Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
A renewed lease for the Toronto Argonauts to play at Rogers Centre will effectively serve as notice to vacate, clearing the way for grass to be installed for baseball no later than 2018.
The Toronto Blue Jays have determined it is possible to grow and maintain a grass playing surface inside the facility by digging up the floor, adding a drainage system and topping it with about 30 centimetres of dirt.
Thirty centimetres is about a foot, for the Americans reading this.
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. cHiEf iMpaCt oFfiCEr JEAlternate closing sentence: "Yahoo!'s Michael Silver was unavailable for comment."
Right now when the field changes from baseball to football (or vice versa) the seats down the first and third baselines move. If they change the surface to grass, they won't be able to move the seats.
This move doesn't really make sense to me, but the Jays have been obsessed with playing on grass for years so it was probably inevitable.
According to etymonline, it is attested since the early fifteenth century as a verb.
The Argos pay less than half a million a year to play in Skydome, I don't think the money is worth worrying about. Presumably Rogers also gets a shore of the concessions, but for that to be significant, people would have to show up for Argos' games.
I thought that deal was expiring shortly. I'm probably wrong, as I really have no idea what's happening in the NFL anymore.
Yes, and there was speculation that Toronto could be a full-time home before the Bills got stadium upgrades to Ralph Wilson Stadium.
At the very least, Toronto has a bunch of people, a bunch of money, and would (by and large) give exactly zero f***s if they lost their CFL franchise and gained an NFL team.
'Course, I'm a Bills fan and would go out of my way not to watch another down of NFL football if the team left Buffalo, so I'm hardly in favor of relocation.
I'd argue the city isn't very into CFL football... I know many people who are NFL fans who have no time for the CFL.
Actually, the city isn't very into anything that it doesn't perceive as the top level league of the sport.
CFL < NFL, so no support.
Junior hockey (and AHL) < NHL, so no support.
The Raptors have sucked for a while, and they still draw middle-of-the-league attendance numbers, because the NBA is the top league.
Toronto FC have sucked for a long time, and they finish in the upper half of the league in attendance, because the MLS is the top league (in North America).
The Maple Leafs have only finally made the playoffs for the first time in 9 years, and they've been sold out every game since forever, because the NHL is king.
Even the Rock (lacrosse) are near the top of the league in attendance (and draw damn good numbers (11,000/game) for the #6 or #7 sport in the city), because NLL is tops.
OTOH, Candlestick had a grass field and seating sections that rolled atop it for a different sport's field configuration. So did Mile High, IIRC.
I'm reasonably certain that this was the case in Shea Stadium when the Jets played there. The box seats along the 1st and 3rd baselines would rotate so that they would be parallel with the football field, which ran from home plate to centerfield. Many of the other multi-purpose stadiums were configured in the same manner; of course they mostly had artificial turf so rolling over the grass was not an issue.
Old RFK Stadium in D.C. was convertible to accommodate both the Senators and Redskins, although from the descriptions above it didn't have anything to do with rotating the seats. There were sections of seats on rollers that could be retracted to allow for realistic baseball distances down to the RF and LF corners. It's a natural grass field, of course. Andy probably has more and better information on that whole arrangement.
As a funny anecdote, during those many, many, many exhibition games when they would kindle hope that baseball would return to D.C. the seats had been deployed for so long in football configuration that they were essentially rusted in place, so they just didn't bother moving them for one or two lousy exhibition baseball games. When it became clear that the Expos were indeed moving to D.C. they had to move those seats the heck out of the way. I assume they just cut them out and disposed of them since the Redskins had since moved to their new facility at beautiful downtown RalJon, Maryland.
Let's see: expand to 40 teams by 2025, with 2 in LA and one each in Toronto, Vancouver, London, Mexico City, Portland and San Antonio.
You're welcome.
In just about any other sport, this would be me being a sarcastic jerk, but in the NFL, we're talking about multiple MVPs who have done time in the past ten years.
What?
They freaking love the Bills. They do well to even come close to selling out their games, considering they play in a 74,000 seat stadium in a small, economically depressed city and have stunk for the past 10+ years.
Does the NHL have this problem across the border? I don't know how many felons there are in the NHL, but I seem to recall a story or two about a player having trouble getting into Canada.
24's recollection of how Shea was configured for football is correct. I recall it being considered somewhat of an innovation at the time, as the seats in older stadia that hosted the NFL (Original Yankee Stadium and Wrigley Field, for two) didn't have this flexibility.
Also, football as a weekend sport draws from an area much wider than just Buffalo. Not that it isn't still a tiny market and that will stop them from moving to Toronto the day after Ralph Wilson kicks it. They were top-10 in attendance as recently as 2008, despite having sucked for much, much longer than that.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main