Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Sunday, November 28, 2021
Champions League Group Stage End - December 7/8
MLS Cup - December 11
Champions League Knockout Stage Draw - December 13
Women’s Champions League Group Stage End - December 15
One Year to World Cup Final - December 18
Women’s Champions League Knockout Stage Draw - December 20
FA Cup Third Round - January 8
CONCACAF World Cup Qualifiers Window - January 27-February 2
EFL Cup Final - February 27
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
United looked pretty weak today to Championship-bound Norwich. The game was in the rain on the road, but not much to get excited about except de Gea.
Arsenal looked good again. Probably they are back on top of the mini-league xGD table. 538 currently has them as ahead of West Ham and just behind United for best of the rest (i.e., 4th best) in the EPL. The gap from the top 7 to #8 in betting odds keeps increasing weekly as well.
Palace continues to impress, AND they have Southampton, Watford, and Norwich to round out the first half of the season.
Arsenal faces West Ham midweek.
Benfica vs. Real Madrid
Villarreal vs. Manchester City
Atletico Madrid vs. Bayern Munich
FC Salzburg vs. Liverpool
Inter Milan vs. Ajax
Sporting CP vs. Juventus
Chelsea vs. Lille
Paris Saint-Germain vs. Manchester United
Barcelona vs Napoli
RB Leipzig vs Real Sociedad
Porto vs Lazio
FC Zenit vs Real Betis
Borussia Dortmund vs Rangers
Atalanta vs Olympiakos
Sevilla FC vs Dinamo Zagreb
FC Sheriff Tiraspol vs Sporting Braga
Rough order of intrigue, above (by talent). Sheriff/Braga are almost the two least fancied teams in the whole tournament, so Sheriff may even make the round of 16 (nah).
At this point is Barca looking at winning the EL as their best path to the CL for next year?
Marseille v Qarabağ
PSV Eindhoven v Maccabi Tel Aviv
Fenerbahçe v Slavia Prague
Midtjylland v PAOK
Leicester City v Randers
Celtic Scotland v Bodø/Glimt
Sparta Prague v Partizan
Rapid Wien v Tottenham Hotspur or Vitesse
538 is lower on Barca than betting odds is, but their ratio is the same. 43% via the league, 9% via Europa.
Salzburg v Bayern Munich
Sporting v Man City
Benfica v Ajax
Chelsea v Lille
Atlético v Man United
Villarreal v Juventus
Inter v Liverpool
PSG v Real Madrid
The first 4 matchups above will not be given close odds. The last 4 are more compelling.
Sporting/City is most fancied v least fancied. Salzburg/Bayern isn't that much better.
Absolutely, but they look worse this year. There's a lot of standing around from those front 3 when the other team has the ball.
The only team I wanted to avoid as a Liverpool fan was PSG. They can randomly put 4 past anyone because Mbappé and they're just super annoying, crowding the ref, complaining about every little thing, rolling around on the ground, etc. As it stands, I'm fine with Inter. Liverpool are better, the San Siro is awesome, should be interesting!
The first time doesn't really matter. You have to draw somebody the first time around. Like rolling a pair of threes is 1/36 odds. But rolling a pair is only 1/6. At those kind of odds, chances are somebody in the draw was going to repeat.
I do find it amusing that Madrid seems annoyed they didn't get to keep Benfica.
Liverpool is a bit more heavily favored than I thought they would be, and Ajax a bit less. 538's odds are pretty similar, though they would put Atleti at 60% over United, and RealMadrid at 55% over PSG (so, basically, would reverse the favorites on these). They also like Inter a lot more than betting odds, giving Liverpool an only 68% chance. 538 really likes Liverpool overall, so the difference must be the view on Inter.
Revised (post-draw) betting odds to lift the trophy.
I meant Chelsea/Lille specifically, because Lille was by far the least fancied of the pot 1 teams and Chelses/PSG were by far the most fancied of the pot 2 teams. Basically Lille was below average for a pot 2 team (had they been in pot 2). Chelsea also gave away winning the group in extra time of round 6, and it looks like it didn't cost them. PSG, the other overqualified pot 2 team, just weren't good enough to keep up with City, so it's the group draw way back when that basically cost them a pot 1 spot and put them into this tough matchup with RealMadrid, not their group play.
In the end, only 5 of the ex-CL teams are favored. Porto is not even favorites to Lazio, which is surprising to me. Zenit and especially Sheriff being underdogs is not surprising. The odds here are pretty similar to 538, with the extremely notable exception of Porto, which 538 likes at 76%. 538 generally has loved Porto this year and hates Lazio, so it's a double whammy. It's not just 538 either... traditional ELO (no xG involvement) has also been very high on Porto and very low on Lazio. And it's not just a mistake or a quirk of the matchup. Each team is currently being given very similar odds to win the whole thing, so are being considered more or less equal.
These track 538 very well except for Porto and Lazio. Also 538 loves Leipzig but betting odds are lukewarm on them.
For some real excitement, there's the best of the rest. Arsenal hosts West Ham today for mini-league xG bragging rights. Oh, and if that doesn't do it for you, both teams are currently projected by betting odds to get right around 60 points this year, so the winner will have a big leg up on the loser for top 4, by odds trailing only United and Tottenham for the last spot, and a much better shot at Europa rather than ECL (if caring about that is a real thing).
Arsenal is at home, so are favorites. They are also a couple points behind in the table with a slightly harder schedule, so are considered to be the slightly better team anyway. 538 also thinks they are very slightly better.
It's going to be interesting (read: shitty) to watch Omicron do it's things to winter sports this year. Especially if the projections I'd read earlier in the year are accurate about the number of unvaxxed soccer players in Europe/England.
NBA is dealing with this too. I think it's really going to affect the product. There's no more room for matches, even the non-Europe teams have shitloads of fixtures here around Christmas. I think they're going to just force teams to play with heavily weakened squads. I suspect there may be a team or two who gets lucky not having their best players get affected, but mostly it's going to benefit the very deep (and 100% vaccinated) teams.
ETA: It's odd because they did postpone the United/Brentford game yesterday.
Personally, I'd forfeit teams which can't play like the NFL.
Brighton up to their old tricks today.
Of course the big story is Arsenal has been all over West Ham, and are just now up a man. Missed the associated PK though, so West Ham still has a chance, even if it's pretty small.
I have a feeling it won't be the last.
I wonder if the PL will have to declare a time out to let this wave pass.
Manchester United Brighton
Southampton Brentford
Watford Palace
West Ham Norwich
Everton Leicester
The only English team left in the competition is Arsenal, who conceded four goals in three separate group stage matches.
So, the real questions are: is Chelsea much better than Wolfsburg and/or Juventus, and did they drop points in the head to head games where they really should have won? Very hard for me to know, without having watched the games.
Looking at the basic stats, they came from two goals behind in the 3-3 home draw to Wolfsburg, had a lot more possession and slightly more shots. Seems like they may have been better but it's not at all a slam dunk. On the other hand, the Juve draw seems to have been quite a disappointment, with Chelsea having all the possession and outshooting Juve 25-2. Wow.
I'm assuming they were outplayed in the 4-0 loss to Wolfsburg, but the statline seems to indicate it was at least a lot closer than the scoreline.
To make matters worse, it looks like Wolfsburg may have been the better team than Juve across the other two relevant group games, where they faced each other, but only managed a single point. Based on group performance, looking only at the stats, Juve seems to have been easily the weakest of the 3 teams.
All in all, yeah, seems like Chelsea really should have been one of the two teams to advance.
Betting odds actually really liked Leeds (relatively speaking) pre-season, but have gone way down on them, understandably, since they've been bad this year.
By clubelo, Arsenal is now a top 10 team in the world. 538 has them 12th, also behind Barca, Atleti, and Dortmund, but ahead of United. Those rankings might be overstating things a bit, but the reality is overall Arsenal has played very well since the beginning of September, and it's showing up in their ratings.
(Yes, Leeds had injuries today, but they were blown off the field at home. Injuries or no that's a strong showing by Arsenal and a poor one by Leeds.)
This was certainly the group with the strongest third team, but Juve are still a major step behind the true top teams in the world. They're good enough to put themselves in a position to get lucky, which they did.
Chelsea's squad is much better than Wolfsburg's. Not that Wolfsburg is bad, but Chelsea's squad is ridiculous. But Chelsea routinely underperform in Europe, often by huge margins. They were thoroughly outplayed by Wolfsburg last year in the quarterfinals but somehow advanced 5-1 on aggregate. One of the craziest ties I've ever seen TBH.
I personally think a big part of their problem in Europe is (lack of) coaching. This is not a very popular opinion in English media--where Emma Hayes is treated like the women's game equivalent of SAF--but it seems pretty clear to me.
On the other side of the coin, two big calls went Spurs' way which would have really changed the game. Horror tackle by Kane, and he was lucky to miss the Liverpool player. He should have been sent off. Then, Liverpool player got barged into through the back in the box. Not at all shoulder to shoulder since the Spurs defender had to go directly through the player.
edit: "in past years" might have been just for the first year of VAR.
And it's given! Klopp will not be happy after this one!
For Spurs part, they are at home, up a man, and have been playing really well. No way they are going to be happy settling for a draw now.
Props to Spurs for clearly having a game plan and executing it very well. On the flip side, Liverpool probably squeaks it if Alisson doesn't whiff on that clearance.
You know who else is good? Antonio Conte.
What I will say with confidence is James Maddison is very very very very good.
538 and ELO have Arsenal as a top 10 team now. Spurs are moving up as well, and would be very close, or right there, under both those systems if they had taken the ECL a little more seriously.
A bit of both, imo.
First goal probably doesn't happen without the slip from Laporte. Dias misplayed the situation and let Maddison skip by him. Their defenders are pretty aggressive and given how they play, individual mistakes can cost them goals. Second goal is a bit concerning, but had some inch perfect dribbling and passing. A press-heavy team is always vulnerable to a goal like that. Third goal was just a really good long range shot that set up the rebound.
Bayern have games like this occasionally, and Liverpool just gave up a ton of xG to Tottenham (though without Van Dijk).
Anyways, Chelsea just drew Brighton at home and didn't look great doing it. Chelsea's looked very beatable the last several games. They're still clearly in a tier of their own as the 3rd best team, imo, but they've been playing more like the rest of the teams fighting for 4th than a title contender for a while now.
I can see why the goal after the Forster mistake was called off, as Doherty did appear to bump him without playing the ball. I still can't fathom how that Kane goal was determined to be offside.
Oh, and since you brought up xG, yeah Spurs put up around 3 xG which I'm pretty sure doesn't count those disallowed goals at all.
One more note - watching Doherty play was so weird because everything he did seemed to be at half speed.
As far as I could tell, Laporte had one called back because his arm was offside.
Oh, and I just started playing CM 01/02 again and it's so much fun. Football Manager in it's current form is way too in depth for someone with a family to delve into.
Southampton, Everton, and Brentford were all slightly negative on non-pen xGD, so did not make the list.
They've had at least 2 xG in 6 out of 7 Conte games (only the first game against Everton was a miss). They didn't have 2 xG in a single game before Conte took over.
edit: and finally the goal. Arsenal played so well but not so smartly. Looked great with 10 men as well and City needed a bit of luck to get their good chance for the goal.
Didn't watch the match but looks like a really good performance by Arsenal. Arsenal and Tottenham both look very good. United have the best squad, which is why they've got the best betting odds, but they really are going to need to put it together soon I think to finish 4th.
One big upgrade for Tottenham I'd like to see is RB. Emerson really is not very capable of beating guys off the dribble or even just creating a half yard of space with pace. They better give Conte what he wants.
Would Frenkie De Jong be a good target? There has to be guys in Germany, Spain or France that could improve the most glaring weakness.
I thought Xhaka's shirt pull was probably incidental enough, but it looked like his thigh came across and made contact, so giving a penalty was not unfair, even if it was a little softer than you'd normally want as a neutral.
Due to all the covid cancellations, we're about two weeks behind on average. After this game exactly 190 games will have been played, with some teams having more exactly played half their games than others. City and Chelsea are the only two teams not to have a game cancelled yet, and only Burnley has had 4 cancelled. Everyone else is between 18 and 20. There's one more game tomorrow, but then no games for more than a week before they have finally scheduled a few make-ups.
Lots of hay was made about City's 36 wins in the 2021 calendar year, an EPL record. Ok, but they also played 44 games, way more than a normal season.
It's very possible Tuchel thinks Lukaku's offensive contributions aren't worth compromising his desired team shape, and/or are coming at the expense of other Chelsea players. Just citing goal numbers though, by Lukaku or by Chelsea in the games he's played in, does not persuasively make the case that he is playing badly or that Chelsea is better off not starting him.
Oooh the Guardian podcast making the case that it's all building up to Rooney at Everton. Love it.
I saw that. Given the job he's done at Derby it's hard not to be excited about that but the problems for Everton are just so fundamentally ingrained right now. It's a team that doesn't know what the #### it wants to do.
I've said it before, I'm content to let the big boys play champions league but I want to see us make some runs in the League and FA Cups, give the Europa League/Conference a fair shake if we make it and beyond all that play wide open, exciting soccer. Attack should always be the name of the game for Everton. We are never winning the league and should never under any circumstances get relegated either so go have some fun.
They haven't looked good today against Wolves at all.
I haven't looked up his stats, but my subjective impression is that Jadon Sancho is disappointing. I'm honestly not sure why he starts.
Betting odds for top 4 are close to completely even now among United/Arsenal/Tottenham.
This is how the team was built: to play a 4-3-3. I can't see changing that now and still finishing top 4. But a new coach might well want 5 new starters depending on what he wants to do.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main