|
|
|
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Phillies trade for Cristian Pache, put Rhys Hoskins on 60-day IL (4 - 11:58am, Mar 31)Last: Anthony22Newsblog: Minor leaguers, MLB reach tentative deal on 1st CBA, sources say (14 - 11:56am, Mar 31)Last: DarrenNewsblog: Shohei Ohtani uses PitchCom in opener, K's 10 in Angels loss (1 - 11:23am, Mar 31)Last: Harmon "Thread Killer" MicrobrewNewsblog: Sioux City Rep. J.D. Scholten pitches legislative ban on MLB television blackouts in Iowa (6 - 11:08am, Mar 31)Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)Sox Therapy: Over/Under (76 - 10:56am, Mar 31)Last: Bad FishNewsblog: 2023 NBA Regular Season Thread (1372 - 9:54am, Mar 31)Last:  TFTIO was writing C programs in the '90sNewsblog: Justin Verlander: Mets place star pitcher on IL hours before opener with muscle strain (5 - 9:53am, Mar 31)Last: kirstie819Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for Opening Week 2023! (170 - 9:23am, Mar 31)Last:  The DukeNewsblog: 2023 MLB predictions: Wild Cards, Playoffs, World Series, more (18 - 4:52pm, Mar 30)Last: My name is Votto, and I love to get MoppoNewsblog: Masyn Winn’s confidence high after sublime camp with Cardinals: ‘I think I belong up here’ (12 - 4:02pm, Mar 30)Last: PerrySox Therapy: Yoshida In The Spotlight (39 - 3:32pm, Mar 30)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: Amazon announces 20 New York Yankees games on Prime this season, commence the complaining (1 - 2:47pm, Mar 30)Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMcNewsblog: The Official Mets Fan Self-Immolation Thread (994 - 2:23pm, Mar 30)Last:  LassusNewsblog: All 30 MLB stadiums, ranked: 2023 edition (58 - 12:36pm, Mar 30)Last: Howie MenckelHall of Merit: Reranking Right Fielders: Results (34 - 2:55am, Mar 30)Last: bjhanke
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
538 had it as a negative performance by Arsenal. Considering the setting, the team quality, and the chances by Bournemouth, it was overall subpar by Arsenal.
That said, check out the non-shot xG: 4.1-0.4. That's really insane--maybe the most lopsided of any EPL game this year, and certainly one of the top few most lopsided.
edit: by 538, only once this year has a team had more than 4.1 non-shot xG, when City lost at home to Brentford 1-2 in a somewhat similar game. (Except, that City lost when Brentford scored the last second winner instead of the other way around, and Brentford had a ton of low xG shots, many from outside the area, racking up high overall shot xG).
Well, yeah. This is a match that should have been a 2-0 gimme, had the team played even okay. It was a bad(ish) match with a good result. It's also the case that Bournemouth took four shots and scored two goals. Had one corner and scored off of it. Completed 184 passes to Arsenal's 740. Had a pass completion percentage of 57 to Arsenal's 88.
Football, like baseball, is a tough game in which the best team doesn't always win -- in which the team that plays best doesn't always win. But that's not what happened today. Bournemouth almost lucked its way into a huge upset. Arsenal lucked its way into a win it deserved, both on team quality and quality of play.
They have been very weak today though, and that's definitely a worse sign than merely losing all then points at Anfield.
By quality, betting odds has them in the chasing pack of four teams, after City, then Arsenal/Liverpool. That's probably where they are, 7-0 or no.
Liverpool when they put it together is still better than any team in the league except City. After today they likely will be projected as slightly better than Arsenal for the last third of the season.
edit: GD coming into play at the end of the season is very unlikely, but due to this single game Liverpool likely will win a GD showdown against any team they would be level with on points, and United would likely lose one.
edit:
EPL winner odds:
It's even more due to Liverpool's first win of the season.
Fulham is already down today though--already gave up 2 big chances and a goal (on a third chance), all in the first 6 minutes.
And no, Fulham/Arsenal is not a matchup of two top-half teams.
FWIW, you can see on the previous page (post 67) that betting odds seems to think West Ham is a top half team, and Villa is right on the borderline. 538 thinks those two are 10th/11th currently, so smack midtable, with West Ham ahead of Villa. For the game itself, West Ham is 44% to win, with Villa at 28%. That's slightly above HFA advantage in the prem, implying again that West Ham is just slightly better this weekend.
By ELO, Villa is in the top half, just barely, with West Ham out of course since they have a poor record this year. Not by much though.
There are 7 teams that are pretty clearly worse than both of them. I'd throw Leicester and Leicester in there too, especially as compared to West Ham. That just leaves Brentford, who have played so well this year but had low expectations coming in, so are a bit hard to peg.
edit: well Chelsea really should have been in front already, but I would have very much preferred it had happened some other way.
Oh, I was just glancing at the table.
edit: Chelse had just the one shot after taking the lead in the 53rd minute, from way outside the box. Dortmund had at least 10, and about 0.75 xG after that. Chelsea survived, but Potter has to think about how to play better in these situations. The same thing happened when Chelsea won against Leeds last weekend, also going ahead very early in the second after totally dominating Leeds for 50+ minutes. Chelsea were very lucky that they managed to not allow a goal over the two games in that scenario.
I'd have them as 5th-7th best of the last 16, after City/Bayern/RealMadrid/Liverpool, around PSG/Napoli, and ahead of Dortmund/Leipzig/Tottenham/Inter/Milan and Benfica/Porto/Frankfurt and Brugge.
FWIW, 538 has them as #11 in the world, and 8th of the final 16 CL teams, behind both PSG and Napoli, but also Leipzig.
I have no problem with this rule in general. You have to have a bright line here in my view. It just rarely comes up because the ball fairly seldom comes back into play off the GK or post in the first place, only some players encroach on any given kick, and the ball has to come back into play to one of them where the outcome is affected (either by the defense clearing or the offense scoring). On the other hand, when there is a stutter step involved it starts getting really annoying because the kicker has effectively also fooled the defenders into encroaching.
If the defending team enters the box:
Missed Kick - Retake
Made Kick - Goal
If attacking team enters box:
Missed Kick - Indirect free kick for defense
Made Kick - Retake
If both teams enter the box:
Retake kick no matter outcome
Doesn't appear to matter who touches it after. It would just be nice if they call it consistently both ways.
While the ball was cleared by one of the Dortmund players that encroached, there was not a Chelsea player there that looked like they would have been able to play the ball. So probably should not have been given.
Four Dortmund players encroached and one Chelsea player did as well. None of the encroachment by the others were at all relevant to the call except for the one Dortmund player who cleared the ball.
The Nets had very, very good title futures odds, better than Boston, basically right up until they played each other, and Boston was favored in the individual games, even though, IIRC the Nets still had better title odds at most books.
IOW, I do wonder if the amount of money already bet on some of these season-long bets makes them drift less than we'd expect (and there is a lot of juice in these, so that's probably less exploitable since sharps aren't playing them).
The reason I bring this up is I just don't see how Chelsea should be considered equal in quality to Napoli.
The EPL is much better than Serie A also, and Chelsea is currently viewed as the 4th best team in the EPL.
538 is similar to this, had them also as basically even in November, and had Chelsea as significantly better in August. I don’t think there is really anything special going on here. There are definitely other situations where odds look more surprising.
edit: well probably no matter, as Bayern have scored off a PSG mistake. PSG was looking pretty good today in the first half, but in the second so far not so much.
This has just been a very lopsided game from the start. Betis was not ready to compete today. United trying to get back all the xG they lost to Liverpool.
The only favorite that did not win at home was Union Berlin, who should have won.
Salah missed anyway.
Liverpool/Tottenham/Newcastle are back in a virtual tie for CL spot hopes again.
Or not.
And should have immediately yielded one.
EDIT: There it is. I would estimate that there is a roughly 0% chance that Palace is going to be able to score.
I agree that under the current rules it is a clear penalty. I just happen to think it's a stupid fucking rule.
Though I was thinking about Arsenal's roster v. City's. Who in Arsenal's first team could crack City's? Saka could push Foden, maybe. Odegaard isn't going to displace De Bruyne, though he could give Silva a run for his money. Really -- Saliba, I guess? We already know Zinchenko and Gabriel Jesus were seen as surplus by Guardiola & co.
United will have a hard time winning this one now.
As sometimes happens in these situations though, the opposite from what you would expect has happened. United has looked far more aggressive and frankly better down to 10, and Southampton now looks overly cautious after a bright start at even strength.
fbref has them as close to but not last (once you factor out penalties and take into account the games today). I think only Bournemouth will be worse after today. Bournemouth has a much lower total xGD, because Bournemouth has been especially bad at giving up penalties. So, to the extent you actually think penalties should not be completely ignored but just regressed somewhat (and I do think this), then Bournemouth has still been significantly worse than Fulham, in xGD at least.
edit: Fulham is +3 in penalties called for/against. Among the bottom half of the league in non-pen xGD, only Southampton is positive in this category, at +1. All others are flat or negative.
Top 4 odds:
Top 6 odds:
Relegation odds:
Because everyone loves FM stories...one of my national teams got robbed (to me, anyway) of WC qualification even with the expanded format. Went 5-2-1 in the group and that wasn't one of the best second-place teams!
Three Serie A teams likely to make the quarters now. Not sure when that last happened. (edit: 2005-2006, with Juve, Inter, and Milan. None of the three reached the final.) Since that year, they only ever only had two in the quarters two other times, once the very next year, and another time in I think 2014-2015.
It's been a very good year for Italian teams in Europe. By ELO, German and English teams have also exceeded expectations, though not by as much, while Spanish teams have done poorly.
With the exception of Benfica, these are actually very similar to 538.
And DeBruyne probably actually had an even better game. He was very good.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main