User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3907 seconds
45 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, August 08, 2011Losing $30M in annual fees shows city whiffed big-time on new Yankee Stadium, Citi FieldJuan gone to the Money Store!
The District Attorney
Posted: August 08, 2011 at 03:22 PM | 17 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: business, mets, yankees |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: 2023 NBA Regular Season Thread
(470 - 3:28am, Feb 08) Last: 57i66135 is a hard word for me. Newsblog: The 53-year-old who might pitch forever (5 - 11:08pm, Feb 07) Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face? Hall of Merit: Ranking Right Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion thread (54 - 10:52pm, Feb 07) Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to Newsblog: The A’s Teardown Is Not Going Well (7 - 10:41pm, Feb 07) Last: A triple short of the cycle Newsblog: Dodgers to retire Valenzuela's No. 34 (27 - 8:27pm, Feb 07) Last: rr would lock Shaq's a$$ up Newsblog: The Boomers Were Right: Batting Average is REALLY Important (15 - 7:21pm, Feb 07) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: OT: Wrestling Thread November 2014 (2642 - 6:29pm, Feb 07) Last: 57i66135 is a hard word for me. Newsblog: OT - 2022 NFL thread Part II (349 - 6:27pm, Feb 07) Last: Zach Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - Hi Ho Hi Ho it’s Back to Club Football We Go (418 - 6:25pm, Feb 07) Last: Mefisto Sox Therapy: The Future Starts Now (Hopefully) (27 - 5:22pm, Feb 07) Last: villageidiom Hall of Merit: Reranking Left Fielders: Results (16 - 2:54pm, Feb 07) Last: DL from MN Newsblog: Baseball Hall of Fame tracker 2023 (748 - 2:43pm, Feb 07) Last: The Duke Newsblog: Negro Leagues legends to be featured in MLB The Show 23 (5 - 1:50pm, Feb 07) Last: Russ Newsblog: This was the wildest game in MLB history (11 - 10:48am, Feb 07) Last: Jose is an Absurd Sultan Newsblog: Park life: Three days with GOAT coach Tom House and his 'misfits' (3 - 5:37pm, Feb 06) Last: Zach |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3907 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: August 08, 2011 at 09:20 PM (#3895650)I get why "cow town" ponies up cash to keep a MLB team, why again did New York city fall for this? Also, where is the roof? If one city could use a roof for baseball (or football for that matter), it is NYC.
At least the big bat is still there.
There should never be roofs on football stadiums in the north. And if one city could use a roof for baseball, it's not NYC. Minneapolis and Miami are far more "deserving."
I don't dispute the basic gist of the article, but I will say that if you are going to make a realistic assessment of what should have been spent on "stadium upkeep" to actually keep those stadiums in reasonable condition, I am not at all sure that the stadiums would have been generating anything like $24-$30M in revenue ... or perhaps even a positive cash flow. There was a ton of deferred maintenance on those places, especially Shea.
http://www.nytimes.com/specials/baseball/yankees/nyy-gid-stadium.html
There was a weird arrangement before the city bought Yankee Stadium (they always owned Shea iirc):
"The stadium, at 161st Street and River Avenue, the Bronx is owned by Rice University and the land is owned by the Knights of Columbus."
Good god. Are you out of your mind?
"Under the old Yankee Stadium deal, the city was assured a percentage of gate receipts, a percentage of food sales, even a percentage of the team's cable revenue. Because of that, the old stadium produced as much as $15 million a year for Parks - even after deducting costs for stadium upkeep.
Likewise, the Shea Stadium deal generated as much as $9 million annually for the city. As recently as 2008, the two ballparks represented nearly half of the $51 million in concessions revenue generated by the entire Parks system.
On top of that, the city was taking in an additional $6 million annually from parking fees at Shea and the old Yankee Stadium. Once the new ballparks opened, all that revenue disappeared - even the parking money. Today, the Mets keep all their parking revenue.
Meanwhile, the Yankee Stadium garages, run by an independent firm, are nearly bankrupt and may never produce the $3 million annually they agreed to provide the city. This loss of $30 million each and every year is a hidden cost to taxpayers from the new ballparks."
Didn't that replace the parkland that became the new Stadium?
EDIT: Either these time stamps are off or I'm a very slow typist. Drinks for #13, put it on the BBTF tab!
How did the Yankees get the current land? That seems like a strange deal, was the Yankees' offer: "If you give us this land for a new stadium, we will give you land that you already own to build parks on?"
To be fair, I think some old, under-used ball fields were used for the NYS, and eventually replaced with some pretty fancy athletic facilities at the site of the former Yankee Stadium.
Did the city own the land under the old under-used ball fields? If so, why didn't they try for the same deal they had with the old park?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main