|
|
|
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Josh Hader discusses reluctance to pitch four outs (13 - 2:27am, Sep 27)Last: Cooper NielsonNewsblog: Qualifying Offer Value To Land Around $20.5MM (18 - 2:00am, Sep 27)Last: Howie MenckelNewsblog: Rays unveil statues honoring 2 iconic moments in club history (13 - 1:56am, Sep 27)Last: Howie MenckelNewsblog: Betts sets 'remarkable' record with 105 RBIs as a leadoff hitter (34 - 1:55am, Sep 27)Last: sunday silence (again)Newsblog: Joey Votto and the city of Cincinnati say 'Thank you' in a potential goodbye (24 - 12:13am, Sep 27)Last: SoSH U at workNewsblog: Baseball America: Jackson Holliday Wins 2023 Minor League Player of the Year Award (7 - 11:58pm, Sep 26)Last: Howie MenckelNewsblog: Omnichatter for September 2023 (543 - 10:35pm, Sep 26)Last:  Walks Clog Up the BasesNewsblog: Hall of Fame 3B, Orioles legend Brooks Robinson dies at 86 (3 - 10:01pm, Sep 26)Last: baxterNewsblog: How to Save an Aging Ballpark (9 - 6:18pm, Sep 26)Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMcSox Therapy: Over and Out (48 - 4:55pm, Sep 26)Last: Nasty NateNewsblog: As Padres’ season spirals, questions emerge about culture, cohesion and chemistry (51 - 3:12pm, Sep 26)Last: Ithaca2323Newsblog: OT - 2023 NFL thread (17 - 1:19pm, Sep 26)Last: tell me when i'm telling 57i66135Newsblog: OT Soccer - World Cup Final/European Leagues Start (117 - 11:47am, Sep 26)Last:  AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance socialeNewsblog: OT - NBA Off-Pre-Early Thread for the end of 2023 (19 - 10:05am, Sep 26)Last: Crosseyed and PainlessNewsblog: The MLB Trade Rumors 2023-24 Free Agent Previews (1 - 11:30pm, Sep 25)Last: NaOH
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Cardinals and Cubs, Cardinals manage to keep the Cubs to one run scored over 6 innings, the Cards have scored 2. I get that there is a backlash against Contreras as a catcher, but it's a bit early to tell based upon data with the new rules etc...
edit: wasn't really paying attention to the game, missed that Mikolas left in the fifth. before a decision was possible.
I'm fine ultimately with it, but with the weekly chats, I feel more comfortable rambling within the chat, and breaking it into smaller parts means I can ramble a bit more... with a long chat, I'm afraid my rambling will be too significant portion of it..
we'll see, I'm not locked into anything. The issue is that often times we'll come up with good points within the thread that evolve other places, but then my rambling will slow the flow down...
As long as I'm around cfb, nobody will notice.
We get very little chatter on some days so 2 half-week chatters won't work well I don't think. I don't know yet if I like a month but I'm more than happy to try.
dude, your comments are the things that actually make these threads great... me, I'm just a rambler, you provide actual value.
Here's a vote of confidence for you. I enjoy your chatter "rambling." (Or "enjoyed" given the context that, historically speaking, you are more often rambling about a Cards win.) There is plenty of content in there.
Even if I didn't enjoy them ... there's low traffic, most of us have been here for years, we know what we're in for, it's free ... if Hombre thinks one chatter a month is the way to go, that's fine with me, still allows me to be lazy. If you and Duke and salvo want to have a public conversation about today's Cards game over 40 posts, that's fine with me, worst-case scenario I have "wasted" 5 minutes of my time. Kirstie wants to try to sucker me into clicking on the phishing link? Well, a girlbot's gotta make a living.
You're talking baseball. I think it's safe to say we're all fine with that.
The cubs have an interesting dilemma. I'm sure Smyly, Bellinger and Stroman were viewed as great trade chips at the deadline but they may have to keep them around as it appears they have the best chance to win the division.
I'm a big fan of what the Cubs are doing. A lot of focus on pitching and defense - it's literally taking a page out of the way the Cardinals used to operate.
But sure the Cubs are a decent bet to limp home with 82-86 wins which just might be enough. They might want to stop shooting themselves in the foot. Poor Nelson Velazquez -- comes up, hits 241/313/621 (149 OPS+) in a part-time role and gets sent down so we can hang onto Hosmer (and of course make sure Velazquez gets everyday PAs because he's clearly struggling in his part-time role). The Cubs have occasionally sat the hot bat of Patrick Wisdom (148 OPS+) and kept the super-hot bat of Morel in AAA to provide ABs for Nick Madrigal (69 OPS+) as the Cubs simply refuse to recognize that (a) he's never gonna hit enough and (b) given long-term contracts to Swanson and Hoerner it doesn't matter if he does because there's no place to play him. Those are fairly minor things overall and if they had their 22 pythag wins instead off 17 real wins wouldn't matter ... but they are in "every win matters" mode for the rest of the year and enough little mistakes eventually add up to 1-2 avoidable losses. There's simply no way Hosmer should have suvived the call-up of Mervis much less the call-up of Morel. Giving Madrigal PAs in favor of Morel or Velazquez (or Wisdom) will never make sense so his PT should drop to almost zero now but I doubt it will.
I can't remember my other predictions which I assume means they aren't doing very well.
Also of note, the Mets scratched Max Scherzer from tonight’s start with neck spasms.
From the prediction thread which I bookmarked....
So the Yanks prediction ain't looking so hot. Good god, the Tigers have risen to second place!! At 16-18 but still parade/riot time in Detroit. I still assume Hou will eventually get it together enough to move past Tex and LAA. Tor is still a good bet but looks like my shock prediction of two from the ALC ain't gonna happen and the ALE is more dominant than I expected so Sea doesn't look like a good bet either.
Atl and LAD (barely) are in first, those were bold. I wish that stupid coin had come up Milw but early yet.
Buxton has been healthy and productive but a 135 OPS+ DH ain't gonna win it unless maybe he changes his name to David Ortiz and drives in 140 runs. Correa is gonna need an excellent RoS just to get his OPS+ up to 120. That's what you get for trying to be shocking. Bieber is doing fine but a huge drop in K rate isn't promising. At 5-0, Justin Steele has an excellent shot at 12 wins.
Grrr ... b-r does have a table of all 2023 rookie-eligibles and it can be sorted by WAR ... but by career WAR, not this year WAR. So I don't know who's leading the rookie WAR races. In the NL, seems to be an Outman-Carroll race at the moment. Nobody in the AL seems to be doing much but Gunnar is indeed struggling so far at 0 WAR (and a nearly 20% BB rate which is just bizarre).
I bookmarked the predictions thread, sadly there was only 19 or so posts in that thread, but wanted to see how it would turn out in the end of the year.
To more about Alvarez, it is something that he can basically do very little for a month, and two swings later is at 245/286/453, which is something I’d sign up for right now given the Mets catchers’ hitting lines the last two years.
And hey, Lindor gets it close. Two run homerun to get us to 7-6.
The Knizner move to full time is paying off, the Cardinals are looking like geniuses once again!
I mentioned before that my brain has been foggy for the past year or so. That game against Detroit stuck in my head as we had lost it when they made it 6-3, I just forgot about the comeback, for some reason I thought they lost the series finale to the Tigers by a score of 6-4, even though I remember commenting on it and everything.
Back in the day, when Carson Kelly was a hot-shot Cardinals prospect and heir apparent to Yadier Molina (no one knew Molina would play until 40), I was lobbying for the team to trade Kelly because (a) he seemed to have some value as top C prospect, and (b) Kelly hadn't looked like much of MLB hitter in his brief MLB stints and (c) there was this Knizner kid in AAA, a year younger than Kelly, who'd done nothing but hit (much better than Kelly) as he marched through the minor-league system.
I've been surprised how weak a bat Knizner has been; his career minor-league line over 4 years was .303/.369/.461, with decent power and at least an average number of walks.
Through 602 MLB plate appearances, he's at .205/.288/.295, with just 8 homers.
It would be huge for the Cardinals if Knizner could be an average-for-a-catcher bat while Contreras learns how to call a game over the next few weeks, which I assume is what he's working on these days.
1. Did not realize Garcia was leading MLB in RBI, with 36 in the Rangers' first 35 games. (He's also tied for third in the AL in both home runs and runs scored.)
2. He's tied for AL lead in assists by an OF (4) in 2023, and he tied for 1st in 2021 (16) as well. Last year he tied for 2nd (10).
For those five guys listed above, the Cardinals received Jordan Montgomery (useful), Matthew Liberatore (may be useful someday), Marcell Ozuna (two years of mediocrity--4.7 WAR), and some cash (for Garcia.)
Bader seems to be having fun in the pinstripes.
Rollicking is a good word. Etymologists?
Which is 2nd in the AL to the Rangers. I had no idea. Now the Rays are carrying a 143 team OPS+ (jeepers!) while the Rangers are at a very good but pedestrian 116, so I assume there's some luck in that Rangers number. But 6.37 R/G is a lot of runs. Is the BDC Dome an indoor Coors?
So, yeah, Adolis Garcia is kinda the new Juan Gone ... or at least Rusty Greer. Marcus Semien has chipped in 28 RBI and catcher Jonah Heim has 27 in just 119 PA (the new Pudge! ... 321/387/557 out of a C is useful). All of this while Seager has missed 2/3 of the season. Meanwhile they'd be better off putting BDC (or maybe even Franmil or Franchy) at DH.
Eovaldi, Gray and Perez are all doing their jobs and deGrom is pitching well on the 2nd Tuesday of every month. Ian Kennedy is still on the roster with a 3.22 FIP and 7.20 ERA (and 2 UER) so that's worth celebrating.
It's almost like maybe Jon Daniels was past his prime (at just 45!) ... but I see he landed as a senior advisor for the Rays which suggests maybe he does know a thing or two.
From back in the days when couples would furtively hide in barrels to perform oral sex on each other, and mischief makers would turn the barrels on their sides and send them down a hill. "A rolling, licking good time" turned into "rollicking good time."
Comparing Rays to Rangers team stats, the Rays have
- 3 more doubles
- 1 more triple
- 29 more home runs
- 6 fewer singles
- 14 more stolen bases but 6 more caught stealing
- even-steven in walks
... and with all of that, only 7 more runs scored.
The Rays' OPS are 139 points lower with men on than when the bases are empty
The Rangers OPS are 230 (!!) points lower with men on than when the bases are empty; including a team batting avg of FOUR EIGHTY THREE (14/29) with the bases loaded; 37 RBI in 29 official at bats.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, with the bases loaded Cardinals are 4-for-29 with 10 Ks, including 1-for-11 with less than 2 out. (They've also walked four times, zero SF)
You've got that backwards---Rangers OPS with men on (.901) is .230 points higher than with bases empty (.671).
P A I N.
Arenado with a triple to give the Cardinals a 1-0 lead in the first inning.
Gameday box supports the ump.
5 HRs in 30 at bats last post season
3 HRs in 28 at bats this year
So 8 HRs in 58 at bats (1 HR per 7 AB) vs 51 HRs in the 1600 at bats before that (1HR per 30).
Hard to believe it's SSS as it is happening in two discrete set of at bats. He's not going to maintain this rate but he's a lot more valuable if he's a 30 HR guy with gold glove defense and blazing speed. Looks a lot more like Andruw Jones. If he's can keep this up and not get hurt, he'll get a massive contract
According to a piece in The Athletic the other day (non-paywall link),
Sox starter ERA is 3rd worst in MLB at over 6, reliever ERA a much better at 3.4 and in the top 10. Of course a lot pitching sins can be negated when you're averaging nearly 5.7 RPG.
Other observations: I see Pittsburgh has become, well, Pittsburgh again, going 1-9 in their last ten. This would normally facilitate a great fall in the standings, however over the last 10 games the entire NL central is 14-36; that is bad.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, with the bases loaded Cardinals are 4-for-29 with 10 Ks, including 1-for-11 with less than 2 out.
At the end of the other spectrum, with the bases loaded, A's pitchers have given up a line of 455/509/841 with 4 HR, 8 BB, 2 HBP and 6 K in 59 PA. The BABIP is 410.
Pit 14-13
Mil 16-15
Chi 15-14
Cin 12-15
StL 8-20
So it's still really only the Cards who've stunk outside the division. No NLC team has played more than 11 games in the division, the Brewers only 6. Obviously those all turn out 500 for the division overall but if the Brewers, say, turn out better than the others or if the Cards are as bad in-division and outside of it, then somebody is likely to finish above 500.
Other notables outside their divisions:
Rays 21-4 (just 8-5 in the ALE)
As regularly noted, the ALE is 88-42 vs everybody else
Even the Yanks 17-12 and Jays 17-10 are crushing other divisions
Pretty amazing, basically the other 2 AL divisions have a starting point around 3 games under and we're not even a quarter way through. If they keep ths up (surely not) an average non-ALE team would be looking at 76 wins. If not for the Rangers at 22-14, the ALE would have the 5 best records in the AL.
Det 2-14 vs ALE but 9-2 vs NL
CWS 9-20
KCR 8-20
Oak 5-20 (you knew that was coming)
Phils are just 1-2 within their division. We're more than a month in, 3 games.
LAD have yet to play an AL team
Not including today's games, AL 72-69 vs NL. As in all things, the Rays 8-1 is balanced by the A's 1-8.
I suppose we can also do all that with run diferential since obviously, intra-division the ALE has a 0 run different, their overall run differential is against other divisions.
ALE +202
ALC -157
ALW -14
NLE -40
NLC +13
NLW +6
The ALC is 53-83 vs the rest of baseball. The ALE and ALC have played each other considerably more so things will even out some (e.g. the ALC is nearly 500 against everybody else) but not a big challenge identifying the best and worst divisions so far.
Looking at statcast outs above average -- it's a weird year so far. The top 3 are all 3B. Eugenio Suarez is +6. A bit further down, Bogaerts is tied with Javy and Wander as best SS and JD Davis shows up at +5. Christian Walker, a 1B, is also +5.
At the other end, the statcast lead glove leaders (outs above average ... I think qualifiers only)
1B Vlad -4
2B Albers -5 (or Pirates -8)
SS Abrams -7 or Kike -7
3B Steer Cin -5 or Miranda Min -5 or O's -8
LF Schwarber -5 or Profar -5
CF Straw -2 (remember statcast compares with average OF, not average CF)
RF Lane Thomas -6
The Pirates have Mark Mathias and Ji Hwan Bae both listed as 2B and both at -4; similarly both Gunnar and Urias are listed as 3B for the O's, both at -4.
Does statcast have an easy-to-find team total OAA table? Eyeballing a team sort, as we might expect teams tend to be about average overall with a good fielder here balanced by a bad fielder there. The Reds look pretty bad; the Pirates look bad despite Hayes doing great; the O's look bad and the Braves are terrible. Ms, Rays, DBacks, Cubs and Brewers look good.
Atlanta's bad defense is a bit surprising to me. Per statcast, qualifers only:
Arcia -1
Grissom -4
Acuna -3
Rosario 0
Riley -2
Albies -5
Olson 0
I guess the O's are just as bad, -11 on the IF (Mateo doing fine but the rest terrible).
Brewers +13
Mariners +12
Padres +12
DBacks +11 (either excellent or lousy)
Rays +9
Cubs +7
Giants +7
Tigers +7
A's -7
Marlins -7
Nats -7 (not bad considering Abrams & Thomas are -13)
Red Sox -7 (good or bad)
Twins -8
Reds -9
Rox -11
Braves -14
Orioles -14
Here's a useful table :-)
You're right that the end of that series sucked, but they went 1-2 in both series. They didn't get swept by the Rangers.
Drilling down from that link I was able to get oaa for each team(you have to do it manually, but for example overall the Cubs are +6 oaa while the Rays are +8 and the Cardinals are - 2, and the Orioles are -14
(just put the name of the team in the search bar
You can also group by "batting team" which I guess tells you who has faced the toughest defenses ... although I'm not sure if +13 means they've faced tough defense (13 more outs against them) or weak (they've gained 13 extra outs). Anyway, Dodgers +13 and Red Sox at -19. That's quite a big swing but will presumably even out as the season goes.
It's a beautiful day here, currently 83 and sunny, with a gametime forecast of around 75.
Since I moved to Boston in 2000, the Cardinals are the visiting team I have seen the most at Fenway. Last year they were in town on Father's Day (the whole family went), this year, Mother's Day.
K. DP. Inning over. Aaaaaagggghhhh.
This'll be six losses out of seven. They're gonna lose Ohtani. I'm going to throw myself into the ocean. Everything is the worst.
Everything is the best!
Cardinals score 3 in the 9th of Janssen to beat the Red Sox, 8-6, with Nolan Gorman (supplanted from the DH spot by Contreras) hitting a go-head two-run pinch-hit homer.
Five homers, a few lead changes, a couple steals, a nice start by Paxton and some shaky bullpen work by both teams.
The monster seats at Fenway are awesome---you still feel close to the action, and there's zero fan "interference"---nobody's sitting right in front of you, nobody's climbing over you (and you're not climbing over anyone else), and food/beer/restrooms are extremely convenient. You've got essentially a bar counter in front of you, and the seats are rotating bar stools. A splurge I was happy to make, once, and maybe again.
Meanwhile Dusty wasting Pressly with a 5-1 lead.
Looks like they will no longer be a 550 team at the end of the day.
(Edit) And he scores on a double by Danny Jansen. He might have been able to score from 1st the way he's been running today, but why take the chance?
Yup, Contreras had one foot out of the box when the ump called a violation on Jansen. On the next pitch, Goldschmidt stole 2nd (just for pinpointing when the ump ###### up). How can you call a violation on the pitcher when the batter has one foot out of the batter's box?
Cardinal radio announcers said pretty much the same, kinda, they implied that Contreras was squared to the pitcher, but not in the box, and it rattled Jansen so he almost quick pitched or something like that. (they said it wasn't at the 8 second mark)
Contreras has been trying to play the rules for the last couple of series, which makes me dislike the rules a little bit, lawyer ball is not playing a game.
I don't think they were calling a quick pitch. Jansen was getting into his set when he was called for a violation. It's very confusing.
Basically what Contreras is trying to do is waste as much time in the box, appear to be ready by facing the pitcher, even though his foot is out of the box(which he is allowed up until the 8 second mark) and if the pitcher in a rush decides to go through with the pitch thinking that Contreras is "ready" because of the pressure being put on the pitcher to throw on time, that the pitcher ends up going into his motion when technically the batter isn't ready and getting a quick pitch violation, when it was clearly egged on by the batters actions.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main