Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
The Library of Congress offers treasures like that:
“And here is a secret for you Bob. Rather than lose him, I would sign him to a Pittsburgh contract, for I think he would come within the three years, but his first contract must not be above $4,000, for he should go out of course. If he were to stay with our club, however, his salary would be the minimum in the major leagues,..., $6,000”
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: April 02, 2008 at 07:41 PM (#2728079)I wonder who that Danglois (sp?) character was.
I wonder what Rickey meant by "come within the three years." Someone here can surely enlighten me.
Please tell me it read something like "Incredible raw talent, could be a great player with proper coaching, lacks intelligence to be a future coach".
I don't know what that meant either, but the ladies loved his staying power.
He rated him all A's and A+'es, raving all the while.
Campanis, BTW, was really a good guy who didn't deserve what happened to him.
It's also interesting that Rickey says "Fine pitching hand .. . let him alone on all his fingering." IIRC from Drysdale's memoir Once a Bum Always a Dodger (which is BTW a mostly-terrible book, well worth avoiding), Drysdale said that he had an unusual delivery, a habit of bending his wrist all the way back ("hooking" the ball? "slinging" it? I can't remember) that some coaches were critical of when he came up with Brooklyn. It sounds like Rickey noticed it and tried to anticipate and prevent people messing with Drysdale's delivery.
I took that to mean he thought he could make it to the big club within three years. Come to Pittsburgh, in other words.
Drysdale said that he had an unusual delivery, a habit of bending his wrist all the way back ("hooking" the ball? "slinging" it? I can't remember) that some coaches were critical of when he came up with Brooklyn.
Saberscouting.com, linked a few spaces down, writes that that very thing can lead to just the kind of arm woes that forced Drysdale to retire young.
Rickey means it in exactly the same sense he would mean it if he was looking at a young Labrador Retriever.
Well, young perhaps, but after 3,400 innings.
I assumed someone would know for sure by now, but I'll half-ass it. I think teams probably could hold a player's rights in the minors for 3 years. So Drysdale should make it to the majors before they have to decide whether to protect him (did they have 40-man rosters then?) or possibly expose him to other teams.
Giving him less than $4000 -- does that refer to the bonus baby rules, whereby players given a certain amount of $ had to be kept on the major league roster. He needs minor league time.
And then I looked at the team that they'd previously been tied with, and I did a complete doubletake. It was the 1945-54 Pirates.
That stretch included 8 teams that won 63, 62, 71, 57, 64, 42, 50 & 53 games over the course of a season.
Is that the most insanely incongruous record imaginable? It's like finding out that Joe Dimaggio had broken Ray Oyler's 44 game hitting streak.
I'm pretty sure that's right; the 3 years means the amount of time you could keep a guy on your 40-man roster and have options to send him to the minors without exposing him to waivers or drafts.
Yes, they had 40-man rosters then; that is a feature that goes back at least to the 1920s.
Yes.
The funny thing about that, though, is that teams flouted the $4,000 limit all the time with various forms of under-the-table payments, including hiring the prospect's dad as a "scout," etc.
seems odd to have an affiliate in a competitors' city
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main