User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3797 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Saturday, January 01, 2022Climate change will force major sports leagues to change. Is MLB ready?
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: January 01, 2022 at 05:41 PM | 27 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: climate change |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: How Good Are Those Probabilities on the Apple TV+ Broadcasts?
(2 - 7:20am, May 27) Last: Paul D(uda) Newsblog: Met Their Match? Infield Defense a Little Off (4 - 6:14am, May 27) Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave) Newsblog: 2022 NBA Playoffs thread (1862 - 4:15am, May 27) Last: The Honorable Ardo Newsblog: Yankees sign infielder Matt Carpenter (5 - 4:08am, May 27) Last: The Honorable Ardo Newsblog: Gammons: While outsiders wonder about the ball, MLB’s pitching coaches fret about finding enough innings (6 - 4:01am, May 27) Last: The Honorable Ardo Sox Therapy: One Step Forward (29 - 2:28am, May 27) Last: Jay Seaver Newsblog: MLB, in memo, rebukes clubs for 'unacceptable' workplace facilities for women employees (2 - 12:31am, May 27) Last: The Yankee Clapper Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for Thursday, May 26, 2022 (35 - 12:03am, May 27) Last: the Hugh Jorgan returns Newsblog: Analyzing the early returns from the Blue Jays’ unorthodox defensive experiment (18 - 9:54pm, May 26) Last: Paul D(uda) Newsblog: At long last, a fun new tool at Baseball Savant. Pitch tempo (2 - 8:17pm, May 26) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Juan Soto trade rumors: Nationals may be 'motivated' to trade outfielder (78 - 6:49pm, May 26) Last: Tony S Newsblog: MLB teams will be allowed to carry 14 pitchers for four more weeks (37 - 5:37pm, May 26) Last: Cris E Newsblog: Anaheim City Council votes unanimously to halt the sale of Angel Stadium | LA Times (18 - 4:06pm, May 26) Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave) Newsblog: 3 years later, this trade has flipped in a BIG way (6 - 3:25pm, May 26) Last: SoSH U at work Newsblog: Who in MLB is must-see TV right now? This season's most watchable teams and players (12 - 3:21pm, May 26) Last: Karl from NY |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3797 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Tin Angel Posted: January 01, 2022 at 06:09 PM (#6059275)WHat about 6 5 team divisions? More difficult. Arizona could shift to a 'mess' division with Seattle, Colorado, and the 2 Texas teams. Royals/Cards/Cubs/ChiSox/and either Milwaukee or the Twins, other going with Detroit/Toronto/Cleveland/Reds, poor Pittsburgh put into division of death with NYY/NYM/Red Sox/Phillies, then Washington/Baltimore/Tampa/Atlanta/Miami for the final division. I guess you could put the Jays in that division instead of the Pirates as they actually can compete with the Yankees & Red Sox but as a Jays fan I'd much rather put them in a division with the Tigers.
Still, regardless of how you do it, radical realignment (6 or 5 team divisions) I think is inevitable and would be good for reducing travel thus better for GHG and for expenses for teams and make for better rivalries. I miss the old Jays/Tigers battles of the 80's.
If Teams promote climate responsibility to their customers, and require their corporate sponsors to accelerate their carbon-zero plans in order to sponsor, it would make a much bigger difference.
And did you ever notice there’s no stars in those pictures of Neil Armstrong on “the moon”?
there were none the first couple of years I visited, and it was great.
buddy made all of us swear that we'll never attend a game at Wrigley under the lights - and I haven't.
That feels light to me. There always seem to be a bunch of hangers on. The Red Sox website lists 13 coaches for example;
26 players
13 coaches; Manager, hitting coach, asst hitting coach (eye roll), other asst hitting coach (other eye roll), pitching coach, bullpen coach, 1B and 3B coach, bench coach, game planning coordinator, bullpen catcher, staff assistant, major league field coordinator
3 trainers; head trainer, 2 assistant trainers
Strength and conditioning coach
Masseuse (2)
Physical therapist
That’s 46 people who are running around the clubhouse and dugout on any given day. Batboys don’t travel I don’t think, I assume there are a couple of clubhouse guys that go along to lug equipment to and fro (I assume no one is expecting Chris Sale to carry his own bags). I assume there are a couple of traveling secretary/assistant to the traveling secretary types to make sure there are rooms and food and presumably someone is paying a bunch of bills for the team.
Even assuming no FO bigwigs (e.g. GM, owner) I’d bet it’s 65-70 easy.
Now I’m curious though as to what the right answer is. Someone around here must know.
This is the first reason for restructuring MLB that I didn't dislike.
Scouts, FO people, and PR people as well
What would reactionary realignment be? All the teams in one division, with no playoffs?
And as 21 points out there are always the sage head nodders who tut-tut that they need to explain to you that cooling, warming, no change at all are all signs of the same phenomenon. Anything that happens is proof of my theory!
I’m old enough to remember when the special section in our Sunday newspaper was devoted to the coming Ice Age. The glaciers will be here soon and the last time they came all the way to the United States!!! At least we don’t have to worry about glaciers for 50-60 more years.
And why is the flag rippling, hmmm??? There’s no air on the moon!
The term climate change was brought to the fore and then into the vernacular based on the recommendation of longtime Republican strategist Frank Luntz. In 2001 he advised its usage to George W. Bush, and then Republicans in general, because, as he wrote to Bush, "climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge." You can read more about the memo here.
You can also read about his statement in 2019 to a Senate committee that "I’m here before you to say that I was wrong in 2001."
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main