Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, November 16, 2019

Brewers’ Christian Yelich tweets harshly at Yu Darvish over accusation

Although a lot of people are talking about banning technology to deal with this problem, technology might provide the solution. Why not have wearable Bluetooth devices where the catcher and pitcher communicate? A lot of catchers already wear wristbands with notes. Why not replace them with a couple of buttons for pitch type and location?

Jim Furtado Posted: November 16, 2019 at 08:11 AM | 22 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: brewers, sign stealing

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: November 16, 2019 at 10:55 AM (#5901619)
Although a lot of people are talking about banning technology to deal with this problem, technology might provide the solution. Why not have wearable Bluetooth devices where the catcher and pitcher communicate? A lot of catchers already wear wristbands with notes. Why not replace them with a couple of buttons for pitch type and location?

Because then the cheating will take the form of SIGINT and decryption technology, which will be much harder to detect.
   2. Rough Carrigan Posted: November 16, 2019 at 11:46 AM (#5901626)
Could Yelich be glancing at the 3rd base coach who maybe sees something in how Darvish grips the ball for his pitches better than the batter can see it?
   3. The Duke Posted: November 16, 2019 at 12:10 PM (#5901631)
I’ve looked at that footage - there just nothing there that I can see.
   4. Jeremy Renner App is Dead and I killed it Posted: November 16, 2019 at 03:53 PM (#5901685)
Checking out bbref the Brewers did have .040 higher OPS at home. Helped by hitting .011 higher at home and drawing a few more walks. 8 fewer extra base hits at home with 2 more dingers but fewer doubles at home. .306 babip at home, .288 on the road. If there is some hidden home advantage it's not screaming out anything.

On player level Hiura had big split in favor of Miller Park. Grandal did better on the road by .092 in OPS. Moose got killed at Miller, .920 ops vs .765.

Wouldn't the vets be able to take advantage of some secret sign setup?

Just asking. I don't get this whole outrage thing.
   5. Greg Pope Posted: November 16, 2019 at 10:51 PM (#5901768)
Why not replace them with a couple of buttons for pitch type and location?

It should be even simpler. The catcher wears an earpiece and the pitcher just tells him what he's going to throw. The pitcher should be deciding anyway. The only reason the catcher gives the signs is because the batter can see the pitcher.
   6. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: November 16, 2019 at 11:00 PM (#5901770)
It should be even simpler. The catcher wears an earpiece and the pitcher just tells him what he's going to throw. The pitcher should be deciding anyway. The only reason the catcher gives the signs is because the batter can see the pitcher.

And how long before the other team is intercepting that communication? Have we not seen all the data breaches out there? What makes you think that an over the air voice signal will be remotely secure?

Making it electronic makes it 1) no harder, and maybe easier to steal signs, and 2) much harder to catch the cheaters. It's a terrible idea.
   7. Greg Pope Posted: November 16, 2019 at 11:04 PM (#5901774)
And how long before the other team is intercepting that communication?

Oh, I agree that security is an issue either way. I just don't see why the catcher would continue to call pitches when the pitcher is the ultimate decider of what pitch to throw. If you're going to implement an electronic solution, then give the call to the pitcher.
   8. Mayor Blomberg Posted: November 16, 2019 at 11:26 PM (#5901777)
Two tin cans and 63 feet of string.
   9. Hank Gillette Posted: November 17, 2019 at 03:09 AM (#5901787)
And how long before the other team is intercepting that communication? Have we not seen all the data breaches out there? What makes you think that an over the air voice signal will be remotely secure?


Encryption.
   10. Fancy Crazy Town Banana Pants Handle Posted: November 17, 2019 at 05:00 AM (#5901789)
And how long before the other team is intercepting that communication?

Oh, I agree that security is an issue either way. I just don't see why the catcher would continue to call pitches when the pitcher is the ultimate decider of what pitch to throw. If you're going to implement an electronic solution, then give the call to the pitcher.

One of the benefits of having the pitcher call pitches this way, is that it reduces the time between signal and pitch. Which gives the opposing team much less time to intercept the signal, and pass on the information to the hitter, in a short enough time where he can do anything with that information.

When they pitcher tells the catcher what is coming, he is basically ready, and can go straight into his windup, the second after he says it. If he gets the signal from the catcher, he has to acknowledge it, mentally adjust what he is going to do, get the grip right, etc.
   11. PreservedFish Posted: November 17, 2019 at 08:38 AM (#5901797)
Since we're automating the umpire, why not automate the catcher? The pitcher could throw whatever he wanted.
   12. Jack Sommers Posted: November 17, 2019 at 09:37 AM (#5901799)
And how long before the other team is intercepting that communication? Have we not seen all the data breaches out there? What makes you think that an over the air voice signal will be remotely secure?

Making it electronic makes it 1) no harder, and maybe easier to steal signs, and 2) much harder to catch the cheaters. It's a terrible idea.


Is this an issue in the NFL, where they have been transmitting to headsets inside QB helmets for years ?
   13. bfan Posted: November 17, 2019 at 10:33 AM (#5901800)

Is this an issue in the NFL, where they have been transmitting to headsets inside QB helmets for years ?


I feel certain the Patriots are listening to every word every team is saying, in Foxboro.
   14. jmurph Posted: November 17, 2019 at 10:48 AM (#5901803)
I feel certain the Patriots are listening to every word every team is saying, in Foxboro.

You're getting your conspiracy theories wrong, they've been accused of interfering with the opposing team's communications.

But sadly, Mike Timlin's constant whining notwithstanding, the NFL controls the communications system in the NFL.
   15. KronicFatigue Posted: November 17, 2019 at 12:31 PM (#5901818)
Oh, I agree that security is an issue either way. I just don't see why the catcher would continue to call pitches when the pitcher is the ultimate decider of what pitch to throw. If you're going to implement an electronic solution, then give the call to the pitcher.


I've heard announcers suggest that catchers can see hitters adjusting, whether it's crowding the plate, choking up, etc better than pitchers and thus are better at countering it.

I presumed that catchers have more time/energy to build a gameplan against a lineup and that's why they call the game. Is that not true?
   16. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: November 17, 2019 at 01:11 PM (#5901821)
I presumed that catchers have more time/energy to build a gameplan against a lineup and that's why they call the game. Is that not true?

Wouldn't a starter who pitches only once every 5 days have more time to plan, vs. a catcher who's playing 3 of 4 games?
   17. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: November 17, 2019 at 01:12 PM (#5901822)
Encryption.

Is broken constantly.
   18. baerga1 Posted: November 17, 2019 at 01:46 PM (#5901826)
Building on what Kronic is saying, I have always assumed that the reason catchers call pitches is because it is a significant mental load. Pitching is so difficult as it is that it makes sense to me that you would want the pitcher to just concentrate on executing pitches.

It may also be that a catcher is able to be more objective about what pitches are working. A pitcher may be prone to getting emotionally attached to certain pitches for whatever reason or be unable to tell how well his velocity or break is working that day.
   19. Walt Davis Posted: November 17, 2019 at 02:43 PM (#5901833)
Wouldn't a starter

Daddy, what's a starting pitcher?

I have always assumed that the reason catchers call pitches is because it is a significant mental load.

Yep, pitchers are Nuke LaLoosh and catchers are Crash Davis. Rule #1 of the unwritten rules.
   20. Greg Pope Posted: November 17, 2019 at 04:25 PM (#5901845)
I have always assumed that the reason catchers call pitches is because it is a significant mental load.

I think all of that is an after-the-fact justification. Catchers call pitches because the batter can't see them do it. Everything else follows from that.

Pitchers have the final call anyway. They can shake off the catcher.
   21. Cris E Posted: November 17, 2019 at 08:11 PM (#5901865)
Catchers are there for the whole game and can see what's working or not working on each hitter. Pitchers come and go, and they can't even watch while warming up. Plus the whole neutral observer thing where they're not nearly as jacked into the pitcher-hitter battle and can be a bit more dispassionate in choosing sequences.
   22. Bote Man Posted: November 18, 2019 at 02:47 AM (#5901896)
One word: neural interface.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Forsch 10 From Navarone (Dayn)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogChicago Cubs facing federal review over Wrigley Field access
(12 - 1:16am, Dec 10)
Last: bobm

NewsblogOT - College Football Bowl Spectacular (December 2019 - January 2020)
(25 - 12:08am, Dec 10)
Last: calming him down with his 57i66135

NewsblogOT - NBA Thread, Start of the 2019-2020 Season
(1398 - 11:42pm, Dec 09)
Last: Athletic Supporter is USDA certified lean

NewsblogNationals re-sign Stephen Strasburg to seven-year, $245 million deal
(40 - 11:16pm, Dec 09)
Last: The Duke

NewsblogLou Whitaker snubbed from the Hall of Fame again
(95 - 11:05pm, Dec 09)
Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to

NewsblogTesting, no suspensions for opioids considered likely in MLB
(11 - 11:04pm, Dec 09)
Last: A triple short of the cycle

NewsblogOT - Catch-All Pop Culture Extravaganza (December 2019)
(80 - 10:59pm, Dec 09)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

NewsblogMLB: Is Mike Fiers a snitch? Depends on who you ask
(12 - 10:50pm, Dec 09)
Last: A triple short of the cycle

NewsblogBaseball’s Most Handsome Managers
(15 - 10:38pm, Dec 09)
Last: Walt Davis

Hall of Merit2020 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(338 - 10:14pm, Dec 09)
Last: Dr. Chaleeko

NewsblogOT- Soccer Thread- October 2019
(844 - 10:03pm, Dec 09)
Last: I am going to be Frank

NewsblogBBO--Hall of Fame-Simmons
(2 - 9:58pm, Dec 09)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCaptain Obvious
(77 - 9:53pm, Dec 09)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogDave Parker's larger-than-life legacy is one MLB fans should never forget
(30 - 9:39pm, Dec 09)
Last: Jay Z

NewsblogMiller, Simmons elected to HOF on Modern Era ballot
(63 - 7:57pm, Dec 09)
Last: caspian88

Page rendered in 0.3723 seconds
67 querie(s) executed