User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.7511 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Tuesday, May 16, 2023Cardinals reverse Willson Contreras’ demotion from catcher after … 6 days
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: May 16, 2023 at 09:16 AM | 35 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: cardinals, willson contreras |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Yankees get Juan Soto in blockbuster trade with Padres
(60 - 2:49am, Dec 08) Last: rr: over-entitled starf@ck3r Newsblog: OT - NBA Redux Thread for the End of 2023 (155 - 2:34am, Dec 08) Last: aberg Newsblog: Jeimer Candelario, Reds reach 3-year, $45M deal, sources say (17 - 12:08am, Dec 08) Last: NaOH Newsblog: Shohei Ohtani's secretive free agency is a missed opportunity for him and MLB (34 - 11:36pm, Dec 07) Last: Booey Newsblog: OT Soccer - World Cup Final/European Leagues Start (327 - 11:06pm, Dec 07) Last: SoSH U at work Newsblog: Who is on the 2024 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot and what’s the induction process? (416 - 10:20pm, Dec 07) Last: Tom Nawrocki Newsblog: Carlyle’s Rubenstein Is in Talks to Acquire Baltimore Orioles (8 - 8:44pm, Dec 07) Last: sunday silence (again) Hall of Merit: 2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion (191 - 7:43pm, Dec 07) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Guardians win Draft Lottery, securing next year's top pick (7 - 6:19pm, Dec 07) Last: Zach Newsblog: Eduardo Rodriguez signs with Diamondbacks: NL champs add to solid rotation on four-year, $80M deal, per report (3 - 6:15pm, Dec 07) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Reports: Astros, Victor Caratini agree to 2-year, $12M deal (7 - 5:23pm, Dec 07) Last: Tom and Shivs couples counselor Newsblog: Mookie Betts will be 'every-day second baseman' for Dodgers (38 - 4:14pm, Dec 07) Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Newsblog: Red Sox trade Alex Verdugo to Yankees for three pitchers (29 - 4:14pm, Dec 07) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Jerry Reinsdorf meets with Nashville Mayor Freddie O'Connell (5 - 3:14pm, Dec 07) Last: Tom Nawrocki Hall of Merit: 2024 Hall of Merit Ballot Ballot (4 - 3:10pm, Dec 07) Last: Jaack |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.7511 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. salvomania Posted: May 16, 2023 at 09:24 AM (#6128411)Fowler and Contreras are now two free agents signed away from Cubs to five years deals who immediately became punching bags for the front office. Not that Ohtani was ever going to sign with us, but what free agent would want to take that risk with us now ?
How far the franchise has fallen.
Clearly the only solution is Yan Gomes for Willson and $40 M.
Has Yadi fathered a Yadi, jr? How old is he?
Then again, it's crossed my mind to wonder to what extent it may be that Adam Wainwright, specifically, is the problem here, because he misses his BFF and would be jealous of anyone who tried to replace him. If this is the case, then he just needs to be released. He's cooked anyway. And Flaherty is just a guy; if he wants to be a malcontent, trade him, and let him find out the hard way that no other team has Yadier Molina on it, either.
There's so much we don't and can't know. It doesn't seem, from where we sit, like Marmol is worth going to that extreme. But there is a serious cancer somewhere in this organization, and whatever it is, it needs to be cut out.
This is what I don't get. The Cardinals have always seemed to take the Royal families' position of don't explain, don't complain line. Did Prince Harry get a job in the St. Louis FO?
I get the impression that Marmol is being arm-twisted to do the FO's bidding. If he's drowning it's because the FO is holding him under.
Every pitcher, even the Cards of the past 15 years, is a foul tip away from losing their catcher to a broken thumb. You can't be such a nancy about this and still consider yourself a professional. Take the money, take the ball, then you gotta take your teammates as well. That means don't sign with a team if you think you're entitled to a HoF catcher and they don't have one. (Hint: pretty much no one does.)
It's generally a wise policy not to fire managers with a hair trigger
That probably used to be true and I suppose even now is the sensible default position, but baseball managers seem to barely manage at this point. And in Marmol's case, it's barely 200 games. Even as a "real manager" how could this guy have built up sufficient "internal corporate capital" to survive a major, publicly embarrassing clash with the front office? I completely agree it doesn't look good for the FO and I won't be surprised if both are gone but why in the world would Cards' ownership choose Marmol over Mozeliak? And who would take Mozeliak's job if ownership is willing to let a guy like Marmol unseat a GM? And if it's all about the "Cardinal Way" then Marmol better not be the guy who let the story get out.
EDIT: To clarify, I know Paste in #9 was agreeing with that more or less. I'm not sure there are more than a couple of MLB managers these days with the clout to survive something like this.
Donovan 2b L
Nootbaar rf L
Goldschmidt 1b R
Arenado 3b R
Contreras c R
Gorman dh L
Carlson cf S
Burlesson lf L
Edman ss S
That lineup actually has real lefty/righty balance. I am very happy with it.
Also deJong is now the starting SS, pushing Edman to 2B. Burleson has been bad and is barely getting any PT now -- 3 starts and 21 PA in the last 14 games. Donovan hasn't really lost any playing time even though he did get benched for 3 straight games (after which he's started 3 straight). He's started 9 of 14 in May after starting 21 of 29 in Mar/Apr. DeJong's hot streak has come at the expense of Burleson mainly and has solved the Cards' defensive issues at 2B.
On the bright side, the Cards have solved their OF logjam -- other than Nootbar, they all stink. :-) Walker's 99 OPS+ is the 2nd-best among Cards' OF so far this year -- they could call him back up but he's been struggling at AAA and maybe they haven't had the same miraculous defensive turnaround as they pulled off with Willson. :-) The others: Donovan 92, Burleson 79, Carlson 74, Yepez 74, O'Neill 72 (on the IL). At least one of those guys will figure it out before the year's up but clearly it was a bad idea to make Contreras the batting coach for the OFs.
There is no smoke, there is no fire, people making a deal out of this are just ####### idiots, nobody is upset, the team is fine, this was publicized, simply because the team decided to give Contreras a break while going over pitch calling with him. There is literally nothing to this story other than the team felt the need to reset expectations.
Some people are saying "why publicize it" when ultimately they had decided to make the move, if they didn't publicize it, then the press would be wondering why not publicize it when they see Contreras as the DH for a week and the team calling up a third catcher... it was an either way they lose situation... by making the comment public, they were able to control it to an extent. (not very well obviously)
To think their real intent was that Contreras needed a week off to hit the books is a misread proving once again that if you spew official bull crap out there, no matter how ridiculous, that some people, even a significant minority will believe it.
The really sad thing about this is that the division is so weak, the Cardinals may still win it handily which will only strengthen an already dysfunctional management team.
The cardinals Mgmt ain't what it used to be and it will lead to long term decline if not fixed soon.
It's not that he isn't taking pitches, it's that pitchers are throwing him more strikes, it's been a bit frustrating to watch him bat because of this, but it will turn around. I think it was yesterdays game (or the day before) he had a four pitch strikeout in which he didn't swing at a single pitch. I think something like that fixes itself over time to be honest. As long as he doesn't panic.
When did they say that?
When did they do that, from day one when they took him off of catching duties they flat out stated it was temporary.
What evidence do you have of that? everything Contreras has done or said has been that he's a team player, the backing out of making him an outfielder was more because the press made a deal about the logjam, and I'm sure that the 4-5 outfielders out there more than likely said something before Contreras who has been as big of a professional on this deal did.
LF Nootbaar
1B Goldschmidt
DH Gorman
3B Arenado
CF Carlson
C Contreras
2B Edman
RF Donovan
SS DeJong
The one big problem with the lineup there is Dylan Carlson's platoon splits. In spite of his being a switch-hitter, they are the splits of a righty who can't hit righty pitching. That's not supposed to happen when you take-up switch-hitting, but it's there. What you have to do is treat Carlson as another righty hitter, and when you do that, you get Arenado through Contreras as righties. And then, it turns out that Tommy Edman has the same issue - a switch-hitter who doesn't hit righties. So, that makes four "righties" in a row, between Gorman and Donovan. Assuming that Donovan does figure out how to deal with the new pitching against him, he's an extreme leadoff type (AVG .280, OBP .400, little power), and he and Nootbaar should really be leading the lineup off, even though they are both lefties. If you do that, then Goldschmidt, Arenado, Gorman and Contreras is right, although, apparently, Contreras will pout. I don't know how much Contreras' pouting is worth right now.
It's also worth mentioning that Alec Burleson gets into the lineup whenever one of the OF or DH crew misses a game. He's sort of the "fourth OF", although the concept is now the "fifth OF/DH." He will probably lose playing time when O'Neill comes back, although - I don't know about you - but I am done with O'Neill. He can't stay healthy, and he's only played WELL one year in his entire career. He's also the oldest of the OF/DH options, being 28. He's the only one who does not have room for more growth. Dylan Carlson, although he is in his fourth MLB season, is only 24. I wonder if it would be a good idea, with that much growth room left, to see what would happen if he just stopped switch-hitting altogether. It's hard to imagine that he would be worse against righties as a righty hitter than he is as a switch-hitter.
RE: #26 -
Dylan Carson, for his career, has hit .304 against lefty pitching. He hasn't much power, but still, I'd rather have him than Contreras against them. It's righties he can't hit.
Though most people assume switch-hitters have small platoon splits, it's actually pretty uncommon.
Research published in a place you just might remember -- BBBA.
That's even worse.
I should have said more about Burleson. I sometimes harp on this until it gets boring, but the context of the Cardinal outfield is different than for normal logjams because al the contenders are still prospects. What they most need is PLAYING TIME. Time to grow into what they can be. But the Cardinals have more of them than they have OF/DH spots, so the time isn't there. Someone has to pay for that, and it's Burleson. He really should be in AAA, playing every day. But the Cards need every lefty bat they can get, so he's playing part time up here. It's not fair to him, but the Cards have an unusual situation. Someone has to be sacrificed.
Why is Carlson playing every day, when he's not hitting? Because he's the only one of the kids who is an actual CF glove. And because he's a hot prospect. He's 24, and this is his fourth year in MLB. That's a hot pick, even if it's not hitting yet. You don't want to send him down to AAA and scare him. This context governs everything about the Cardinal OF/DH problem. It's not a normal logjam. They all need to play every day, and there are too many of them. That's why taking Contreras out from behind the plate was intolerable. The last thing the Cards need is a veteran sucking up one of the precious DH/OF slots.
Why is Donovan still playing every day? Because he's young. He needs playing time, and he's still good enough that he's not killing the team effort even while he is struggling. Part of why I'm done with O'Neill is the the Cards don't need him. He's not young any more, and he's only had the one good year, and he can't stay healthy, and he's a righty power hitter, of which the Cards have more than enough, thank you. Give his time to Carlson or Burleson. They need it.
The Oscar Mercado addition would seem to be silly, but it does serve a need. Carlson's going on the IL. The Cards don't really have another CF glove. Nootbaar and O'Neill are not good choices there. Mercado will be happy with a role as the backup CF, and he IS an actual defensive CF. He won't be demanding playing time the the kids need. He'll just suck up a little of what Carlson would be sucking up if Carlson was available. I assume that he will go right to the bench as soon as Carlson is healthy.
I should mention that the STL press corps seems to have NO idea of this. They are treating the whole thing as a normal logjam. That's part of why I keep harping on the "Kids need playing time" thing. It's not getting noticed in STL, and it governs the whole analysis. Of the STL writers, Ben Frederickson, who seems to know very little about baseball, is just adjusting to the idea that Donovan and Nootbaar are leadoff types. Bernard Hochman, just today, put out a column about Nootbaar taking "more walks than most." It starts out by noticing that Nootbaar has the second-highest walk rate in the league, behind only Juan Soto. That's not "most." That's "overpowering leadoff credential which, when added to what Brendan Donovan has always been able to do, makes the top of the Cardinal lineup look really scary." But Hochman hasn't thought about any of that. H'es just writing a "wow - look at this stats oddity that Nootbaar has" piece. Because that's all he sees. One reason that I defend Marmol is that he's way ahead of that. He's getting no media support for putting Donovan and Nootbaar at the top of the lineup, but he knows what he's doing.
We’ll be patient, but look, again, this has not gone how we would have thought. You’ve got to remind yourself it’s a long season, but it’s certainly gotten off on the wrong foot.
Mozeliak on whether Contreras will catch again:
I do (still believe in Contreras). But some of the things we expect, some of the things about the game we’ve become accustomed to, I think he realizes it’s going to require more preparation. Now the question is, can that happen? I guess we’ll have to find out.”
Mozeliak on Contreras playing OF:
I know that came out yesterday, but after talking with him, it’s basically going to be more in the DH role right now.
Contreras on playing OF:
Contreras approached the Cardinals on Saturday after the club lost to Detroit 6-5 in extra innings for their eighth straight loss. He understood that his role, for now, will be as the team’s primary designated hitter. However, he did express a desire to remain focused on two positions, catcher and designated hitter. The Cardinals adjusted and will no longer keep him in their tentative outfield plans.
Back then we only had access to around 15 years of detailed data.
I loved the bbba, not sure the year that I got first, but a friend of mine worked for the printers and knew I liked stats so he snuck a copy out for me (sorry I took some of your pay---Brock was also a writer for that wasn't he?)
You didn't cost me anything. Don just sent me a check -- I had no contract or entitlement to a share of the profits (if any. I doubt that BBBA made minimum wage profits). I'd have done it for nothing (hell, it's the kind of thing I'd do on rec.sport.baseball). Brock on the other hand ...
The only BBBA that ever made a profit of any kind was the first one - the 1989 Baseball Abstract. I don't think that Don ever made a cent; in fact, he was subsidizing the book to a larger tune than I had been able to.
What happened to get me into the project was this: Bill was giving up on doing his Bill James Baseball Abstracts, and knew there would be people who wanted to continue the franchise. I'd never met Bill, but knew John Dewan through Project Scoresheet. So, I bought a book called "How to Write a Book Proposal", and followed instructions. No one else thought to do this, so my sample looked more professional than it really was. This was useful, because Bill's one constraint was that whoever did the book would have to self-publish. No commercial book deals gotten because of Bill's name by people who were not Bill. I agree with that. Someone that Bill knew better than he knew me would have done the book if he could have gotten a commercial deal.
Bill, who of course got to choose who could use his title, paired me with Rob Wood, who I had never met. Rob and I had very different ideas about what kind of book to do, so that didn't work, but we both tried for the one issue. I ended up editing and publishing because 1) I have a Master's Degree in English, so I have editing experience, and 2) I had done the work of finding out how to get a trade paperback printed and how to get a book into bookstores. My sabermetric credentials were no better than Rob's. My main collaborator was Don, who I had known since 1969 from Washington U. in St. Louis. Rob, I think, worked alone. Bill contributed an article, to help us out.
I printed 1500 copies, which was too few. I needed to print 3,000 total, so I had a second printing.
The book did not make much money, and it was obvious that none of us could quit our day jobs.
The one thing I really regret was my failure to use more outside contributors. The issue was workload. I was writing, editing, doing the printer's masters, and publishing, and I had to work a day job to live. I just never did have time to make a contact with anyone who sent me submissions. I take responsibility for that - I was trying to do way too much. Don, who had more living resources than I did, was MUCH better at finding and using contributors. That's why Ron J's work was all done for Don. I just didn't have the time to work with others. The second-most regret is the lack of quality of the copy editing. The things are mostly proofreading trash. The reason, again, was time. I can copy edit and proofread. I've done both for money. But I just had to get the masters to the printer by the deadline, and something always had to give....
In case anyone was wondering, I did the printer's masters in PageMaker on a Mac. PageMaker is designed to produce newspapers, and I found it ridiculously easy to use. I could never have put the book out without it. I get to thank Don Malcolm. He knew what a Mac was and what PageMaker was. I did not, at the time. He turned me on to them.
All those great stat dumps in my books were done by Dick Cramer. Dick was living in STL at the time, and did ALL the programming for FREE!!!! He was perfect. I'd say that I had an idea but didn't want to make him program even MORE numbers, and he'd say to include it. He was HAPPY to do all that programming. Dick's programs ran in the background partition of John Dewan's Dec VAX computer. The whole Dick Cramer program took an entire 24-hour DAY to run. That, again, was crucial. I could never have done all those stats without that computer access.
OK. Enough reminiscing about my misspent youth for now.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main