Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Interesting moment on the Gladbach/Bayern game. Handball pen given on what must have been the lightest of touches, and no effect on the ball. Announcers are absolutely aghast and are blaming VAR.
I'm not so sure on this one, because the Gladbach defender appeared to intentionally, specifically try to touch the ball with his hand. That's very rare, so (if you think that was the intent) even the most mild of actual contact is rightfully a penalty and a yellow.
Sociedad has 1 win in their las 9 La Liga games. Their schedule got harder and they've had a little hard luck with results, but they haven't been a top 4 La Liga team over that stretch either. They've now played exactly half the schedule (more than most teams in La Liga) and are projected to finish 6th.
Sociedad had a very good year last year, deservedly finishing 6th in the league and not that far behind Sevilla and Villarreal. On a whole so far this year seems to be more or less a repeat. With half the season left a lot could change of course.
So I knew Schalke have been bad, but they've been on a historic winless streak. That ended today with a hat trick by an American! Matthew Hoppe - never heard of him, he's only 19 and has only played five matches for the first team. By virtue of being an American scoring a hat trick in a top league there is now going to be a lot of attention.
606. spivey 2
Posted: January 09, 2021 at 01:56 PM (#5998621)
Leipzig/Dortmund first half was entertaining but cagey, and no real chances came of it.
Witsel looked to have a non-contact injury that could have been an achilles, and was replaced by Emre Can. Can is much more athletic and progressive than Witsel, and they've been much better winning the midfield battle and pressing. Of course that's not just him, but I do think the double pivot of Delaney/Witsel isn't dynamic enough and holds them back against top teams.
Anyways, the first 20 minutes of this second half have been all Dortmund, and they've collected a few high xG chances. And now Dani Olmo did a beautiful feint to create space and got a good shot off that hit the post as well. Fun second half so far. Big match for both teams, of course.
607. spivey 2
Posted: January 09, 2021 at 02:04 PM (#5998623)
Haaland is just a ####### monster. He may be better than Kane.
608. spivey 2
Posted: January 09, 2021 at 02:07 PM (#5998629)
Dortmund can have these halves where they look like the best team in the world. Such a frustrating team to semi-root for.
609. spivey 2
Posted: January 09, 2021 at 02:19 PM (#5998641)
I do appreciate that infogol only gives 0.49 xG on a Haaland goal where he rounded the keeper and tapped it in.
Fourth tier Crawley Town is up 3-0 on Leeds. Aside from Villa, who lost to Liverpool when fielding a team of children, Leeds will be the best team to go out so far. The other prem teams that have gone out so far have been bottom-tier (West Brom, Palace (to Wolves), and Newcastle (to Arsenal)).
Not only are there almost no stands and the grass is not in great shape, the field is clearly not level.
Still, all of it seems higher quality than Joe Hart, who almost gifted Marine a goal on a decent attempt from 35 yards from a plumbing student at the local college.
I'll always love a ground where neighbors across the street can watch the match through their windows.
Marine's shorts are being sponsored by Cartilage Free Captain (which is a little weird, but cool in the amount CFC raised for Marine and charity for the privilege).
It does not seem that Spurs will be going the way of Leeds; even Joe Hart can't muck it up at this point, I imagine ...
I don't really mean to pick on the field--it's only poor by EPL standards. It's in much, much better shape virtually all the fields I played on growing up.
I was watching Atletico playing Copa Del Rey earlier this week. They played a team in the 3rd tier called UE Cornelia. The field was turf and it had extra lines on it, like a college intramural field. Cornelia did end up winning and play Barcelona next. Cornelia lost to Barcelona 'B' last month.
616. spivey 2
Posted: January 11, 2021 at 09:05 AM (#5998948)
Fourth tier Crawley Town is up 3-0 on Leeds.
I'm not sure if that's worse, or Derby losing 2-0 and getting thoroughly outplayed by 6th tier Chorley. Seriously, Chorley had 19 shots, 6 on-target - compared to 2 (1) for Derby. Chorley is in the National League North, which I understand is semi-pro level.
I'm not sure if that's worse, or Derby losing 2-0 and getting thoroughly outplayed by 6th tier Chorley. Seriously, Chorley had 19 shots, 6 on-target - compared to 2 (1) for Derby. Chorley is in the National League North, which I understand is semi-pro level.
I learned after the fact that Derby were basically playing their U-23 team. Apparently due to COVID they were missing their entire first team and something like 9 of the 11 starters were making their full squad debut. Chorley actually were favored by the bookies in the immediate run up to the game.
618. Richard
Posted: January 11, 2021 at 10:03 AM (#5998961)
The whole of the Derby team made their professional debuts. There was no disgrace in that defeat. Same for Villa.
619. spivey 2
Posted: January 11, 2021 at 10:16 AM (#5998968)
That's too bad. I was hoping for cup magic. Sounds like it was just pandemic magic.
Speaking of pandemic magic, Tottenham is having their Wednesday Villa match rescheduled to be Fulham. They were supposed to play Fulham last week, but Scott Parker said - I think reasonably - that he would have set up his team differently in the FA cup if they knew they had a mid-week match.
Tottenham's schedule is extremely crowded and will stay like that for a while given we should at least expect them to get past their first knockout match in the Europa League. Part of me does feel like the burden for rescheduling should be a little bit more on the team that had the COVID outbreak, but I need to think about that a bit more.
Anyways, between now and when the players get the vaccine in England, I think it's going to be a mess. Same for the NBA, stateside.
620. spivey 2
Posted: January 11, 2021 at 12:43 PM (#5999004)
I'm interested if people think Messi is still the best player in the world. I was trying to think about it. He's still sitting around 1.1 xG+A/90, and he's still one of the very best dribblers in the world (whoscored shows him as the best dribbler in La Liga by over 1 more successful dribble per game vs. his competition). But he doesn't defend or press. Neymar looks statistically like the best dribbler in the world, though he misses so many games.
I'm inclined to think he's fallen back into a lump with your Lewandowskis, Mbappes, etc.
I actually think Kevin DeBruyne may be the best player in the world now. He's been the best midfielder for a couple of years. But this year his xG+A/90 is over 1. It was about 1 last year. And while he does occasionally play as an attacking midfielder or false 9, he most commonly plays as a box-to-box midfielder who seems to take the defensive side of the game pretty seriously.
621. KronicFatigue
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 08:15 AM (#5999186)
People need to answer #620 so I know what to think (and can pass it off as my own opinion)
622. jmurph
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 09:28 AM (#5999202)
I just don't watch enough of La Liga or Ligue 1 (I guess I should just say PSG there) to have a strong opinion. I'm pretty confident the best player in the world does not play in Serie A, though, I watch enough of that.
Despite many years now of watching high level soccer I'm still GOALS! biased enough to think that there must be someone better than KDB because he's not a big scorer. That said, as a City fan, I'm very aware of his importance to them.
623. Mefisto
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 10:08 AM (#5999213)
You might want to define "best player in the world". For example, say Babe Ruth was the best player in MLB from at least 1920 through 1932. That doesn't mean he was the best player every single year though (e.g., 1922 or 1924). Messi might not have been the best in 2020 (I haven't tried to analyze it), but he might still be "the best in the world" in some larger sense.
624. Baldrick
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 02:21 PM (#5999288)
I haven't watched a ton of Messi in 2020, but from what I have seen he's dropped a LOT from his peak. I certainly don't expect him to be the best player in the world in 2021, or any future year. But he's still good enough to be among the best and anyone in that range could end up actually having the best year.
Which I think is basically what Mefisto is saying but with a little more certainty about where he fits into the mix.
625. Mefisto
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 02:26 PM (#5999290)
It's Sheffield United's day? Newcastle went down to 10 on two quick yellows at the end of the first half. Then with another Newcastle player taking a knock they were temporarily down to 9. A ball over the top was swiped at in the box by the Newcastle defender's hand, for a penalty given on VAR, which seemed to be the right call. Sheffield United up 1-0.
Curious incident in the Manchester United - Burnley game. Cavani taken down outside the box on what looked like it could be a DOGSO. VAR spent a bunch of time looking at an earlier moment at the beginning of the move where Shaw got the ball but followed through and got the man as well.
Weirdly, the announcer (Neville?) repeated over and over again that Shaw "missed the ball", which was very clearly not the case. Follow-through was high though and justly a foul, so it was probably the right call to not let the DOGSO stand. They must have decided it would have been DOGSO or there would be no reason to give the Shaw foul to reverse it. IOW, Burnley was very close to being down a man.
And now Maguire gets a goal reversed on a marginal call. If they hadn't given it on the field probably no way VAR reverses. Maybe it's Burnley's day.
628. Richard
Posted: January 12, 2021 at 08:29 PM (#5999382)
It's Sheffield United's day?
Yes, at last. We needed that.
629. jmurph
Posted: January 13, 2021 at 03:11 PM (#5999524)
Ooh, the battle of former Spurs managers in Ligue 1 right now, Poch vs AVB's Marseille.
By 538, only the 5th time this year an EPL team had more than 4.0 xG. All the others were victories by at least 2 goals.
West Brom 0 - 4 Arsenal
Villa 3 - 0 Palace
ManU 6 -2 Leeds
Chelsea 3 - 1 Leeds
Liverpool 3 - 0 Leicester
edit: Spurs for a while were way up on their xPoints. They've given most of that back with some "hard luck" results and now are only slightly ahead of even.
It probably wouldn't surprise anyone that ManU, leading the league, has been out-resulting their underlying xG. Two teams right there with them (slightly ahead, actually, per understat) are Everton and Southampton.
Sure, but when you field Hjoberg, Winks AND Sissoko in midfield, together, with Dele on the bench, against Fulham, at home? You deserve *any* and *all* satchels of Richards that might come your way.
Forgive an ignorant question but why can't you get Peacock?
638. jmurph
Posted: January 14, 2021 at 08:57 AM (#5999676)
Forgive an ignorant question but why can't you get Peacock?
Well anyone can get it on their computers/phones. But it's still not available on Amazon devices, which is a pretty sizable share of the streaming market.
639. Mefisto
Posted: January 14, 2021 at 09:04 AM (#5999678)
638 is correct. Watching a game on my cell phone is hopeless (bad eyesight). Watching on my computer is possible but not all that enjoyable.
Penalties aren't random. Good teams over time will tend to be positive in penalty differential, and bad teams will be negative. Also playing style matters.
Of the EPL Top 6, all have positive differential over the last 6+ years except Arsenal. Spurs (positive) and Arsenal (negative) are close to even. The others all have significant differential, led by the team that has been best of all, City. That's not a coincidence. Expanding it to top 9, Everton is flat and Leicester highly positive. (Wolves is slightly negative in 2+ years.)
West Ham hasn't had a year with a positive differential in the last 6.5 years. Newcastle is +1 this year but otherwise hasn't been positive in any of the past 6 years. Burnley's been negative every single year but one. All the teams that get relegated each year are generally negative.
One surprise is that Palace has had positive differentials almost every year recently, but they were a decent team not that long ago.
Taking penalties completely out of the analysis of how well a team is likely to perform going forward might be close to as inaccurate as leaving them in without adjustment. The truth is somewhere in between.
Second half was basically a mirror image of the first, this time with Palace doing absolutely nothing. Arsenal couldn't get the goal though, and without any really good chances either way 0-0 seems fair.
Definitely Arsenal's worst performance over the last few games.
I have to admit I expected a lot more from Brighton-Leeds. BHA played really well, I won’t say they parked the bus but they played an organized game, they never really let Leeds have any space especially once they got the lead.
Fulham started overmatched, then came on strong at the end of the half but missed their chances. Pretty disappointing by Chelsea. With Fulham's red at the end of the half it looks like Chelsea is likely off the hook though.
Kind of interesting to see where the seams are in the top 4 leagues, according to 538. Defined as the biggest gaps between consecutive ranks.
EPL:
1. between 19th (Newcastle) and 20th (West Brom) = 9.7
2. between 1st (City) and 2nd (Liverpool) = 5.1
3. between 13th (Wolves) and 14th (Leeds) = 4.1. More of less the line between mid and bottom table teams. Also by 538 Wolves is barely hanging on to midtable. Between 12th (Brighton) and 14th (Leeds) is a gap of 6.3.
LA Liga:
1. between 6th (Sociedad) and 7th (Getafe) = 8.5. Currently there is a very solid top tier in La Liga
2. between 19th (Huesca) and 20th (Elche) = 5.3. They are no West Brom, but Elche have been very bad.
3. between 1st (Barca) and 2nd (Real Madrid) = 4.7. Barca still considered head and shoulders above the others.
4. between 3rd (Atleti) and 4th (Sevilla) = 4.6. La Liga has atop tier within a top tier, along with a top team. According to 538, all the variation is at the very top, with Elche straggling. The other thirteen teams are fairly tightly bunched.
Bundesliga:
1. between 1st (Bayern) and 2nd (Dortmund) = 6.3
2. between 4th (Leverkusen) and 5th (Gladbach) = 4.8. The CL spot race might not be very exciting this year.
3.between 15th (Bremen) and 16th (Koln) = 4.8. Germany also has a bottom tier per 538.
Serie A:
1. between 7th (Lazio) and 8th (Fiorentina) = 5.6
2. between 6th (Roma) and 7th (Lazio) = 4.2. There is a very strong top tier in Serie A, and Lazio is barely hanging on. Between 6th and 8th is a gap of 9.8. Unlike the other top leagues, Serie A does not have a dominant team at the moment per 538.
3. between 14th (Torino) and 15th (Benevento) = 3.6.
649. frannyzoo
Posted: January 16, 2021 at 03:32 PM (#6000132)
My EPL viewing has been spotty for a while now, but this Leicester/Saints 1st half has been the best viewing in that stretch. Countering the counter-attack and vice-versa is fun to watch with quality squads.
Southampton has a serious problem getting good looks from open play. They are near bottom of the table in xG, propped up mostly by JWP's excellence giving them (per understat) 4 set piece goals, which is almost top in the EPL right now, and 3 more direct free kick goals, with only a handful of other teams even having 1.
Lack of ability to generate good looks from open play is holding them back, and probably means they won't end up in the top half of the league this year. (Finishing as high as 7th is possible, but 11th seems more likely.)
Only Burnley and hopeless West Brom have been worse than Southampton at generating xG from open play this year. A few other teams are in the same neighborhood: Sheffield United, Newcastle, Fulham, and Palace. Basically it's the whole bottom tier plus Southampton.
xG on that one will be a slaughter. Good example of how game state doesn't necessarily mean less xGD for the team leading most of the game.
653. spivey 2
Posted: January 17, 2021 at 11:24 AM (#6000178)
Bayern is living an extremely blessed life in the Bundesliga this year. Freiburg just rocketed a shot off the crossbar in extra time that would have tied it up. I think Bayern is only in third in xPoints and maybe even xGD. They aren’t nearly as scary as last year. Their press is way worse, probably because of COVID fixture congestion, and their defense is still just as leaky as it was when the press could justify it.
Edit: Bayern deserved to win, but that was the kind of match that Dortmund has been drawing recently.
United might be slightly lucky not to be down a goal, but their counterattack has made Liverpool uncomfortable despite not getting any shots. So far it's pretty much the game the teams drew up coming in.
538 has Bayern down a bit from the start of the year, and that seems to be well deserved. They had a huge edge in ranking over the other two coming into the year, and a chunk of that is gone now.
by xG the second half was probably won by United, who maybe had the two best chances of the game.
Maybe the "unlikeliest" 0-0 draw of the season, considering the chances created. Only real competition is probably Leeds v Arsenal.
656. spivey 2
Posted: January 18, 2021 at 12:38 PM (#6000277)
We don't talk about Serie A a ton, but there was a very big match between Inter and Juve yesterday.
I watched the first half and the last 10 minutes of the second half, and Inter basically dominated the match. They dominated xG, but also dominated the middle of the pitch and it felt like all of the little moments in the game that could have led to decent chances but didn't were basically on Inter's side as well. Juve are now 7 points back of both Inter and Milan, and both on the eye test and xGD/xPoints, the top 6 of Serie A is all pretty even this year. The results of the top teams against each other have been pretty inconsistent as well. I have a hard time picking a winner, but it's very much in play for Juve to not only not win the league, but also not qualify for Champion's League. They're in 5th, but most importantly, they don't really deserve to be higher.
Juve really don't have a very good midfield, especially without McKennie being fully fit just now. It's kind of outrageous how poor their midfield is based on what they're presumably spending on wages for the collective group.
657. jmurph
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 12:16 PM (#6000524)
In the games I've seen, Napoli and Inter have been the most impressive, but they clearly haven't been consistent enough. I think Juve still has a lot of quality, but you're right that there isn't much separating any of those teams.
I weirdly watch a lot of random Serie A games- like I would never put a Burnley-Brighton game on if I had any other choice, but I'll watch like Genoa-Spezia without thinking. Parma has been my pet team since they came back up, but they look hopeless so far- not sure why the managerial change happened.
Juve remind me of the 2002 Yankees. They are still good but I think there are a lot more names than talent on that roster. I heard a term recently that I like a lot; "donut team." It's a team with former and future stars but no one in their prime (i.e. a hole in the middle like a donut). I think that's Juventus right now.
The game doesn't seem to be called this way, but Vardy came from way offside to try to make a play on the goal kick. He jumped, challenging for it along with a Chelsea defender. The ball went off the Chelsea defender's head straight to a Leicester player (and then straight downfield for the second Leicester goal). If I were in charge of the game, that would be offside.
A Chelsea loss today would be devastating for their top 4 hopes.
661. Mefisto
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 04:05 PM (#6000614)
I don't see how Lampard survives this.
Havertz looks lost out there. H-O looks ineffective (as usual, IMO). The midfield can't get the ball to the forwards, and the defense is leaky.
ETA: Perhaps Abramovich can shift his attention away from (allegedly) murdering dissidents to his team.
662. Mefisto
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 04:14 PM (#6000618)
@660: That's how I saw it too. I was sure VAR would reverse it.
Leverkusen has just beaten Dortmund, which makes both the race for the Bundesliga winner and the race for top 4 less interesting. Who knows though--maybe Leverkusen will challenge for the title. Seems a bit doubtful.
665. Mefisto
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 04:30 PM (#6000623)
My understanding is that you *can* be offside when it's your own goal kick, but not when it's the opposing team.
666. spivey 2
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 06:03 PM (#6000646)
Part of me can't help but feel like Chelsea has been pretty unlucky during Lampard's tenure there. They've underperformed xGD by quite a bit. And the talents they have now, while talented, all mostly like to play in the same spaces and many of them have the same weaknesses, which is unlocking a parked bus. And some of them are just plum overrated, like Chilwell. They also brought in a lot of new talent this year, it was hard to expect it to gel quickly. I think he deserves the whole season, really, but Chelsea have been very, very quick to fire managers.
667. Mefisto
Posted: January 19, 2021 at 10:20 PM (#6000712)
Part of it is luck. As MCOA points out, Chelsea are 4th in xGD. But as he also points out, they're worse this year than last after spending a ton of money.
By betting odds, Chelsea is still expected to have the third most points in the 2nd half of the season, barely ahead of Manchester United and a little bit ahead of Tottenham.
Arsenal and Leicester are even at 6th most projected for the second half. That all pretty closely matches 538's rankings as well, FWIW.
669. manchestermets
Posted: January 20, 2021 at 09:37 AM (#6000764)
Howard felt bad about celebrating even a little bit as it broke the keeper code to celebrate an accidental goal.
edit: Also, here's video of some other long keeper goals. Most feature a bounce over the opposing GK's head. Two from deadballs around the box (so, very similar to a GK, but of course not).
Hard to understand how City isn't up a couple goals already. If this game continues like this, it will put a serious dent in Villa's to date excellent xGD.
Coming into the game, these were the top two teams in non-pen xG per game and xPoints per game (understat). Of course, playing City can put a hurt on that.
By betting odds, in terms of expected quality they were not close, with Villa near the bottom of the midtable pack and City of course top in the league by a good margin. 538 has liked Villa quite a bit more than betting odds--8th after Arsenal and Leicester.
edit: after City ran circles around Villa in the first half, the announcers are spending halftime criticizing City's setup and praising Villa's defense, just because it is still 0-0. It's so stupid.
By 538, 2nd highest combined xG and non-shot xG in a single game by a team. Highest was Manchester United against Leeds, where Leeds decided to play all out offense for the full 90, despite trailing by a lot of goals. edit: highest without a penalty was Chelsea's 3-1 win over Leeds. Leeds is on the short end of a lot of these, in fact.
As far the goal from play, it was pretty clearly not offside the way the rule is written and has always been interpreted. The City player clearly didn't make a play on the ball, or interfered with play in any way, until after the ball was already controlled by the defender. The defender has to know better than that. IF it were a much closer case, such that it was not so clear whether the offensive player was getting involved in the actual receipt of the pass than I would have more sympathy.
There are so many more obvious cases where an offensive player interferes with play due to his offside position, and just because he doesn't touch the ball no offside is given. If we want to broaden the offside rule, let's take care of those first.
ManchesterCity 67.5 (80)
ManchesterUnited 13.5 (11)
Liverpool 9.5 (5)
Leicester 4.5 (2)
Tottenham 3.5 (2)
Field 1.5
Basically, at the halfway point, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal have given up most, all, and all, respectively, of their shares to the other four.
679. The Marksist
Posted: January 21, 2021 at 05:19 PM (#6001078)
Long way to go, but I think that might be it for Liverpool's title hopes this year. I'm not about to complain after the run these last three seasons and COVID doing it's thing, but I am definitely sad about it.
680. spivey 2
Posted: January 21, 2021 at 05:22 PM (#6001081)
The penalty that Burnley got was so, so weak.
Liverpool was long overdue to get some bad results, though. It's amusing how frustrated their fans, players, and Klopp seem. I think they had it so good, they forgot what #### luck several matches in a row felt like.
It's very hard to feel sorry for Liverpool right now, after last year. If it's more of the same next year than we'll talk. By the way, by xPoints (understat), City is still underperforming their results by more than Liverpool, and neither are doing so by a significant margin.
As a (mostly) neutral, would have been a lot more exciting if Liverpool had spread last year's fortune over two seasons instead of one.
682. The Marksist
Posted: January 21, 2021 at 05:50 PM (#6001087)
OK. I will complain: f###ing Burnley, man. What a bunch a sh#thousers. I think I hate Burnley more than I hate United.
683. Mefisto
Posted: January 21, 2021 at 08:19 PM (#6001102)
ManchesterCity 97 (99)
ManchesterUnited 76.5 (80)
Liverpool 72 (66)
Leicester 50 (46)
Tottenham 45 (38)
Chelsea 27 (26)
Everton 12.5 (12)
AstonVilla 6.5 (14)
Arsenal 6 (6)
WestHam 3.5 (8)
Southampton 2.5 (4)
Field 1.5 (1)
The main reason for the differences is that 538 reacts very strongly to recent performance, probably more than is justified. As I've mentioned several times here, one reason they seem to overcompensate for individual games is that they don't do in-season league adjustments.
Betting odds still has hope for West Brom, and hasn't been as impressed with Brighton's great underlying numbers,
686. spivey 2
Posted: January 22, 2021 at 12:27 PM (#6001214)
DeBruyne is out for 4-6 weeks. Of course City is god damn loaded and this probably just means that Bernardo and Foden will play a lot more, I think it does open the door for some other teams. City rely on DeBruyne a lot imo, especially since they've moved to the more pragmatic setups recently with a double pivot and trying to regularly keep 3 defenders back.
I'd be tempted in Vegas to put some money on United.
687. jmurph
Posted: January 22, 2021 at 02:40 PM (#6001251)
Yeah that's rough. I expect no tears to be shed but De Bruyne is clearly their most important player. Should be interesting.
688. jmurph
Posted: January 22, 2021 at 02:47 PM (#6001253)
This is fine as long as they make deals with everyone to carry Peacock:
John Ourand @Ourand_SBJ
NBC has told distributors and some sports leagues that it plans to shut down its NBCSN sports channel by the end of the year. Story coming in SBD
689. The Marksist
Posted: January 22, 2021 at 04:49 PM (#6001273)
I'd be tempted in Vegas to put some money on United.
If I were a gambling man, I'd probably put small bets on United, Leicester, and Tottenham.
About as close as we will get to halfway through the EPL season. Home teams are exactly .500 (71 -43-71).
5 games still delayed. Everton/City, Villa/Everton, Vila/Spurs, Southampton/Leeds, Burnley/Fulham.
Performance so far v. pre-season rating (538 and ELO, normalized for league)
Aston Villa +11.9 +86 (off the charts)
Brighton +5.9 -2 (great underlying stats)
West Ham +5.2 +52
Arsenal +4.1 -10 (538 hated them preseason)
Leeds United +3.5 +30 (same)
Tottenham +3.2 +27 (kind of the same)
Leicester +1.9 +51 (not great underlying stats)
Southampton +1.4 +28
Fulham +1.3 -3
Everton +0.8 +29 (not great underlying stats)
Chelsea +0.3 -1
Manchester City -0.3 -4
Crystal Palace -0.8 +4
Manchester United -1.7 +9 (538 liked them preseason)
Burnley -1.7 -24
Liverpool -2.7 -69 (538 was never super high on them)
Newcastle -4.3 -33
Sheffield United -6.1 -95 (not as bad as their record)
Wolverhampton -6.3 -51
West Brom -8.7 -43 (terrible underlying stats)
Performance so far, by xPoints per game and non-pen xGD per game (understat). Games remaining to round out first half indicated.
xP npxGD
Manchester City 2.19 1.23 (Everton)
Liverpool 1.86 0.74
Chelsea 1.82 0.58
Aston Villa 1.82 0.66 (Spurs, Everton)
Manchester United 1.69 0.37
Leicester 1.67 0.01 +9 in pens
Tottenham 1.60 0.47 (Villa)
Brighton 1.52 0.21
Arsenal 1.50 0.14
West Ham 1.48 0.35
Everton 1.35 0.13 (City, Villa)
Leeds United 1.31 -0.18 (Southampton)
Southampton 1.18 -0.26 (Leeds)
Wolverhampton 1.14 -0.13
Crystal Palace 1.14 -0.38
Fulham 1.09 -0.53 (Burnley)
Sheffield United 0.99 -0.57
Newcastle 0.95 -0.75
Burnley 0.91 -0.49 (Fulham)
West Brom 0.50 -1.38
Expected team strength for second half of the season, measured by expected points to be earned. First betting odds, then 538. Games in hand are noted to put teams in the right order.
remaining points expecte odds 538
Manchester City 46 47 (Everton)
Liverpool 40 37
Chelsea 35 34
Manchester United 35 34
Tottenham 34 33 (Villa)
Arsenal 30 30
Leicester 29 30
Everton 29 27 (City, Villa)
West Ham 27 26
Aston Villa 29 31 (Spurs, Everton)
Wolverhampton 25 23
Southampton 26 26 (Leeds)
Leeds United 25 23 (Southampton)
Brighton 23 25
Crystal Palace 20 21
Burnley 21 22 (Fulham)
Fulham 21 21 (Burnley)
Sheffield United 17 18
West Brom 17 14
Newcastle 16 17
Total 545 539
Betting futures odds, as usual, very slightly inflate team totals, as optimistic fans tend to bet on their own teams. Probably should subtract close to an average of 0.5 points for all betting odds numbers above.
Doing that, biggest disagreements are Liverpool and West Brom (betting odds likes both much better) and Brighton and Villa (betting odds likes both much worse). Not too surprising for West Brom and Villa, since their performance so far has been off opposite ends of the charts and is likely to regress quite a bit. Also, betting odds hasn't been a total believer in Liverpool's mediocrity, or Brighton's excellence (relatively speaking, of course).
Brentford is playing a bunch of backups against Leicester. Saving it for the Championship race probably, where they are still angling for auto-promotion. It does put a damper on the FA cup though.
694. Mefisto
Posted: January 24, 2021 at 09:41 AM (#6001447)
I personally don't care about the FA Cup and always root for United to be eliminated as quickly as possible. I'm sure this puts me in a significant minority.
695. Mefisto
Posted: January 24, 2021 at 09:57 AM (#6001449)
I personally don't care about the FA Cup and always root for United to be eliminated as quickly as possible. I'm sure this puts me in a significant minority.
ETA: I think managers fail to rest their players often enough and that scheduling so many games, especially close together, is bad for the players (and the team, eventually). My distaste for cup games stems from prioritizing the competitions. Because I'm a fan of a (usually) top 4 team, the CL is more significant to me and that makes the league finish important also. The rest just interferes with those priorities.
If I were a fan of, say, West Ham or Everton or a similar team, I'd prioritize the FA Cup because the CL isn't available.
If teams rotated their players better (and tbf, Solskjaer is decent at that), I'd be happy to enjoy all the various cups.
Whether or not you like the FA Cup, this game has been pretty exciting so far. United has probably had more chances, even.
697. spivey 2
Posted: January 24, 2021 at 12:57 PM (#6001460)
Yeah, I've enjoyed this game quite a bit. The cups have grown on me. There's certainly, for the top teams, kind of this no-man's land of the cups where you're kind of early on and draw a good team, do you rotate or not. Tottenham did that in the EFL when they got Chelsea kind of early on, then had a couple of weaker teams, and now in the final I would expect them to play their best team.
Today, both teams are playing a lot of their starters and playing with good effort.
I agree that top teams should rotate more in the cups, but I don't think that means they don't matter. Top teams should have top players on the bench that should be hungry for more minutes and to try to win a starting spot.
Brentford is an interesting situation, and I suppose makes some sense since the financial windfall of making the EPL is so large, and they just barely missed out last year despite probably being one of the 3 best teams. That said, that match was fairly interesting too. Their second team outplayed Leicester's strong lineup in the first half, before Leicester played a very strong second half.
I generally enjoy the Cups immensely. The one off nature creates a drama which perhaps is artificial but drama nonetheless and there always seems to be a greater atmosphere than regular league games.
Also a proposed rule change: no keeper is allowed to yell “AWAY!” On a corner kick. Ever.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I'm not so sure on this one, because the Gladbach defender appeared to intentionally, specifically try to touch the ball with his hand. That's very rare, so (if you think that was the intent) even the most mild of actual contact is rightfully a penalty and a yellow.
Witsel looked to have a non-contact injury that could have been an achilles, and was replaced by Emre Can. Can is much more athletic and progressive than Witsel, and they've been much better winning the midfield battle and pressing. Of course that's not just him, but I do think the double pivot of Delaney/Witsel isn't dynamic enough and holds them back against top teams.
Anyways, the first 20 minutes of this second half have been all Dortmund, and they've collected a few high xG chances. And now Dani Olmo did a beautiful feint to create space and got a good shot off that hit the post as well. Fun second half so far. Big match for both teams, of course.
Still, all of it seems higher quality than Joe Hart, who almost gifted Marine a goal on a decent attempt from 35 yards from a plumbing student at the local college.
Marine's shorts are being sponsored by Cartilage Free Captain (which is a little weird, but cool in the amount CFC raised for Marine and charity for the privilege).
It does not seem that Spurs will be going the way of Leeds; even Joe Hart can't muck it up at this point, I imagine ...
I'm not sure if that's worse, or Derby losing 2-0 and getting thoroughly outplayed by 6th tier Chorley. Seriously, Chorley had 19 shots, 6 on-target - compared to 2 (1) for Derby. Chorley is in the National League North, which I understand is semi-pro level.
I learned after the fact that Derby were basically playing their U-23 team. Apparently due to COVID they were missing their entire first team and something like 9 of the 11 starters were making their full squad debut. Chorley actually were favored by the bookies in the immediate run up to the game.
Speaking of pandemic magic, Tottenham is having their Wednesday Villa match rescheduled to be Fulham. They were supposed to play Fulham last week, but Scott Parker said - I think reasonably - that he would have set up his team differently in the FA cup if they knew they had a mid-week match.
Tottenham's schedule is extremely crowded and will stay like that for a while given we should at least expect them to get past their first knockout match in the Europa League. Part of me does feel like the burden for rescheduling should be a little bit more on the team that had the COVID outbreak, but I need to think about that a bit more.
Anyways, between now and when the players get the vaccine in England, I think it's going to be a mess. Same for the NBA, stateside.
I'm inclined to think he's fallen back into a lump with your Lewandowskis, Mbappes, etc.
I actually think Kevin DeBruyne may be the best player in the world now. He's been the best midfielder for a couple of years. But this year his xG+A/90 is over 1. It was about 1 last year. And while he does occasionally play as an attacking midfielder or false 9, he most commonly plays as a box-to-box midfielder who seems to take the defensive side of the game pretty seriously.
Despite many years now of watching high level soccer I'm still GOALS! biased enough to think that there must be someone better than KDB because he's not a big scorer. That said, as a City fan, I'm very aware of his importance to them.
Which I think is basically what Mefisto is saying but with a little more certainty about where he fits into the mix.
Weirdly, the announcer (Neville?) repeated over and over again that Shaw "missed the ball", which was very clearly not the case. Follow-through was high though and justly a foul, so it was probably the right call to not let the DOGSO stand. They must have decided it would have been DOGSO or there would be no reason to give the Shaw foul to reverse it. IOW, Burnley was very close to being down a man.
And now Maguire gets a goal reversed on a marginal call. If they hadn't given it on the field probably no way VAR reverses. Maybe it's Burnley's day.
Yes, at last. We needed that.
West Brom 0 - 4 Arsenal
Villa 3 - 0 Palace
ManU 6 -2 Leeds
Chelsea 3 - 1 Leeds
Liverpool 3 - 0 Leicester
edit: Spurs for a while were way up on their xPoints. They've given most of that back with some "hard luck" results and now are only slightly ahead of even.
It probably wouldn't surprise anyone that ManU, leading the league, has been out-resulting their underlying xG. Two teams right there with them (slightly ahead, actually, per understat) are Everton and Southampton.
1 on NBCSN, 3 on Peacock.
Well anyone can get it on their computers/phones. But it's still not available on Amazon devices, which is a pretty sizable share of the streaming market.
Of the EPL Top 6, all have positive differential over the last 6+ years except Arsenal. Spurs (positive) and Arsenal (negative) are close to even. The others all have significant differential, led by the team that has been best of all, City. That's not a coincidence. Expanding it to top 9, Everton is flat and Leicester highly positive. (Wolves is slightly negative in 2+ years.)
West Ham hasn't had a year with a positive differential in the last 6.5 years. Newcastle is +1 this year but otherwise hasn't been positive in any of the past 6 years. Burnley's been negative every single year but one. All the teams that get relegated each year are generally negative.
One surprise is that Palace has had positive differentials almost every year recently, but they were a decent team not that long ago.
Taking penalties completely out of the analysis of how well a team is likely to perform going forward might be close to as inaccurate as leaving them in without adjustment. The truth is somewhere in between.
It's maddening. I almost literally never use Peacock, just pay for it every month for kicks.
Bellerin must be the only player who still tucks in his shirt. Has he always done that?
Definitely Arsenal's worst performance over the last few games.
EPL:
1. between 19th (Newcastle) and 20th (West Brom) = 9.7
2. between 1st (City) and 2nd (Liverpool) = 5.1
3. between 13th (Wolves) and 14th (Leeds) = 4.1. More of less the line between mid and bottom table teams. Also by 538 Wolves is barely hanging on to midtable. Between 12th (Brighton) and 14th (Leeds) is a gap of 6.3.
LA Liga:
1. between 6th (Sociedad) and 7th (Getafe) = 8.5. Currently there is a very solid top tier in La Liga
2. between 19th (Huesca) and 20th (Elche) = 5.3. They are no West Brom, but Elche have been very bad.
3. between 1st (Barca) and 2nd (Real Madrid) = 4.7. Barca still considered head and shoulders above the others.
4. between 3rd (Atleti) and 4th (Sevilla) = 4.6. La Liga has atop tier within a top tier, along with a top team. According to 538, all the variation is at the very top, with Elche straggling. The other thirteen teams are fairly tightly bunched.
Bundesliga:
1. between 1st (Bayern) and 2nd (Dortmund) = 6.3
2. between 4th (Leverkusen) and 5th (Gladbach) = 4.8. The CL spot race might not be very exciting this year.
3.between 15th (Bremen) and 16th (Koln) = 4.8. Germany also has a bottom tier per 538.
Serie A:
1. between 7th (Lazio) and 8th (Fiorentina) = 5.6
2. between 6th (Roma) and 7th (Lazio) = 4.2. There is a very strong top tier in Serie A, and Lazio is barely hanging on. Between 6th and 8th is a gap of 9.8. Unlike the other top leagues, Serie A does not have a dominant team at the moment per 538.
3. between 14th (Torino) and 15th (Benevento) = 3.6.
Lack of ability to generate good looks from open play is holding them back, and probably means they won't end up in the top half of the league this year. (Finishing as high as 7th is possible, but 11th seems more likely.)
Edit: Bayern deserved to win, but that was the kind of match that Dortmund has been drawing recently.
538 has Bayern down a bit from the start of the year, and that seems to be well deserved. They had a huge edge in ranking over the other two coming into the year, and a chunk of that is gone now.
Maybe the "unlikeliest" 0-0 draw of the season, considering the chances created. Only real competition is probably Leeds v Arsenal.
I watched the first half and the last 10 minutes of the second half, and Inter basically dominated the match. They dominated xG, but also dominated the middle of the pitch and it felt like all of the little moments in the game that could have led to decent chances but didn't were basically on Inter's side as well. Juve are now 7 points back of both Inter and Milan, and both on the eye test and xGD/xPoints, the top 6 of Serie A is all pretty even this year. The results of the top teams against each other have been pretty inconsistent as well. I have a hard time picking a winner, but it's very much in play for Juve to not only not win the league, but also not qualify for Champion's League. They're in 5th, but most importantly, they don't really deserve to be higher.
Juve really don't have a very good midfield, especially without McKennie being fully fit just now. It's kind of outrageous how poor their midfield is based on what they're presumably spending on wages for the collective group.
I weirdly watch a lot of random Serie A games- like I would never put a Burnley-Brighton game on if I had any other choice, but I'll watch like Genoa-Spezia without thinking. Parma has been my pet team since they came back up, but they look hopeless so far- not sure why the managerial change happened.
A Chelsea loss today would be devastating for their top 4 hopes.
Havertz looks lost out there. H-O looks ineffective (as usual, IMO). The midfield can't get the ball to the forwards, and the defense is leaky.
ETA: Perhaps Abramovich can shift his attention away from (allegedly) murdering dissidents to his team.
Leverkusen has just beaten Dortmund, which makes both the race for the Bundesliga winner and the race for top 4 less interesting. Who knows though--maybe Leverkusen will challenge for the title. Seems a bit doubtful.
Arsenal and Leicester are even at 6th most projected for the second half. That all pretty closely matches 538's rankings as well, FWIW.
Until a few years ago, it wasn't possible to score directly from a goal kick. But that has now changed, and last night someone did!
I could have sworn Tim Howard did this like a decade or so ago?
Howard felt bad about celebrating even a little bit as it broke the keeper code to celebrate an accidental goal.
edit: Also, here's video of some other long keeper goals. Most feature a bounce over the opposing GK's head. Two from deadballs around the box (so, very similar to a GK, but of course not).
Coming into the game, these were the top two teams in non-pen xG per game and xPoints per game (understat). Of course, playing City can put a hurt on that.
By betting odds, in terms of expected quality they were not close, with Villa near the bottom of the midtable pack and City of course top in the league by a good margin. 538 has liked Villa quite a bit more than betting odds--8th after Arsenal and Leicester.
edit: after City ran circles around Villa in the first half, the announcers are spending halftime criticizing City's setup and praising Villa's defense, just because it is still 0-0. It's so stupid.
As far the goal from play, it was pretty clearly not offside the way the rule is written and has always been interpreted. The City player clearly didn't make a play on the ball, or interfered with play in any way, until after the ball was already controlled by the defender. The defender has to know better than that. IF it were a much closer case, such that it was not so clear whether the offensive player was getting involved in the actual receipt of the pass than I would have more sympathy.
There are so many more obvious cases where an offensive player interferes with play due to his offside position, and just because he doesn't touch the ball no offside is given. If we want to broaden the offside rule, let's take care of those first.
Basically, at the halfway point, Liverpool, Chelsea, and Arsenal have given up most, all, and all, respectively, of their shares to the other four.
Liverpool was long overdue to get some bad results, though. It's amusing how frustrated their fans, players, and Klopp seem. I think they had it so good, they forgot what #### luck several matches in a row felt like.
As a (mostly) neutral, would have been a lot more exciting if Liverpool had spread last year's fortune over two seasons instead of one.
The main reason for the differences is that 538 reacts very strongly to recent performance, probably more than is justified. As I've mentioned several times here, one reason they seem to overcompensate for individual games is that they don't do in-season league adjustments.
Betting odds still has hope for West Brom, and hasn't been as impressed with Brighton's great underlying numbers,
I'd be tempted in Vegas to put some money on United.
If I were a gambling man, I'd probably put small bets on United, Leicester, and Tottenham.
5 games still delayed. Everton/City, Villa/Everton, Vila/Spurs, Southampton/Leeds, Burnley/Fulham.
Performance so far v. pre-season rating (538 and ELO, normalized for league)
Betting futures odds, as usual, very slightly inflate team totals, as optimistic fans tend to bet on their own teams. Probably should subtract close to an average of 0.5 points for all betting odds numbers above.
Doing that, biggest disagreements are Liverpool and West Brom (betting odds likes both much better) and Brighton and Villa (betting odds likes both much worse). Not too surprising for West Brom and Villa, since their performance so far has been off opposite ends of the charts and is likely to regress quite a bit. Also, betting odds hasn't been a total believer in Liverpool's mediocrity, or Brighton's excellence (relatively speaking, of course).
ETA: I think managers fail to rest their players often enough and that scheduling so many games, especially close together, is bad for the players (and the team, eventually). My distaste for cup games stems from prioritizing the competitions. Because I'm a fan of a (usually) top 4 team, the CL is more significant to me and that makes the league finish important also. The rest just interferes with those priorities.
If I were a fan of, say, West Ham or Everton or a similar team, I'd prioritize the FA Cup because the CL isn't available.
If teams rotated their players better (and tbf, Solskjaer is decent at that), I'd be happy to enjoy all the various cups.
Today, both teams are playing a lot of their starters and playing with good effort.
I agree that top teams should rotate more in the cups, but I don't think that means they don't matter. Top teams should have top players on the bench that should be hungry for more minutes and to try to win a starting spot.
Brentford is an interesting situation, and I suppose makes some sense since the financial windfall of making the EPL is so large, and they just barely missed out last year despite probably being one of the 3 best teams. That said, that match was fairly interesting too. Their second team outplayed Leicester's strong lineup in the first half, before Leicester played a very strong second half.
Also a proposed rule change: no keeper is allowed to yell “AWAY!” On a corner kick. Ever.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main