User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3707 seconds
45 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Friday, January 14, 2022Breaking Down The MLB Top 100 Prospect Incentive Proposal
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: January 14, 2022 at 12:42 PM | 15 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: labor issues, prospects |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Zach Davies’ estranged wife says MLB pitcher ghosted her for a year
(60 - 2:09pm, May 23) Last: Lassus Newsblog: JOEY VOTTO IS THE GREATEST REDS PLAYER OF ALL TIME (20 - 1:53pm, May 23) Last: Nasty Nate Newsblog: 2022 NBA Playoffs thread (1725 - 1:45pm, May 23) Last: spivey Newsblog: Roger Angell, Who Wrote About Baseball With Passion, Dies at 101 (54 - 12:51pm, May 23) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: Adley Rutschman, MLB's No. 1 prospect, called up to O's (29 - 12:40pm, May 23) Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave) Newsblog: Former Giants fan-favorite infielder Joe Panik retires from MLB (16 - 12:05pm, May 23) Last: jingoist Sox Therapy: One Step Forward (19 - 11:57am, May 23) Last: villageidiom Newsblog: Juan Soto trade rumors: Nationals may be 'motivated' to trade outfielder (58 - 11:06am, May 23) Last: bfan Newsblog: Yankees, White Sox benches clear after Josh Donaldson calls Tim Anderson 'Jackie' Robinson (47 - 10:45am, May 23) Last: Rally Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - Crowning Champions and Pro-Rel (160 - 10:42am, May 23) Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale Newsblog: WEEKEND OMNICHATTER for May 20-22, 2022 (120 - 9:59am, May 23) Last: The Duke Newsblog: Sports teams love crypto. What happens when their sponsor strikes out? (12 - 8:35am, May 23) Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale Newsblog: Seattle Mariners sign Justin Upton (14 - 12:33am, May 23) Last: bookbook Newsblog: New York Mets' Max Scherzer out 6-8 weeks with oblique strain (16 - 12:25pm, May 21) Last: nick swisher hygiene Newsblog: Sports Venues Create Quiet Refuge for Fans with Sensory Needs (2 - 7:23pm, May 20) Last: AndrewJ |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3707 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John Northey Posted: January 16, 2022 at 12:24 PM (#6061224)Seems more fair. The players who are hurt by the current policy get rewarded while the team who pushed it get punished. Can't think of anything more fair than that.
What if service time were only measured in half year increments (at least for free agency purposes). So if you spend a single day in the big leagues, you get half a year service time credit. If you spend ~85 days or more in the big leagues, you get a full year credit.
Bryant type situations should be avoided, as the team would have to leave him down over half the season to gain the extra year. Guys ready around mid year might get down a few weeks longer so the team only spends a half year service time but those guys aren’t really better off today. Fringey guys like relievers who get yo-yoed all year could get gamed out of a few years, but those guys rarely last long enough for it to matter. Maybe teams in an emergency situation are a little less likely to call up a guy that aren’t sure is ready, so that could be a drawback but seems like an acceptable trade-off.
So now, dear readers, pick it apart and tell what’s wrong with this as a plan.
So we need a lottery system! A random selection of
1. 1/3 of players with 5-<6 years become FAs (unless under a contract extension of course)
2. 1/4 of players with 4-<5
3. 1/8 of players with 3-<4
4. 1/16 of players with 2-<3
5. 1/32 of players with 1-<2
I think I'm kidding.
EDIT: Further consequence is it may force a team like the Rays to spend some of their money ... if you stock your team with pre-arb and arb players, you'd lose 2-3 players a year for nothing. You either start making them good buyout offers or you have to start signing a few more FAs to build your winning team.
As far what to give up, do you expect me to do Tony Clark’s whole job for him? :)
What is a half-year credit? Are they eligible for FA in the middle of their seventh season?
How does that help a player who comes up and stays up on July 17 vs. the guy who comes up and stays up the next year on June 12?
Oh, and though you somehow didn't ask, I do hate pants.
Player B called up June 2022 (before full year cutoff)
Player A: current system: free agent after 2027 season
My idea: free agent after 2027
Player B: current: free agent after 2028
My idea: free agent after 2027
Player A (guy who’s not ready until mid-year) comes out the same compared to today
Player B gets free agency a year earlier compared to today
So if you want to compare them directly player b comes out better than player a. But it’s because the system helps player b while not hurting player a.
Note that neither are really the player the system is meant to help. It’s meant to help the guy who’s ready at the beginning of the season
6 years of control was negotiated in good faith years ago. Today teams game the system to get practically 7 full seasons of control. In my system, the gaming leaves the team with less than 6.5 years of control (which players in that boat already give today)
Also since I wasn’t explicit about it, this would apply for arb as well. Super 2 would no longer be a thing.
One potential drawback for the players is that teams may be less likely to call a guy up for September if that uses a half year of service up. This seems like a trade off that’s worth it
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main