“We were waiting for Tanner (Houck) to see how he felt after his start,” Cora said. “We’re going to make a change, actually Tanner is going to start on Sunday and Corey is going to go to the bullpen starting on Friday.
“We had that conversation with Corey, very professional, he understands. He signed here to be a starter, but right now he’s struggling and obviously the kids are throwing the ball well, there are a lot of off days coming up. So, we decided to make a change. We were just waiting for Tanner to see how he felt after his start.”
Kluber’s run with Boston has been a mess so far. He’s been hit hard by teams, resulting in a 2-6 record with a 6.26 ERA. The 37-year-old hasn’t pitched in relief during the regular season since 2013, but he did appear out of the bullpen once last postseason with Tampa.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DarrenUnfortunately, he doesn't seem like the type of pitcher who will improve with a move the pen, so it's likely mop-up for now.
But it's not exactly uncommon for pitchers his age to just lose it. And mediocre aging pitchers are terrible bets anyhow.
Sure. Garbage time makes sense now. Maybe there's something correctable and he comes back and gives them some OK innings. They've paid for his time and could easily do worse (well maybe not that easily. The As have a remarkable collection of worse options)
The team should go Sale, Paxton, Bello, Houck, and Whitlock as long as those five are healthy. The real question is what the team does when one or more of those five inevitably get hurt. The three guys besides those five who have started a game for the Sox this year are Kluber, Pivetta, and Kutter Crawford. Crawford has been by far the most successful of the three this year, has the most upside of the three, and is the youngest. To me, it's a no-brainer: Crawford is the next man up if and when it's needed.
For 2023, beyond Crawford, there is nobody at AAA who would be ready (in the case of Shane Drohan, who just got promoted to AAA), or is pitching remotely well enough (Brandon Walter, Chris Murphy, or Bryan Mata) to supplant Kluber or Pivetta as the next option.
There is where the farm system is improving, but has not yet recovered from the Dombrowski years (not complaining - flags fly forever!). The guys drafted during the Bloom years have not yet gotten to the upper levels of the minors, and the guys drafted in the 2016-2019 range that weren't traded away are either up in the bigs already, or look like they aren't going to pan out.
There really isn't such a thing as a mop-up man in modern baseball. Most likely Kluber will either agree to go down to AAA or be released within a week or two.
At this point, he doesn't have a fastball to keep hitters honest, so when he throws strikes, it's BP. That's hard to correct.
37 years young. who says no?
Players in his situation almost never agree to go down to AAA.
If he's released he'll land somewhere. He's certainly worth a roster spot to somebody at major league minimum.
There are pitchers who pitch in high leverage and there are those who generally don't. I'm saying Kluber is in the latter group for now. This may just be a disagreement over semantics.
I also agree with Nate about him not agree to going to AAA--very unlikely. IL is an option--perhaps he'll develop the back tightness that has plagued Noah Song. As for him being released, it's possible, but I don't think teams like to cut bait that quickly. I'd say he has another month of whatever before that's considered. They aren't exactly blocking anyone important for their 13th pitcher spot.
The correctable part here would be adjusting to the fact that he can no longer challenge hitters. It's possible he could have a few years as the good version of Ross Grimsley for instance. It's a tough way to make a living, but anybody who starts with good command (the worse walk rate this year is consistent with your take -- that he's overthrowing) has a chance.
I'd bet against it, but I'm genuinely surprised he's still around. I thought his career was over years ago.
Can anyone name a player in his position who has agreed? The issue for someone in Kluber's position, if I'm correctly remembering the rules, is that if he accepts then the team is under no obligation to call him back up. So he gets his full pay, but he's trapped in the minors. (I'm not certain, but I think outrighting him is necessary as they can't option him at his level of service time, and to do that takes him off the 40-man. That's even more significant with Kluber because at some point this season, I'm not certain when, he crosses the 10-year mark for service time and becomes fully vested in the player retirement benefits.)
It's pretty obvious that Kluber would accept his release. Somebody would want him. He's not much, but at a prorated major league minimum somebody can find a use for him.
Anibal Sanchez consented to bring optioned by the Tigers in 2017. He had already lost his rotation spot and wasn’t going anywhere in the pen, and was a pending free agent too. So I guess he agreed to go to AAA to get stretched out for starting again. Came back to MLB after 4 AAA starts and continued performing poorly, but did manage to stick in the MLB rotation the rest of the year. The following season was his bounce back with Atlanta.
I suppose the A's or Royals can find a use for someone with a 6.26 ERA and the fundamentals to match. Beyond that, the only teams that may find him genuinely useful on the mound are a good ways down the minors or in other countries.
As a major league pitcher, however, he is finished.
You may be right but I'd be stunned if he didn't latch on elsewhere if the Sox released him. He's a two time Cy Young winner in the not too distant path. Someone would say \"####, let's give it a whirl." Hell, he was a good pitcher last year (ERA 4.34, FIP 3.57). With pitchers dropping like flies, he'd pick up somewhere. I'm not saying you are wrong that he'll still suck, just that I wouldn't expect Boston to be his final MLB stint.
It's rare and none spring right to mind but I'm pretty sure there have been a few guys who've accepted the assignment. Now I guess that depends on what you mean by "Kluber's position" -- he's got over $70 M in career earnings, he might walk away completely or just wait at home to see if anybody expresses an interest.
I suspect we see it relatively often with "very old backup C." A guy like Pat Borders was always on somebody's AAA roster, would get called up in an emergency, then get DFA'd when the guy came off the IL and I suspect he'd often stick around with the team. So in 2003, Borders was mostly at Tacoma but caught games for the Ms in Apr, June, July, Aug then the Sept expanded roster. I'd think we'll see that sort of thing with old relievers too. I suppose that's different for a guy who started the year in the minors -- if Borders has already agreed to play in Tacoma, he's got an apartment there with a couple of suitcases and pots and pans, why look to move to Charlotte mid-season if you can just return to Tacoma? (No, I've never been to Tacoma and only a bit to Charlotte.)
Anyway, it's unlikely anybody will give Kluber a 26-man slot. And if he doesn't get a 26-man slot, there's no reason to give him a 40-man slot yet. So he'll get a deal from some team to make a few starts at AAA and then either call him up or release him. That is he'll be "trapped in the minors" no matter who he latches on with. So if Boston seems to offer the best way back to the majors, he might as well take the assignment at least as long as they'll agree to flat out release him when he wants it.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main