Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, February 15, 2019
I estimate only 10-12 Primates care about the NBA, none of whom can be bothered to curate their own thread to avoid detracting from what this site is really about: Kyler Murray and how the Galactic Empire did nothing wrong.
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Promptly go on a 15-0 run to end it.
Yeah.
We won't have to play GSW/HOU until the Western Conference Finals!
A guy named Anfernee Simons played the full game, and scored 37 points. Entering the game he'd scored 38 total points on the season.
(On terrible shooting, though)
Less interested in the playoffs than usual for many reasons, but am interested to see if:
1. Boston has another gear and takes out Indiana and gives Milwaukee a lot of trouble.
2. OKC makes real noise. I have defended Westbrook and have always been a proponent of George's value. OKC is positioned to get to the WCF and with two big stars and their payroll, they should be able to make a run at it even from the 6 seed.
3. Milwaukee has trouble or if their regular season performance carries over and they make the Finals.
I agree with this. Feeling a lot better about my season-long MIL as the giant hiding in plain sight sentiment.
Are we doing awards ballots again?
just to point something out:
in the 6 seasons since sam hinkie was hired, the sixers have won 50+ games twice.
the only teams who have more 50+ win seasons over that time period are CLE, GSW, HOU, LAC, POR, SAS and TOR.
and, again dating back to hinkie's hire, the sixers have more playoff wins (5) than 1/3 of the NBA.
Leave it to the Kings and Wolves to defy almost mathematically impossible odds of futility. I guess the moral is, if you're relying on one of those teams to make you happy, you're pretty much screwed (sorry Wolves fans).
I think the Rockets are better than their record. They had some big injuries and a slow start, but they're 20-4 in their last 24 games and 3 of those losses were by 1 or 2 pts (and the one that wasn't was to MIL). That said, I actually do think this will be a fun series and it should be more competitive than it was last year. I just wish it wasn't happening in the first round. I'd have been totally fine with a 2nd round meeting with the State Farm guys.
god.
Just in time for the playoffs!
Seriously though, very glad this turned out to not be anything serious.
Golden State Warriors now have the best 1-season (73), 3-season (207), 4-season (265), 5-season (322), and 6-season (373) in NBA history. Of course, Jordan's Bulls have best 2-season total of 141 (Warriors best 2-season total is 140).
Warriors 57 wins this season were just enough to tie the Bird Celtics with 373 wins in 6 consecutive seasons. Bird's Celtics win totals in 7- (434), 8- (493), and 9-seasons (550) seem far out of reach. Magic's Lakers have best 10-season total with 598.
* I am pretty sure this is at least partially a Wyatt Earp phenomenon, for the record, though I also expect the string of good (though probably not top-5) three point defenses from the team to continue as long as they have a good defensive coach and Danny Ainge keeps aggressively drafting perimeter players for their defense.
Bucks 94%
Raptors 89%
Bucks 83%
Celtics 81%
Warriors 97%
Nuggets 68%
Blazers 47%
Rockets 76%
I've seen inferences that Joerger is a plus coach but is also an a$$hole to his bosses. Tough to keep jobs with that approach.
From a Chris Wallace Q&A:
* Lost 6 of their last 11, 3 of those by 25+ points. And it took a miracle to escape with a victory against a tanking T-Wolf team last night.
Edit: In fact, I wouldn't be too surprised if POR got swept by the 6th seed for the 2nd year in a row.
I definitely think the Spurs can beat Denver in the series. I think the 76ers are vulnerable if Embiid's hurt. Celtics I think could be a bit vulnerable too, especially without Smart. If Kyrie has a poor series, that could be tight.
MIL over DET in 4
TOR over ORL in 6
PHI over BKN in 5
BOS over IND in 6
GSW over LAC in 5
SAS over DEN in 6
OKC over POR in 6
HOU over UTA in 6
MIL over BOS in 7
TOR over PHI in 6
GSW over HOU in 6
OKC over SAS in 5
MIL over TOR in 5
GSW over OKC in 6
MIL over GSW in 7
I think Harden wins the MVP, but I'd pick Giannis. I'd probably pick De'aaron Fox as MIP.
TOR over ORL in 5
PHI over BKN in 6
IND over BOS in 7
GSW over LAC in 4
DEN over SAS in 5
OKC over POR in 5
UTA over HOU in 7
MIL over IND in 5
TOR over PHI in 6
GSW over UTA in 6
OKC over DEN in 7
MIL over TOR in 7
GSW over OKC in 4
GSW over MIL in 6
For the Jazz-Rockets, I'm going with the homer pick. I do think there are good arguments that the Jazz have a real shot. The series has a ton of days off, and the Jazz are really banged up, so that should help Rubio, Korver, and Neto get healthy. They did not have Rubio for any of the Houston series last year, and the Rockets do not have Ariza this year (who held Donovan to something like 35% shooting while guarding him last year). Chris Paul is not as good this year as he was last season, and Harden has often ran out of gas in the playoffs and carried a larger load than ever before in the regular season this year. Also, the biggest improvement for Rudy's offense this year has been increased core strength so that if a guard is switched on him he can quickly establish position right by the basket for either an easy dunk or foul -- he's added more points from additional lobs, but I think that was always there with his length and athleticism and Jazz playmakers before this season were just bad at going to it. Being able to punish guards is particularly important with the Rockets' switching defense, and he didn't do it last year.
On the flip side, the extra rest benefits Paul and Harden just as much if not more than any Jazz player. Exum is by far the Jazz' best Harden defender and he's out. The Jazz don't have any player who is on Paul's level on offense even in his current form, let alone Harden's. And even with no Ariza, the Jazz have struggled against switching defenses. Finally, with Harden and Paul, Rockets are one of the few teams who can take advantage of the Jazz' defensive scheme even when it's working, by draining mid-rangers better than basically anyone else, and Harden might force Gobert to come out and guard him on the perimeter anyway.
TOR 4 ORL 1
PHI 4 BKN 2
BOS 3 IND 4
GSW 4 LAC 1
SAS 2 DEN 4
OKC 1 POR 4
HOU 4 UTA 3
MIL 4 IND 1
TOR 4 PHI 2
GSW 4 HOU 1
DEN 4 POR 2
MIL 4 TOR 3
GSW 4 DEN 2
MIL 4 TOR 2
MIL 4 GSW 3
MVP: Giannis
MIP: Siakam
COY: Bud
DPOY: Gobert
MVP: Giannis
DPOY: Gobert
COY: Bud
MIP: Siakam
ROY: Luka
All-NBA:
Curry/Harden/George/Giannis/Jokic
Lilliard/Irving/Kawhi/Durant/Embiid
Jrue/Beal/Lebron/Blake/Gobert
All-Defense:
Jrue/Smart/George/Giannis/Gobert
Bledsoe/White/Siakam/Draymond/Embiid
Rookie:
Luka/Trae/Ayton/Jackson/Shae
Robinson/Shamet/Bagley/Mikal Bridges/Brunson
Playoffs(?!?):
UTA
SAS (Malone fired)
OKC (Stotts fired)
GSW
GSW (Wins NBA Finals)
SAS
MIL
TOR
BOS (Would dearly love to pick IND but Horford+Kyrie too good)
BKN (Brown fired)
TOR (Wins ECF)
BOS
Milwaukee was comfortably the best team in the NBA this year and also had an extremely good record against the other best teams in the NBA. I think any analysis has to start with that, and moving from there to Toronto is way more likely to beat Golden State requires putting an abundance of weight in matchups.
Assuming Brogdon is healthy, I also think they have more guys that can get a shot, and also are just tougher at most positions than Toronto, especially down low. I think Toronto has better wing defenders, but Milwaukee's still a great defense, and I think can score better against them.
I think the Spurs and Popovich used all their wizardry to even make the playoffs with this on-paper-terrible team. I don't really think there's anything left in the bag. If there's one team in the West that didn't coast at all this regular season and thus likely doesn't have another gear for the playoffs, it's them (maybe also the Clippers).
It will be fun to briefly see the Nets and Magic in the playoffs.
What the hell is this.
Nuggets in 5
Thunder in 6
Rockets in 7
Warriors in 6
Nuggets in 7
Warriors in 4
Bucks in 4
Raptors in 5 (lose first game)
Nets in 7
Celtics in 5
Bucks in 6
Raptors in 5
Bucks in 7
Bucks in 7
I think the thing that gives everyone pause about the Bucks is just how many 3pers they give up (36 per game, good for 30th in the NBA). When you are giving up those shots to Vucevic, Bogdanovic, D'Angelo and the other weak sisters of the East, it's not that big of a deal.
Maybe it's just not that big of a deal, but frankly we haven't seen a defense built around giving up the 3per since it's become prevalent, and no one really knows what to make of it.
I totally get it, man, but shite gets real in the playoffs and none of those guys know what they are doing. I'm assuming that even losing in the 2nd-round puts Malone at serious risk, especially if they get their asses kicked.
It's been a couple years since I lived there, so I don't know what the local media says. What's the on-the-ground take on organizational expectations for sticking around in the playoffs?
Denver: Even if Denver were to lose to San Antonio, and I do not think that they will, I do not think that Malone would get fired.
Milwaukee: I am less sophisticated than Shipman. My questions about them are the guys they have after Antetokounmpo. Also, to go from where they were last year all the way to the Finals, much less beating Golden State for the title, would be a pretty big jump in one year. But I thought they would win about 49 games, not 60, so I may be underrating them as a postseason team. Also, I will not be surprised if they win the East. But I will not be surprised if they don't.
You would figure the Bucks have a great chance to win at least one of those series. Though I would argue having to play 2 series at once might leave them stretched a bit thing.
I am also not sure what would happen if they one both series, and the two following series, and ended up having to play themselves in the Conference Finals.
regardless of whether embiid goes FULL EMBIID, make no mistake: the sixers are vulnerable. they don't know each other; they haven't played together; since the harris trade, guys have been streaming in and out of the lineup due to various scrapes and bruises. you can't trust a team that has no continuity.
plus, as i've said, brooklyn is more than capable of beating them. BRK can steal a game because of the refs; they can steal a game if embiid gets back spasms or whatever; and they can always outscore the sixers if they get hot from beyond the arc. personally, if i was going to vegas, i'd bet on the nets to win in 6 games.
if you remember back to last year, MIL pushed BOS to 7 games in the first round. this year, they have a better coach, and better personnel.
my guess is that joerger does not tolerate fools.
i couldn't blame walton for jumping on any job he can get, but i would not take that job if i was him. that front office is poison.
TOR over ORL in 6
PHI over BKN in 4
BOS over IND in 6
GSW over LAC in 5
DEN over SAS in 6
OKC over POR in 6
UTA over HOU in 7 (probably crazy, but eh, why not)
MIL over BOS in 7
TOR over PHI in 5
GSW over UTA in 5
DEN over OKC in 6
TOR over MIL in 6
GSW over DEN in 5
GSW over TOR in 6
I'm not even a little confident in any of this.
I can't believe one of Denver, OKC, Portland, or SAS will make the WCF. Crazy.
The East series are all kind of gross, I think- even if a couple end up going 6 or 7 I doubt they'll be very entertaining.
Philly was, uh, a bit better in their first 26 games.
Golden State Warriors now have the best 1-season (73), 3-season (207), 4-season (265), 5-season (322), and 6-season (373) in NBA history. Of course, Jordan's Bulls have best 2-season total of 141 (Warriors best 2-season total is 140).
Warriors 57 wins this season were just enough to tie the Bird Celtics with 373 wins in 6 consecutive seasons. Bird's Celtics win totals in 7- (434), 8- (493), and 9-seasons (550) seem far out of reach. Magic's Lakers have best 10-season total with 598.
The first year of that Warriors 6 year run is only 51 wins in the last year of the Mark Jackson era. Unless the team is gutted in free agency, the Dubs should better than in 2019-2020 and take sole possession of the 6 year record.
Taking sole possession of the 6/7/8/9 year records would require over the next 1-4 years:
6y: 52 wins in 1 year
7y: 113 wins in 2 years (56.5/year)
8y: 172 wins in 3 years (57.3/year)
9y: 229 wins in 4 years (57.3/year)
57 wins is a tall order (the last two years have been 57 and 58) but I definitely wouldn't call it out of reach (and certainly not far out of reach) as long as Curry is on the team.
Fans don't care that your editor made you write about the Lakers or Warriors.
Fans don't care about your twitter mentions.
Fans don't care about the snark you get from the assistant to the assistant to the assistant general manager in your text messages.
I'm certain that Vlade has been mocked more than (pre-resignation press conference) Magic. What am I missing here?
TOR over ORL in 5
PHI over BKN in 5
BOS over IND in 6
GSW over LAC in 4
SAS over DEN in 6
OKC over POR in 5
HOU over UTA in 7
MIL over BOS in 6
TOR over PHI in 6
GSW over HOU in 6
SAS over OKC in 7
MIL over TOR in 7
GSW over OKC in 5
GSW over MIL in 6
I don't know, Hombre. I think it'd be pretty messed up if SAS beat OKC in round 2, but the league let OKC play in the WCF anyway. I get that Westbrook and George will probably bring better ratings than Aldridge and DeRozan, but that's going a bit too far, IMO...
There were conflicting reports about this the other day, but it seemed like the Wolves are going to both A. hire a new PBO, but also B. almost certainly bring back Layden and Saunders. So basically Glen Taylor is going to keep being Glen Taylor.
TOR over ORL in 6
PHI over BKN in 7
IND over BOS in 6
GSW over LAC in 4
DEN over SAS in 5
OKC over POR in 6
UTA over HOU in 6
MIL over IND in 6
TOR over PHI in 7
GSW over UTA in 5
DEN over OKC in 5
MIL over TOR in 7
GSW over DEN in 5
GSW over MIL in 6
MIL over DET, TOR over ORL, PHI over BKN, BOS over IND
GSW over LAC, DEN over SAS, OKC over POR, HOU over UTA (the Paul George injury gives me pause)
MIL over BOS, TOR over PHI
GSW over HOU, DEN over OKC
TOR over MIL (such a tough call), GSW over DEN
GSW over TOR (I think I have MIL winning if they were healthier)
MVP - Giannis, DPOY - Gobert, ROY - Doncic, MIP - Siakam
Joerger - I think it's partly that he's a bit irascible and partly Divac trying to control as much of the org as he can.
This is a mistake for the Lakers. I wouldn't hate bringing on Ty Lue, but that's about it for guys who I think of as an upgrade over Luke.
Luke consistently built reasonable defenses with terrible personnel. He's dealt with horrific injury situations, and his offenses get tons of shots at the rim.
I kinda like Vlade, and wonder if Walton to Sacramento might not be a really good move?
no offense to ty lue, but he is not an upgrade over luke walton. and anyone who expects lue to keep the whole roster happy, should first ask him why he wasn't able to do more to keep kyrie irving from forcing his way out of CLE*.
(i'd accept "man, have you tried to get someone to live in CLE?" as an answer, but i'd hope for something a bit more specific).
FWIW, i think this is my coaching wish list, assuming the sixers get swept by BRK and wind up firing brett brown:
1: jerry stackhouse - he's a great defensive coach, and he'll have the players' respect from day one.
2: elton brand - pull a gregg popovich/bobby cox, hire someone to replace you as GM and then coach the team the way you intended it to be.
3: chris beard - it seems like he's really good at player development and defensive scheming
4: luke walton - seems like he knows what he's doing.
5: dave joerger - same.
Lue has won a championship, which I think of as pretty damn valuable.
There is the whole thing where he doesn't even pretend to care about defense, but I'm hoping/praying that was a Cleveland thing.
I thought Walton was a quality coach who, in more stable circumstances, could be a really terrific coach. This is all sort of going up in flames right now, and it's just damned depressing.
Lue: In most situations, he would be a bad hire, but I think he would be OK in this one.
Pelinka: Most of the fanbase wants him out, and I understand that. As I said in a previous post, I thought that Jeanie Buss had two options, and they did not include Walton being gone and Pelinka staying. But my guess now is that Pelinka stays and she promotes Ryan West and/or one of her brothers (Jesse or Joey).
Stiggles, Stackhouse just got hired as Vanderbilt’s head coach like a week ago.
are we gonna pretend like that means anything? noone whose opinion matters would think anything less of stackhouse if he leaves vanderbilt for any NBA team, let alone a team that is positioned to contend for the NBA title for the next half-decade.
Right. Additionally, Stackhouse would ensure himself of being part of every conversation about Hinkie and The Process.
plus, stack started his NBA career in philly, so he may as well come back for his first head coaching job.
It’s that time of the year #Playoffs #ImOut
TOR over ORL in 5
PHI over BKN in 5
BOS over IND in 6
GSW over LAC in 5
DEN over SAS in 5
OKC over POR in 5
HOU over UTA in 7
MIL over BOS in 6
TOR over PHI in 5
GSW over HOU in 6
OKC over DEN in 6
TOR over MIL in 7
GSW over OKC in 6
TOR over GSW in 7
MVP
1. Giannis
2. Harden
3. George
ROY
1. Luka
2. Trae
3. Ayton
DPOY
1. Gobert
2. Giannis
3. George
Lou Williams of the Year
1. Lou Williams
COTY
1. Bud
2. Doc
3. Pop
Eh, Embiid is moving like my late grandfather but this game would be out of hand without all his first quarter free throws.
(EDIT: Not really disputing your overall point, they look terrible.)
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main