Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, April 10, 2023
For no other reason than what we have to assume he felt like it, Gattis took to Twitter on Monday and was a completely open book. But in doing so, he made numerous admissions about his individual role in the sign stealing scandal.
Specifically, Gattis not only admitted that his home run in Game 7 of the ALCS against the New York Yankees was a “trash can bang”, but that he was probably on PEDs at points of the season as well.
Though his Twitter feed was full of a number of admissions and revelations in his own tweets and certainly in the replies, perhaps the funniest one of all was talking about how he and the Astros knew what was coming from Yu Darvish and they still couldn’t put up a run on the now-Padres pitcher.
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. The Duke Posted: April 10, 2023 at 11:29 PM (#6123457)2. After tweeting while drunk, claim somebody hacked your Twitter.
3. Or check how much you have left from your $16.6 M in career earnings and, if you like what you see, say \"#### it."
Seriously, we all watch a lot of baseball, but his 11!!! triples has to be near the top of "weird sh*t that happened in baseball"
That never happens when you're drunk!!
(I'm just joking around.)
Seriously, we all watch a lot of baseball, but his 11!!! triples has to be near the top of "weird sh*t that happened in baseball"
Ron Santo had 67 career triples ... Rickey Henderson had 66. Santo led the NL in 1964 with 13.
Rickey once was asked "why so few triples with your speed?"
Rickey's answer was something like "Rickey knows when the outfielders have better arms than the catchers and just waits to steal 3rd."
I wish I could find the source of the quote. Not all print media from the 80s is googleable.
Brett and Jimmy Collins had lots of triples and I think are the 3B leaders. Chipper and Beltre had just 38.
Still, other than the fact it's obviously a trick question, you go into a bar and bet who had more triples, Santo or Rickey ... or Jeter if you're in NY.
#3 was a misplay/weird bounce off the wall
#4 saw the CF fall down after missing a ball at the top of the hill
#6 was a missed catch that could have been an error
#7 was another misplay off the wall
#8 was another missed catch
#10 was another misplay off the wall
#11 the fielder misjudged the ball and then literally just fell down
I don't know if I've ever seen one player benefit from so many odd bounces in one season
Not so weird. Santo still had both legs at the time.
Rickey never took much advantage of his speed when it came to batting. He didn't hit a lot of doubles or triples. He had good but not great ROE and GDP avoidance numbers.
I imagine that played a small part, yes.
Here's a factoid: during the years that Banks played road games at the Polo Grounds (1954-57; 62-63), he hit 6 of the 301 triples that were hit there. Only Willie Mays (28), Charlie Neal (9), and Jim Hickman (7) hit more. Of course there's four Giant and two Mets years involved, so visitors tend to be high on that useless leaderboard (Snider, Mathews, Aaron, etc.) But the only parks where Banks hit more career triples were Wrigley (42) and Forbes (7) – Forbes was the best triples park of that era.
I would imagine a lot of those were at oddly-configured Fenway Park?
I would imagine a lot of those were at oddly-configured Fenway Park?
Sort of. 44 at home vs. 35 on the road for his career. An even 15/15 split during 1977-1978.
According to this article, Rickey stole third base 322 times, many more than the 4 next players with most SBs. 22.9%, as per the article.
Yes, he mostly stole second, but nobody came close to Rickey in re: stealing third.
When it came to getting out of the batters box, Rickey was the slowest fast guy.
Rickey always said third was easier because you could get much bigger leads.
JRVJ, great link, thanks.
The young Baylor was fast. That version of Baylor also didn't hit many HRs. I don't remember if he got hurt or just older and fatter. Not that I have a very clear picture of young Baylor but I recall more of a George Hendrick type. Chili Davis maybe the best comp -- broke in as a CF, pretty much full-time DH (and substantially bulkier) by 31. In part because of my name dyslexia, as a kid I often confused Baylor and Baker ... then they both became managers, including of the Cubs. But none of Hendrick, Davis or Baker stole bases like Baylor did; Chili, a BHB, leads in triples at a meagre 30.
There's no bad time to steal second. As the old adage goes, you don't want to make the first or 3rd out at 3rd, so that cuts way down on the opportunities.
Seconded.
The internet is not exactly over-run with images from Baylor's O's days. Here's one claiming to be from 1973. Another one, not sure of the year, looks a bit more filled out to me. That guy's obviously an athlete but we're not talking Frank Thomas (or Frank Howard). In his latter years, for sure, his arms were Bagwellian, maybe even McGwirean.
I got yer throw from right field to third base right here...
I think his swing kind of corkscrewed him into the box as well, so he had to unwind before moving.
Heh. According to the Hall of Fame electors, Adderall is not a PED at all. As a PED, it is essentially a low-grade amphetamine, completely in the group that contains "greenies" from the 1960s. The electors have NO problem with players form the 1960s being in the HoF, although it is widely known that just about all of them took greenies, sometimes in very large does ("Handfuls"). And yes I think the electors are guilty of monumental hypocrisy about PEDs.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main