP or strikeouts or something.
15 games
14 starts
11 complete games (including a 10 IP, 0 R, ND)
124.2 IP
73 H
9 ER
10-1 record, 0.65 ERA
3-0 in the playoffs, including 2-0 in an upset WS sweep. Cowherd is ridiculous, but that was the best two months I've ever seen any pitcher have. Especially when you consider a significant part of it was in the NLCS and WS.
Hershiser's supposed dominance may be an example of how the memory cheats. Everyone remembers 1988, at least those of us who were around then. Everyone remembers the 59 inning scoreless streak, and those of us who were Mets fans remember his dominance in the NLCS (series ERA: 1.09). He pitched more innings than anyone else, and had enough wins (23) and a high profile as a result of the Dodgers winning the World Series to justify winning the Cy Young Award that year, but the fact is, Cone had a good year; for that matter so did Tudor and Jose Rijo.
and
2) In the end, he's judged on effectiveness. Was Hershiser ever the most effective pitcher in his league, much less in baseball? The only year that's even plausible is 88, and it's not clear to me that he was better than Cone, though I could be persuaded otherwise.
Was he really a *great* pitcher at his peak? Not compared to somebody like Kevin Brown. I don't know where a non-consecutive peak of 172/148/148/133/130/119 puts him exactly, but it doesn't look to me like a "great peak." Dave Stieb, who looks to me like a pitcher whose case depends on consistency not a superlative peak, went 171/145/142/138/135/130. Frank Viola went 161/155/149/141/131/123. Did he have a great peak? Kevin Appier went 178/165/139/139/135/130. Did he have a great peak?
I like Orel Hershiser plenty, and he had some really good seasons, and he really never had the stinko seasons that get almost every pitcher, but I wouldn't say he was ever 1) the most dominant or 2) the best pitcher in the league, nor would I say he had a great peak.
I don't know about "most dominant," but even as a Mets' fan, I have to concede that Hershiser was the "best pitcher" in the NL in 1988. He pitched 36 more innings than Cone, with almost identical ERAs (2.22 for Cone, 2.26 for Hershiser). Orel had the better ERA+ (148-145). Although he didn't lead the league, the guys ahead of him are really big-time asterisks: Magrane (160) and Rijo (150) each pitched 100 fewer innings than Hershiser did, and Tudor (149), who was basically tied in ERA+, pitched 70 fewer innings. Orel led the league in CGs and shutouts. He was the best pitcher in the league.
14 starts
11 complete games (including a 10 IP, 0 R, ND)
124.2 IP
73 H
9 ER
10-1 record, 0.65 ERA
And that one non-start was the save in Game 4 of the NLCS - crucial, because closer Jay Howell was out due to his pine tar suspension.
During his last nine starts of 1988, Hershiser's ISO was .028.
84: 189.7, 133 ERA+
85: 239.7, 172 ERA+
86: 231.1, 90 ERA+
87: 264.7, 130 ERA+
88: 267.0, 148 ERA+
89: 256.7, 148 ERA+
A wicked six-year stretch broken up by one below-average year that's completely out of place. Just from the innings he doesn't seem injured - dead arm, maybe?
Not that this is relevant to anything here, but I just like posting it: Bob Gibson, from his last four regular season starts in 1967, through the WS and the 1968 season, ending after his second start in the 1968 WS:
382 innings, 241 hits, 44 ER, 345 strikeouts, 1.04 ERA, 30-10 record
Tommy Lasorda?
Well, Le Sam stole my thunder, but, yes, 1986 is one of these stinko years.
BP sees is his NRA that year as 4.92, his DERA at 4.49.
That is, with average defensive support, he would have given up runs at almost exactly average rate, while throwing a lot of innings. He was a bit better than an average pitcher that year, but the defense behind him stunk. Hence the 90 ERA+ rather than a more accurate 100 DERA+.
Sure, he was not nearly as good in 1986 as he was in surrounding seasons, but "stinko"? No.
Control seems to have been a bit of a problem: higher walk rate than in surrounding seasons.
He was also a bit run unlucky.
In the RA+ PythPat system, I have Saberhagen at an overall career record of 174-111. His best five years are 21-8, 19-10, 18-8, 14-6, and 13-8.
I have Hershiser at 191-157, with a best five years of 20-10, 18-10, 17-9, 17-12, and 13-8. So Saberhagen's best five years are better (including that Saberhagen's 1989 tops Hershiser's 1988) and the career difference between them is Hershiser going an additional 17-46, which I take as negative value.
In the same terms, Gooden is as 174-137 (that's 0-26 added to Saberhagen's record) with a best five years of 25-6, 15-9, 16-12, 12-8, and 13-10. His 1985 is one of the greatest years ever for any pitcher, but after that ...
There's been very little discussion of this new candidate. Is anyone planning to vote for him?
He'll miss my ballot, but he won't be that far off. Five outstanding seasons between 1984 and 89 plus a couple of decent seasons after his move to Cleveland in 96.
My pitching rankings at present are John, Tiant, Matlock, Saberhagen /end of ballot/ McCormick, Grimes, Lee Smith, Mullane, Tanana, Redding, Sutter, Guidry, Kaat, Wood, Reuschel, Walters, Langston, Hershiser, Newcombe, Shocker, Bond, Hough, Whitney, Welch.
If Lasorda hadn't run Hershiser's arm into the ground, I suspect Hershiser would have ended up with a longer career and a better case. But that only earns him selection to the Hall of What If.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main