User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.7291 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Sunday, November 13, 2022OT - World Cup ThreadGroup A - Sunday/Monday/Friday/Tuesday Group B - Monday/Friday/Tuesday Group C - Tuesday/Saturday/Wednesday Group D - Tuesday/Saturday/Wednesday Group E - Wednesday/Sunday/Thursday Group F - Wednesday/Sunday/Thursday Group G - Thursday/Monday/Friday Group H - Thursday/Monday/Friday Jose is an Absurd Sultan
Posted: November 13, 2022 at 06:35 PM | 823 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: off topic, soccer |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for June 2023
(54 - 9:05pm, Jun 02) Last: cardsfanboy Newsblog: The Athletic: After 50 years, is this the San Diego Chicken’s last stand? [$] (14 - 8:23pm, Jun 02) Last: Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Newsblog: 2023 NBA Playoffs Thread (2539 - 7:27pm, Jun 02) Last: Tom Cervo, backup catcher Newsblog: Aaron Boone’s Rate of Ejections Is Embarrassing ... And Historically Significant (1 - 6:28pm, Jun 02) Last: i don't vibrate on the frequency of the 57i66135 Newsblog: Economic boost or big business hand-out? Nevada lawmakers consider A’s stadium financing (10 - 6:14pm, Jun 02) Last: McCoy Newsblog: MLB managers should be challenging a lot more in 2023 (3 - 6:09pm, Jun 02) Last: cardsfanboy Newsblog: Jays pitcher Anthony Bass sorry for posting video endorsing anti-LGBTQ boycotts (96 - 5:07pm, Jun 02) Last: Captain Joe Bivens, Pointless and Wonderful Hall of Merit: Reranking First Basemen: Discussion Thread (35 - 4:10pm, Jun 02) Last: bjhanke Newsblog: 8 big All-Star voting storylines to follow (25 - 3:48pm, Jun 02) Last: cardsfanboy Sox Therapy: Lining Up The Minors (30 - 3:43pm, Jun 02) Last: Darren Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - The Run In (416 - 3:15pm, Jun 02) Last: Infinite Yost (Voxter) Sox Therapy: The First Third (23 - 2:58pm, Jun 02) Last: pikepredator Newsblog: Diamond Sports Group fails to pay Padres, loses broadcast rights (23 - 2:21pm, Jun 02) Last: Karl from NY Newsblog: ESPN the Magazine: Bat and Ball Games you've never heard of (31 - 1:05pm, Jun 02) Last: gehrig97 Newsblog: Former Los Angeles Dodger Steve Garvey weighs U.S. Senate bid (17 - 12:59pm, Jun 02) Last: People like Zonk and Chris Truby |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.7291 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
But that wasn't obvious! I'm not referring to the close cases like that.
One thing to keep in mind is the linesman does not have the main camera view, or anything close to it. Especially if the play is on their side of the field and even worse a fast break coming down their side its extremely difficult to see everything happening exactly as it happens. It's way easier from the booth.
Ronaldo claimed the goal but he might not have touched it at all.
edit: South Korea not managing to draw the game against Ghana despite their siege on goal in the last 20 minutes is really a shame. In retrospect they would have faced off against a Portugal who had already clinched top spot in the group, where a win would put them in and even a draw with luck.
edit2: and I'm quite happy that Bruno took that penalty rather than Ronaldo. Luckily Ronaldo was off the field.
Take your pick of the three ...
10AM
Netherlands-Qatar
Ecuador-Senegal
NED/ECU win -both advance
QAT/SEN win - Senegal advance, goal difference ECU/NED
QAT/ECU win - ECU win group, NED advance
NED/SEN win - both advance, NED win group
NEDwin/ECUSEN draw - NED win group, Ecuador advance
QATwin/ECUSEN draw - ECU win group, SEN/NED GD
NEDQAT draw/ECU win - ECU win group, NED advance
NEDQAT draw/SEN win - Senegal win group, NED advance on GD
BOTH DRAW - ECU wins group, NED advance
2PM
England-Wales
USA-Iran
ENG/USA win - both advance ENG win group
ENG/IRN win - both advance ENG win group
WAL/IRN win - Iran win group, ENG/WAL goal difference (3 goal win for Wales to advance)
WAL/USA win - USA win group, ENG/WAL goal difference (3 goal win for Wales to advance)
ENG win/USAIRN draw - ENG win group, Iran advance
WAL win/USAIRN draw - ENG win group, IRN/WAL GD
ENGWAL draw/USA win - ENG win group, USA advance
ENGWAL draw/IRN win - IRN win group, ENG advance
BOTH DRAW - ENG win group, Iran advance
Results by conference:
African teams have done slightly better than expected, but still are expected to get 1 or 2 teams in out of 5, so not much has really changed.
Asian teams are now doing slightly worse than expected. They were expected to get 1 team in out of 5, and now that's somewhat iffy.
North American teams have done worse than expected. Originally expected to get 1 or maybe 2 teams in out of 4. Now the expectation is less than one team.
South America teams very slightly better than expected. Still 3 of 4 expected to advance.
European teams are doing almost exactly as expected. Still about 9 expected to advance. Belgium's downfall has been more than made up for by all the other European group favorites advancing.
Of course, there will still be some surprises on the last day, so the above could change.
IF Netherlands wins A, they'd play USA if they're in 2nd in B.
IF the USA wins, they'd then face the winner of C 1st (assuming Argentina) vs. D 2nd (assuming Denmark).
I often think USA making the quarterfinals in 2002 was the high-water mark for USMNT at the WC, but if they made the semifinals this year and go through Argentina to get there, that would absolutely be the high-water mark.
Just beating Iran and making it to the KOs would feel like a success of a world cup for me. Anything more is gravy.
10AM
Netherlands-Qatar
Ecuador-Senegal
NED/ECU win -both advance winner decided by goal difference (really, all tie breakers)
QAT/SEN win - Senegal win group, goal difference ECU/NED to advance
QAT/ECU win - ECU win group, NED advance
NED/SEN win - both advance, NED win group
NEDwin/ECUSEN draw - NED win group, Ecuador advance
QATwin/ECUSEN draw - ECU win group, SEN/NED GD
NEDQAT draw/ECU win - ECU win group, NED advance
NEDQAT draw/SEN win - Senegal win group, NED advance on GD
BOTH DRAW - ECU/NED advance group winner by later tie breakers (level on GD)
2PM
England-Wales
USA-Iran
ENG/USA win - both advance ENG win group
ENG/IRN win - both advance ENG win group
WAL/IRN win - Iran win group, ENG/WAL goal difference (4 goal win for Wales to advance) - 3 is level on GD, with Wales behind on goals scored
WAL/USA win - USA win group, ENG/WAL goal difference (4 goal win for Wales to advance)
ENG win/USAIRN draw - ENG win group, Iran advance
WAL win/USAIRN draw - WAL advance on GD; ENG/IRN GD to advance (WAL would have to beat ENG by probably 7 for IRN to advance) group winner ENG/WAL (4 goal win for WAL)
ENGWAL draw/USA win - ENG win group (USA win group with maybe 4 but probably 5 goal win), USA advance
ENGWAL draw/IRN win - IRN win group, ENG advance
BOTH DRAW - ENG win group, Iran advance
Ronaldo is a such loathsome individual, and I can only hope his end-of-career temper-tantrums ruin his standing in the pecking order of all-time great players. In hindsight Real Madrid make precisely the right call at the right time in getting rid of him.
EDIT: The tv man has explained to me that the winner of Senegal-Ecuador advances (assuming the Netherlands win), is that correct?
Cheers Geoff.
The ECU/SEN game matters way more. Holland is essentially through. Senegal needs to win to advance. If they don't win, Ecuador will advance.
Yes but in exchange we'll get many more mediocre teams involved, so it's really win-win.
(I haven't thought about this for more than 10 seconds but expanding the field is just about making sure the US and (especially) China qualify, right?)
I don't know, if you just eyeball their rosters it's clear that the US has far better players. I never really understood why the betting odds and 538 had this at basically even money.
Iran now needs to score. Their first shot was a dangerous one.
edit: it was even money for a US win versus draw/loss. That means the USA was a fairly strong favorite.
edit2: also, what I meant was while I expected Iran to play defensively, I didn't expect such a margin of shots. There is essentially no team that expects to survive a 20-0 shot barrage (extrapolated over the full game) and escape with a draw.
As a coach, when you tell your players you want them to give 110%, that's what you mean. When you've got nothing left, give a little bit more. Musah did there.
notable: US sportsbooks were offering almost 4-1 odds today on an Iran win, because over 90 pct of the money was on US and they couldn't make a line high enough to lure money in on Iran.
Iranic - er, ironic - because at those odds, that was the smarter play (that lost). US was even-money to win iirc.
meanwhile, as noted in Post 52, my pre-Cup wager was on Netherlands at 12-1 to win it all.
figured they might play US in Round of 16 and here we are.
and likely would have to beat Argentina in QF, which is unlikely but it's why I got long odds in the first place.
If Pulisic can't play and Reyna doesn't play, I don't know where the US gets goals from, though.
Also, the US almost looks like a good squad and then we're going and giving huge minutes to Agoos-level ##### like Shaq Moore and Haji Wright.
####### play Yedlin and Reyna. Yedlin may be bad, but he's respectably bad. Shaq Moore is like having me out there.
And, because Iran didn't need to win. They had zero shots when the game was level. What were the odds for a draw? That may have been where the smart money was, but based on today's game I don't know if that's even true. The US winning 50% of the time on a game like this seems pretty reasonable, and Iran won't win many.
edit: also, you can get the Netherlands at better odds now than you could when the tournament started, even with them winning their group, not having to face England, and potentially not having to face Argentina. They have not been good.
Tunisia-France
Australia-Denmark
FRA/AUS win - France win group, both advance
FRA/DEN win - France win group, both advance
TUN/AUS win - FRA/AUS advance, tiebreaker to win group
TUN/DEN win - FRA win group, DEN advance
TUN win/AUSDEN draw - FRA win group, AUS advance
FRA win/AUSDEN draw - FRA win group, AUS advance
FRATUN draw/AUS win - France win group, Australia advance
FRATUN draw/DEN win - France win group, Denmark advance
BOTH DRAW - France win group, Australia advance
2PM
Poland-Argentina
Saudi Arabia-Mexico
POL/KSA win - POL win group, KSA advance
POL/MEX win - POL win group, MEX advance
ARG/KSA win - ARG/KSA advance, tiebreakers to win group
ARG/MEX win - ARG win group, MEX/POL tiebreakers to win group
POL win/KSAMEX draw - Poland win group, KSA advance
ARG win/KSAMEX draw - ARG win group, POL/KSA tiebreakers to advance
POLARG draw/KSA win - KSA win group, POL advance
POLARG draw/MEX win - POL advance, ARG/MEX tiebreakers to advance
BOTH DRAW - POL win group, ARG/KSA tiebreakers to advance
Joe Scally, good enough to start in the Bundesliga, not good enough to play ahead of Shaq Moore.
Apparently.
yes, good point
The man took a hard shot to the nuts. God love him, but he should be available.
Yeah, Moore was notably terrible in his minutes. This is a team with options; he shouldn't be one of them.
To be fair to Howie above, in retrospect it's easy to say that the way the US and Iran played the odds seemed reasonable. I think if Iran had played a bit more on the front foot today in the first half they might have had a better shot to at least get the draw, and certainly the win. Had we all known the coach's game plan going in would be quite so defensive I think it's a lot harder call.
What's interesting is Iran was so much better this tournament when they opened it up. They were a horror show playing defensively, or trying to, against England, and did nothing to threaten the US in the first half while giving up way too many chances, presumably trying to hold onto their draw.
It seems like a common theme--defending deep and compact is a very effective strategy, but an integral part of it has to be transitioning to breaks and making use of the open field as soon as you gain possession of the ball. This is a problem with some defensive minded approaches when teams are inferior or just looking for a draw, but is as big a problem when teams are defending a lead in the last 10 minutes of the game. Defending with all 11 with no hope of forcing counters is suboptimal, even with limited time left (unless maybe you are in the last 2 minutes or something).
Also France seems to have rotated virtually their entire team.
And what happened to Denmark. 3 straight under par games for them.
It's not actually true that Poland needs to score, considering the score in the Mexico game. They shouldn't leave the back door open just yet.
I think Poland is up 3 on yellow cards (i.e., are comfortably ahead and likely would advance if it came down to fair play). Things can change quickly at the end of games though, even if the score stays level.
edit: now I'm seeing post 382. Still 15 minutes left plus extra time, so we'll see if they dial it back. They are just passing the ball around now.
But it is not enough! The saddest part here is that this did not go to fair play.
What a crazy couple of games.
Poland are complete rubbish. It's kind of stunning that they advanced.
10AM
Canada-Morocco
Croatia-Belgium
CAN/CRO win - CRO win group, MAR advance
MAR/BEL win - MAR win group, BEL advance
CAN/BEL win - BEL win group, CRO/MAR tiebreakers
MAR/CRO win - MAR/CRO advance, tiebreakers for group
CAN win/CROBEL draw - CRO win group, BEL/MAR tiebreakers
MAR win/CROBEL draw - MAR win group, CRO advance
CANMAR draw/CRO win - CRO win group, MAR/BEL tiebreakers
CANMAR draw/BEL win - BEL win group, MAR advance
BOTH DRAW - CRO win group, MAR advance
2PM
Japan-Spain
Costa Rica-Germany
JAP/CRC win - JAP/CRC advance, tiebreakers for group
ESP/GER win - ESP win group, GER advance
JAP/GER win - JAP win group, GER/ESP tiebreakers
ESP/CRC win - ESP win group, CRC advance
JAP win/CRCGER draw - JAP win group, ESP/CRC/GER tiebreakers
ESP win/CRCGER draw - ESP win group, CRC advance
JAPESP draw/CRC win - CRC win group, ESP advance
JAPESP draw/GER win - ESP win group, JAP/CRC/GER tiebreakers
BOTH DRAW - ESP win group, JAP/CRC tiebreakers
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main