|
|
Hall of Merit— A Look at Baseball's All-Time Best
Sunday, September 17, 2006
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (118 - 4:10pm, May 30)Last:  Kiko SakataReranking First Basemen: Discussion Thread (27 - 2:03pm, May 30)Last: DL from MNReranking Shortstops Ballot (10 - 5:16pm, May 25)Last: Chris CobbCal Ripken, Jr. (15 - 12:42am, May 18)Last: The Honorable ArdoNew Eligibles Year by Year (996 - 12:23pm, May 12)Last:  cookiedabookieReranking Shortstops: Discussion Thread (67 - 6:46pm, May 07)Last: cookiedabookieReranking Centerfielders: Results (20 - 10:31am, Apr 28)Last: cookiedabookieReranking Center Fielders Ballot (20 - 9:30am, Apr 06)Last: DL from MNRanking Center Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion Thread (77 - 5:45pm, Apr 05)Last: Esteban RiveraReranking Right Fielders: Results (34 - 2:55am, Mar 30)Last: bjhanke2023 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (376 - 10:42am, Mar 07)Last:  Dr. ChaleekoReranking Right Fielders: Ballot (21 - 5:20pm, Mar 01)Last: DL from MNRanking Right Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion thread (71 - 9:47pm, Feb 28)Last: GuapoDobie Moore (239 - 10:40am, Feb 11)Last:  Mike WebberRanking Left Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion thread (96 - 12:21pm, Feb 08)Last: DL from MN
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: September 17, 2006 at 07:13 PM (#2179651):-)
Marc, believe it or not, I'm a political junkie outside of the HoM. I spend time posting in political forums almost as much as I do here.
Both sides of the aisle have pointed their fingers at the other side when it comes to the criminal Horton for '88 (Gore in the primary and Bush #1/Atwater in the general election). I wanted to nip in the bud with post #1 by acknowledging both positions, but...
I don't remember any negative stories about him. He did have a long and productive career for the Tigers, so I'm not surprised by his selection. Besides, if Ed Kranepool is a Met HOFer, Horton is inner-circle in Detroit. :-D
I was shocked to hear that the Tigers have retired Horton's number. I guess he was a great guy.
I don't remember any negative stories about him. He did have a long and productive career for the Tigers, so I'm not surprised by his selection. Besides, if Ed Kranepool is a Met HOFer, Horton is inner-circle in Detroit. :-D
Horton was also a Detroit native, which could have been a factor. During the 1967 riots, he ventured out onto the streets in full uniform in an attempt to help restore the peace, a very brave and noble thing to do.
Retiring his uniform may also have been a way of mending fences by reaching out to the Black community in Detroit, which I believe has had a bit of rocky relationship with the Tigers over the years. (And by mentioning this, I am not saying that honor was undeserved, or trying to start a racial flame war. But I believe that factor, and hometown factor, were part of the reason why his number was retired).
Horton 119/165-37-33-32-32-25-16-16-8-4
Duffy 121/172-37-25-25-23-23-22-16-6
Easter 120/175-44-25-23-20-19-18-11-11-11-11-11-11-6-6-6
Closest comps I could find among contenders. Duffy was a better fielder, maybe, while Easter's record is somewhat speculative.
(I hadn't been aware that Gore brought it up. And that's my final answer ;-)
Horton was a DH for around 40% of his career games. In the other 60%, he should have been a DH.
Horton was a DH for around 40% of his career games. In the other 60%, he should have been a DH.
I have to agree. Duffy was a world-class fielder, while Horton could be said to be better than the Win Shares version of Manny Ramirez. :-)
Which is fine by me, AFAIAC. The team HOF's standards shouldn't be necessarily the same as the MLB HOF's, IMO.
Gotcha ;-)
Oh well. Big deal. No need to sugarcoat it. That being said, Willie was a good player. Not as good as Kaline, Cobb, Gehringer, Newhouser and Greenberg, but pretty good nonetheless.
I knew you had to be joking, Marc. :-) The difference between them as fielders is Bunyonesque.
That must have been some clubhouse!
ditto
Freehan, Cash, Trammell, Kell, Whiteker, Morris, Kuenn ext. would have been better choices
Horton at one time held the Mariners' single-season home run record...
What's this another Pavement fan in our midst? (in addition to me and Brent --- or was it Daryn?)
My infrastructure's rotting. Hey, are you mixing drinks with a plastic-tipped cigar?
I'd count, too!
With Kaline, McAuliffe, Cash, and Freehan underrated (and Hiller too by 1967), someone must have been overrated.
With Kaline, McAuliffe, Cash, and Freehan underrated (and Hiller too by 1967), someone must have been overrated.
Not necessarily overrated, Paul, but there were certainly weak spots: Jerry Lumpe, Don Wert, Chico Fernandez, Cesar Gutierrez, for example.
With Kaline, McAuliffe, Cash, and Freehan underrated (and Hiller too by 1967), someone must have been overrated.
Denny McLain? Mickey Lolich? They had a couple of good years each, but both of them also got racked up a lot of wins on run support as well.
I don't think its just the Tigers, there were a ton of non-inner-circle hitters from 1965-1976 who were underrated. I think its just part of the playing in a low-scoring era. Willie Horton had a 165 OPS+ in 1968. That's within a few points of the career highs for guys like David Ortiz, Vladimir Guerrero and A-Rod. But Horton only scored 65 runs and 85 RBI's due to the the low scoring context (even in a hitters park like Tiger Stadium).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main