User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3730 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Wednesday, February 22, 2023Mookie Betts admits 2018 Red Sox occasionally used video to steal signs
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: February 22, 2023 at 10:23 AM | 22 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: red sox, sign-stealing |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Qualifying Offer Value To Land Around $20.5MM
(14 - 3:08am, Sep 25) Last: sunday silence (again) Newsblog: OT - NBA Off-Pre-Early Thread for the end of 2023 (5 - 1:34am, Sep 25) Last: tell me when i'm telling 57i66135 Newsblog: OT - 2023 NFL thread (7 - 12:51am, Sep 25) Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale Newsblog: Omnichatter for September 2023 (520 - 11:43pm, Sep 24) Last: DFA Newsblog: Oakland vs. the A's: The inside story of how it all went south (to Las Vegas) (40 - 8:18pm, Sep 24) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: As Padres’ season spirals, questions emerge about culture, cohesion and chemistry (46 - 6:43pm, Sep 24) Last: Jose is an Absurd Sultan Newsblog: Republicans propose $614M in public funds for Brewers' stadium upgrades (36 - 6:03pm, Sep 24) Last: base ball chick Newsblog: Is It Time to Stop Using Scripts on Sports Uniforms? (19 - 4:55pm, Sep 24) Last: base ball chick Newsblog: OT Soccer - World Cup Final/European Leagues Start (106 - 1:47pm, Sep 24) Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter) Newsblog: Left-handed hitters describe the craft of hitting lefty pitching (2 - 12:25pm, Sep 24) Last: McCoy Newsblog: Here are the 2023 Arizona Fall League rosters (1 - 11:36am, Sep 24) Last: Ziggy: social distancing since 1980 Newsblog: Ex-Nats reliever Sean Doolittle exits after '11 incredible seasons' (3 - 9:38am, Sep 24) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: Yankees' status quo under Brian Cashman resulted in 'disaster' season, and a fresh perspective is needed (7 - 2:59am, Sep 24) Last: TVerik - Dr. Velocity Newsblog: OT - August/September 2023 College Football thread (106 - 11:26pm, Sep 23) Last: Lance Reddick! Lance him! Newsblog: Can Freddie Freeman Re-Open the 3,000 Hit Club? (49 - 4:04pm, Sep 23) Last: John DiFool2 |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3730 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DarrenSee? No big deal. Nothing really. Move along.
The Astros were signaling pitches from the dugout in real time.
The first part is fair game. The second part needed to be banned (and has been) and the third part is outright cheating.
Key elements from an article today in Stl paper
"As far as I know, no one every breached the Cardinals database or performed any criminal act,” an Astros employee tells Drellich, now a senior writer for The Athletic. “But there was a lot of bad (gunk) that would get people who currently have jobs in baseball fired. It would probably also vindicate (Chris) Correa a little bit.”
Within “Winning Fixes Everything,” Drellich describes a PowerPoint presentation made to the “core” of the Astros’ front office in September 2015, a few months after the revelation a Cardinals executive was behind the hacking. The presentation centered on draft advantages Luhnow and Sig Mejdal had helped create for the Cardinals and also how the industry was catching up. Drellich quotes an executive who attended the presentation and says it included “internal draft valuations the Cardinals” made. One example given was how the Cardinals rated Allen Craig, a future All-Star, as the seventh-best player available in the 2006 draft but got him in the eighth round. In 2009, the Cardinals famously saw a slugging catcher from Slippery Rock as the 17th-best player in the draft but got Matt Adams in the 23rd round. Where each player was taken in the draft was obviously public, but the Cardinals internal rankings had not been.
The Post-Dispatch reported in January 2017 that a defense motion was made to access Houston’s internal emails that referenced “Girsch” and “PV,” a reference to Cardinals general manager Michael Girsch and the value metric he helped develop and was used internally by the Cardinals. The motion also requested emails with the words “Leveque” and “mechanics” – references to Cardinals pitching coordinator Tim Leveque and his extensive studies on pitching mechanics.
Drellich’s reporting confirms Houston had Leveque’s “biomechanics grades.”
It's ridiculous to think that anyone is guided by some sense of chivalry or code of honor once they decide to cheat at baseball. The decision to use a cheating scheme like that of the Astros or the more limited ones used by other teams was driven by cost and benefit, risk and reward. The Astros scheme gave them greater coverage but came with significant liabilities (which they would eventually learn about the hard way). Using a baserunner scheme was not obviously distinguishable from naked eye sign stealing. But the Astros scheme produced anomalous signals that couldn't be explained away or confused for anything else. These signals could be decoded by the opposition, who could basically steal back their own signs and adjust their codes as needed. (The cheaters' signal code has to be stupidly simple because they have only seconds to react.) It also created a record of suspicious activity that could be used against them in event of an official complaint. This was a particular problem for the Astros because the bang signals left a clear trace in game film, but even visual signals would be a problem in an era where teams were filming everything obsessively, not just the action on the field (think about the controversy over teams filming the opposing dugout during the 2018 ALDS). "Why is the hitter watching that guy standing by the tunnel instead of the third base coach? And why does that guy always touch his chin when it's a fastball?"
But, no, it's just that teams Playing The Game The Right Way did the work of getting a runner to second and thus earned the right to cheat on that at bat. As ####### if...
Follow up question: Unless the powerpoint included the secret sauce that explained WHY the cardinals had higher internal valuations on those players, how would such slides be valuable.
"The Cardinals knew these guys would be great". Um, okay, how does that help us going forward??
Why would someone say Correa would be somewhat vindicated. His argument was the the Astros took proprietary data. So what else could vindicated mean?
There was no concept of IP back then. Did Luhnow take stuff? I don't think he carted off files. I think he and Sig may have copied the system and simply brought it with them. Did they steal it? No. They probably rationalized it by saying "we built that system". The Cardinals didn't patent any of it (I believe) My guess is they didn't even change their user passwords but renamed the domain which is how, when Correa found their domain name, he logged in and used Luhnows old Id and Password (which worked). Once inside there was probably lots of historical cardinal info in the database. Why bother erasing it.
I don't know how many Cardinal front office people moved to Houston. Quite a few I believe. So it's likely a very complicated tale. But it will eventually come out.
If this was true, why would the Cards run the risk of waiting until the 23rd round? By that point, GMs are picking guys because their 8-year-old thinks "Slippery Rock" sounds funny.
2017 Astros runs scored:
Home 395
Road 501
W-L Splits:
Home 48-33 .593
Road 53-38 .654
Yeah, that sign stealing was a brilliant scheme, all right, scoring 106 fewer runs in order to lull their opponents into winning 5 more games.
Doesn't excuse the cheating but the results hardly merit the righteous indignation you see from some quarters.
Quite frankly I just don't care about it. Teams bend the rules all the time to gain advantage and I'm always surprised when a Cardinal fan pipes up about this stuff as your team actually got caught hacking another team's database(which your team managed to convince everyone that only 1 guy knew about it type of thing)
I would be more impressed if their system had picked some high school outfielder out of New Jersey as the best player in the draft and took Mike Trout at pick 19 that year..
Really not true.
Not relevant. The issue was the unauthorized access of the database.
— Your friendly neighborhood IP lawyer
On a quasi-related note, when do managers and coaches form their own union?
Right, but that was a typo on my part. The .654 was correct. I'm awaiting the revelation of how those fiendish Astros managed to bribe those in charge of all those other stadiums to let them slip in their sign stealing devices. Those Yankee Stadium and Fenway Park** boys couldn't have come all that cheap.
** The Astros record in each of those parks that year was 3 and 1.
Andy you dont seem to acknowledge that there doesnt really have to be a 1:1 correspondence between a teams home and away record. We were just discussing the other day how much variabity there is based on projected WAR (seasonal projections as well as pythagorean w/l projections. Just because there road record was better doesnt mean cheating wasnt going on. This seems elementary.
here's a link to a recent discussion:
https://www.baseballthinkfactory.org/newsstand/discussion/how_should_you_interpret_fangraphs_projected_win_totals
Andy you dont seem to acknowledge that there doesnt really have to be a 1:1 correspondence between a teams home and away record.
Obviously I was being sarcastic, and obviously your point is correct. But the larger holds that it remains completely unproven just how much the Astros were helped by sign stealing. You can't just assume that if a batter knows what type of pitch is coming, without knowing the location, that he's going to be able to tee up on a ball. How many times have we seen batters gear themselves up for a heater, only to still be completely overpowered by it, or to flail helplessly at an outside breaking ball that everyone from the batter to the announcers in the booth knew was going to come in nearly every key situation?
You can claim (rightly) that the Astros cheated, and call for whatever penalties you may think would've been appropriate. YMMV. But those penalties should be based on the Astros' intent, and not on any proof that their cheating did them any good. Because that's something that simply can't be proven by anything other than a faith-based assertion.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main