|
|
|
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for Opening Week 2023! (168 - 1:57am, Mar 31)Last:  cardsfanboyNewsblog: 2023 NBA Regular Season Thread (1366 - 12:18am, Mar 31)Last:  Russlan is not RussianNewsblog: Justin Verlander: Mets place star pitcher on IL hours before opener with muscle strain (4 - 11:25pm, Mar 30)Last: BooeyNewsblog: Phillies trade for Cristian Pache, put Rhys Hoskins on 60-day IL (3 - 9:59pm, Mar 30)Last: BoxkutterSox Therapy: Over/Under (73 - 9:21pm, Mar 30)Last: Jose is an Absurd SultanNewsblog: Minor leaguers, MLB reach tentative deal on 1st CBA, sources say (13 - 6:27pm, Mar 30)Last: Barry`s_Lazy_BoyNewsblog: 2023 MLB predictions: Wild Cards, Playoffs, World Series, more (18 - 4:52pm, Mar 30)Last: My name is Votto, and I love to get MoppoNewsblog: Masyn Winn’s confidence high after sublime camp with Cardinals: ‘I think I belong up here’ (12 - 4:02pm, Mar 30)Last: PerrySox Therapy: Yoshida In The Spotlight (39 - 3:32pm, Mar 30)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: Sioux City Rep. J.D. Scholten pitches legislative ban on MLB television blackouts in Iowa (5 - 3:27pm, Mar 30)Last: Karl from NYNewsblog: Amazon announces 20 New York Yankees games on Prime this season, commence the complaining (1 - 2:47pm, Mar 30)Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMcNewsblog: The Official Mets Fan Self-Immolation Thread (994 - 2:23pm, Mar 30)Last:  LassusNewsblog: All 30 MLB stadiums, ranked: 2023 edition (58 - 12:36pm, Mar 30)Last: Howie MenckelHall of Merit: Reranking Right Fielders: Results (34 - 2:55am, Mar 30)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: ‘OOTP Baseball:’ How a German programmer created the deepest baseball sim ever made (31 - 12:16am, Mar 30)Last: catomi01
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Hombre BrotaniShohei, do you prefer the twice a week omnichatter format better or are you leaning to doing daily? I like the twice a week personally, but since you are pretty much in charge, I thought it was important to see your opinion on it.
The worst teams in baseball by run differential are 1. Baltimore, 2. Pittsburgh and 3. Arizona... I think most people predicted some of that, the surprise to me is Colorado not being as bad as expected. Cubs being a lot worse, Nats and Twins being pretty bad also (to be fair, the Nats and Cubs gave up pretty early so pre-season predictions might not have accounted for that)
If you had to rate the biggest surprises from pre-season to right now... What would it be. Giants is of course going to be on any list like this... White Sox maybe... but beyond that, is there any real surprises either way? Slight underperformance (San Diego) or over performance doesn't really qualify for the discussion... the Blue Jays probably enter the list that I forgot to mention,
I like the twice-weekly chatters -- we just haven't been getting enough traffic to justify daily and this allows for broader discussion than just "so that happened" posts. What I would like is if the thred could stick at the top for the 3-4 days it's active. I know it's possible to make a thread sticky but usually they stay stuck for months (sometimes months after they're done) not days so I don't know how annoying it is to stick/unstick threads.
On the broader topic -- on mlb.tv, under the games there's a set of other things to watch like interviews, highlights, etc. And I don't know if you have this in the US but here in Oz I just noticed that we also have "The Bettor's Eye" (the "o" suggests it's not US). Oh well, not like we didn't know that was coming (probably been there for years, I only ever watch games).
That is the thing, I pushed for this and I wanted to check with the "guy in charge" that he was fine with it. I respect the people with the keys type of thing, and I just wanted to see if others felt like I did.
And the broader thoughts was one of the reasons I pushed for this, often with the daily, a convo would come up, but wouldn't be explored because another chatter came up.
For age 22 seasons, that moves him out of a tie with Johnny Bench, and into one with Joe DiMaggio's 1937 season. He's one shy of Eddie Mathews 47HR in a season at that age. Phenomenal company.
I recently noticed that every advertising sign in the Washington, DC METRO (subway) Station for Nationals Park was for the team’s official gaming partner, BetMGM. Must have 40 or more of them.
Hey I haven't been to DC since the Nationals moved there. I've been to some Capitals games, but I seem to remember it being a "get in, get out" experience. What's it like for Nats games? Is there anything like a community around the ballpark, are there any hotels or restaurants? Is it safe, or is it "get in, get out" and perhaps best if you drive?
Agreed. I thought the Astros would be an 85-87 win team, because the starting rotation would turn out to be a weakness. I'm sure most casual fans, and even some more than casual fans, aren't very familiar with Luis Garcia, Framber Valdez, Jose Urquidy and Cristian Javier, who have ERA+ of 128, 133, 128, and 135, and have accounted for 71 starts this season. It's been quite the pleasant surprise to see all these pitchers do well.
Of course having seven players in the regular lineup with OPS+ of 132, 127, 132, 128, 121, 145 and 138 helps, too. And the player at 145, Kyle Tucker, has exceeded all expectations. I've always thought the great thing about baseball is how every team's season is a story that never unfolds exactly as planned, and the positive surprises are quite fun.
If I go by memory it was pretty much AL west belonged to the astros, al central was the twins with maybe the indians challenging, the al east was the Yankees with the Rays challenging and Red Sox... NL east was the Braves with the Nats and Mets challenging, central was the Cubs, Cardinals and Brewers with the Reds challenging, west was Dodgers with the Padres challenging (and locking up the wild card)
That is from a half formed memory... I don't think anyone thought the White Sox was going to walk away with the division, but at the same time the central was clearly open to anyone.
Clapper, thanks for the reply. I remember that shooting, and came away with the impression that it was abnormal for the area, but it's always good to ask a local. I like a ballpark (any venue, really) that is convenient to public transit because I am not addicted to renting vehicles and driving. But I also don't like being caught out at a transit station without at least my hockey stick.
BOS 84-65 +0.5 (W)
NYY 83-65 --- (W)
TOR 82-65 0.5 (L)
OAK 79-67 3 at LAA
SEA 78-68 4 at KC
Go Baseball !
And of course, the Angels turn a beautiful DP. Mofoerthuckers !
STL 77-69 --- (W)
CIN 77-71 1 (W)
SDP 76-71 1.5 (L)
PHI 75-72 2.5 (W)
Darvish vs Wainwright on Saturday, with SDP season on the brink
this recent 10-22 stretch has left on a mark on the Padres, I'd say
and as things currently stand, the Pads may look back and realize that their last 22 games of 2021 were against playoff teams
Disgusting.
And fook you, Gabe Fookler ! With that sidehand/underhand idiot pitcher !
Write your last will and testament !
well, they are up 5-4 with 2 outs in 9th and down to their last strike but listen, when 33-year-old slugger Donovan Solano is at the plate, all things are possible. and he hits a solo HR - the 23rd of his glorious career as a power hitter and his first AB after 24 days on the IL - to send us to extra stanzas....
Braves lose another 1-run game to fall to 23-29 on the year in those contests. Phillies are 28-22 in 1-run affairs, which is a big reason why the division is so close despite the Pythag difference.
Braves also 4-9 in extras.
We have somewhat different memories. Astros, yes, but with A's challenging and really an open question as to whethher Houston's lackadaisacal 2020 would carry on. I sorta figured them for 89-90 which might or might not win the division. The Twins were the pick of the ALC but a lot of people were touting the White Sox too -- although if you'd told them Robert and Eloy would be (we thought) out for the season (and it was still 2/3 of it), I don't know that anybody would have predicted this. The NLC was supposed to be a mediocre 4-team slog and the NLE a mediocre 3-team slog. ALE some folks were touting Toronto to do well and everybody had pretty much given up on the Red Sox. Of course the Dodgers were supposed to win 200 games and run away with the NLW -- I still can't believe they haven't, they might be the best team since at least the Big Red Machine. Their pitching staff has a 137 ERA+ for crying out loud -- that sorta thing will get you into the HoF easily.
Meanwhile, on topics nobody cares about, the Cubs continue their offensive barrage, not that it does much good. They've scored 33 in their last 6 games and gone 1-5 (given up 55). Anybody know what the modern record is for games giving up 10+? Cubs are up to 18 and should be able to squeeze in a few more before it's all done. The did it 8 times in August. We're only 7-5 when scoring 10+ runs.
Not that much different, I just never take the A's seriously, especially when it comes to pre-season predictions, I just didn't think anyone thought there would be a competitor in the West, so the Astros were by default the team. I did miss people touting the White Sox, the hiring of TLR seemed like a white flag for the franchise more than a revival.
Yea, right now the Dodgers feel like late 90's Yankees or 50's Yankees or 20's Yankees. (although I'm looking at the Yankees franchise page, and have no idea what happened in 1925-- yes Ruth had an illness, but still)
BOS 84-65 +0.5 (W)
NYY 83-65 --- (W)
TOR 82-65 0.5 (L)
OAK 80-67 2.5 (W)
SEA 79-68 3.5 (W)
..............
NL LEAST thru Friday
ATL 76-69 --- (L)
PHI 75-72 2 (W)
.............
NL BEST thru Friday
SFG 96-52 --- (W)
LAD 94-54 2 (L)
...........
second NL WILD CARD thru Friday
STL 77-69 --- (W)
CIN 77-71 1 (W)
SDP 76-71 1.5 (L)
PHI 75-72 2.5 (W)
The Dodgers are pretty much who everyone expected them to be - they're still on pace to win well over 100 games. The only bizarre thing that happened to the Dodgers is the Giants.
The Dodgers are +242 in runs; we would expect them to be 100-48. They are "only" 94-54. Despite a great bullpen.
The Giants are a super team. +182 in runs. But instead of 6 games behind, they are 96-52, 2 games up. Whaddaya gonna do.
At one point this may have been true, but the Padres as currently constituted aren't better than the Cardinals as currently constituted.
The Padres have one reliable SP (Musgrove), and have gone 10-22 over their last 32 games.
The Cardinals are 24-14 since Aug. 5, around the time they revamped their staff and Edmundo Sosa began supplanting Paul DeJong in ther lineup, and they've enjoyed a healthy OF of O'Neill, Bader, and Carlson during that stretch as well, which wasn't the case for most of the first half of the season.
Through July the Cardinals were putting a whopping 5.2 runners on base per game via walk or HBP, a number shaved down to 3.0/game since then, and they haven't hit a batter in 25 games---their longest such streak since 1989.
EDIT: The Cardinals current no-hit-batsmen streak is the longest in MLB since the A's streak of 27 in 2013, and the fifth-longest in MLB since 2000.
I'm also a huge fan of Pham, and he's having a really off year, that isn't to his level... but outside of catcher, if you look at the Padres, we are talking every hitter is plus hitter (100 ops+)... their pitching hasn't shown up though... Darvish is a huge disappointment same with Snell etc... but if you look at going forward, you kinda have to assume some potential there.
Mind you, I like my team more going forward.. I think Lester has found what is working for him, same with Happ, and I think Wainwright is a legit Cy Young contender, add in that the Cardinals, like the Padres do not have a single weak position player in their lineup, and I like what they are providing. And that Tyler O'Neill should be in the MVP discussion and Carlson in the ROTY (along with Sosa)... not that I think any of them should win, but they should enter the discussion.
I think there's a pretty substantial body of evidence that refutes this.
I know... but I can be optimistic. And in case of the Padres, there is some real evidence that the front office is trying to supplement the elite talent.
Using Sosa as the SS, the Cardinals can same the same thing.
(OK, technically Edman is at 97, but the lineups are pretty similar; the Cardinals don't have a Tatis, but 5 guys with an OPS+ of 110 or better, vs. 4 for the Pads. Team OPS+ of 99 for the Cardinals, 101 for the Padres.)
The thing I like about the Cardinals is that you have
1b Goldy 5.5 war
2b Edman 3.4
SS Sosa at 3.1
3b Arenado at 4.1
c Molina 1.7
Lf O'neill 5.2
CF Bader(87 games) 2.9
RF Carlson 2.5 war...
The standard is 2.0 war for a season is league average... The Cardinals are above that at every position except their future hof catcher.
Then you add Waino who is a Cy Young contender that isn't liked by war as much as he should be while still putting up a 3.7 war...
The thing is that logically a guy who is top 10 in innings pitched and era and era+ (and league leader in complete games) at 190 innings, should most definitely be much closer to 6 war than 4 war for the season.
The argument that era difference is more important than seasonal quality/quantity just doesn't strike me as sensible.
Zack Wheeler had a pretty terrible August. He's straightened things out in Sept and still leads the NL in IP, K and WARpit but he's come back towards the pack. Which opens the door for a possible 4th CYA for Scherzer. He's well back in IP but leads the league in ERA, is less than one WAR behind, has the better record and has been insanely good down the stretch (0.88 ERA for the Dodgers). If the Phils miss the playoffs and the Dodgers win the division, Scherzer is probably the favorite. (I realize you could make a pretty similar case for Buehler too but he doesn't have the sub-1 Aug/Sept ERA.)
It also means that Wheeler won't be MVP. That probably wasn't a big "risk" anyway but he used to have the most WAR in the NL by a good margin. Not anymore as Tatis and Soto are closing -- pretty amazing given the time they've missed. Normally you might need to make a case for a guy who's missed that much time based purely on rate stats but Tatis leads in HRs and WARpos -- leading in some counting stats despite missing time is impressive. Then normally you might need for the Padres to make the playoffs but if the main competition is Wheeler, chances are he's not making the playoffs either (and obviously Soto isn't).
Which brings us to two darkhorse candidates. I'm sure CFB and the other Cards' fans have been pointing this out for a while and I just wasn't paying enough attention but Goldschmidt is 3rd in WARpos at 5.5. It's really just a standard Goldschmidt season but he got off to a pretty lousy start (sub-700 OPS through May) and was still at 750 at the AS break. In the 2nd half, he's hit 327/398/593 and even better over the last month. The counting stats aren't impressive so he'll need a major "they made the playoffs" bias but if they hold Tatis's missed time against him and the Padres miss the playoffs ...
The other very darkhorse is Posey. It's very, very light playing time by MVP standards but when there's not a clear candidate, catchers sometimes sneak through. WAR's not impressed at all (just 3.1 WAR) but he's still a C with a 139 OPS+ (same as Goldschmidt) on the team with the best record so there must be some reason they're so good and so surprising so it must be Posey. Normally 450 PA would be immediately disqualifying but if the other candidate is only 80 PA ahead and missed the playoffs while you're a catcher on the best team ...
The Brewers don't really have any viable candidates. Adames has been their best position player but between starting in TB and having some injuries, he's played in just 88 games for the Brewers. Burnes and Woodruff might have good CYA arguments in other seasons but if voters will go for a lower-IP candidate, Scherzer is the obvious choice. They also have just 10 and 9 wins respectively -- how a guy can have a 166 ERA+, a similar FIP, pitch for a 600 team and go 9-9 is beyond me. (I know deGrom does that regularly but he hasn't played for a 600 team.)
I'm not sure what you're saying here. But whatever it is, that era difference will affect all pitchers in this era so it wouldn't seem to explain why he his 2-3 WAR behind the WARpit leaders. What's "killing" him isn't anything related to era differences, it's the 92 park factor.
EDIT: For those that don't know, era differences in WARpit enter in two ways. First is in Rrep (replacement value) -- it takes about 220 innings to get to 20 runs of replacement value. Of course today's starters almost never get to 220 innings (Wheeler might make it this year). But that doesn't mean their Rrep should go up to 20/180 innings or whatever -- relievers are now throwing about 35-40% of all innings, all starting pitchers are simply less valuable, especially in a "replacement" sense.
The second is in the RA9role component. This is where the inherent advantage for relievers (or disadvantage for starters) is adjusted for. Relievers (of the 1-inning variety at least) are usually more effective than starters, lowering the league average ERA making starters look worse than "they really are." Even over the course of Wainwright's career, this has gone from about 0.16 R/9 to 0.21 for starters versus about -0.33 for relievers. Back in the good old days (Steve Carlton say), RA9role for starters was around 0.11 versus -0.28 for relievers (Pedro Borbon Sr). So that gap has shifted from about 0.39 R/9 to 0.54 R/9 in starter's "favor."
Anyway, there's simply no way around the fact that greater reliever usage means starters are less valuable overall. To force a modern "average starter" to a 2.2 WAR would mess the whole system up. WAR is a zero-sum game so if you want to argue that 180 inning pitchers now are the same as 220 inning pitchers 30 years ago are the same as 250 inning pitchers 50 years ago and everybody deserves the same Rrep, that extra WAR has to come from other positions. Similarly if you want to argue that Cs are under-valued by WAR, etc.
There is a problem with judging people who are expected to be good, early season dissatisfaction might affect the perception. By the numbers I know Goldy has been good... It just doesn't feel like it.
Like the name change. Would also have accepted Brohei Shohtani.
The issue I have is that era difference isn't being properly monitored... Guys like Scherzer and their 187 era+ over 30 fewer innings than Waino with his 130 era+ should be a lot closer than 5.4 vs 3.5... That 30 innings is huge. That era+ isn't nearly as important to be honest. The difference in winning percentage between 130 era+ and 180 era+ isn't nearly as important as innings pitched at 120 era+ .
If you tell me that I'm going to have 35 starts by a guy who goes 7 innings at 120 era+... vs a guy who is going to give me 27 starts at 170 era+... and I have to eat the rest with a replacement level pitcher... the ace of my staff is the guy who is giving me 35 starts... I'll win nearly as many 3 runs allowed games as 2 runs allowed, the difference is that I can count on the guy to show up.
Tatis .287/.382/.580
Harper .352/.484/.762
Soto .362/.529/.649
Not to be pedantic, but people need to always include rate stats and pa.... to not just feels like you are hiding something. Throw in position to also help solidify the case or what not.... As an observer you have to assume anyone in these discussions is at least average defensively.... but if one is a shortstop and the other two are corner outfielders, that is going to matter in looking at the numbers.
I'm watching the Padres feed and their announcers said "that's terrible."
It's not like these are two teams fighting for a playoff spot or anything...
I guess one could say "well, he's calling pitches six inches outside, so you'd better swing" but I'd rather the ump just call those pitches correctly than have the batters expand their zone against a guy like Darvish.
edit: 2-0.
edit: 3-0.
Turner: .315018
Harper: .314607
Soto: .314534
Turner should have 1 more PA today, and Harper plays tonight in the ESPN Sunday Night Game. It would be kind of fun to see the lead rotate among the contenders after every PA until season’s end.
Jays have won 7 series in a row. 15-3 in Sept.
Josh Donaldson walked behind the plate after the loss, and called over Vlad Jr. They exchanged jerseys and had a photo op.
STL 79-69 --- (W)
CIN 77-73 3 (L)
PHI 76-72 TONIGHT at NYM
SDP 76-73 3.5 (L)
Relieved by Michael Rucker who has a 7.83 ERA. Granted, I'm not sure how many relievers we have on the roster with a lower ERA.
FB to the edge of the warning track in CF. Cubs win! Cubs win! Attractive blonde woman with a W t-shirt rubbing it in to her boyfriend in a Brewers shirt. It's like the good ol' days of May.
13 GS, 47 IP, 0-8, 9.89 ERA, 7.15 FIP, 370/436/654, 405 BABIP
Somehow his season adds up to just -2.4 WAR which isn't even (quite) among the 25 worst of the expansion era. (Steve Blass at -3.9 in a mere 89 IP is the worst. Dave Hamilton's -3.1 in just 30 IP was really something: 44 H, 28 BB, 38 ER)
In the previous 110 years, only 3 Braves had hit for the cycle (Albert Hall in 1987, Mark Kotsay in 2008, and Freddie in 2016).
Big win with the Phillies breathing down the Bravos' necks. C'mon Mets, can't you at least win one?
Legends!
BOS 86-65 +1 (W)
TOR 84-65 --- (W)
NYY 83-67 1.5 (L)
OAK 82-67 2 (W)
..............
NL LEAST thru part of Sunday
ATL 77-69 --- (W)
PHI 75-72 TONIGHT at NYM
.............
NL BEST thru Sunday
SFG 97-53 --- (L)
LAD 96-54 1 (W)
Except the fact that each club loathes the Cardinals and it would be most satisfying to see the Cards miss the playoffs. I'm sure Cub and Brewers players would be more than happy to be responsible for this Cardinal misfortune.
Honestly I did think that was a potential thing, but outside of playing to win simply to win, I don't think it really adds any adrenaline to the equation.
Hammerin' Hank never did it despite good speed, 98 career triples, and a few HRs.
But to show how lucky this achievement is, Freeman has 25 triples in his 12-year career and 2 cycles.
Four thousand holes in Blackburn, Lancashire
And though the holes were rather small
They had to count them all
Now they know how many holes it takes to fill the Albert Hall
Is John Olerud the most unlikely/luckiest multiple cycle player in history?
13 total triples. The years he hit for the cycle (1997/2001) are years where he hit only one triple that year.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main