Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, May 18, 2009

Hiestand: MLB, Fox turn back World Series clock with earlier start times

Someone has finally thought of our Fanpop-addicted children!

Major League Baseball and Fox will announce today a real TV throwback: World Series action starting before 8 p.m. ET.

That hasn’t happened, in a regularly scheduled weeknight Series game, in at least 34 years.

The long-overdue idea will start this fall on Fox as its weeknight World Series games — as well as its American League Championship Series games — will have first pitches at 7:57. Last year, on average, World Series games’ first pitches came at 8:28. In recent years, some have come as late as 8:38.

Commissioner Bud Selig and Fox Sports President Ed Goren say Game 3 of the Series, scheduled for a Saturday night, could even start a few minutes earlier (the sides continue to work out details). Postseason games on Sundays, partly because of Fox’s NFL coverage, will keep the old start times.

Selig says whether postseason start times will change for games on TBS, which this fall has the National League Championship Series, hasn’t been determined.

“I give Fox a lot of credit,” Selig says. “I’ve wanted this (for) a long time. And it’s a very significant change.”

Repoz Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:51 AM | 84 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: business, media, television

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. TVerik - Dr. Velocity Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM (#3182955)
Nice touch. I'd still prefer 3PM, but baby steps.
   2. Starring RMc as Bradley Scotchman Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:36 AM (#3182959)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.
   3. Mike Webber Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:17 PM (#3182965)
This is a good thing, maybe I won't spend the month of October walking around like a zombie until my third cup of coffee every morning.
   4. Fly is talking about film ####ing magic Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:18 PM (#3182966)
7PM would be better, but 7:57 is still way better than 8:28, or even 8:43, or whatever other ridiculous times they've come up with the last few years.
   5. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:25 PM (#3182970)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.


I agree, RMc.
   6. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:51 PM (#3182989)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.
Pass - I don't want games airing opposite each other.
   7. Gamingboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:53 PM (#3182992)
8 PM! Still not perfect by any means, but ####### it, at least now some kids East of the Mississippi might see the end of a game and not be zombies the next morning.
   8. Levi Stahl Posted: May 18, 2009 at 12:56 PM (#3182994)
This is great news. Those of you who still think 8 o'clock is too late are welcome to move to the Midwest, where we'll get to start them at 7.
   9. Best Regards, President of Comfort, Esq., LLC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:08 PM (#3183000)
This is great news. Those of you who still think 8 o'clock is too late are welcome to move to the Midwest, where we'll get to start them at 7.
Yes, but then you have to live in the midwest.
   10. villageidiom Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:09 PM (#3183001)
8 PM! Still not perfect by any means, but ####### it, at least now some kids East of the Mississippi might see the end of a game and not be zombies the next morning.
Quick: how many MLB teams' homes are east of the Mississippi?
   11. John (You Can Call Me Grandma) Murphy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:12 PM (#3183004)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.

Pass - I don't want games airing opposite each other.


Good point. For those days, then one game has to be played no later than 4 PM on a weekday and no later than 7 on a weekend.
   12. plim Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:19 PM (#3183008)
i'm sorry, but what's the rush to have weekend playoff games start earlier than on the weekdays? it's not like the kids have to go to school on sat/sun.

and also, it's pretty sad that regular season football has to interfere with playoff baseball timetables.

i mean, it's not like we're trying to make way for the wnba, mls, or mll (are they still around?), and while i do understand that football is huge, this is playoff baseball. what's the pecking order of sports?

does playoff baseball really rank behind regular season football?
   13. Answer Guy. Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:23 PM (#3183010)
I'd rather have 7 of course, but this is an improvement. The fewer games that are still running at midnight the better.
   14. villageidiom Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:27 PM (#3183014)
i'm sorry, but what's the rush to have weekend playoff games start earlier than on the weekdays? it's not like the kids have to go to school on sat/sun.
I've seen plenty of young kids AT playoff games who can't stay awake to the end. Roaring crowds don't wake them up. It's hard for kids (say, age 10 or under) to stay up late when they're not used to it.
   15. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:27 PM (#3183015)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.

I think 4 PM is too early. Lot's of people are still doing outdoor activities on October weekends. 5 or 6PM would be nice. Friday and Saturday don't matter as much as Sunday, since there's no problem sleeping in.
   16. TVerik - Dr. Velocity Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:28 PM (#3183018)
does playoff baseball really rank behind regular season football?


By the ratings, easily. Depending on the specifics, it could rank below preseason football.
   17. Best Regards, President of Comfort, Esq., LLC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:35 PM (#3183023)
Quick: how many MLB teams' homes are east of the Mississippi?
16. 17 if you count the Nationals.
   18. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:37 PM (#3183024)
does playoff baseball really rank behind regular season football?

Yeah, b/c every city is seeing its home team, and the gambling factor is huge.

I'm a much bigger baseball fan that football fan, but if the NY Giants are playing, I'll watch that over a Cubs-Phillies playoff game.
   19. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:41 PM (#3183026)
Great news.
   20. Clemenza Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:42 PM (#3183027)
“I give Fox a lot of credit,” Selig says. “I’ve wanted this (for) a long time. And it’s a very significant change.”

Just go away.

You could've had it, maybe at a price, but you could've had it whenever you wanted it.
   21. Famous Original Joe C Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:48 PM (#3183029)
I'm a much bigger baseball fan that football fan, but if the NY Giants are playing, I'll watch that over a Cubs-Phillies playoff game.

In terms of its contribution to the season, each game in the NFL is like ten in MLB - that's a pretty significant difference as well. Four straight losses in baseball happens to almost every team every year, even the very best ones - whereas four losses in a row in the NFL can pretty much kill your season.
   22. TVerik - Dr. Velocity Posted: May 18, 2009 at 01:52 PM (#3183033)
I don't know if you can make that comparison, Joe. There's more to it.

I mean, if an NFL team goes 9-7, they're a wheezing maybe-playoff team. If a baseball team goes 90-70, they're a solid playoff entrant. If an NFL team goes 10-6, they're all right. But a 100-60 MLB team is among the best in the league. The best NFL teams in a particular year go 13-3 or 14-2 - it's completely unheard of for a baseball team to win 140 games.

*Rounded off the MLB season here*
   23. Famous Original Joe C Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:10 PM (#3183041)
I don't know if you can make that comparison, Joe. There's more to it.

I agree with you that the records aren't directly comparable - but one NFL game still carries much more weight on the season outcome than one MLB game does, which in turn makes the average NFL game "feel" bigger.
   24. More Dewey is Always Good Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:12 PM (#3183044)
It's hard to overestimate the impact that gambling has on interest in the NFL. There are probably millions of Americans that otherwise don't care about sports that watch football because they have money in their office pool.
   25. Starring RMc as Bradley Scotchman Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:17 PM (#3183051)
All baseball playoff games should be at 7PM weekdays, 4PM weekends, IMNSHO.

Pass - I don't want games airing opposite each other.


Div Series and LCS: 4pm and 7pm weekends (plus 1pm if they're played in the Eastern time zone), 4pm and 7pm weekdays.

World Series: 4pm weekends, 7pm weekdays.

F#@k football.
   26. ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:22 PM (#3183054)
Quick: how many MLB teams' homes are east of the Mississippi?


16. 17 if you count the Nationals.

More to the point, what percentage of the U.S. population lives in the two easternmost time zones?

(Answer: 79.9%, and 47% in the Eastern Time Zone alone)

does playoff baseball really rank behind regular season football?

You don't really want to know the answer to that, but of course it does, at least in the minds of those who make the decisions. You have to remember that Saturday football isn't just one national telecast, it's scores of local telecasts, and big city sports bars that show dozens of games at once. And of course on Sunday you're up against the NFL's Sunday ticket. With football, nearly every fan can watch his or her favorite team, whereas with baseball most of those favorite teams are already finished with their seasons.
   27. Slivers of Maranville descends into chaos (SdeB) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:36 PM (#3183068)
It's hard to overestimate the impact that gambling has on interest in the NFL. There are probably millions of Americans that otherwise don't care about sports that watch football because they have money in their office pool.


I disagree. People (other than professional sports gamblers) bet on football because they like football, not because they like gambling.
   28. Crispix Attacksel Rios Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:36 PM (#3183069)
Huzzah!

i'm sorry, but what's the rush to have weekend playoff games start earlier than on the weekdays? it's not like the kids have to go to school on sat/sun.

Because it's nice to be able to play baseball when the sun is out and it's more than 50 degrees outside, and that can only be done on the weekends when viewers (mostly) aren't at work?

I still think the times for the weekday games should depend on where the game is being played. If these games start at 7:57 eastern time, that means if it's an all-west coast series, every game starts at 4:57 local time. Did anyone think this was bizarre during the Giants-Angels World Series, because it seems bizarre.
   29. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:43 PM (#3183077)
People (other than professional sports gamblers) bet on football because they like football, not because they like gambling.

I agree. I've constantly read on the internet that there are millions of people who are obsessed with NFL gambling and thats the only reason they are interested or watch. I have met hundreds of sports fans, and I'd categorize one guy who fits that profile. But I do know a few guys who are big NFL fans who occasional place bets "to make things more interesting".
   30. John DiFool2 Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:48 PM (#3183084)
Now all we need is one, just one, World Series weekend game to be a day game.
   31. More Dewey is Always Good Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:49 PM (#3183085)
I agree. I've constantly read on the internet that there are millions of people who are obsessed with NFL gambling and thats the only reason they are interested or watch. I have met hundreds of sports fans, and I'd categorize one guy who fits that profile. But I do know a few guys who are big NFL fans who occasional place bets "to make things more interesting".

What's the variance in ratings on (regular-season) NFL games? It was always my understanding that the ratings stay pretty constant, regardless of the matchup, and this is because so many people have money on the games.

I refuse to believe that, unlike every other sport, the NFL is somehow special, and has lots and lots of fans that love the sport so much that they'll watch even if their favorite team isn't playing.
   32. God can’t be all that impressed with Charles S. Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:56 PM (#3183094)
People (other than professional sports gamblers) bet on football because they like football, not because they like gambling.

I agree. I've constantly read on the internet that there are millions of people who are obsessed with NFL gambling and thats the only reason they are interested or watch. I have met hundreds of sports fans, and I'd categorize one guy who fits that profile. But I do know a few guys who are big NFL fans who occasional place bets "to make things more interesting".


As usual, the answer is somewhere in the middle. Most football gamblers are fans first, but they watch more games, particularly out-of-market games because of office pools. That is true at the college and pro level. for example, Sunday night ESPN baseball will do well in local markets as will Monday Night Football. Football will do way better in the rest of the country because of the gambling aspect.
   33. BDC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 02:58 PM (#3183097)
fans that love the sport so much that they'll watch even if their favorite team isn't playing

I dunno; in Texas, football is truly the secular religion, and if there is a game on, people turn it on: three games on Sunday and one on Monday night, just as regular as church on Sunday mornings and Wednesday nights. One of them is going to be the Cowboys, but the other three could be Titans-Buccaneers or Marauders-Goliaths or who cares what, and Texans will stare at them for all they're worth.
   34. The Original SJ Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:01 PM (#3183100)
This is a good thing, maybe I won't spend the month of October walking around like a zombie until my third cup of coffee every morning.

October won't be a problem in the World Series, because if it goes 7 it ends November 5th.
   35. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:05 PM (#3183106)
I disagree. People (other than professional sports gamblers) bet on football because they like football, not because they like gambling.

They like football, basically their home team, so they get involved in office pools or fantasy football, which leads them to watch 3 other games they never would have cared about if the didn't have an "interest" in the outcome or a particular player's stats.

It is not inconsistent to say that football gamblers are football fans first, but, the gambling still grossly inflates NFL ratings.

I will basically never watch Sunday or Monday night football (unless the Giants are playing), but if my starting QB or RB in fantasy is playing, I'm often up watching until mid-night to see if I won my game that week.
   36. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:06 PM (#3183108)
I will basically never watch Sunday or Monday night football (unless the Giants are playing), but if my starting QB or RB in fantasy is playing, I'm often up watching until mid-night to see if I won my game that week.

Thats different than gambling.
   37. Moloka'i Three-Finger Brown (Declino DeShields) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:13 PM (#3183120)
Didn't something like Jets-Saints on ESPN's Sunday night package outrank Game 7 of the 2001 WS (Yanks and D-Backs)?
   38. BeanoCook Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:15 PM (#3183121)
F#@k football.


You mean, F&#K;NFL football.

Also, regarding football in Texas. The order is High School>College>NFL
   39. More Dewey is Always Good Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:15 PM (#3183122)
Thats different than gambling.

How so? Fantasy is just a different form of gambling.
   40. BeanoCook Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:16 PM (#3183123)
Didn't something like Jets-Saints on ESPN's Sunday night package outrank Game 7 of the 2001 WS (Yanks and D-Backs)?


No.
   41. BDC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:31 PM (#3183138)
regarding football in Texas. The order is High School>College>NFL

We could quibble about the 2-3 ranking there (I think that the NFL is more popular than college ball), but no question whatsoever about #1, I agree.
   42. Fly is talking about film ####ing magic Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:32 PM (#3183140)

I still think the times for the weekday games should depend on where the game is being played. If these games start at 7:57 eastern time, that means if it's an all-west coast series, every game starts at 4:57 local time. Did anyone think this was bizarre during the Giants-Angels World Series, because it seems bizarre.


But 5pm is the perfect time to start a game. I can't imagine finding that bizarre.
   43. More Dewey is Always Good Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:38 PM (#3183145)
But 5pm is the perfect time to start a game.

Unless you work, and plan on attending the game.
   44. North Side Chicago Expatriate Giants Fan Posted: May 18, 2009 at 03:40 PM (#3183147)
5pm start time is tough for the west coast. Who gets off work that early?
   45. Mirabelli Dictu (Chris McClinch) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:10 PM (#3183162)
5pm start time is tough for the west coast. Who gets off work that early?

Who cares? In the unfortunate scenario where one coast is going to see only 7 innings, I'd rather see everyone able to watch the ninth inning than everyone able to watch the first.
   46. More Dewey is Always Good Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:21 PM (#3183172)
Really, the ideal solution is to start all playoff games at 7 P.M. - local time. The idea that playoff games have significant national interest is pretty much a fiction by now.
   47. Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:25 PM (#3183174)
does playoff baseball really rank behind regular season football?

In 2001, due to the weeklong schedule pushback caused by 9/11, a World Series game went head-to-head with a Monday Night Football game. Not just any MNF, but one where the matchup was so lame that the network decided to openly bill it as perhaps the worst matchup in MNF history (Redskins-Cowboys, at a time when neither time was very good).

Result: the lousy regular season NFL game beat the World Series in the ratings.

EDITED to add: going through the thread something like this has already been brought up and rebutted. Damned if I know whose memory is off.
   48. BDC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:27 PM (#3183176)
Actually, I think it's great that football is more popular than baseball. I walked up to the gate at the Ballpark yesterday and got decent seats for $16 apiece. I can't afford to get Cowboys tickets unless someone dies and leaves me an oil well.
   49. zenbitz Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:34 PM (#3183185)
Did anyone think this was bizarre during the Giants-Angels World Series, because it seems bizarre.


It was odd. But it didn't really matter since the world ended half way through game 6.

/giants fan
   50. Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:34 PM (#3183186)
Well now that I've bothered to check . ..

The 2001 World Series did NOT have a game on Monday night.

The Cowboys and Redskins DID play a Monday Night game on 10/15/01, though. The Cowboys and Redskins were both 0-4 heading into that game. (The Redskins had been outscored 135-25 prior to that game. Ouch). So I remembered that part right.

On 10/15/01, both ALDS series had their fifth and final game: the Yanks finished their impressive comeback against the A's after losing the first two games of that series and the 116-win Mariners finally stumbled past Cleveland.

My memory obviously was a bit off, but I'm pretty sure a really meaningless NFL game still won the ratings war against two key playoff MLB contests.
   51. ?Donde esta Dagoberto Campaneris? Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:37 PM (#3183190)
I couldn't find it with a quick google search, but I'm fairly sure that I've read that the Cowboys always draw top ratings for MNF, whether the team is playing well or not.
   52. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:40 PM (#3183194)
We could quibble about the 2-3 ranking there (I think that the NFL is more popular than college ball), but no question whatsoever about #1, I agree.


A few years ago I went to a Texas HS game just outside DFW metroplex on a Friday, OU v Texas at the Cotton Bowl on Saturday and Panthers at Cowboys on a Sunday during the same weekend. The level of intensity and excitement was much stronger on Fri. and Sat. than it was at that moldy Cowboys game, and that was the closest game of the three. As a non-Texan, I felt HS>College>NFL in Texas.
   53. dave h Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:43 PM (#3183199)
I recall the Cowboys-Redskins Monday Night Football game when both teams hadn't won a game outdrew an MLB playoff game, but I don't remember which one. Looking it up - both teams were 0-4 when they played on October 15, 2001, and there were two ALDS game 5's that night - NY vs Oak and Sea vs Cle. I can't imagine the NY game was outwatched by MNF, but maybe Sea v Cle - couldn't find anything to back it up.

EDIT: Shouldn't have stopped to look it up I guess. I have the same memory as Dag Nabbit obviously, for what that's worth.
   54. BDC Posted: May 18, 2009 at 07:47 PM (#3183204)
Yes, OU-Texas beats just about any event around here for day-of-game excitement; but it is by far the biggest rivalry in the region. I just get the impression, having lived here a long time, that interest in college football runs fairly high among alumni of the big schools and among a certain social set in the cities (TCU, SMU, Rice fans) – and that certainly takes in a lot of people. But for constant chatter and attention in the media and the larger community, the Cowboys, at any rate, really absorb people's notice in North Texas. (The Texans, probably, a lot less so.) I have often felt that most Texans think that college football is an inexplicable waste of time between HS graduation and Draft Day :)
   55. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:03 PM (#3183220)
You're right about the point of non-alumni being more interested in the Cowboys, as it is certainly a lot easier to reach a wider audience by talking about the Cowboys as opposed to splitting time talking UT, A&M;, TT, TCU, SMU, UH, Rice, BU, etc. I just get the vibe, and perhaps it is my college football bias coming through, that Texans care more about college ball than pros.

The Cowboys atmosphere was rather NBA-like and I know it is unfair to compare it to OU/Texas, but this is the mighty, invincible NFL we're talking, America's team and it was a giant buzzkill.
   56. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:18 PM (#3183244)
"Unless you work, and plan on attending the game."

If you're lucky enough to score playoff tickets, take a damn half day and shut up.
   57. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:26 PM (#3183258)
This information has zero impact on my life. I can't see a game start at 5:38 PM and I can't see a game start at 4:57 PM. Thank God for DVRs.
   58. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:29 PM (#3183262)
Really, the ideal solution is to start all playoff games at 7 P.M. - local time.

Ding ding ding.
   59. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:30 PM (#3183264)
I think there was some Jets/Saints game up against 2001 Game 7. Kyle Turley ripped off some dude's helmet and chucked it 20 yards.
   60. bads85 Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:43 PM (#3183278)
I think there was some Jets/Saints game up against 2001 Game 7. Kyle Turley ripped off some dude's helmet and chucked it 20 yards.
Page 1 of 1 pages


Right -- but it was Sunday Night Football, not Monday Night Football. I seriously doubt an ESPN game outdrew a network game though.
   61. Answer Guy. Posted: May 18, 2009 at 08:55 PM (#3183294)
This information has zero impact on my life. I can't see a game start at 5:38 PM and I can't see a game start at 4:57 PM. Thank God for DVRs.


It makes no sense to me to have people on the east coast have to miss the last few innings of a game so that people on the west coast can see the first few innings.
   62. DaMick knows what love is. A Boy Loves His Dog. Posted: May 18, 2009 at 09:00 PM (#3183297)
I was hoping by earlier, they meant like September 20th.
   63. Internet Commenter Posted: May 18, 2009 at 09:33 PM (#3183342)
It makes no sense to me to have people on the east coast have to miss the last few innings of a game so that people on the west coast can see the first few innings.

It is much easier to stay up late than it is to leave work early.
   64. cardsfanboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:00 PM (#3183366)
Actually, I think it's great that football is more popular than baseball.

and I reject this conclusion. In any given season I would argue (and probably win) that Baseball has more unique visitors to a MLB game than to an NFL game. The ratings are higher because as mentioned, the games have a stronger value to the season. Football is not more popular, it's individual games are more poopular.
   65. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:11 PM (#3183377)
and I reject this conclusion. In any given season I would argue (and probably win) that Baseball has more unique visitors to a MLB game than to an NFL game. The ratings are higher because as mentioned, the games have a stronger value to the season. Football is not more popular, it's individual games are more poopular.

I agree. I probably watch 80% of NY Giants games, but that's what a 40 hour time committment over 16 weeks. There's no way I can do that for the Yankees, my wife would shoot me if I insisted on watching every night, so maybe I watch 40% of the games. But I still spend way more total hours watching the Yankees.
   66. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:24 PM (#3183392)
I watch close to 500 hours worth of Angels baseball in a season.
   67. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:26 PM (#3183395)
Btw, never before have I read such an eloquent defenestration of the institution of marriage as "my wife would shoot me if I insisted on watching every night, so maybe I watch 40% of the games."
   68. villageidiom Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:27 PM (#3183398)
The NFL gets high ratings on Sundays because there are multiple games, and coverage is tailored to either (a) local market or (b) national appeal, if no local market game. Ultimately you're comparing the combined ratings for 12 football games to the ratings for one baseball game.

Instead for comparison you should look at one-game football offerings, like the nighttime games. Like, for example, during the 2008 World Series:

DAYPARTPRIMETIME MON-SUN
FROM 10
/20/08 THROUGH 10/26/08
REGULAR 
AND SPECIAL PROGRAMS

                                   VIEWR  VIEWR 
RANK                                2
+     2+   
                                   (
000)   RTG  
-----                             ------ ------ 
    
1   CSI                        19490    6.7 
    2 
DANCING WITH THE STARS     18500    6.4 
    3   NCIS                       17230    5.9 
    4 
DANCING W/STARS RESULTS    16350    5.6 
    5 
DESPERATE HOUSEWIVES       15950    5.5 
*** 6   FOX WORLD SERIES GAME 4    15480    5.3
    7   MENTALIST
THE             15280    5.3 
    8   CRIMINAL MINDS             15010    5.2 
    9   TWO 
AND A HALF MEN         14630    5.0 
***     FOX WORLD SERIES GAME 1    14630    5.0 
   11 
GREY'S ANATOMY-THU 9PM     14450    5.0 
   12   CSI: NY                    14390    5.0 
   13   CSI: MIAMI                 13510    4.7 
   14   SURVIVOR: GABON            13310    4.6 
   15   OT, THE                    13280    4.6 
   16   HOUSE                      13080    4.5 
   17   FOX WORLD SERIES GM4-PRE   13060    4.5 
   18   60 MINUTES                 12820    4.4 
***19   FOX WORLD SERIES GAME 2    12780    4.4 
   20 * EXTREME MAKEOVER:HM ED-8P  12260    4.2 
   21   COLD CASE                  11970    4.1 
   22   ELEVENTH HOUR              11850    4.1 
   23   WITHOUT A TRACE            11630    4.0 
>>>24 * SAT NIGHT FOOTBALL         10370    3.6 
   25   GHOST WHISPERER            10140    3.5 
   26   WORST WEEK                  9880    3.4 
   27 * BROTHERS & SISTERS          9860    3.4 
***28   FOX WORLD SERIES GAME 3     9840    3.4 

  ....

***85   TIL DEATH RAIN 10/25-B      3600    1.2 
***86   TIL DEATH RAIN 10/25-A      3530    1.2 
***87   TIL DEATH RAIN 10/25-C      3380    1.2 


Monday Night Football averaged 11.9 million viewers in 2008, which would put it 22nd on the list in an average week (a little bit better than Saturday Night Football* that week). This was one of the few weeks ESPN didn't crow about their ratings, which might suggest their ratings were lower than average. Still, the MNF average outdrew only WS Game 3, which started with a 1.5-hour rain delay (and three episodes of Til Death.

Baseball ratings are fine. They're in decline because broadcast TV ratings are in decline.

EDITed to clean up the table and fix the NFL afternoon game total.
   69. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM (#3183404)
Saturday Night Football has nothing to do with the NFL.
   70. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:30 PM (#3183407)
Btw, never before have I read such an eloquent defenestration of the institution of marriage as "my wife would shoot me if I insisted on watching every night, so maybe I watch 40% of the games."

Actually, I'm super happy with my marriage. Have to say the best 4 years of my life by far.

It's just not fair to ask her to watch baseball every night for 6 straight months, when she has no interest. If she tried to watch Jane Austin movies every night for 6 months, I'd shoot her.
   71. Greg Pope Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:43 PM (#3183421)
It is much easier to stay up late than it is to leave work early.

Maybe for some people. For me it's the opposite. And for most people I know, too. If you have a non-time clock job and a reasonable boss, knocking off a few hours early to attend a playoff game is pretty easy. I have no idea of what percentage of people that is, though.

That's if you're talking about attending the game. If you're talking about TV, it's still the same result, though. Sure, if you're out at a bar you can watch the whole game, but if you're at home, sitting on your couch or whatever, there's a good chance you'll fall asleep. Whereas for the early start, you either miss the beginning or with a Tivo you see the whole thing anyway.

Unless you're going to implement 7 PM local start times (Which I would vote for), you're going to inconvenience someone and while it's not great for those being inconvenienced, the solution is obvious.
   72. cardsfanboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:46 PM (#3183424)
I said poopular..... wow that is embarrassing (if I knew many of you)

Football does have a larger national appeal on a per game basis, and I do think people care about other teams results more in football than in baseball, but again that has to do with fantasy, football pool, and the relative importance of each game.
   73. PreservedFish Posted: May 18, 2009 at 10:54 PM (#3183431)
Btw, never before have I read such an eloquent defenestration of the institution of marriage as "my wife would shoot me if I insisted on watching every night, so maybe I watch 40% of the games."


Defenestration. Are you just using that word very creatively?
   74. FBI Regional Bureau Chief GORDON COLE!!! Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:00 PM (#3183435)
I said poopular..... wow that is embarrassing (if I knew many of you)

Nah, it was just a freudian slip. "Football is a nice sport--for you to poop on!"
   75. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:01 PM (#3183438)
Defenestration. Are you just using that word very creatively?

It fits, I'm reading and writing this on a PC.
   76. Captain Joe Bivens, Pointless and Wonderful Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:02 PM (#3183442)
What's more of an inconvenience? Expecting west coast viewers to tune in at 4pm their time, or east coast viewers to tune in at 10pm their time?
   77. Greg Pope Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:07 PM (#3183448)
What about the children? And I'm not kidding. Kids will be home from school on the West Coast in time to see the games, but they won't be able to stay up on the East Coast. I know we have this discussion about bedtimes every time this comes up, but my kids just are not capable of staying up to see the whole game. I've tried, when the Cubs are in the playoffs, and they just can't make it.
   78. cardsfanboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:16 PM (#3183455)
What about the children? And I'm not kidding. Kids will be home from school on the West Coast in time to see the games, but they won't be able to stay up on the East Coast. I know we have this discussion about bedtimes every time this comes up, but my kids just are not capable of staying up to see the whole game. I've tried, when the Cubs are in the playoffs, and they just can't make it.

Raise tougher children hooked on caffeine.

actually I agree with the thought process that says work with the time zones relative to the participating teams primarily. The other thing is that I doubt many games are really relavent after the 7th inning or so, if it's interesting enough the added energy from a taut game may help make it easier for them to stay up.
   79. Los Angeles Waterloo of Black Hawk Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:16 PM (#3183456)
What's more of an inconvenience? Expecting west coast viewers to tune in at 4pm their time, or east coast viewers to tune in at 10pm their time?

It is impossible for most west coast viewers to tune at 4 PM locally, whereas east coasters watching at 10 PM is completely possible.

But, as we've discussed ad nauseum, there simply isn't a solution that works for everyone. That's why I like the 7 PM local start idea. That may not be ideal for west/east coast World Series, but there is no ideal solution in that circumstance (an 8 eastern/5 pacific start is likely the best compromise there, actually). People are going to be dissatisfied, no matter what. And, once again, this is the beauty of the DVR, that we can put these problems behind us.
   80. NTNgod Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:19 PM (#3183460)
This must be the only site on the Internet talking about Fox's upfront announcements they made today and NOT ######## about Terminator:SCC getting (unsurprisingly, if you live on the planet Earth) canceled :P
   81. cardsfanboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:23 PM (#3183469)
This must be the only site on the Internet talking about Fox's upfront announcements they made today and NOT ######## about Terminator:SCC getting (unsurprisingly, if you live on the planet Earth) canceled :P

yet Dollhouse stays.... No accounting for taste I guess.
   82. NTNgod Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:31 PM (#3183475)
yet Dollhouse stays

That's an easy one, actually.

DOLLHOUSE is an in-house FOX production, so FOX gets all the money from overseas sales, syndication, and DVD sales, plus they chopped next season's per-episode budget to about $12 and a bag of dry ice for effects.

TSCC is a WB show that FOX buys, so even if TSCC were wildly popular overseas and on DVD, FOX doesn't get that money, WB does.

I thought DOLLHOUSE was a goner, too, because of ratings, but that's before the news of the budget getting dramatically slashed down to the bone came out. Even with the wretched ratings, I can see how DOLLHOUSE could be profitable overall next season.
   83. cardsfanboy Posted: May 18, 2009 at 11:37 PM (#3183479)
That's an easy one, actually.

That and they wanted to suck up a lot to Joss Whedon.
   84. LTV100 Posted: May 19, 2009 at 03:09 AM (#3183846)
This must be the only site on the Internet talking about Fox's upfront announcements they made today and NOT ######## about Terminator:SCC getting (unsurprisingly, if you live on the planet Earth) canceled :P


Hadn't heard that news, but I'm kinda glad. I felt compelled to watch the SCC due to a desire to know all of the Terminator mythos, but I thought the show got pretty lame the last half of this past season. Too bad they couldn't have tied up the loose ends first.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Dock Ellis
for his generous support.

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogSpring training OMNICHATTER 2023
(154 - 10:16pm, Mar 25)
Last: The Duke

Newsblog“Friday Night Baseball” resumes on Apple TV+ on April 7
(8 - 8:35pm, Mar 25)
Last: It's Spelled With a CFBF, But Not Where You Think

NewsblogRhys Hoskins suffers torn ACL in Phillies' spring game | ESPN
(14 - 6:37pm, Mar 25)
Last: The Duke

NewsblogMLB to stream all minor league games for free on Bally’s casinos app
(4 - 6:33pm, Mar 25)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT Soccer Thread - Champions League Knockout Stages Begin
(301 - 6:22pm, Mar 25)
Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter)

NewsblogMLB 26-and-under power rankings: Which clubs have the best young players?
(6 - 3:05pm, Mar 25)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogCheck out all 30 Opening Day starters
(10 - 1:59pm, Mar 25)
Last: The Mighty Quintana

Newsblog2023 NBA Regular Season Thread
(1285 - 11:08am, Mar 25)
Last: Crosseyed and Painless

NewsblogReggie Jackson: Former commissioner Bud Selig blocked me from buying A's
(24 - 10:29am, Mar 25)
Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMc

NewsblogJed Lowrie announces retirement, reflects on 7 years with A’s
(5 - 10:26am, Mar 25)
Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMc

NewsblogTrevor Bauer is Reportedly Off to Pitch in Japan
(44 - 10:18am, Mar 25)
Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome

NewsblogBaseball’s Most Valuable Teams 2023: Price Tags Are Up 12% Despite Regional TV Woes
(7 - 10:16am, Mar 25)
Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMc

NewsblogAll-Star pitcher Miles Mikolas, Cardinals agree on multi-year extension: Sources
(14 - 8:53am, Mar 25)
Last: sanny manguillen

NewsblogLAT: Ralph Avila, who helped Dodgers develop a pipeline in Latin America, dies at 92
(1 - 3:27am, Mar 25)
Last: amityusa0106

NewsblogRays near 3-year extension with Yandy Díaz (source)
(9 - 3:24am, Mar 25)
Last: amityusa0106

Page rendered in 0.4124 seconds
48 querie(s) executed