User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.5889 seconds
45 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Wednesday, May 19, 2021Orioles’ Chris Davis will miss all of 2021 MLB season after undergoing hip surgery
Tough break for the Orioles in their attempt to get a high draft pick next year. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: May 19, 2021 at 04:27 PM | 59 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: chris davis, orioles |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for Monday, May 23, 2022
(2 - 7:39pm, May 23) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: These 5 MLB Breakouts Are (Probably) For Real (13 - 7:36pm, May 23) Last: Captain Joe Bivens, Pointless and Wonderful Newsblog: Yankees, White Sox benches clear after Josh Donaldson calls Tim Anderson 'Jackie' Robinson (54 - 7:21pm, May 23) Last: Lars6788 Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - Crowning Champions and Pro-Rel (163 - 7:10pm, May 23) Last: The_Ex Newsblog: 2022 NBA Playoffs thread (1743 - 6:55pm, May 23) Last: asinwreck Newsblog: Zach Davies’ estranged wife says MLB pitcher ghosted her for a year (64 - 6:03pm, May 23) Last: Hombre Brotani Newsblog: JOEY VOTTO IS THE GREATEST REDS PLAYER OF ALL TIME (27 - 5:27pm, May 23) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Look Good, Feel Good, Play Good. Smell Good? (6 - 5:11pm, May 23) Last: Walt Davis Hall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1899 Ballot (1 - 5:02pm, May 23) Last: DL from MN Newsblog: Roger Angell, Who Wrote About Baseball With Passion, Dies at 101 (54 - 12:51pm, May 23) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: Adley Rutschman, MLB's No. 1 prospect, called up to O's (29 - 12:40pm, May 23) Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave) Newsblog: Former Giants fan-favorite infielder Joe Panik retires from MLB (16 - 12:05pm, May 23) Last: jingoist Sox Therapy: One Step Forward (19 - 11:57am, May 23) Last: villageidiom Newsblog: Juan Soto trade rumors: Nationals may be 'motivated' to trade outfielder (58 - 11:06am, May 23) Last: bfan Newsblog: WEEKEND OMNICHATTER for May 20-22, 2022 (120 - 9:59am, May 23) Last: The Duke |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.5889 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Barry`s_Lazy_Boy Posted: May 19, 2021 at 04:38 PM (#6019722)I thought you meant that in the Alfonso Soriano sense, where you'd like to see the O's take them off your hands. Which would have left me startled to learn he was still playing.
Probably not, but OTTOMH it's hard to think of a worse one.
Davis'a OPS+ since he signed that $161,000,000 contract: 110, 96, 49, 61, -8
Davis's WAR during that same time: 3.1, -0.6, -3.3, -0.9, -0.9. Net WAR -2.6
All players who debuted in MLB after 1/1/1980 have health coverage for life at no cost.
Davis 2017-2021: -5.7 WAR, $115M
Howard 2012-2016: -4.8 WAR, $115M
I've seen this claimed, but unsupported. Do you have a cite?
Everyone who has played one game in MLB is given a $1M+ benefit?
From this website
I think investopedia is doing a poor job interpreting the document.
Nothing on that link mentions medical benefits. Disability is the closest item.
This section says you vest into the pension plan with one day of service, but that you only actual earn a benefit after 43 days of service. Your pension goes up for every 43 days, or a quarter season, you spend on a roster.
Anecdotally, I've seen a former player on youtube say that you qualify for the MLB medical plan after one day of service, not lifetime medical.
Edit to share a link: https://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/f7s300/matt_antonelli_1_day_in_mlb_lifetime_health/
I’ve yet to find someone who can explain it in detail.
Miguel Cabrera 2017-2021: -1.2 WAR, $148 million...and he has 2 more years at $32 million per year after this! I know people think he'll obviously get to 3,000 hits and 500 HRs - he's so close, right? - but not at this rate: So far in May, his BA and SLG are the exact same....218. He's 12-for-55 with 12 singles. He has more GIDPs (3) than runs scored (2) this month. It's a change of pace from his April, when he had two HRs and a double, but hit .140 for the month.
And they feel obligated to stick him in the middle of the lineup - he's typically hitting cleanup while getting 18 hits for the entire season thus far. Once he gets paid through 2023, he'll be at negative several WAR, at a cost to the Tigers of $212 million from 2017-2023. That's the worst contract.
Link
There’s a popular misconception that any professional baseball player who spends even one day on a major league roster will receive free health care for life. In reality, that’s not true. Instead, what one day of service gives you is the right to buy into a healthcare plan, which isn’t really the same as free, comprehensive coverage. A player’s eligibility for health and pension benefits is tiered, and depends on how much time the player spent on a major league roster, how much service time he accrued, and can even be a matter of which years he played, as different benefits are available to different eras of players.
Now Davis has been around long enough and made enough money that his health insurance is probably whatever the fullest coverage is.
On worst contracts ... apparently Josh Hamilton made it to 3 WAR for his $125 M. Ian Desmond was a bargain at -2.5 WAR for $70 M. Chan Ho Park was 0 WAR for $85 M back in 2002 $.
The Davis contract was of course a terrible idea -- why that many years? who were they bidding against? But it was 1 year shorter and same AAV in RAW dollar terms as what Tex had gotten 7 years earlier, the same as what AGon got 4 years earlier, 2 years shorter and same AAV as Fielder got 4 years earlier. Those guys were all better but, once we control for MLB salary inflation, more expensive.
The O's of course couldn't know (but coulda guessed) that salary inflation would slow considerably ... but that still doesn't excuse 7 years. The Padres are similarly guilty with Hosmer -- much lower AAV than Davis but very long and the market for average-ish FAs has collapsed.
It's only 300 PA but Hosmer has put up a 133 OPS+ the last couple of "years." No power this year but he is hitting over 300 which is similar to his other good years. (What an odd career.)
Interesting use of the word "good".
So true. No way any of us would come close to hitting a 95mph fastball or one of those big bendy curves, much less be able to drive a ball 400 feet. Now these days, poor Chris ain't doing that too often, but he can do it at times. My chances are never.
Hell, so am I!
Albert was a Browns fan as a kid.
Yeah, he's fun to joke about but while I don't follow the Orioles closely he seems like a perfectly decent guy who just is really bad at being a Major League Baseball player. It's not his fault the O's gave him that deal.
Dammit. The joke was right there and I whiffed.
Yeah, he's fun to joke about but while I don't follow the Orioles closely he seems like a perfectly decent guy who just is really bad at being a Major League Baseball player. It's not his fault the O's gave him that deal.
I have to think something physical happened. Cabrera lost power. Pujols lost speed. But Davis went from a very good (overrated, but still) hitter to not being able to even make contact. I guess I haven't paid attention to him for a couple of years but last I saw him I wouldn't say you and I couldn't match him, he looked so bad. And for a guy who had been a good MLB hitter, that suggests to me something substantially wrong, not just age and slowing a bit. I don't exactly feel bad for him - he's in the top 0.00001% of blessed individuals - but that must suck in the moment.
For as bad as things have gone for Davis in recent years hopefully with time he will be remembered for his high moments as well. Only 29 batters have hit 50+ home runs in a season, Davis is one of them.
The Davis deal reminds me a bit of the Sandoval deal. It looked bad when it was signed but I don't think anyone expected it to be THIS bad THIS fast. Couple 40 homer seasons then slowly sink into the morass of hitting .190? Fine. Immediately going in the tank? Not good.
Cabrera and Davis are about tied for the worst contract I think. You could even argue that Cabrera is worse, basically getting an extra $11M per WAR (and that number may go up if the WAR declines).
Depends on how you look at it. I might not have the ability to every now and then connect on a ball and hit it 450 feet and Davis did, at least before the latest injury. But on most days, my 0-4 would look the same in the box score as Davis's 0-4.
I may be mis-remembering, but I feel like 10 years is what was needed for lifetime benefits. I remember a story about some reliever who was bouncing back and forth between the minors and majors for years hanging on for a couple of extra seasons to try and get to the vesting mile-stone.
i think this describes scott atchison who i believe had a medically complex child that would benefit from the best insurance mlb had to offer.
Davis was a late bloomer who couldn't crack the regular lineup for Texas and didn't qualify for the batting title until he was 26. I don't recall if this was proven or not, but there is a theory that late bloomers have a short peak and then decline dramatically.
A high-K hitter like Davis, even when he was good, doesn't have much room for error. In his breakout year ('13), he had a 29.6% K-rate and a very high babip (.336) for someone who hits a lot of homers (and even then his OBP was "just" .370). He became an average hitter at 30-31 once he started striking out in the mid-30s% and was homering 5% of the time instead of 7%.
When his power really declined at 32, which brought done not only his HRs but also his babip, he became useless.
Jeff King retired in the middle of the season, supposedly because he had just fully vested after he crossed the 10-year mark. In his defense he was playing for the late '90s Royals.
But why would Davis work on it that hard? What's in it for him?
Not sure where you are getting your 'slight upgrade' from, Pujols was at .198/.250/.372/.622 when the Angels dropped him, the O's 1B line is .236/.271/.376/.647 and DH line is .214/.268/.393/.661. More importantly Ryan Mountcastle and Trey Mancini have been splitting those spots (as well as a bit of LF) - two building block guys for the organization.
Respect. He'd get to feel like he's making some kind of contribution, instead of being a guy who is only still in the league because of a terrible contract.
Staying in the big leagues? Professional pride? If not for the contract he would have been released and retired a few years ago (and probably should have been anyway.
That still doesn’t make Davis worthy of sympathy - no pity parties for Howard, Cabrera and of Pujols, so why the sentiment for Davis who was terrible for the contract he signed?
"If not for the contract" does a lot of work there. He has the contract. My guess is Davis would be perfectly fine with being released. He's just not going to give the money back, nor should he have to. I mean, if Davis wants to be a pitcher, try it. But you have to have buy in, you can't just make him be a pitcher (the way you could with someone not signed or pre-FA).
My default is to root for entertainers. Why wouldn't I? Add on the precipitous fall he's had, and my empathy endures. To me, it's no different than hoping some rookie has a fantastic debut. His contract—any player's, for that matter—is irrelevant for me.
Chris is already a pitcher. Not just a pitcher, but an undefeated pitcher.
He also pitched in 2019 and got a no-decision.
My point was not that he owes the Orioles anything or should give the money back or anything like that...it was more that guys who have the skills and mindset to be in the big leagues generally have to be taken out kicking and screaming...they'll generally do what it takes to stay in the big leagues.
Not everyone is the same, but if the Orioles had come up to him and said your choices are "learn to pitch or get released," and his agent said "if you get released, maybe we can get you a contract with the Long Island Ducks," he's probably on the mound before the end of the conversation.
It seems fitting that in his victory, he went 0-8 with 5 K.
My guess was that there was something wrong with his eyes. Watching him bat in 2018, I had the impression he couldn't see the ball at all. He would take the same big swing every time, regardless of the location of the pitch, just hoping the planes would intersect.
Hitting to the score.
I read speculation elsewhere that Davis had ADD, and that mlb is no longer allowing him to take his previous medication? And that this roughly corresponds to his decline? I haven't seen that anywhere else though
Did you look? :-) Davis was suspended in 2014 for use of adderall (which as a stimulant I believe required two positive tests to get suspended). He had a TUE for the drug previously, somehow messed up filing for the TUE in 2014, struggled so badly he took the chance. Link The TUE was restored in 2015 (see Wiki) and he had an excellent season. Whether the TUE continued past I didn't find info on (not that I looked hard). Note all of this was before the big contract.
ADD diagnoses are alarmingly high among athletes (or were), leading some cynics to speculate that false/borderline diagnoses were sometimes being made to allow the player to use stimulants to enhance their play. But to be clear, there is no probable cause that I am aware of to suspect Davis's ADD diagnosis isn't legit.
Now, his decline ... not that unusual. Many around here predicted it -- not me and if we're honest, there are always a lot of voices around here (sometimes me) that predict imminent decline for any FA. But under both the "aging oafball" theory dating back to Bill James and the "late bloomers don't age well" theory (I recall Dan S claims evidence for this and maybe even incorporates it into ZiPS but I may be getting my nerds mixed up), Davis would not have been expected to age well. So the critics got this one very right. At the time, I suggested that basically the O's were mainly just hoping for a couple more big seasons out of him then they'd just have to suffer through the rest. Obviously it was even worse than that.
But looking at the actual pattern of the decline, it doesn't look as unusual in retrospect as I remember it. It wasn't exactly immediate and dramatic. From 2013-18, he went excellent, below-average, excellent, (contract), average for 1B, below-average, disaster. It all happened maybe two years earlier than expected but that pattern isn't too unusual. Mo Vaughn went from a 150 OPS+ hitter to 115 in one season, although he hung at 115 for a good bit. Boog was a very good platoon-y type (137 OPS+) in his early 30s then dropped to 90 then was gone in short order. Luzinski put up a 150 OPS+ from 24-27, dropped to 125 for 28-32, dropped to 89 and was done. Zisk put up a 137 for 24-28, then 120 for 29-33, then 94 and was done. Nate Colbert put up a 132 from 23-27, dropped to 96, never played a full season again while hitting atrociously. (Was there an injury?) Good old Erubiel Durazo put up a very solid 126 for 25-30 (including 138 at 30) then fewer than 200 PA at 79 and done. From 26-30, Richie Sexson put up a 135 OPS+ then a drop to 117, then 84 then 89 and done.
Sexson and Davis look fairly similar.
RS 5604 PA, 306 HR (45 twice), 120 OPS+, he signed a 4/$50 contract (reasonably big at the time) just before his last really good season.
CD 5630 PA, 295 HR (53, 47), 106 OPS+ (118 before things got really bad), big contract after his last really good season.
This sort of thing is always a risk and probably especially for the double whammy of late-blooming oafballer (at least he wasn't super-fat). Giving Davis whatever the 2016 equivalent of Sexson's 4/$50 would have been reasonable, then it's just a standard "oh well, that didn't work out" contract as opposed to contender for worst of all-time. But then there's almost nothing that rivals that 2018 (-3.3 WAR on a 49 OPS+ in 522 PA), a season that will make almost any contract look bad. But IMO, it was always the 7 years that made no sense (other than it went through the magic age of 36).**
In that way if it had been vaguely Hosmer-esque -- say 7/$100 as a deferred 4/$90 contract or something -- maybe even that would make sense.
I can't see how this would be a positive for the Orioles in any way. Davis (or any other non-pitcher out there) is never going to be a good enough pitcher to bring into a game situation that matters. Say the Orioles do want him to learn up on it so he can "pitch" the inevitable blow out innings and not get hurt, that means he's going to be taking focus away from his bat, which is his only chance of providing any value to the team.
It's been almost 5 years and 1500 plate appearances since his bat provided any value to the team.
Very true.
It's very unusual in how bad Davis got. Not a single other player that you mention ever had an OPS+ as low as Davis' 49 in 2018, even in a partial season. And it's not like he was playing solely because of the contract at that point; he had been a league-average hitter the year before, with 26 homers, and was only 32.
The other players you mentioned had generally diminished by the age of 32, but in their case diminished meant an OPS+ of 125. The worst player (and best comp) you mentioned was Richie Sexson, who declined to OPS+'s in the 80s at that point. Nobody else was down around 50.
That sounds like the Angels Josh Hamilton. Even then, his strikeout rates were not extraordinary, but that description is exactly what his swing looked like. Some thing, over and over, regardless of the ball location.
It’s Josh’s 40th birthday today.
Sure. Davis got the chance to do that only because the team still owed him 5/$115 and the team was bad anyway. Those other guys were not given the chance to play after putting up their single season of 80-90 OPS+ (or got an NRI from somebody the next spring but didn't produce). If Davis doesn't have his contract, he's released mid-2018. But sure if we want to say that a drop from a 95 OPS+ to a 50 is "dramatic" that's fine -- the guy was done if he'd put up a 80-85. But what's unusual isn't the level of performance, it's that he was given so much playing time to demonstrate how far he'd fallen. And that's because he was still owed millions. Davis did hit the wall a year or two earlier than most guys of his type.
How many 1B/DH are allowed to put up 1946 PA of a 85 OPS+? Pujols. Cabrera has put up a 51 OPS+ so far this year, has been replacement-level for 4 "years" ... has two years left on his contract, I haven't heard any suggestions of retirement or release. Votto is a 226 hitter and below-replacement player for his last 341 PA but has 2 years left on his contract.
It's a classic case of selection bias. There have been lots of guys who would have put up OPS+ like 50 in a full season at 30-33 if given the chance to do so. But they weren't. Most such guys were gone after putting up an 85 the year before or were given 150 PA of putridity then shown the door. For obvious reasons. The main difference between Davis and those guys is 5/$115 M. It was a perfect storm in that he was also on a terrible team who might as well have kept playing him in hopes he'd break out of it.
You want some more examples? Glenn Davis -- 130 OPS+ from 24-29, then two average 1B seasons, then 123 PA of a 22 OPS+ at age 32. The man's ISO went from 272 at 29 to 233, 146, 53. Alvin Davis -- 135 OPS+ from 23-29, 76 at 30, 86 in 118 PA and done. Incaviglia threw in a 76 at 27, a 82 at 30, didn't play at 31, was OK at 32, finished up with a 79 and a -23. Hollandsworth was never as good as any of these guys but got to finish off his career with a 73 and a 78 (566 total PA across those two seasons, not trivial). At 32, Willie Upshaw had to go to Japan where he had one good season and one terrible one. Jose Cruz Jr was quite good through 31, followed that up with two OPS+ in the mid-80s then a 19 in 60 PA. George Bell put up a 63 in 436 PA at age 33. Preston Wilson put up a 73 at 29, bounced back at 30, a 85 at 31, a 50 in 68 PA at 32 and done. Nate McLouth put up a 69 OPS+ at 28, bounced back to around 90, finished with a 45 in 162 PA at 32. Trumbo was a perfectly decent hitter at 32 and given just 31 PA of a 34 OPS+ at 33 before being shown the door (by the O's! the same season Davis was allowed to put up a 61). Barfield was above-average at 31 and was given just 105 PA of a 22 OPS+ at 32 and was gone. Justin Smoak was given 132 PA of 62 OPS+ at 33; Logan Morrison, fresh off a 133 OPS+ at 29, finished off his career with a 74 in 359 PA, 69 in 38 and 32 in 28. Chris Carter was given 208 PA of a 71 at 30. A few years back, Odor put up a 63; he put up a 64 last year; but he's signed through next year so he's busy putting up a 81 for the Yanks.
And of course Khris Davis put up a 84 at 31, a 78 last year and a 44 in his meager 25 PA this year.
Anyway, in addition to Sexson, these guys are pretty good comps for Chris Davis (and you'll notice a deeply depressing pattern here):
Glenn Davis 4189 PA, 190 HR (3 top 10), 123 OPS+, 22 OPS+ in 123 PA at 32
Khris Davis 3715 PA, 218 HR (42, 43, 48), 118 OPS+, 82 in 657 at 31-33
Alvin Davis 5010 PA, 160 HR (not a big deal), 127 OPS+, 78 in 646 at 30-31
FWIW, I ripped my knee to shreds at 32 pretty much ending my softball career.
and some less depressing ones comps:
Bell 6592 PA, 265 HR (47), 113 OPS+, 63 in 436 at 33
Inky 4677 PA, 206 HR (2 top 10), 104 OPS+, 62 in 201 at 33-34
Carter ... basically half of Davis's career, 71 in 208 at 30
Trumbo 4419 PA, 218 HR (47), 34 in 31 at 33
Carter is a classic -- led the NL in HR with 41 in 2016. The Brewers didn't even bother to re-sign him. The Yanks grabbed him and released him after that age 30 performance, the A's picked him up but didn't play him, let him go and the Angels picked him up for 2018 in the minors, sold him to the Twins who released him 6 weeks later. That's 4 teams deciding the defending NL HR champ's skilled deteriorated so badly in one season that he had no place in baseball. (He had been below average in 2015-16 despite the HRs.)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main