User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.4600 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, May 26, 2008Imagine Sports announces the end of Diamond Mind BaseballWell, many people thought it was coming, since IS bought out DMB and never actually advertised or promoted DMB. They are moving to an all on-line model. They say they will still release season disks for DMB V9 for the foreseeable future, but only as long as it makes sense. This isn’t really baseball news, but a lot of Primates are DMB players/owners/lovers, so it’s relevant. I understand that many DMB owners will want nothing to do with the new incarnations of DMB, as they hate IS for killing it, and don’t want to give them another cent. That’s a fair viewpoint. That said, there are certainly some positives with moving to an on-line game:
That said, it will come down to the ability to customize a league’s format and the cost of playing in leagues (I’ve long said that one cool thing about playing DMB is that I just buy one season disk each year, but play three leagues with it). And the afore-mentioned attitude towards IS. (more commentary and quoting, including an offer for free play, if you click the Comments link) I do think it’s worth pointing out that IS is trying to do do right by DMB owners (or, depending on how you see things, trying to take advantage of their brain power):
I will try out the new on-line game, and am open to moving to it. Like I said, there are some definite positives with a game that is managed on-line. I understand the people that feel they’ve been sold out and don’t want to even give it a chance, though.
Harold can be a fun sponge
Posted: May 26, 2008 at 07:07 AM | 20 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: business, fantasy baseball, sabermetrics |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for June 2023
(79 - 12:24am, Jun 03) Last: Snowboy Newsblog: 2023 NBA Playoffs Thread (2540 - 12:15am, Jun 03) Last: Athletic Supporter's restaurant with Ted Danson Newsblog: 8 big All-Star voting storylines to follow (26 - 11:54pm, Jun 02) Last: bjhanke Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - The Run In (417 - 11:53pm, Jun 02) Last: frannyzoo Newsblog: Former Los Angeles Dodger Steve Garvey weighs U.S. Senate bid (20 - 11:15pm, Jun 02) Last: baxter Newsblog: MLB managers should be challenging a lot more in 2023 (4 - 10:22pm, Jun 02) Last: The Duke Newsblog: Aaron Boone’s Rate of Ejections Is Embarrassing ... And Historically Significant (2 - 10:18pm, Jun 02) Last: The Duke Newsblog: Jays pitcher Anthony Bass sorry for posting video endorsing anti-LGBTQ boycotts (97 - 10:02pm, Jun 02) Last: baxter Newsblog: The Athletic: After 50 years, is this the San Diego Chicken’s last stand? [$] (14 - 8:23pm, Jun 02) Last: Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Newsblog: Economic boost or big business hand-out? Nevada lawmakers consider A’s stadium financing (10 - 6:14pm, Jun 02) Last: McCoy Hall of Merit: Reranking First Basemen: Discussion Thread (35 - 4:10pm, Jun 02) Last: bjhanke Sox Therapy: Lining Up The Minors (30 - 3:43pm, Jun 02) Last: Darren Sox Therapy: The First Third (23 - 2:58pm, Jun 02) Last: pikepredator Newsblog: Diamond Sports Group fails to pay Padres, loses broadcast rights (23 - 2:21pm, Jun 02) Last: Karl from NY Newsblog: ESPN the Magazine: Bat and Ball Games you've never heard of (31 - 1:05pm, Jun 02) Last: gehrig97 |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.4600 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. CraigK Posted: May 26, 2008 at 07:20 AM (#2794466)Yeah, shelling out $70-100 is a big layout at first. It's always been worth it to me, but I understand that for college students and the like, that's a ton of money. And it's basically $30/year, plus the cost of upgrades. Like I said, it's been totally worth it to me, because I get a ton of enjoyment out of it. But I can see how it'd be a barrier for some people to get into it.
I have no idea how they'll price the new offering (it's possible they've talked about it, but I haven't looked into that sort of thing yet).
That said, I understand where they're coming from. I suspect that a lot of current DMB league players don't buy the software themselves, so instead of selling 20-30 disks, they sell one and the rest of the league copies the disk off the single purchaser. That could have been dealt with a number of ways, though, short of going to this expensive online model.
The DMB folks (as opposed to IS, with whom I have no experience) are an unbelievably great bunch of people. Tom Tippett and Pat Morgan have always been tremendous, and both have helped out greatly when my leagues have had software issues in the past (including saving the playoffs in one league after a particularly nasty corruption of the league file). I'm hopeful that they will figure out a way to make this work for all the loyal DMB customers over the long term.
Way too rich for me. That would be $1800 per year if I got managers for all 30 of my teams.
At this point I wouldn't even advertise for owners to do GM work/lineup setting, because I don't play the games at a regular enough schedule or update my league site enough.
I've never played the online version from all the past enticements Meyers has given, and I'm sure not going to start now.
I will be a happy man when his business fails... rat bastage.
I think that's where OOTP always had the advantage. It was $30 for the game, and that was it. Our league's been going almost 20 seasons now, and aside from $10 for a software upgrade about 2 years ago, that $30 was my only outlay. For 20 seasons of a DMB league, I'd have spent about $650 with the new disks each year.
I know they're very different products. But if all you want is a good simulated baseball experience and the fun of an online league, either one will give it to you.
I just couldn't see any generic system providing this level of detail, and we have a rules committee to make changes yearly depending on what is perceived as unfair etc.
It's similar to how Primer's fantasy football league works. Yahoo doesn't support our keeper system, trading draft picks, etc. So Szym manages that all himself, and just enters the rosters in at the beginning of each system, and we rely on them for the in-season stat-keeping and stuff.
Hey, they are still selling season disks, just no new versions of the game. I can live for quite a while on the current version.
My thoughts too. I'm cool with v.9. Just hope they still sell the past seasons. And even then I guess I could go ebay.
They say they are for now... of course, everything dbDayne has said previously about the PC game has been proven as a lie with his recent announcement so take his latest appeasement for what it's worth.
I'd like to see a homebrewed 2008 season disk get some traction so loyal gamers have an option other than funding the further development of the online game. I homebrewed the 1918 season disk that's out there for download and did the huge study on the effects of player range and arm ratings, so I have a pretty good idea of what goes into a high-quality homebrew season disk and would be glad to be part of such an effort.
Homebrewing league files with the basic stats should be relatively easy; there are already a few folks out there who can import stats from a standard format into a DMB database (Tango's ZiPS projections, e.g.), and if not, we can figure out something. Figuring out which defensive metric(s) to use to derive fielding ratings would be harder than actually deriving the ratings, I reckon.
I'm not sure how much effort it would take to incorporate real-life transactions & lineups, but it seems doable.
Oh, and for those not following along, there's a threat on the DMB forum where Dayne has promised to answer some of the questions and criticisms arising from the latest announcement here. No answers yet, but reportedly coming soon; we'll see if the answers are actually substantive. . .
Still, while I'm comfortable playing the existing version in my historical league, I might be willing to give a looksee to the online version, particularly if we can find a way for our league to run on-line as it has by PC (as Harold points out).
OTOH, it might be time to give OOTP a looksee too.
Anything that has Derek Jeter among the bottom of MLB shortstops would be reliable enough to get my vote!
I think I used some adaptation of BP's fielding runs and assists per opposing baserunner to get my range and arm ratings for 1918, and I think they tended to follow the CW reasonably well. My EX range ratings went to:
P: Mays (BOA), Ruth (BOA), Grimes (BRO), Tyler (CHN), Douglas (CHN), Benz (CHA), Bressler (CIN), Coumbe (CLE), Doak (SLN)
C: Perkins (PHA), Schmidt (PIT)
1B: Merkle (CHN), Sisler (SLA)
2B: Doolan (BRO), Gedeon (SLA)
3B: Baird (SLN), Foster (WAS)
SS: Fletcher (NYN), Peckinpaugh (NYA)
LF: Meusel (PHN)
CF: Myers (BRO), Paskert (CHN), Speaker (CLE)
RF: Hooper (BOA), Flack (CHN), Demmitt (SLA)
(I hope I got them all!)
I wrote a script that exported lineups from Excel into the season disk using a Windows scripting tool (AutoIt) recommended by DMB forum member Diesel. You had to "play" every game in order to get the lineups it, but it automated the process of entering and saving every lineup slot for every game. Works pretty fast too.
I think transaction entry could be done the same way. Start compiling the transactions from MLB.com into Excel than adapt my script to export those into the Transactions Entry form once the season database contains all the players for the season.
These are both relatively crude tools though. I don't know anything about the internal structure of the lineup/transaction databases. Others may have tools that can write directly to them. Everything I do has to go through some DMB user interface.
A threat or a thread? Actually, I think it reads just as well either way regardless of whether or not the original line was a mento or not.
Threa_d_; neither threats nor bribes seem likely to revive DMB for the PC at this point, it seems.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main