|
|
Hall of Merit— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Quincy Trouppe
Eligible in 1958.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Adam S for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Reranking First Basemen: Discussion Thread (34 - 9:52am, May 31)Last: DL from MN2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (118 - 4:10pm, May 30)Last:  Kiko SakataReranking Shortstops Ballot (10 - 5:16pm, May 25)Last: Chris CobbCal Ripken, Jr. (15 - 12:42am, May 18)Last: The Honorable ArdoNew Eligibles Year by Year (996 - 12:23pm, May 12)Last:  cookiedabookieReranking Shortstops: Discussion Thread (67 - 6:46pm, May 07)Last: cookiedabookieReranking Centerfielders: Results (20 - 10:31am, Apr 28)Last: cookiedabookieReranking Center Fielders Ballot (20 - 9:30am, Apr 06)Last: DL from MNRanking Center Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion Thread (77 - 5:45pm, Apr 05)Last: Esteban RiveraReranking Right Fielders: Results (34 - 2:55am, Mar 30)Last: bjhanke2023 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (376 - 10:42am, Mar 07)Last:  Dr. ChaleekoReranking Right Fielders: Ballot (21 - 5:20pm, Mar 01)Last: DL from MNRanking Right Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion thread (71 - 9:47pm, Feb 28)Last: GuapoDobie Moore (239 - 10:40am, Feb 11)Last:  Mike WebberRanking Left Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion thread (96 - 12:21pm, Feb 08)Last: DL from MN
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: August 17, 2005 at 02:01 PM (#1551879)baseballaddict.com, I think is where I found this:
"Originally spelled Troupe, he put an extra "p" in his name because Latin American sportswriters continually misspelled it.
His son, Quincy Troupe (one p) is Professor of Creative Writing and American and Caribbean Literature at the University of California, San Diego."
Posted by Dr. Chaleeko on August 12, 2005 at 01:31 AM (#1541022)
QUINCY TROUPE'S MEXICAN LEAGUE PERFORMANCES IN CONTEXT
MEXICAN COUNTING STATS
YEAR TEAM AGE G AB H TB 2B 3B HR BB SB
----------------------------------------------
1939 MON 26 38 137 42 71 11 3 4 24 7
1940 MON 27 76 276 93 150 25 7 6 48 9
1941 MON 28 98 363 111 171 25 4 9 66 9
1942 MEX 29 70 269 98 171 27 5 12 62 20
1943 MEX 30 76 276 83 143 18 3 12 60 5
1944 MEX 31 57 197 47 82 12 1 7 40 4
1950 JAL 37 67 206 58 92 10 0 8 55 3
1951 JAL 38 63 177 45 70 6 5 3 52 2
==============================================
TOTAL 545 1901 577 950 134 28 61 407 59
POSITIONS: Cisneros offers no defensive splits, and he lists Troupe as being a 3B-C. The Negro Leagues book that KJOK posted a page from the other day shows his positions this way:
1939 C 2B SS OF
1940 3B
1941 C 3B
1942 C
1943 C
1944 C 3B 1B OF
1950 C 3B
1951 C
The Mexican season typically lasted between 80 and 100 games, though I think that the 1939 season was probably more like 50-60 games long.
MEXICAN CAREER RELATIVE AVERAGES
LG LG LG
YEAR AVG OBP SLG AVG OBP SLG OPS+
--------------------------------------
1939 .307 .410 .518 .261 .319 .358 173
1940 .337 .435 .543 .290 .379 .420 144
1941 .306 .418 .471 .288 .390 .396 125
1942 .364 .483 .636 .289 .380 .394 189
1943 .301 .426 .518 .273 .366 .367 157
1944 .239 .367 .416 .284 .380 .387 104
1950 .282 .433 .447 .272 .361 .335 153
1951 .254 .424 .395 .279 .384 .367 118
=======================================
.304 .426 .500 .281 .374 .382 145
MEXICAN CAREER RELATIVE AVERAGES
AVG+ 108
OBP+ 114
SLG+ 131
OPS+ 145
ROUGH TRANSLATION FROM MEXICAN LEAGUE TO MLB CONTEXT
MLE AVG MLE OBP MLE SLG
-------------------------------
1939 .296 .406 .476
1940 .284 .367 .415
1941 .252 .344 .366
1942 .295 .390 .471
1943 .263 .372 .417
1944 .205 .299 .338
1950 .255 .375 .424
1951 .218 .349 .332
===============================
MEAN .259 .363 .405
NL
MEAN .268 .338 .385
NL
C ONLY
MEAN .256 .322 .364
This rough translation considers the Mexican League to have a conversion rate of .90/.82 for each season through 1951. That might not be reality, but I think it probably averages out to be around there over the full scope of the 8 and 10 years of Troupe's and Wright's careers. I arrived at it by
-first indexing Troupe's averages relative to his league (to MxL that is)
-second applying that index to the NL context
-finally applying the 10%/18% conversion rate.
I'm surprised by how well Troupe comes out in this. I've been double-checking, and I don't think it's due to any computational error, though I'm not immune to them, so I'm not guaranteeing anything....
Perhaps one thing that might explain some of this surprising result is that he had an outstanding season in 1939, which was a weaker league season than the next few; and the same goes for 1950 and 1951 versus their preceeding seasons.
On the other hand, Wild Bill Wright wasn't down there in 1939, but was there for the first and second waves of imported hitting talent (1940-1941, then again in 1946-1947). But that is counterbalanced by fewer imported hitters in the surrounding seasons, where the number averaged about ten imported players.
Troupe missed that second wave altogether, but was very much on hand for the first wave, and was, in fact, leading it with C.P. Bell and Chet Brewer.
As mentioned in the Wright comments, I'm going away for a few days, which means I won't be able to do much with Troupe at this point, but with the information supplied by KJOK and others, there's lots more to go on now than before.
I don't know at this point that he's a HOMer, but based on his Mexican performance, his (roughly) translated performance relative to his MLB positional peers, and based on the high averages that Holway reports for him, I think he deserves a full workup by Chris C.
This is a pretty good catcher. Trouble is there's niggling questions about what to do with his age 20-24 seasons and the end of his career.
1) In 1933-1936 he was playing high-caliber ball in North Dakota and with the Monarchs. What is the best way to apportion credit to him?
2) In 1937 he voluntarily retired to pursue a boxing career due to his association with famous black boxing figures. This seems to me to be an economic-based and racial-conditions-based decision since boxing was integrated and payed well. I lean to extending Trouppe credit for this season.
3) I suspect his MLB career would have ended around 1950, but his entre into "organized" baseball didn't happen until two years later, at which point his hitting skills were quite diminished... Hmm....
4) Looks from this like he's an example of the late-peaking catching phenomenon.
METHODOLOGY
Just like with Willard Brown, I used every available scrap of information to figure Trouppe out, increasing the sample sizes available to me and decreasing the peaks and valleys a bit. This is also why you'll see differences between the Mexican translations above and these numbers: they've got PRWL and CWL figures worked into them as well to provide a fuller picture.
PRWL, CWL, and MxL are .90/.82 conversions until the late 1940s when they go down to .87/.76 (AA-level). For PRWL, CWL, and the Canadian Provincial League (1949), I had no leaguewide numbers to go on, so I just used the NL's leaguewide numbers as my reference point. This introduces a lot of uncertainty, in particular with regard to Trouppe's SLG relative to his leagues. But without more info, I do my best with what I gots.
I used SFWS to generate the Win-Shares estimates. On defense, they allot 1 FWS per every 24 games at catcher. Trouppe played several positions, but I assumed 75% of his games were at catcher (1 FWS per 24 G) and that the other quarter of his games were combined spent between 3B (1 FWS per 38 games) and OF (1 FWS per 48 games) with a 1 FWS per 40 games fielding rate. This of course assumes that Trouppe played average-level defense.
Does this seem reasonable to everybody? And if it does, or if it doesn't, what to do with 1933-1937???
Just on WS that puts him between (keeping it just to guys within 25 WS and 25 years either way):
Bresnahan 231
Schang 245
Freehan 267
Cochrane 275
That's it, the only C between 231 and 281 and between 1900 and 1975. With the possible exception of Biz Mackey, is he the best C candidate we have, or is there something wrong with our MLEs that the two best are both NeLers?
Anyhow, I'll eventually post up numbers for Trouppe with slightly more realistic playing time numbers, but first I'd like to hear any suggestions from the electorate on how to improve the projections or what to do with 1933-1937.
Not any major changes, just some playing time adjustments mostly. I lowered his G totals for several of his decline years figuring that as his bat wore down, he'd get less PT.
By this same token, I also gave him fewer AB/G in his decline.
Pre-1948 CWL conversion rates have been upped to .94/.92 at Brent's suggestion (in the Dandridge thread).
No park adjustments.
The G played estimates should be a little closer to reality since I was able to fill in some gaps in my data about how many games his teams played.
Finally, thanks to Gary A, I got the 1952 AA leaguewide numbers which enabled me to normalize Trouppe's Indianapolis season more accurately.
As always, I'm looking for any feedback, particularly about what to do with Trouppe's 1933-1937 seasons.
As previously mentioned, he has two early NNL seasons (1931 and 1932) where we have convertable information for him, he played at a high level from 1933-1936 (in ND and touring with the Monarchs), and he retired one year to pursue boxing in 1937.
I think Trouppe would have been at least an average hitter (at least 95 to 105 OPS+ hitter) during this early stretch, and perhaps a little better than that. In other words, those seasons would, I speculate, mostly help him add bulk to his career.
MLB Catchers from 1938-1952 (Trouppe in parenthesis)
AVG .255 (.270)
OBP .329 (.372)
SLG .358 (.407)
OPS .687 (.779)
I don't usually do a lot of by-position analysis of this sort, but because catchers are a different beast altogether, I thought ths might be worth pointing out.
Leaders in games caught, National League
Year gms Catcher
1938 132 Todd
1939 132 Danning
1940 131 Danning
1941 128 Owen
1942 133 Owen
1943 140 Mueller
1944 155 Mueller
1945 096 Lombardi
1946 124 Masi
1947 132 Cooper
Note, the 155 games caught by Mueller set a record (actually tied by Hayes in the AL the same season); I believe it was only third or fourth time an MLB catcher had exceeded 150 games caught.
Are there seasons at which you are projecting Trouppe as playiing a position other than catcher, or playing some games at some other position?
It would be helpful to know how you're handling the positional issue when analyzing your projections of playing time.
If these projections are accurate, btw, Trouppe is sure looking like a very serious candidate for the HoM.
I've been very literal in interpreting Trouppe's playing time both positionally and in terms of the number of games he played. I decided against making him just a catcher, and I used a straight-line schedule adjustment to adjust his games played, to the effect of
That said Trouppe was fairly durable, and resolving the position question will lead to a better projection of playing time.
Re Trouppe's candidacy: I agree. If the current MLEs are in the ballpark, then Trouppe will have a very compelling case.
But put him in the Majors - no way he plays those other positions . Check out the catchers in the 40's and 50's. Did anybody play years where they got say 90 games at C, 30 games at some other position? Not that I know of.
Here's Brent's chart again, this time with the total G I've projected for Trouppe alongside them. (140 not included since he was a 3B that year.)
1938 and 1946 stick out as the years that look like they should be ratcheted down. In most other years he's either under the leader or above by only two or three games.
Just to put an arbitrary figure on it, would 130 G for 1938 and 120 for 1946 be more likely? Or is there a better combination? Thanks!
Also, why not give him 130 or so games in 1946? It would have led the league yes, but he was also playing probably his best offensive ball (with 1947) so maybe he gets more games than a few other guys.
I agree that Trouppe's case is compelling. Right now I dont' know if he has Bresnahan's peak, especially with some war discount, but he seems to have more career than Roger does. Give him some credit for 33-36 and he may even make my ballot.
Karl mentions Lombardi, his defense is largely what's keeping him off most ballots, I believe. A below average defensive rep probably would keep Trouppe off of my serious consideration list as well, while a really positive rep might vault him onto my ballot.
I also uncovered a small calculation error in my career totals. Career line should have read
.270/.374/.416 OPS+ 118
and with the changes mentioned would now read
.270/.374/.416 OPS+ 118.
In reference to his defense, I assumed average defense because I was using sfws. I don't recollect what Riley said about Trouppe's defense, and I don't have it with me to look it up right now. Nor do I have any defensive stats to offer.
I'll, therefore defer to others on that question, but before I do so, I'll interpret what his offensive statistical record might say about his defense. Trouppe's foot speed wasn't Lombardiesque (he hit plenty of doubles and triples and would steal a few bags a year), so I'd say QT was mobile enough to be at least average defensively, and as a part-time 3B, he probably had a pretty good arm and decent reflexes.
Since the NgLs were a running league, the fact that Trouppe continued to catch and didn't move out from behind the plate may suggest that his defense was seen as more valuable there than at another position.
But that's just one way of looking at it, and I have no definitive answers to offer, merely speculation.
In reviewing their cases, I find that the Mackey thread includes the standard Biz Mackey Data from Holway--ie. his raw NeL record insofar as it is documented. I find his MLEs across G, PA, BB, H, TB, BA, OBP and SA, and then I see his BA+/OB+/SA+ and OPS+ of 98.
For Mackey I don't see a WS MLE/analysis. Did that get done, did I miss it?
For Trouppe all I see is his MLEs including OPS+ (118) and WS, but I don't see his raw NeL record anywhere. I remember he was first introduced somewhere else before he had a thread. Was it the 1957 Discussion Thread or what? Can somebody point me to it or import his raw record.
Right now their ballot positions comes down to OPS+, but otherwise I can't quite do apples to apples between the two of them. So again, can someone point me to
Mackey's WS
Trouppe's raw NeL data
Thanks.
Mackey's win shares are in the second post on the second page of his thread.
Trouppe's NeL data, such as it is, has been posted to the Hall of Merit yahoo site by KJOK. It has not been posted on this thread.
As for Trouppe, yes, I have that to. Doh!
Trouppe est. 7200 AB, don't have position data
Bresnahan approx. 4500 AB, about 2/3 of games at catcher
Mackey est. 8350 AB, est 85 percent catcher
Lombardi 5855 AB, 84 percent catcher
Schang about 5300 AB, 78 percent catcher
Win Shares
Trouppe 262/31-26-26/111
Bresnahan 231/29-27-27/116
Mackey 278/26-23-23/105
Lombardi 218/24-18-17/89
Schang 245/20-20-19/77
OPS+
* indicates years of less than 100 games
# indicates years not playing at catcher
Trouppe 118/153-45-45-41-35-33-28-14 (7 years > 100 OPS+ and GP at C)
Bresnahan 126/161#-46*-45*-39-38#-36-35*-32-28-25*-16#-9*-5* (4 yrs > 100 OPS+ and GP at C)
Mackey 98/142-31-22-11-10-10-9-8-7-4-1* (9 yrs)
Lombardi 126/162-54-48-42-40-37-32-31-29*-23-20-2*-2-0* (11 yrs)
Schang 117/140#-39*#-38-36-34-33-22#-22-21*-19*-11-9-4*-1* (7 yrs)
The 3 MLers' big edge is on OPS+ but it is in significantly shorter careers, and for Bresnahan in particular, but also Schang, some of their best hitting years were not spent primarily as catchers.
Mackey's edge is in longevity and career WS.
Trouppe is the only one that has a little bit of everything. Reasonably long career, reasonably high OPS+, 2nd in career WS, and then he has clearly the highest peak as well.
All of this is based on one's acceptance of the MLE analysis above. There is of course some uncertainty to them. If Trouppe or Mackey had played in the MLs, they probably would have been rested more, like most ML catchers of their respective times. So I can see how somebody might prefer Bresnahan and his nice peak on WS and OPS, or Lombardi who played a little longer. I have a hard time seeing Schang.
But factoring in a bit of uncertainty for Trouppe I still can't quite see how he isn't the best catcher around. On further review, I think #20ish on the ballot is about the right place. Given the likelihood that he might have sacrificed a few more ABs (i.e. might have had less than the MLEs suggest) I can't quite see having him in the top 15 right now.
As for Mackey, I can't quite see him ahead of Bresnahan. So it's a pretty clear pecking order:
1. Trouppe--about #20 overall
2. Bresnahan despite a pretty desparately short career
3. Mackey--Bresnahan and Mackey around #40-45
4. Lombardi--around #60
5. Schang--around #80
6. The next catcher on my list is John Clapp who is hovering down around #100.
The rest don't matter much.
As you can see the difference is minimal, less than five S-FWS. Hopefully that addresses any concerns about the effect of position. If not, I'll be happy to add any clarification I can!
Thanks Doc
Are you assuming that he's catching 154 games in 1946?
Sorry for any confusion. I had originally used 154 only because that was what the data suggested. However, I've since revised his G totals for 1938 and 1946 downward, but I haven't reposted the data yet. Here's the data with revised G totals for those seasons along with the revised career total. Just substitute this data directly into the appropriate slot in the V 2.0 MLEs above.
Trouppe 256/26-26-26/105
Bresnahan 231/29-27-27/116
Mackey 278/26-23-23/105
Lombardi 218/24-18-17/89
Schang 245/20-20-19/77
Doc,
does the above show the adjustments correctly, if so does it change the assesment of the overall rankings of catchers?
Mike
I think so. What's the last column? Best five straight?
I have been voting for Bresnahan, and at one time I thought Schang was ahead of Mackey, but I have been persuaded that Mackey is ahead of Schang. Which might be important in 15 or so elections.
If the MLE's are to be trusted, Trouppe ust edges him out in my system where I lower teh bar for catcher based on the fact that they play fewer games.
So currently...
Trouppe (Could make my ballot)
Bresnahan (Just off ballot, have voted for him before)
Mackey (late 20's early 30's)
Lombardi (out of top 50)
Schang (out of top 50)
I guess the question for me is, is Trouppe definitely better than Bresnahan, and if so is he better than Doerr and/or Gordon (the guys who are tentatively 14th and 15th on my ballot)?
1938 - Trouppe
1939 - Trouppe
1940 - Trouppe
1941 - Trouppe
1942 - Trouppe
1943 - Trouppe
1944 - Campanella
1945 - Campanella
1946 - Trouppe
1947 - Trouppe
1948 - Trouppe
Of course Campanella was very young in the late 1930's/early 1940's, but the point is that Trouppe was almost certainly the greater Negro League Player, and overall was probably at least very close to being just as great a player as Campanella.
WS
Campy 33-33-31-28-24-22-22-22-21-18-12-11-11-10 = 320
Trouppe 31-26-26-24-22-21-18-16-12 = 264
Campy's 14 years >10 are pretty extraordinary. This assumes a mid-season call-up in 1943, no MLE WS before that. Trouppe's MLEs show 9 years >10 WS. And Campy's top 4 seasons are significantly better than Trouppe's, Trouppe is more or less equal for #5 and #6, and then Campy pulls away again.
OPS+
Campy 158-54-53-34-30-20-20-13-4-2 (10 years >100 with ?100G)
Trouppe 153-45-45-41-35-33-29-14 (8 years > 100 with ? 100G)
Here years #4 through 8 of Trouppe are better than Campy's but #1-3 and #9-10 are all Campy. Actually Trouppe's big year (153 with 31 WS) is Campy-esque, too.
So I see Campy is significantly better on a 3-5 year peak basis, a little better for prime, and significantly better again for the career as a whole. Campy will be #1 on my ballot and Trouppe is around #20, destined to make my ballot someday, I would think.
As for the rest, it goes: Bresnahan, Mackey, Lombardi, Schang, Clapp and fugheddaboudit.
I didn't know we could vote for actors who played catchers in movies...does this apply to other positions, too? ('Cause if so, I'm voting for David Straithairn. Think that'll make karlmagnus happy?)
:)
I previously reported his career totals as .270/.372/.416/118/256.7 (see post #29).
Now those totals would be .270/.372/.420/119/259.5
It's just one OPS+ point, but I thought everyone might want to know.
There remains no accounting of his North Dakota exploits, so there's still no MLE for those seasons. But considering he returned to the NgLs at 25, it's not unlikely that his years in ND were typical growth years. So too his boxing year in 1937, if you choose to see it that way. In other words, the MLEs do not tell his full story.
Against contemporaries (of which none are in the HoM):
Walker Cooper 116 in 5100
Ernie Lombardi 125 in 6350
Gabby Hartnett is 126 in 7300
Bill Dickey is 127 in 7050
Still, I had him ranked too highly and he'll drop off my ballot into the mid 20s. That's assuming he's overall an average fielder for a catcher which I believe is a fair assumption.
(Mark Donelson, #38): I didn't know we could vote for actors who played catchers in movies...
Don't forget James Earl Jones (Bingo Long ... ).
1. There aren't enough catchers in the HoM, relative to the importance of the position.
2. Catchers before c. 1920 (the standardization of protective equipment) deserve a slight bonus.
3. Catchers, by the standards of other positions, are "short-career" players; hence, peak is more important to their HoM cases.
My rankings for 1982 (/ = big gap, -- = small gap) are Freehan (4)--Schang (6)--Trouppe (9) / Howard (20)--Lombardi (30ish)--Bresnahan (35ish).
-"A smart receiver and a superior handler of pitchers...."
-"During his short time with the Indians the veteran catcher proved to be a hard worker, good on blocking balls, and a very good receiver with an excellent arm who called a good game."
This isn't the glowing praise we often hear about NgLers' defense, but it is rather better than no mention at all of his glove. You have to interpret everything with NgL defense, and I don't think there's anything to suggest he was a poor defensive catcher. It's not unusual for NgL players to play multiple positions throughout their careers either, so the fact that he played elsewhere isn't suggestive of his defensive abilities by itself, except perhaps that his being stationed at 3B suggests the strength of his arm and maybe the quickness of his reflexes. Despite a lack of speed, Trouppe was a good athlete (he was a Golden Gloves boxer as well as a ballplayer), and was very likely a smart man (given his son's intelligence and the fact that he, himself, was known as a good game caller and was a successful manager too).
So I've taken the position that he was an average defensive catcher. I believe this is a reasonable position to take, neither extreme in the overrating-the-NgLs-based-on-glowing-oral-history direction, nor unduly knocking him down for a lack of glowing reports.
He was a strong offensive player, appears to have generally been durable, and had a long career. The matter of his undocumented Bismark days is not vital to his case, but credit for them could push him up a bit, especially for career voters. And I believe that the Bismark time should be credited to him because he was playing baseball professionally at the highest level available to him before Bismark---he didn't go to ND until the NgLs had collapsed under the weight of the depression.
As I said on the Simmons (I think) thread, QT and Simmons are very, very similar candidates. Without Bismark, QT's neck and neck with Simmons. With Bismark, there's an argument for placing him above Simmons by a nose. Either way, I have Simmons and Trouppe as extremely close to one another...just as I have Freehan and Simmons extremely close to one another (with Torre right there, too). And all of them are safely above my in/out line.
"Quincy Trouppe
G-24 (never missed a game once he joined ballclub)
AB-89
R- 22
H-39
2B-3
3B-5
HR-3
SAC-0
HP-0
BB-18
SB-3
AVG. .438 (league avg. .241)
OBP. .533 (lg avg. .300)
SLG. .685 (lg. avg. 330)
DEFENSE (at catcher):
G-23
DI- 207.0
PO- 247
AST- 15
E- 4 (three in one game!)
PCT.- .985 (league average .967)
Sure, he benefited from a lot of strikeouts, but it was a high strike out environment for everybody (league-wide, pitchers averaged 8.56 K/9)
SBA: 6
SB/9: 0.26 (league average 0.84)
Side note: He allowed two stolen bases in his debut game, then pretty much shut everybody down the rest of the summer- 4 in 22 games (0.18 per 9 defensive innings)
PB- 0 (!) (league avg. 0.12)
I get the impression that, even at a young age--- Trouppe was a pretty damn good defensive catcher. And a winner: Bismarck was 10-10-1 before Trouppe arrived, then rattled off an 18-2-4 mark the rest of the way. Paige arrived shortly after Trouppe and they were 14-0-3 with both stars on the ballclub. The losses and tie ballgames were against guys like Willie Foster and Barney Brown… other Negro stars.
Couple things to keep in mind… contrary to what has often been written, the competition in Bismarck was sketchy. It was akin to starting a league that had Dizzy Dean, Guy Bush, Ernie Lombardi and Dick Bartell at the top of their games, coupled with a couple AA ballplayers, some low-low-level minor league guys with alcohol problems, a couple dozen college kids and several high school players. Once in awhile (if somebody’s car got pulled over on the way to a game, for instance) they’d pull somebody out of the stands in dress pants to fill in for an inning or two. This is the honest to God truth. That being said- Bismarck WAS good. They played .500 ball against Negro League teams (KC, Chicago American Giants) who visited the Capital City, and beat the piss out of minor league all-star squads on a couple occasions."
Quincy Trouppe - 1952 Indiannapolis, American Association:
G - 84
AB - 205
H - 53
2B - 7
3B - 2
HR - 8
AVE - .259
The first MLEs are in post #6. According to that post, Trouppe hit .268/.372/.407 115 OPS+ with 277.3 Win Shares.
The second MLEs are in post #10. According to that post, Trouppe hit .270/.372/.416 118 OPS+* with 261.8 Win Shares.
The changes between the two are due to changes in playing time, which is why his WS drop while his rate stats go up. * - the rate stats given in post #10 are incorrect; Doc C gives the correct rates in post #20
The third MLEs are in post #25. Two different versions are given. According to the first Trouppe has 263.4 WS, according to the second he has 267.5
The changes here are purely to the estimated WS--the first version is based on the assumption that Trouppe would have spent some time at other positions. The second is if he spent the entire time at catcher. The first version (WS1) is supposed to be the same as post #10 (version 2.0). However, it is not--the WS given for Trouppe's last 4 years in WS1 (post #25) are higher than version 2.0 (post #10). No reason is given for the change.
The fourth MLEs are in post #29. Two different versions are again given. WS1: 256.7, WS2: 260.5
The changes here occur in two seasons: 1938 and 1946. the amount of playing time is downgraded to better reflect the playing time catchers in the majors recieved during Trouppe's era. What was Trouppe's best season (1946) becomes his 4th best season, dropping from 30/31 WS to 25/26 WS, leveling his peak.
The fifth MLEs are in post #40. According to this post, Trouppe hit .270/.372/.420 119 OPS+ with 259.5 WS.
These changes are made "by the ability to compare him to his league." The 4 addition SLG. points increased his OPS+ by 1 and his WS by 2.8 (which means his catching only WS would be 263.3). These are the last of the changes to Doc C's MLEs.
So, after looking through this thread, it appears to me that the final conclusion on Quincy Trouppe's MLEs are:
.270/.372/.420 // 119 OPS+ // 260/26-26-26/112 (some time spent at 3B/OF)
.270/.372/.420 // 119 OPS+ // 263/27-26-26/113 (catching exclusively)
Now, these numbers don't match the ones Chris Cobb mentioned, however, Doc C does give MLEs for 1931 & 1932 (post #6). But Trouppe was 18/19 years old; he probably wouldn't be playing in the majors then. Also, Trouppe did spend 4 years playing ball in North Dakota (1933-36), for which we have few/no numbers--post #54 is the definitive post on that subject. On Trouppe's defense and overall reputation, the latest is post #52 (also Mr. Cobb's post #18 in the 1995 Ballot Discussion thread).
I hope this helps . . . or something. I was a bit confused over all the number changes, so by working this out at least I'm a little less confused and maybe if I'm wrong somewhere it could be pointed out. . . . Also, thank you Dr. Chaleeko for the work you put in to produce these MLEs; without them Trouppe would recieve much less consideration, from me at least.
#6 #10 #25WS1 #29 #25WS2 #29
1938 16.5 16.5 16.5 15.3 17.1 15.8
1939 26.5 26.4 26.4 26.8
1940 18.1 18.1 18.1 18.1
1941 25 23.6 23.6 24.2
1942 21.4 22.5 22.5 22.5
1943 21.3 21.3 21.3 21.3
1944 10.2 11.7 11.7 12.1
1945 11 11 11 11.5
1946 31.9 30.7 30.7 25.2 31.4 25.7
1947 25.6 25.6 25.6 26.1
1948 25.6 25.6 25.6 26
1949 12.6 9.5 10 10
1950 10.8 6.2 6.5 6.5
1951 11.8 5.8 6.2 6.2
1952 9 7.3 7.7 7.7
15 yrs 277.3 261.8 263.4 256.7 267.5 260.5
+2.8 280.1 264.6 266.2 259.5 270.3 263.3
1931 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8
1932 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4
296.3 280.8 282.4 275.7 286.5 279.5
Just incase it's easier, here's a chart of the Win Shares estimates. The number above each column is the post in which they appear. The bottom section is what Trouppe's numbers would look like if MLEs given in post #6 for '31 & '32 are included.
And then the second really big question is the one everybody wrestles with on every MLE but which seem especially germane for a catcher. In my heart I don't believe he was any better, or probably as good as, Elston Howard. But because we're translating Trouppe he gets the benefit of the doubt on playing time. Howard, in the real world, got everything but.
(1) He is clearly a member of the Schang/Bresnahan/Howard/Munson cluster of catchers. (Other candidates for this cluster include, depending on your preferences, Tenace, Posada, and Lombardi.)
[That cluster is clearly below all of the catchers elected thus far with the possible exceptions of Bennett, Freehan, and Mackey. (Because of the way I value defense and peak, I have Bennett and Freehan ahead of these guys. I think Mackey was a mild mistake and have him below the four catchers named in (1) above.)]
(2) There is room in the HoM for 1-3 guys in the cluster.
(3) Trouppe is the best candidate in the cluster.
Unless someone can convince me that propositions (1), (2), or (3) is untrue, Trouppe will be in my top 5.
The NgL have a lot of great catcher candidates.
Either
A) The NgL had a lot of great catchers
or maybe
B) NgL schedules or catcher demands or other considerations were such that allowed catchers to not face the same challenging circumstances most MLB catchers did, thus enhancing their ability to play well and long.
I have no idea why B) might be true. Workload / schedule / rest days? Responsibilities of game calling, squatting, throwing out runners?
Those who have studied NgL history more than I might be able to give insight. It sure COULD be just random chance, or maybe a greater tendency among NgL teams to allow or even push their top stars to play catcher.
But if there WAS something different, 'twould be good to unearth and analyze it before next week's vote, no?
The answer is not B. Negro League schedules were harder than MLB schedules forcing NeL catchers to face more challenging circumtances than most MLB catchers. A Negro League catcher and a Major League catcher might be expected to catch the same number of games in a season. However, while the Major League catcher was given a day off, the Negro League catcher would be expected to play a different position when he wasn't catching. That's one of the reasons why catchers like Trouppe have so many games at other positions. It wasn't because they weren't good catchers. It was because they were being given a partial day off (kind of like today's AL players being given a day at DH instead of in the field). The same thing was done with pitchers, such as Jose Mendez and Martin Dihigo who would play shortstop in between starts on the mound.
The Negro League schedule was also harder. Negro Leagues rarely had the set schedule that the Major Leagues did and they certainly weren't able to sustain three-game series before moving on to the next town. Travel in the Negro Leagues was exponentially more difficult than it was in the Major Leagues. And while the NeL teams may not have played as many league games as their MLB counterparts, they were always barnstorming in between league games in order to remain financially solvent.
As for rest days, NeL players did not make as much money as MLB players and couldn't afford to take the winter off. Most NeL players played year-round, joining American teams during the summer and heading further south in the winter.
If anything, the wear and tear on a Negro League catcher was significantly higher than it was on a MLB catcher. Yet, despite all of that, the prestige of the position continued to draw top candidates. It shouldn't be surprising or shameful in any way for us to elect more NeL catchers to the HoM than players from other positions.
St. Louis Stars (1930-31, 1939); Detroit Wolves (1932); Homestead Grays (1932); Kansas City Monarchs (1932, 1934-36); Chicago American Giants (1933, 1948); Indianapolis ABC’S (1938-39); Mexican League (1939-44, 1950-51); Puerto Rico (1941-42, 1944-45, 1947-50); Cleveland Buckeyes (1944-47); Venezuela (1945-47, 1951-53); New York Cubans (1949); Cuba (1950-51); Cleveland (AL) 1952; Colombia (1953-54)
The case for Monterey would be
(1) The most win shares (depending on the 1944 split)
(2) Those were his age 26-28 seasons, and thus are more likely to represent his true playing peak.
(3) It would be cool to for the Mexican Leagues to have an official representative in the HoM.
The case for Cleveland would be
(1) Longest continuous stretch wth any one team, by half a season
(2) Possibly his most win shares with any one team
(3) Managed there
I tend to not to pay much attention to the Puerto Rico Winter League myself, partly because I don't have a good read its quality, and partly because as a winter league with short seasons it generally seems to me to be a secondary league for players. The CWL had short seasons also, but we are a lot more certain about the quality of play (which was even higher than the NeL at a few points), and it was clearly the home league for players like Mendez, Dihigo, and Oms. Trouppe was always playing summer baseball somewhere else when he was playing winters in Puerto Rico, so I tend to view his play there as secondary.
If we were to elect a player like Pancho Coimbre or Perucho Cepeda, I think it would make sense to give them a PRWL cap, because that would be their home league.
Now, if Eric chimes with evidence that Trouppe played with the same PRWL team every time he went down, or that he had a strong connection to baseball there, that might open up a different view of his play there.
I could imagine an argument for Willard Brown to have a PRWL cap. If he had moved around like Trouppe did in the rest of his career, his PRWL time where he was clearly a big star, might have been the anchor of his career. Since Brown had a long and distinguished tenure with the Monarchs, they were the obvious choice for him, of course.
So maybe we ought to consider the PRWL for Trouppe, to see if he has a steady history with a team there.
Another reason I look favorably on the Mexican cap option for Trouppe (if he is in fact elected), is that he was definitely a very well known, very big star there.
MxL
1939-1941 Monterrey (212 g)
1942-1944 Mexico City (203 g)
The schedules waxed and waned in this time....
NgL
1945-1947 Cleveland NNL (154 g)
Shorter skeds than the MxL.
I don't see an easy answer here. Here's another branch for the decision tree: have we honored any other player with a cap from a non-U.S. team? If not, then I'd default to Cleveland. If so, more discussion needed.
Chris, you are probably correct. Obviously the whole NgL schedule was "rougher" than MLB. This impacted every NgL player. But it is possible that catchers were impacted more. You would think that we would find this in the data; if there were FEWER NgL catchers who lasted a long time, I would think we'd consider giving bonus credit to them. OTOH, that is not the case; there seem to be proportionately MORE great NgL catchers.
Your suggestion, shared by others, that teams and players pushed their greats to the C position more than MLB does is cetainly plausible. But let me say this: MLB catchers are valuable by measures like RCAP because so few of them hit well. If NgL catchers generally were "better", then their effective RCAP (or comparison against their colleagues who played catcher) would not be very high. Nonetheless, many argue that we ought to compare them more against their MLB counterparts (using MLEs), and in so doing, we find Trouppe more HoM worthy than say Bresnahan or Munson. But IF we give NgL catchers a bonus because more great dark-skinned baseballers played catcher, should we then not give a small penalty to the other 7 positions, since fewer of them were there? It's a small thing; but maybe the reason an OFer (Oms?) stood out among OFers was some stud player donned a mask and squatted instead, where in MLB, it's the opposite; sometimes managers saw a great bat and got him out from behind the plate so his bat could play every day.
Long and short of it: I am coming around on Trouppe. I have been pinging him too much for only being the (my estimate) 5th best NgL catcher. BUT. If he moves up 12 places on my ballot, 6 other NgLers go down 2 places each (not a hard and fast rule, but a generalization).
I may re-submit my 1995 ballot.
that would certinaly explain how Eddie Collins got a White Sox hat
Oh, I don't know -- it might have had something to do with the fact that Collins played 514 more games for the White Sox . . . Just speculating.
John, in Trouppe's case, the dartboard might well be the way to go. Fortunately, there probably won't be Monterey and Cleveland Buckeye partisans itching to second-guess the result if it goes against the home team.
:-)
Despite yest's unwarranted sarcasm, it is close, though Eddie's ChiSox years have a slight edge based on his much longer career there.
I'm thinking maybe 65 pct C and either 20 pct 3B and 15 pct OF, or 25 pct 3B and 10 pct OF.
Anyone have a preference?
Very difficult to say. Cisneros gives no breakouts of his positional stuff. Here's what Clark and Lester say:
1930 of c
1931 c of
1932 c of
1933 c of
1938 c of
1939 mx c 2b ss of
1939 us c
1940 3b
1941 c 3b
1942 c
1943 c
1944 c 3b 1b of
1945 c of
1946 c of
1947 c of
1948 c of
1949 can c of
1949 us c
1950 c 3b
1951 c
1952 c
1953 c
all catcher in the winterball entries.
I would say that Bismarck ought to be added to Satchel Paige's team's list, esp. if Satchel Paige's all-stars (which was not a league team at all) is listed.
Will Trouppe, if elected, be the first electee to have played in the CPL?
Thanks, Chris!
I believe so, Chris.
Willie Wells was a playing manager in Canada, but it's unclear from Riley whether that was in the CPL or not.
He gets in a mere 6 MLB games for the 1962 Indians, who go 93-61 and finish in 2nd place.
Trouppe is 1 for 10 with a walk at age 39, lasting from April 30 til May 10.
He does get a brief look at 36-yr-old Luke Easter putting up a 31 HR, 97 RBI, 141 OPS+ season in 437 AB, along with an All-Star season from 28-yr-old Larry Doby (32-104 with 162 OPS+, 2nd only to Mantle).
Birdie Tebbetts wrapped up his own long career that year, with 37 G C. Birdie debuted in 1936 backing up Mickey Cochrane, and watching Gehringer, Goslin, Simmons.
Trouppe would have seen a little of Pete Reiser - once the pride of Brooklyn before he ran into too many OF walls - struggle to go 6 for 44 in his last go-round with those 1952 Indians.
Trouppe happened to have been around, too, to see Snuffy Stirnweiss's last effort - a 1-G appearance at 3B without an AB for the Tribe.
Bob Feller had a bad year at 9-13, but colleagues Early Wynn, Bob Lemon, and Mike Garcia all won 20 and went a combined 67-34.
Has anyone ever asked Feller - who's still quite sharp - what he recalls of Trouppe's cup of coffee? He'd remember it well.
Team - Drummondville
G - 82
AB - 264
R - 45
H - 73
2B - 16
3B - 0
HR - 8
RBI - 37
SB - 1
AVE - .277
Fielding (positional breakout unknown except primarily catcher)
G - 82
PO - 431
A - 63
E - 13
PB - 16
League Totals - 175 players:
AB - 20306
R - 3044
H - 5412
2B - 934
3B - 81
HR - 459
RBI - 2749
SB - 440
AVE - .267
At "Quincey Trouppe" he is still only a few posts up from the bottom of the board.
>>
86. Eric Chalek (Dr. Chaleeko) Posted: March 04, 2007 at 07:32 PM (#2306717)
No. Ray Brown was there 1950, 51, 53 according to the Clark/Lester book.
Willie Wells was a playing manager in Canada, but it's unclear from Riley whether that was in the CPL or not.
<<
That is the "Canadian Provincial League" --based in Quebec? in Quebec and other eastern provinces?
Or was there another Quebec Provincial League?
from "Willie Wells" at Wikipedia:
>>
He returned to the U.S. in 1945 and played for various Negro League teams through the 1950 season. He then went to Canada as a player-manager for the Winnipeg Buffaloes of the Western Canadian Leagues, remaining there until his retirement from playing baseball in 1954.
<<
Winnipeg is north of Bismarck.
The official website of the CanAm League makes some vague claim regarding this series of league names:
>>
Eastern Canada League -- 1923
Quebec-Ontario-Vermont League -- 1924
Quebec Provincial League -- 1940
CanAm League -- 1941-42, 1946-50, 2005-present
Provincial League -- 1951-55
Eastern League -- 1971-77
Northern League -- 1999-2002
Northeast League -- 2003-04
<<
I feel certain that the 1950s Provincial League was based in the east (and I suppose that all its teams were located in the east). Stepping back onto solid ground, I feel certain that Ray Brown pitching in Quebec province and Willie Wells player-managing in the Western Canada League north of Bismarck ND were working in different leagues.
--
Did people in Puerto Rico and Cuba call their winter leagues the Puerto Rican Winter League and the Cuban Winter League? Do PRWL and CWL abbreviate translations of their Spanish-language names?
I doubt that that is the case re the Provincial League in Canada, and the second reference in "Ray Brown" at wikipedia supports my guess (as does the CanAm website if it refers to the same league).
from "Ray Brown" at wikipedia
>>
But after his long solid stint with the Grays, he opted to play in Mexico and in the Canadian Provincial League in his later and final years. In those years, he continued to dominate most batters, leading Sherbrooke to a title in the Provincial League.
<<
(my emphasis on the two references)
Here's a link
Quebec Provincial League
Chet Brewer was in this league. Former MLB players such as Sal Maglie and Danny Gardella played there also.
Armed with a comprehensive list of players banned for going to Mexico in 1946, maybe we would find most of them in Quebec.
#92
Thanks, Kevin.
I won't call that league the "Canadian" one.
The CanAm League website lists Quebec Provincial League for 1940 only --now I suspect that that was the unique season for a "Q.P.L." in Organized Baseball.
The Negro Leagues Database is currently missing most of Trouppe’s seasons. I happen to have access to his the Mexican League stats but some Negro Leagues seasons aren’t available yet. Will update when they are.
Currently sporting 56.6 WAR.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main