User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.8235 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Monday, May 30, 2022Protest by San Francisco’s Gabe Kapler brings support from some fellow managers, but Chicago White Sox’s Tony La Russa differs
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: May 30, 2022 at 03:51 PM | 127 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: gabe kapler, national anthem, protest, tony larussa |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OT - August/September 2023 College Football thread
(91 - 5:21pm, Sep 23) Last: tell me when i'm telling 57i66135 Newsblog: Oakland vs. the A's: The inside story of how it all went south (to Las Vegas) (32 - 5:12pm, Sep 23) Last: Starring Bradley Scotchman as RMc Newsblog: Omnichatter for September 2023 (496 - 4:39pm, Sep 23) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Is It Time to Stop Using Scripts on Sports Uniforms? (11 - 4:26pm, Sep 23) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Yankees' status quo under Brian Cashman resulted in 'disaster' season, and a fresh perspective is needed (6 - 4:11pm, Sep 23) Last: The Duke Newsblog: Can Freddie Freeman Re-Open the 3,000 Hit Club? (49 - 4:04pm, Sep 23) Last: John DiFool2 Newsblog: Qualifying Offer Value To Land Around $20.5MM (9 - 3:31pm, Sep 23) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: Republicans propose $614M in public funds for Brewers' stadium upgrades (35 - 3:17pm, Sep 23) Last: tell me when i'm telling 57i66135 Newsblog: OT - 2023 NFL thread (4 - 1:38pm, Sep 23) Last: Lance Reddick! Lance him! Newsblog: OT - NBA Off-Pre-Early Thread for the end of 2023 (3 - 9:58pm, Sep 22) Last: Athletic Supporter's aunt's sorry like Aziz Newsblog: Carroll makes more history: 1st rookie to have 25-HR, 50-SB season (3 - 6:28pm, Sep 22) Last: ReggieThomasLives Newsblog: OT - NBA Bubble Thread (4096 - 5:01pm, Sep 22) Last: Hombre Brotani Newsblog: As Padres’ season spirals, questions emerge about culture, cohesion and chemistry (43 - 3:32pm, Sep 22) Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave) Newsblog: OT: Wrestling Thread November 2014 (2971 - 2:21pm, Sep 22) Last: tell me when i'm telling 57i66135 Newsblog: OT Soccer - World Cup Final/European Leagues Start (98 - 12:09pm, Sep 22) Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.8235 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
You mean "why is it still being played"? Because you must know it started as a celebration of our winning WWII.
If I'm correct in inferring that you feel the anthem is unnecessary in the sports setting...I agree with you.
How do you feel about GBA sound during the 7th inning stretch? I'm a "Take Me Out to the Ballgame" person.
** At least at Yankee Stadium, where they also trot out some nonagenarian WW2 vet with a canned "thank you for your sacrifice, and your service" as a prelude to the song. It'd be one thing to do this on Memorial Day and the 4th of July, but they do it for EVERY BLEEPING GAME.
I went to the Orioles game a week ago or so -- my first visit to Camden Yards since pre-covid -- and the seventh-inning song was "This Land Is Your Land", which is at least a vastly better song than GBA. But it's still followed by (groan) "Thank God I'm A Country Boy".
But since the only teams I really care about are the Yankees and the Orioles, here would be my suggestions for the Birds and the Bombers, taken from their respective Award Winning HBO series.
I’m sorry, but the risk of Kid Rock is just too high.
This used to be Detroit's National Anthem, and it'd still work today.
It's not like the anthem is a televised event any more or that Kapler has the gravitas for anyone to give a crap what his position on anything is.
I've always felt that using the flag as a point of protest undermines the underlying issue.
Sadly, I doubt there will be any meaningful legislation unless and until a congressperson is directly affected when it's their child or grandchild. Clearly, it had no impact on Scalise.
For songs, in LA should be "The End." Doors were an LA band.
That was my wife’s observation, too- I married well!
Kindly signal your virtue elsewhere, sir.
Kapler: I won't stand for the anthem, because Uvalde.
Me: Whatever, dude.
Kapler: But I'll make an exception for Memorial Day, because dead soldiers.
Me: Whatever, dude.
Speaking as a former serviceman or woman, I could give a #### whether anyone stands for the anthem or not. I feel in no way disrespected if anyone chooses that time for a peaceful, respectful protest. And TLR can go eat a large satchel of Richards.
He didn't.
Ken Holtzman was sort of the opposite. In 1967, he went 9-0 while pitching mostly on weekend passes from his full time guard duty in Peoria.
That was my wife’s observation, too- I married well!
Obviously you did. And I think come July she might take this one as a timely backup.
BITD there was a White DJ in Durham named "Country Boy" whose intro song went like this:
Sounds like the kind of deejay who today would be playing anything but soul music. And yet he had all the Motown / Atlantic / Stax artists on his playlists.
How about a candidate that will support committing the mentally ill to psychiatric hospitals? A kid whose nickname is "school shooter" needs some involuntary psychiatric treatment. As we've seen elsewhere you can commit mass murder with a truck, or a gallon of gasoline.
MLB really should bin that and the anthem. Take me out is fun and kind of silly. The world needs more fun, not more chest beating patriotism.
As for Kapler, sure do whatever you want, I don't really care and if that works for him, then I'm fine with that.
Did you consider that the Eagles, X, Red Hot chilli peppers, Guns and Roses, Beach boys, Black Flag, NWA, the Offspring, all the Laurel Canyon bands from the 60's and on and on and on are all LA bands. Lots of good music to choose from there.
But, we rarely do. If we restricted guns in this country like they do in Europe and other western style democracies, and have the level of no gun mass murders that they do, that would be a huge net benefit.
I've been to north of 1,000 MLB/MiLB games in my life, and I never tire of Take Me Out To the Ballgame (and 100s of playings of Roll Out the Barrel). I enjoy observing the fans around me, maybe those that rarely get to a game and really get into fanfare of it. GBA just feels like a forced interruption.
- mental hospital? WHAT mental hospital are you talking about? unless you have $$$ and lots of it there isn't no mental health NOTHING here. we're like the 3rd richest state in the country and the right wingers have basically gotten rid of anything mental health (and public health). you now have to PAY to go to a supposedly "public" health clinic. about 1 out of 5 LEGALS here got zero health care at all. It would be much higher if you checked only non-pregnant adults over 18. There's no medicaid for anyone over 18 unless they're pregnant. and MHMR (public mental health clinic) have basically vanished over the past 15 years and 15 years ago they have over a 1 year wait list. people here can't afford docs and they can't afford meds
- uh hunh. and in a tiny crap town like uvalde he's gonna get this WHERE? they only got ONE pediatrician for the entire town. medicaid can't pay for a psychiatrist. they already in big demand and they ain't goin to no craphole like uvalde
- sure. but it is a lot harder to get hold of a big truck than it is an assault rifle.
you know that the gun nuts here have made it legal to open carry even in colleges? and the streets of houston? it like they LOOKING for an excuse to have more shootouts
what needs to happen is that some gun nut needs to shoot up the exclusivo hella rich private skoolz that ted cruz's kids and the kids of people just like him. pretty hard for the right wingers to shrug off they OWN kidz getting slaughtered
EDIT: And before people jump in with "it's just a handful of bad apples," that's all it takes. A bad apple with a happy trigger finger and an easily acquired semi-automatic will cut down a lot of good apples in a hurry.
I despise GBA?
And the Kate Smith version that the Yankees played FOR EVER was about as welcome as a long raspy fart in church?
Also ... spot on Lisa.
Since I'm also living in Texas, I can relate ... my sister's husband is partially paralyzed ... spinal injury from a car accident as a teenage, he's in a wheelchair ... it took him 3! applications to finally start receiving disability.
Texas seems to be the state where if you're not dead, you don't qualify and **if** you ARE dead ... you also don't qualify.
I thought we were trying to find ways to shorten games.
Guns are a tool, a thing, an inanimate object with some utility, like a power drill. That's all they are. The way they've been elevated to some perverse symbol is most of what's causing the problem with them.
Tony (32) I'm still waiting for someone to share the proper use for an AR-15. How does that tool help the handy homeowner?
I know, since I am the former, but I used to be the latter.
I used to pore through gun magazines as a teenager thinking, oh, as soon as I can, I'm going to buy this gun and that gun and OMG ... that's just a cool gun.
Then one night, while I was "cleaning" my Ruger 10/22 (note ... when any gun person tells you they were just "cleaning their gun" and it just "went off" ... they're lying) I put a round through the wall between my room and my sister's.
It deflected off one post of her brass bed and landed on her pillow, about 2 inches from her head (luckily the impact with the bed post took the energy out of it, so she would have been OK in any case).
That was the moment I changed.
But some people never do.
Like, my father.
He's put 3 gunshot holes in his last 2 houses ... all while "cleaning" his guns.
He has a gun on his nightstand ... and one under the bed and always open carries when we go for our morning walk.
#35: Firat rule of gun safety is to treat every gun with the respect due to a loaded gun. That was hammered into my head before my 7th birthday, and I'm very glad. Some years later when I was in the advanced levels of junior NRA rimfire riflery, I was "dry-firing" my old Mauser in my bedroom to practice my holds. I'd put empty brass in the chamber to protect the firing pin, and work on trigger squeeze. The gun had a very light trigger pull, and one evening I was surprised to find the firing pin had been let off when I closed the bolt - the trigger was so light that any bump would break the sear. Dad adjusted the trigger and glued the adjustment to prevent further creep, but I still shiver a bit thinking of what might have happened if the problem had been discovered at the range with a live round - might've sent 40 grains of lead over the mountain behind the targets. (2nd rule: Never point a gun at something you don't want to shoot.)
Like Tony says, they're a tool, and the one real use I can think of for an AR-15 is in hunting feral hogs which do tens of millions of dollars damage to crops just in Texas every year in addition to breeding like rabbits and having a temperament that will wreck your day just for the fun of it. In Texas, you can hunt them year-round, there's no bag limit, no license required when shooting for population control, fire suppressors are legal, you can hunt them from a helicopter. The only rule seems to be to kill as many as you can as fast as possible, and it's still not enough.
Minor pedantic point: Before 1931 the Star-Spangled Banner wasn't the official National Anthem. But you're right about its being first played at baseball games during WW1.
We shouldn't stop any murder until we can stop every murder. Libs just don't get it.
This is almost literally Archie Bunker's view on gun control. "Would it make you feel any better if they was pushed outta windez?"
That aside, do any ballparks still do the wave? I haven't been to a game for a few years but they were still doing it at Fenway the last time I went. I get the sense that a whole generation of idiots in Boston decided they wanted to be the guy who started the wave, so every game someone in the bleachers was that guy, and the park indulged him.
- healthy young males don't usually need no doctor. unless yall get sick and HAVE to have meds. or break a leg and need a cast. or something. most small towns got no hospital no mo and all they got is "urgent care" which cost you at least 150 - 200 smackers up front BEFORE they see you. and of course they figure out WHY you gotta have all these tests you can't pay for. and most of them got only a nurse or 2 and some MD who so bad they can't get a job any place else. IF you got a public health clinic, you got to fill out all KINDS of forms to get any kind of low cost anything. they like to tell you they just doing a little and then you got to see your OWN doctor which of course you ain't got. And they won't give you refills on anything you need to live like blood pressure meds or asthma meds so as they can get another 200 smackers when you have to come back in next month. you ain't rich, you aint shtttt
- hey whaddaya know. for once sugar got it spot on. unarmed WOMEN no body armor, no big metal peanusss, no NOTHIN, were ready and more than willing to go into that building, facing an armed shooter who just might could have more bullets to rescue kidz. all the cops good for was handcuffing PARENTS and whinin about how they scared of an armed shooter like what if they got shot
BAH
- them cops good for NOTHING (except shooting unarmed Black people). same with the cops at that florida high school. they be waitin on a miracle or to be sure the shooter out of bullets after killin all the kidz they can. and they can't be sued or nothin. they not even apologising.
- speaking of Black people anyone notice that no matter how bad the neighborhood that no one is goin around shootin up little kidz in skoolz???
and TLR can just suck mah youknowwhat small as it is
the pledge of allegiance? "liberty and justice for all" mah ASS. not mention the "under God" or the "indivisible" part
and the SSB? "land of the FREE" mah ass
BBC, you remain the ginchiest. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter -- make it two and I'll comp TLR. Clearly, you and I are already on the same health care plan. Rub some dirt on it, right?
they did it at Citi Field when I went on Saturday night, but it was in the middle of a rally early in the game - so the unamused gods immediately made it start raining to successfully stifle the effort
Impossible to miss, for anyone paying even the least bit of attention. There are reasons, primarily IMO having to do with community versus alienation/atomization (*), but it's better to leave it at that rather than do a half-ass job of further developing the thoughts.
(*) America is a profoundly alienating and atomizing place, which is the ultimate primary source of these atrocities. Throw in the fact that it's a place that glorifies violence and you have a toxic brew. Would there be as many murders with sensible gun control? No, there would not be; using a truck or gasoline takes effort, time, and competence and risks detection far more. Nor do those things give the frisson of physical energy and immediacy and presence and dominance offered up by an assault weapon.
People rail about guns but the most appropriate response to MacBook shootings in the short term is surround the schools with security (fencing, guards, more police on the street, etc). For those old enough to remember we didn't use to have all the security in airports (globally) that we have today. That's relatively new and largely in response to violence against innocent people massed in a shooting gallery with nowhere to hide. It's just the nature of the beast.
The gun issue will not be resolved anytime soon so protective measures should take place. If we can give the
Entire country a check for $500 or give the Ukraine billion in arms, surely we can defend the schools from cowards with guns.
And the practical purpose of a hand gun? You won't be doing too much hunting with one of those. Seriously, this is how you justify the need for a tool who's sole purpose was created for combat in which humans kill each other?
So he's just walking around like it's 1865 with a gun in a holster, out in the open? Do you realise how inane that sounds to the rest of the world?
It's like everyone thinks they're still in the wild west and need a firearm in case the bad guys ride into town!
The sad thing is, the bad guys do ride into town and in the most recent mass incident lots of trained law enforcement guys(who had sh*tloads of guns) all sat around for 90 minutes whilst the bad guy shot lots of kids anyway, so really even with everyone having guns, the response was, well, underwhelming....
America's response to gun violence? More guns, more fences -- the standard modern Republican response to everything, guaranteed to not work. Kids dying? More guns. Inflation? More guns. Food too salty? More guns.
Why is there more gun violence? Let's not ask that. Let's just buy more guns.
I totally get where you're coming from. My thinking on this issue has evolved over the years. As much trouble as guns are, as harmful as gun-fetishists are to society, I just don't think that banning any type of firearm will resolve more problems than it creates.
To me, it's the other side of the coin of the war-on-drugs (and its ancestor, alcohol prohibition). When you criminalize something that is popular, and something that is relatively benign and harmless to RESPONSIBLE adults, you're not really ending the practice or item or service; you're just driving it underground. The war-on-drugs has been a decades-long disaster, and though we're finally seeing some realization of this at the state level (and in countries like Portugal), it continues to feed cartels, tag productive citizens with scarlet letters for ingesting a plant, needlessly crowd our prisons, and just mess up society in countless other ways. I'm afraid that criminalizing gun ownership will lead to similar results. Do we want to hand over MORE power and money to foreign cartels? Do we want to expend even more resources on law enforcement (which, I'm sure, will act completely fairly and objectively, just like they do with drugs)? That's part of the reason I'm uncomfortable with gun-control legislation.
I don't have any quick answers. I would just suggest that we approach this by taking guns out of the hands or criminals and the incompetent, the same was we try to keep bad drivers off the road through licensing.
I do agree that open-carry is just silly, childish flexing. After all, this is the same crowd that Refuses To Live In Fear.
I don't know. I think the popular "Build a Wall" strategy might actually make some sense when dealing with that "feral hogs are eating my children and destroying my azaleas" problem.
Though we disagree, I appreciate you taking the time to explain your position.
- Black people are not taking assault weapon INSIDE of kidz skools and machine gunning little kids. the little kidz getting shot are getting shot in drive bys or domestic fights or shot by the male their mama is/was with. not that i think that is a great thing neither. but WE are not TRYING to kill our own little kidz. even the gangs are not shooting little kidz in skoolz
- i don't know about chicago but here nobody walks to skool. i can't find something about some Black/Hispanic guy in body armor in chicago or anywheres else machine gunning little Black kidz walking to skool. or running them over with a truck. or baseball batting them to death. or knifing a bunch. or any other kind of mass killing
- ok
so maybe here we could pay security guards - how many were you thinking of - to put around skools. you want to give them machine guns, i mean assault rifles, too? right wing people already screaming we should stop public skools, defund the teachers. they want to get paid for in home schooling, keep that $$$ for themself and the so called religiss skoolz. you think they wanna see money going to more cops and security guards especially if they the Wrong Color?
did you happen to see that ALL the cops - not just one, LOTS, who poured into the school yard sat with thumbs up butt ignoring all the little kidz 911 calls and voice calls for help for a HOUR? not the first school shooting where this happened neither
how do you think cities and poor towns like uvalde that can't even afford a hospital or a public health clinic have lot of $$$ to hire all these extra cops for each skool?
what i think is gonna happen in any place not a large city is you're gonna get all these males who think a assault rifle means they have a giant youknowwhat like their jacked up truck does, gonna form a citizens vigilante group and parade around with guns
cocked.
pointed.
out.
yeh they call me da Hunter, yeh that's mah game. only gun full of lead not love
BTW
i got no problem with actual hunting rifles that are not the AR15/AK47 kind. and if someone who is rural wants to have an AK to shoot feral hogs they need to be licensed and registered and have actual training at an actual training course. and 25 years old and not have a record of any kind of violence too
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2022/05/27/stopping-mass-shooters-q-a-00035762
The hardening approach (more police, security, walls) doesn't work. Indeed as the article points out, the individuals in the mass shooting situations are suicidal, the possibility of shooting it out with an armed guard is desirable.
37, yes, well most people, me certainly included aren't as tough as they think they are (and I'm yellow to begin with) and to quote the philosopher king/champ Mike Tyson everyone's got a plan until they get punched in the face (channeling von Clausewitz). So while I can understand the police not going inside the building (I wouldn't, but again, color me yellow), the bigger question for them is why keep tossing so much money their way?
The name calling monsters, evil, sick is just non-productive. It may feel empowering, but accomplishes nothing. Besides, even if the shooters are mentally ill (again, probably major depressive disorder), they don't seem to be delusional.
Still, it is a constitutionally protected right, the diminution of which I don't take lightly. Of course, I also don't take lightly the infringement of the right to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures, be free of cruel and unusual punishment, have legal counsel and post a reasonable bond. Many of the people who want to bear arms appear not to want to concede, if that's the proper term, those latter rights to those accused of crimes.
As usual, Lisa is the voice of common sense. If only her governor had any.
Sorry, but even mentioning Chicago automatically makes you a racist. Come quietly, now.
Riiiiggghhtttt... I'm sure it's totes organic - or just random - that in fact, Chicago per capita rate on shootings is slightly below Albany, Georgia and roughly the same as Little Rock, Arkansas.... or the fact that Baton Rouge, New Orleans, and Shreveport Louisiana rank well above it. Or that St Louis Missouri and Memphis Tennessee both nearly double the rate. Or that actually - both downstate St Clair county and east central Vermillion county actually have higher per capita rates than does Cook county within Illinois.
I have no doubt the whattabout Chicago comes from a place of good faith.
To Do the Right Thing, You Might Have to Die.
Detectives posit that alcohol is involved.
edit...Also, see #9.
As an experienced pig hunter I can tell you that the advantage they offer in culling a sounder of hogs is minimal. Wild pigs are FAST. Most could easily beat a deer in a 50 yard dash, probably 100 yards too. By the time you aim your second shot, they are flying away. The only way in which the rapid fire helps is if you spray lead recklessly without proper shot placement, which not just unsporting (you'll wound rather than kill) but dangerous as hell to the surrounding area.
Professional hog cullers almost always use cage traps. A cage trap is a chain link fence laid out in a circle or square with a remotely operated gate. The culler piles in loads of bait for several nights in a row to attract as many as possible, then hits the button to drop the gate when the time is right. At that point, they are typically shot en masse, and in that instance an AR with a 30 round clip could possibly have some value. But a 30.06 with a 4 round mag works too, and the .06 round is a lot more powerful which means a quicker and cleaner kill. Same/similar for a 357 pistol.
AR's are not made for hunting, they are made for killing people.
I think this is a really weird argument. What if we applied the same argument to say beer, cigarettes and driving? Would you argue that those should not be regulated because you know, people will just go underground with their cigarettes?
Or to take another example, think of Europe and Canada. Do they have some huge underground gun lobby? Well probably there's some criminals with guns, but its also clear they dont have the same number of guns or the same number of mass shootings as in the USA. no one in Europe or Canada is worried about some huge underground gun movement.
But of course, america has a gun culture and also a violence culture to a certain extent. I dont want to diminish those I think the guy upthread made a good pt. about that. But I think if you get into the American culture of violence then that's quite a different argument than saying gun regulation will drive guns underground.
I get there's lots of arguments for gun ownership. I dont want to diminish the Constitutional argument, I think that needs to be considered. But I think once you agree that regulating guns IN SOME MANNER is OK, then you pretty much have to agree that the 2nd amendment is not absolute. So let's take a poll: does anyone think that the second amendment means that guns can never be regulated in any way? presumably no one agrees to that. Right? You wouldnt insist that ten year olds can carry guys, or people should be able to carry loaded guns into class rooms and such. Right? obviously there's limits to gun ownership, and obviously the second amendment doesnt just mean anyone can carry a gun anytime anywhere...
Ok then. THe vast majority of people think guns should be regulated in some way. The only issue is how much? or how intrusive? Once you agree to that then you have to admit that the second amendment is not sacrosanct.
i'm a teacher, and i don't want to quit my job, but i also don't want to go to work in such an environment.
i wouldn't have wanted to attend school in such an environment, either.
there is no reason that teachers or other school staff should have firearms in schools.
that is an absurdly terrible idea.
we have metal detectors at entrances and "school resource officers" (security) for a reason.
if anyone should be armed in a school, which is at best arguable, it should solely be trained law enforcement personnel.
(who are under no obligation to protect anyone, apparently!)
"good times, good times."
here in ohio, a state owned by republicans who refuse to relinquish their hold, a bill has been fast-tracked by the state legislature to allow schools to have armed personnel with just 24 hours of firearms training. the governor will sign the bill if it is presented to him.
i'm a teacher, and i don't want to quit my job, but i also don't want to go to work in such an environment.
i wouldn't have wanted to attend school in such an environment, either.
there is no reason that teachers or other school staff should have firearms in schools.
that is an absurdly terrible idea.
- so
all people can be trained to use a gun as well as a cop/military personel in 24 hrs. boy i am sure that schoolteachers are gonna be happy packing in the classrooms and won't none of the little kidz grab it. or worse a group of teenagers. all it takes is one teen to hit some teavher over the head take his/her gun and start shooting. and all we need is some unhappy teacher with a glock or something thinks the kidz disrespecting the heft of his youknowwhat to go off,
um
half, uh, cocked
i am really REALLY glad mah kidz are done with skool.
i looked it up for Harris County (yewstin for the rest of all yall non-texans) - the percent of people under 65 ho got NO health ins. it's 25% so you can subtract pretty much everyone under 18 and all pregnant women.
so
population of harris county 4,728,030
10% are over 65 so that's 472,803
so that's 4,225,227 people under 65
but you got to take out all the people under 18 because between medicaid and the CHIPSs and private ins, basically everyone under 18 got something
and 26.4% under 18 and that's 1,248,200
you subtract those 2 out and you got 3,054,307 people left andout of the 18-65 population 763,576 got NO ins
763,576 got NOTHING
and we live in a rich county as countys go
just imagine the folks who don't. bet the number of uninsured is real high there
My employer brags on the great benefits package, which they tout as foundational to their overall compensation package. True enough. However, since landlords and HEB don't tend to swap their goods and services for household deductibles, those sub-$25k salaries for f/t permanent work are painfully limiting. Sweet land of liberty, right?
He's Ralphie from A Christmas Story ... he's convinced he needs his Red Ryder for when Black Bart (who is probably a Mexican) and his gang come over the fence.
Also, I will quibble ... I wouldn't use inane ... I'd go with insane.
"Regulated" and "criminalized" are two completely different things. I wasn't arguing against regulation, though determining what shape such regulation would take to be (a) effective, and (b) constitutional is way above my pay grade.
The percentage of Americans who smoke cigarettes has declined dramatically over the last 60 years or so. And cigarettes were never banned by the government, so they remained available and affordable to those who DID want to smoke. Which turned out to be an effective way to deal with the problem.
If tobacco had been outright prohibited, I guarantee you cartels would have emerged to meet the demand, and we would have seen a corresponding increase in crime, turf wars, and other nice things. We saw this movie in the 1920's with alcohol. We're still seeing it now with cannabis.
And suppose we do ban firearms (or a subset of them). Are you ready to pay extra taxes for the massive resource-suck enforcing this is going to be? It's bad enough with the drug war. And do you really believe such a ban will be enforced evenly, across the board, with no particular groups especially targeted? Do you want to give cops (government) even MORE power over citizens than they have now? That's... naive.
Security theater, school-shootings version. It's the Illusion Of A Solution so favored by elected leaders as a way of abdicating dealing with the real underlying problems.
No more naive than believing your guns will protect you against the government, should it turn against you.
that is an absurdly terrible idea.
we have metal detectors at entrances and "school resource officers" (security) for a reason.
if anyone should be armed in a school, which is at best arguable, it should solely be trained law enforcement personnel.
Parkland had an armed security guard. I won't name the poor deputy here, but he did the sensible thing and hid in a stairwell for 45 minutes until things died down, so to speak. Preventing school shootings is a complicated issue, but huge magazines and rapid fire make it hard to fault one guy for not standing up and getting cut down immediately. You need to rein in the firepower available on the street if you expect more than a tiny number of people to willingly engage these shooters on an individual basis. (But arming teachers is madness, in case there's any doubt about that.)
I remember going to supper with a group of about 15 people some 7 years ago. Two of those present made a point of letting us know that they were packing, & that they were sitting where they were sitting in case a shooter burst in through the front door. One of the two was in a wheelchair because of spina bifida, so I guess that could contribute to a certain feeling of vulnerability? But still.
And the second guy had noted on FB that his wife never opened their door at home without a gun on her person.
These people are ... not well, period, & I suspect are beyond help. Well, actually the second guy is neither well nor not well but definitely beyond help, as he died a few years back.
Gee, I wonder why?
Firearm-related deaths per 100,000 people:
United States: 12.21
Canada: 2.05
Apologies if this is already in the thread (I didn't see it on a search) and IANAL, but in the Heller decision, even Scalia (writing the opinion for the conservative majority) said the 2A right is not absolute.
It goes on to address the argument that the 2A's militia clause means people should be able to have weapons in common use at the time and suitable for military use. Even if you accept that, and that a militia today would need advanced weapons, he writes, that does not change the interpretation that laws can prohibit use of certain weapons.
pages 54-55 here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
If I say that it ought to be illegal to criticize Joe Biden, and you say "Free speech," and I say, "Well, no rights are absolute," has that platitude added anything to the discussion?
Ah, I'm well aware of that. I just want to have a fighting chance if a couple of Proud Boys thugs show up to harass me and my partner because they're triggered by the rainbow flag on my property.
If we do get gun control, there's a very strong chance it will be enforced unevenly. And probably not in my favor.
But yes, if the government decides to crush me, no AK-47s are going to bail me out. That is true. But at that point, we're all going to have bigger problems.
If it isn't, it would be the first law in history that wasn't.
Those figures are from when, Andy? Bear in mind that Canada didn't have a major gun violence issue prior to Fidel Trudeau in 2020 exploiting a single mass shooting in Nova Scotia and banned many different classes of semi-automatic rifles.
Parkland had an armed security guard. I won't name the poor deputy here, but he did the sensible thing and hid in a stairwell for 45 minutes until things died down, so to speak. Preventing school shootings is a complicated issue, but huge magazines and rapid fire make it hard to fault one guy for not standing up and getting cut down immediately. You need to rein in the firepower available on the street if you expect more than a tiny number of people to willingly engage these shooters on an individual basis. (But arming teachers is madness, in case there's any doubt about that.)
It's funny though that these shooters target "gun free zones" like schools. They don't target places where a lot of people may be armed. High capacity magazines make little difference. A skilled marksman can change magazines very quickly. Or you can kill lots of people with a couple of gallons of gasoline, or a truck (pace Waukesha).
It's also funny that no one cares about all the people killed in inner cities because of the de-policing of the last two years. It's only when a mass shooting occurs that anyone cares. Yet the people killed in ones an twos in Chicago and NY and Baltimore are just as dead.
Where pray tell are places where would be mass murderers know that a lot of people may or may not be armed? Texas has among the most liberal open or concealed carry laws in the country. Yet we have in recent years El Paso, Sutherland Springs, Midland-Odessa.. Please tell me how the El Paso shooter knew that no one would be packing in the Walmart?
Given how we saw the police react in Uvalde, and how defenders of the police cite Supreme Court decisions that say the police are not required to protect the pubic, I don't think that supports any argument you might be making.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main