Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Mariners lose 16th in a row with little suspense

What are you talking about? There was a lot of suspense! Do the Mariners lose by 5 runs? 6?

Seattle loses 10-3 and drops No. 16 in a row. That ties the 1944 Brooklyn Dodgers for the eighth longest streak in baseball history (seventh-longest if you go 1900 and later) and leaves them one away from the 1962 New York Mets at 17 in a row.

The George Sherrill Selection Posted: July 26, 2011 at 04:21 AM | 23 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: mariners

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Infinite Yost (Voxter) Posted: July 26, 2011 at 05:46 AM (#3885477)
Have you ever had two friends who were dating, and then they broke up, but instead of having it be a couple of weeks of unpleasantness and then everybody trying to get on with their lives, it was like cinematic slo-mo mutual destruction for months?

That's what every Mariners season is like anymore.
   2. Endless Trash Posted: July 26, 2011 at 06:19 AM (#3885517)
Holy Jesus on a stick with mustard. Sixteen?!?! This has somehow flown completely under my radar. I thought they were having an OK year.

I just looked at the standings...Mariners have lost 16 in a row, Pirates are in first place...wtf??
   3. Walt Davis Posted: July 26, 2011 at 06:20 AM (#3885518)
That ties the 1944 Brooklyn Dodgers for the eighth longest streak in baseball history (seventh-longest if you go 1900 and later) and leaves them one away from the 1962 New York Mets at 17 in a row.

C'mon now, the snark is so obvious it should have been snarked by now ...
   4. Endless Trash Posted: July 26, 2011 at 06:28 AM (#3885521)

C'mon now, the snark is so obvious it should have been snarked by now ...


I refuse.
   5. cabintwelve Posted: July 26, 2011 at 06:33 AM (#3885524)
Fister v. Sabathia tomorrow.
   6. Boxkutter Posted: July 26, 2011 at 06:53 AM (#3885532)
As a Mariner fan, I have to admit that I am enjoying this a little. We haven't been relevant for so long, this streak is actually bringing the team a little (in)fame(y).
   7. AJMcCringleberry Posted: July 26, 2011 at 07:12 AM (#3885535)
I thought they were having an OK year.

They were. They are now 16 games under .500.
   8. RollingWave Posted: July 26, 2011 at 07:56 AM (#3885541)
Don't worry, the Yankees are the king of ending (other ppl's) losing streaks.

I must say, the 4th inning in today's game kinda summed up the streak so far, bad play with a lot of bad luck as well, the Yankees hit like one ball hard the whole inning and scored 5 runs on a blown call and 2 errors and gazillion bloopers . OUCH.
   9. Curse of the Andino Posted: July 26, 2011 at 08:11 AM (#3885543)
And poor Dave Cameron.

/Do the Ms play the O's any time soon?
   10. Rowland Office Supplies Posted: July 26, 2011 at 11:33 AM (#3885560)
Fister v. Sabathia tomorrow.


I guess every starting pitcher has his own unique game-day routine.
   11. base ball chick Posted: July 26, 2011 at 12:07 PM (#3885569)
Mostly Harmonless (Voxter) Posted: July 26, 2011 at 01:46 AM (#3885477)

Have you ever had two friends who were dating, and then they broke up, but instead of having it be a couple of weeks of unpleasantness and then everybody trying to get on with their lives, it was like cinematic slo-mo mutual destruction for months?

That's what every
Mariners astros season is like anymore.

it's so unfair - when the astros were GOOD didn't nobody pay attention because there was sosa mcgwire in the 90s and the (swear words) yankees/redsox in 04/05

now that we are in a year of epic suckage, the mariners are stealing our headlines.

i see that this team is going to have to go for the mets '62 record to get ANY face
   12. Justin T Posted: July 26, 2011 at 12:16 PM (#3885573)
I just looked at the standings...Mariners have lost 16 in a row, Pirates are in first place...wtf??

This seems to be saying that the normal roles of these two teams have been reversed this year. As though the Mariners are usually in first place.
   13. Dan In Toronto Posted: July 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM (#3885575)
As they say, baseball games aren't played on paper. But, on paper, the Mariners chances tonight vs CC look pretty poor.
Vegas has the Yankees at -320. I took a peek at the M's schedule. After the Yankees, they play the Rays. If Seattle doesn't win this week, they'd be facing Oakland for the "record" (23 losse: 1961 Phils; 24 losses: 1899 Spiders).
   14. The Yankee Clapper Posted: July 26, 2011 at 12:40 PM (#3885583)
C'mon now, the snark is so obvious it should have been snarked by now ...

OK, what would it take for the Mariners to have the sixth longest losing streak in MLB history?
   15. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: July 26, 2011 at 01:23 PM (#3885607)
I think it's terribly unfair that the Mariners are getting so much attention when the Orioles have been equally embarrassing and just had a very similar tailspin.
   16. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: July 26, 2011 at 02:00 PM (#3885631)

That ties the 1944 Brooklyn Dodgers for the eighth longest streak in baseball history (seventh-longest if you go 1900 and later) and leaves them one away from the 1962 New York Mets at 17 in a row.


I have it as tied for the 13th longest streak since 1900.

1. '61 Phillies - 23
2. '88 Orioles - 21
3. '69 Expos - 20
4. '43 Athletics - 20
5. '05 Royals - 19
5. '75 Tigers - 19
7. '48 Senators - 18
7. '59 Senators - 18
7. '20 Athletics - 18
10.'77 Braves - 17
10.'62 Mets - 17
10.'26 Red Sox - 17
13.'11 Mariners - 16
13.'96 Cubs - 16
13.'44 Dodgers - 16
13.'37 Reds - 16
   17. Don Lock Posted: July 26, 2011 at 02:30 PM (#3885663)
What really hurts is that Seattle has lost 16 in a row and still have a better record than the Orioles. .422 to .408.

Also interesting is that Eric Wedge and Buck Showalter were the finalists for the Orioles job. Both teams had pretty good starts in April and then bottomed out lately. The two new guys, seasoned leaders both, have been able to do little to stop the hemorrhaging.
   18. ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Posted: July 26, 2011 at 02:36 PM (#3885667)
#16, is there a webpage that has a list like that?
   19. PreservedFish Posted: July 26, 2011 at 02:43 PM (#3885676)
5. '05 Royals - 19
5. '75 Tigers - 19
7. '48 Senators - 18
7. '59 Senators - 18
7. '20 Athletics - 18


The gods have conspired to steal our joke from us.
   20. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: July 26, 2011 at 02:44 PM (#3885677)
I found it on BBRef's streak page.
   21. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: July 26, 2011 at 03:29 PM (#3885703)
I have it as tied for the 13th longest streak since 1900.

1. '61 Phillies - 23
2. '88 Orioles - 21
3. '69 Expos - 20
4. '43 Athletics - 20
5. '05 Royals - 19
5. '75 Tigers - 19
7. '48 Senators - 18
7. '59 Senators - 18
7. '20 Athletics - 18
10.'77 Braves - 17
10.'62 Mets - 17
10.'26 Red Sox - 17
13.'11 Mariners - 16
13.'96 Cubs - 16
13.'44 Dodgers - 16
13.'37 Reds - 16


I don't think the '96 Cubs lost 16 games in a row. Perhaps you meant the '97 Cubs, who started 0-14.

I remember getting caught up in the '05 Royals' chase for history and getting mildly upset when they finally halted the losing streak. They couldn't even be the best losers, I thought.
   22. Cblau Posted: July 26, 2011 at 10:17 PM (#3885923)
There was more than one team prior to 1900 with a 16+ game losing streak as well. Just off the top of my head, the 1899 Spiders had a 16 and a 24 game losing streak (and that's just in September), the 1889 Colonels had the record 26 game streak, and the 1890 Athletics lost their last 22 games.
   23. Cblau Posted: July 26, 2011 at 10:24 PM (#3885926)
The 1996 Cubs lost their last two games, so combined with the 14 losses at the beginning of 1997 makes for a 16-game streak.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
BFFB
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogYankees’ Masahiro Tanaka hit in head by Giancarlo Stanton line drive
(11 - 12:51am, Jul 06)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogCleveland Indians look into changing name amid pressure
(118 - 11:42pm, Jul 05)
Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter)

NewsblogEmpty Stadium Sports Will Be Really Weird
(6506 - 11:34pm, Jul 05)
Last: Mayor Blomberg

NewsblogAre there graves under Tropicana Field parking lots? Archaeologists want to find out
(7 - 10:18pm, Jul 05)
Last: Gonfalon Bubble

NewsblogDodgers pitcher David Price opts out of 2020 MLB season
(11 - 9:14pm, Jul 05)
Last: Barry`s_Lazy_Boy

Newsblog31 MLB players, 7 staff test positive for COVID-19, or 1.2%
(15 - 8:10pm, Jul 05)
Last: puck

NewsblogWith baby on the way, Trout unsure if he'll play
(35 - 6:23pm, Jul 05)
Last: never forget: the pee tape is 57i66135

NewsblogFormer Phillies pitcher Tyson Brummett dies in plane crash in Utah
(1 - 5:07pm, Jul 05)
Last: puck

NewsblogOT Soccer Thread - Spring 2020
(361 - 4:01pm, Jul 05)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogOT – NBA Revival Thread 2020
(463 - 1:37pm, Jul 05)
Last: Slivers of Maranville descends into chaos (SdeB)

NewsblogMLB teams can't identify players who test positive for coronavirus
(48 - 11:54am, Jul 05)
Last: Misirlou cut his hair and moved to Rome

Sox TherapyWarning: Actual Baseball Content
(23 - 8:12am, Jul 05)
Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...)

NewsblogBill James: Why We Need Runs Saved Against Zero
(178 - 7:54pm, Jul 04)
Last: Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)

NewsblogAthletics To Trade Jorge Mateo To Padres
(10 - 7:35pm, Jul 04)
Last: Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)

NewsblogRob Manfred admits MLB never intended to play more than 60 games
(20 - 1:16pm, Jul 04)
Last: Sunday silence: Play Guess How long season lasts

-->

Page rendered in 0.3063 seconds
46 querie(s) executed