“It’s like, once that happened, I dissolved my affiliation with them,” Maddon said. “There’s no emotion anymore. There’s no anything. It’s like to me they don’t even exist, organizationally.
“I still text with a lot of the players, I text with a lot of the staff. One of them called me (Friday). So we’re staying in touch.”
He said the Angels having a worse record since his firing — 25-38 through Friday — doesn’t impact his perspective.
“It doesn’t make me feel better, it doesn’t make me feel worse,” Maddon said. “Organizationally, I’m kind of numb to the whole thing. Because when you wish them badly, I’m wishing really good friends badly — and I can’t do that.”
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. The Gary DiSarcina Fan Club (JAHV) Posted: August 21, 2022 at 12:36 PM (#6092446)He's right about the middle manager thing. Shildt got fired for the same reason.
I can see how this might work for a while but as you push old school managers out and replace them with robots, I suspect issues will develop.
Most companies find that when you start moving decision-making away from the front -line, things get inevitably worse. It used to be Owner- GM - manager - player. Now it's owner - VP operations - GM - Manager - bench coach - player. (Yes, bench coaches existed before but they are now much bigger filters between players and manager).
I doubt that works out long term. Although people will point to TLR and Maddon as old model failures, I think that is just because they are dinosaurs.
Look at the AJ Hinch situation in Houston. People can't conceive why he knew about the TV screen and didn't do anything - it's because he's not really in charge of the dugout. He knew if he tried to stop it, Luhnow would fire him because he had no leverage.
They spend a fortune on top end talent (Trout, Rendon) and got damn lucky too (Ohtani) but the next 2 highest paid are middle relievers Aaron Loup and Ryan Tepera - both making around $7 mil a year. Seems silly doesn't it? Their farm sucks - ranked #25 going into the season (MLB.com), #30 after the draft (bleacherreport.com). Pre-season Keith Law had them #23, Baseball America had them #29. Basically no one likes their farm.
So now what? I'd hate to be a fan of that team even with Trout there long term as Ohtani is probably going to be gone after next year or even this offseason. Sad situation. Maddon might be the lucky one getting out of town before a total collapse.
To be fair, Detmers and Sandoval look like the real thing, and Suarez actually looks like he could be solid as a #4/5 starter. Of course, Canning looked like he could be something before he got hurt. It's a rough go. If the team loses Ohtani, I'd just have to give up on this team after 41 years. That would just too hard to take.
Speaking as a Tigers fan, I feel ya, brother. (Hell, I almost pity you!)
Namely, they don't. For a team that spends as much money as the Angels do, it's embarrassing how little they seem to spend on scouting and player development staff. While other teams have begun snatching some of these people who run baseball development programs (e.g. Driveline), the Angels have done nothing when they clearly have the resources to go get those people. And so their farm system is a wasteland. I don't know an easy way to do this, but I'd be curious where the Angels rank among WAR produced for them by players who spent time in their system. After Trout got to the team, there are a few gems, but not nearly enough. Those dollars spent on good player development personnel and programs go a lot farther than the dollars spent on high-priced free agents.
I'm not sure why Moreno has failed in that regard; is it just an honest miss where he's hired the wrong people? Or is it a bad philosophy? I lean toward the latter, since I know from acquaintances who work there (or used to work there), that Moreno has gutted other departments as well (customer service, marketing, sales, etc.). I have no hope for this team as long as Moreno owns it. It's a bad place to be as a fan.
Certainly no easy way to do this -- if we had the full b-r databases to work with, maybe. It's even hard to summarize anything about international signees. But draft picks are fairly easy to track so ...
1st round picks (incl supplemental picks) since Trout have totaled about 18 WAR with 13 of that due to CJ Cron. But this was also only one 9 and two 10s as the highest picks so that outcome probably isn't so terrible and of course the last few picks haven't necessarily had time to develop. But "not so terrible" is a long way from good. The 2nd round has gotten them Canning (and Marsh who is now gone). The 3rd round produced nothing (reasonably typical) but the 4th round gave them Mike Clevinger ... who they traded to Cle for Vinnie Pestano who was a reliever in his late 20s who had had a couple of big years although I'd never heard of him.
Given where they picked, that's probably not nearly as terrible as it sounds (e.g. Cron is the 10th best #17 pick of all time) but still getting only about 15 WAR out of 4 rounds over 10+ years is a tough way to build a consistent winner. And they traded the other good player they found in Clevinger. Even off that 2009 draft, they also found 11 WAR Grichuk and 14 WAR Patrick Corbin, both traded before reaching the majors. Dan Haren (Corbin) was at least quite good for 1.5 years and David Freese (Grichuk) was above-average.
Goofus has two great players, but never makes the playoffs
Gallant surrounds his great players with versatile spare parts and always makes the playoffs
Goofus charges a lot for his games and people mostly come
Gallant charges his fans an exboritant amount and even more show up!
Goofus tried to get a new stadium through a deal with a corrupt city government
Gallant dealt with a corrupt city government in the past, so he doesn't have to do it anymore.
That's not necessarily a terrible thing. The Yankees also had a somewhat similar situation. They traded prospects for vets to Win Now, but the Yankees had consistently better farm systems, and were thus able to trade for better vets, and did a lot more winning than the Angels.
I like to think this has something to do with Tom Kotchman leaving the Angles in 2012.
Even the good players that have come through the Angels system seem to realize their full potential once they're out of the organization (Clevinger was mediocre in the system until he got traded, same with Patrick Corbin; only Chatwood looked decent with the team prior to being dealt). Whether that's because other teams know what to do with them once they get there or because the Angels made a poor value judgment on what the player would be worth doesn't really matter. It's all part of the same system. I think other teams have struggled with this at times, but it ebbs and flows. The Angels have been consistently poor for 15 years now; Mike Trout is the proverbial exception that proves the rule.
I look at what the team has done and is doing with Jo Adell and I can't help but think that the kid would have a chance to succeed in almost any other major league organization. He might not become the 5-tool stud he was projected to, but he wouldn't look like a football player who stumbled into a major league outfield. Every time I see him swing at a ball two feet out of the strike zone or over-run a flyball, I can't help but wonder what the heck they're doing with him that's produced this mess.
In 15 years, the two guys Hombre named are it as far as homegrown players generating 5 WAR: Calhoun and Fletcher. Every other player they've drafted who's put up that much value has done it after being traded (and usually traded young, while they still have development to do). It's pathetic.
Hallelujah!
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main