Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, January 20, 2021
Outfielder George Springer and the Toronto Blue Jays have agreed to a six-year, $150 million contract, sources confirmed to ESPN’s Jeff Passan on Tuesday.
Springer is headed to the Blue Jays’ spring training facility in Dunedin, Florida, for a physical. If all goes according to plan, Toronto will get the star it has been looking for all winter.
The contract would be the largest given out by the Blue Jays in franchise history. Their only other contract that topped $100 million was a $126 million extension given to Vernon Wells in 2006.
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. The Duke Posted: January 20, 2021 at 08:41 AM (#6000757)But
“From the standpoint of cruel efficiency, $150 million is probably a bit of an overpay on Toronto’s part (ZiPS would suggest six years, $130 million).”
And it's just nice to see teams pushing their chips in. This off-season is being driven by the Padres (far and away the most active team), the ChiSox, the Mets and now the Jays.
2B Biggio
3B Guerrero
DH Hernandez
SSS Bichette
LF Gurriel
1B Tellez
RF Grichuk
C Jansen/Kirk
Ryu/Ray/Pearson/Roark/Stripling
I don't think that's a contender, but they're not far off at all, and you never know with young guys. Good for the Jays for moving towards contention.
There is talk that the Jays (and Springer) are trying to get Michael Brantley to come to Toronto, too.
(They are friends and have the same agency representing them.)
As it is now, Grichuk is on razor thin margins to remain a Blue Jay, but picking up Brantley would have to justify the Jays trading Grichuk (and a catching prospect) for some more pitching.
Walker would be a good pickup. I'd be happy with Paxton on a short deal too.
Read an item speculating that Gurriel might be the trade bait, which I think is nuts, given his age, production and contract relative to Randal.
Fair. Given the moves of the last 24 hours, I should probably give the front office the benefit of the doubt.
2015 -102 games, 2016 -162, 2017 -140, 2018 - 140, 2019 - 122.
More a Rf than Cf. I'd have offered 3 years at $75 mil or 4 years at $80.
Who else was bidding for him? Brantley for 3 years sounds better. Both will be DH soon enough.
Why would you say that? He grades out above avg. in CF by both DRS and UZR. He's probably a RF in three years, but right now he's a fine CF.
In 2015, he was playing everyday until he got hurt at the beginning of July and missed two months.
In 2017, he was playing everyday until he missed two weeks around the end of July, and then returned to playing everyday after he came back.
In 2018, it was the same thing, except the two weeks were in August.
In 2019, it was the month of June he missed with injury.
He's been a full time player for his entire career, albeit an injury prone one. The time he's missed hasn't been from benchings, or platooning, or anything else like that.
Now, how often he seems to get hurt is a different concern.
Since becoming full time player in 2015, he has played in 717 of 870 possible games, 82%
He played in 162 games in 2016, but in his other years he has missed a lot of games.
He’ll be 31 this season.
Toronto will doing really well (lucky) to get 800+ games out of him over 6 years. More likely, 650-700 games tops over the 6 years of the contract.
But of course with these deals it’s all about the front end. If they can get 2, maybe 3 very healthy, very good years at the front end of the deal, then they’ll be happy.
Yes, this is correct, but I think the Blue Jays may be inclined to deal Grichuk and pay the cost to keep all their young outfielders.
That's the premium for getting a player to come to a team that is in a different country with no home field in 2021.
Brantley has just signed with Houston. 32 million for two years.
That's way too pessimistic. Even Larry Walker managed 765 games over that stretch and that includes missing nearly half of 2000. The worst 6-year stretch you can find for Walker was 711 and that includes missing two half-seasons. Larkin 31-36 got into 764. Obviously it's possible he'll turn into Griffey (just 550 ... but oddly followed by 287 for ages 37-38) but that's a rather unlikely outcome. And it's the AL so you're certain to have the DH available if he starts pulling hammies every year.
At first blush this seems about right. He's been at 5 WAR/650 but the injuries knock that to about 4/season. They're paying him for, give or take, 16-20 WAR over 6 years though if he ends up at the lower end, they probably could have cobbled together something just as good with less money. A fully healthy Springer probably projects to something like 22 WAR over that time; the 80% Springer gets you to 17.
I don't have time to look at comps right now. First name that springs to mind is Matt Holliday and that would not be a good outcome -- 15 WAR, 760 games, for 31-36, in part because his Rfield dropped considerably and he missed half of age 35. It was though still 19 oWAR so Holliday with average defense would be fine.
Poor Hazel Mae! I was happy to see her with the scoop on this . . .
I'll take it! :-)
EDIT: There are no doubt many counter-examples, I just picked 3 guys famous for being fragile. But Dick Allen had 817 games 25-30 then just 458. JD Drew 707 games 25-30, 606 for 31-36. "Way" too pessimistic is an oversell by me.
Other reports had the Mets at 6/125, which still makes Toronto's offer very high, but not as absurd. As others mentioned, it's the premium for another country and possibly playing outside of an MLB stadium for most home games this season.
What's the tax situation in Toronto? I know NY teams have had to pay more than teams in zero income tax states.
Turns out they'll pay Canadian taxes if their "presence in Canada exceeds 183 days". No idea what that means. Probably an issue of what constitutes their legal residence. And you can bet their agent will know how to manage this.
And there may be state and province level taxes. And city level for that matter. But it's a straight US filing if they don't break the 183 day rule. Don't know the implication of provincial levies on a US filing. That's why tax lawyers will always have full employment.
EDIT: I do know that Roger Clemens ended up paying more taxes after moving from the Jays to the Yankees.
Wasn't he an extension?
Russell Martin, $82million over 5 years
Hyun-Jin Ryu, $80million over 4 years
Roger Clemens, $40million over 4 years
A.J. Burnett, $55million over 5 years
Kendrys Morales, $33million over 3 years
Other players have had bigger extensions, as previously mentioned.
I think those are the only ones above $10million per year, before Springer's.
Martin gave them 8.2 WAR in an almost perfect reflection of the "standard" aging curve: 3.2 WAR at 32 then 2, 1.7, 1.3. Given he'd just had two big years with the Pirates, they were probably hoping for more but he was a 32-yo C.
Clemens -- hard to do better than this. They got 15 WAR in 2 seasons then flipped him to the Yanks for Wells, Lloyd and the immortal Homer Bush. As it turned out, the next two seasons were two of Clemens' worst (just 3.6 WAR) while Wells gave them 8 WAR. Lloyd gave them 1 solid season in relief then got hurt. I assume the Jays also saved some money in that deal.
Burnett was only OK-good in his first 3 years at 6.7 WAR. Did Burnett have an opt-out ... transaction shows him being declared FA after that then signing with the Yanks.
Kendrys was not good and got traded for very little.
Ryu continued his run of brilliance and didn't miss a turn in 2020. Don't be surprised when he's traded after this season for David Wells.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main