Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Sunday, February 19, 2023

Report: White Sox bring back Andrus on 1-year deal, will play 2B

Elvis Andrus is returning to the South Side.

The veteran infielder has reached an agreement with the Chicago White Sox on a one-year contract, sources told ESPN’s Jeff Passan. Financial terms are not yet known, and the deal is pending a physical.

Andrus is expected to play second base for the White Sox, according to Passan. When he does line up at the keystone, it will be the 34-year-old’s first time playing a position other than shortstop in 15 big-league seasons. His only experience playing second as a professional came in 2005, when he made one appearance there as a 16-year-old prospect in the Gulf Coast League.

RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 19, 2023 at 06:45 PM | 19 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: elvis andrus, white sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. JoeC Posted: February 19, 2023 at 07:59 PM (#6117922)
How on earth are there so many decent average-ish shortstops right now? Is it just a random thing, or maybe that with fewer balls in play the bar to handle SS is lower than ever? He's got a pretty decent projection but you can't find a team that's trying to win that could use him at short (Angels are maybe the closest).

His ZIPS projection is 1.8 WAR, which is 64th among guys who are listed at SS (players listed there, not necessarily expected to actually play there). That number would be 28th at 1B, 41st at 2B, 38th at 3B, 30th in LF, 34th in CF, 32nd in RF.

Glad to see him back on the South Side, where he shouldn't have too much trouble with playing time (I guess there's some chance that Romy Gonzalez's 2021 wasn't 100% fluke, but not enough of one to clear the decks for him). The Sox would of course be better off with Elvis at SS and Anderson at 2B, but not by enough to complain too loudly about. When they finish 82-80 and fall a game short of the Guardians for the division title, maybe I'll eat my words.
   2. Cris E Posted: February 19, 2023 at 10:32 PM (#6117930)
Do you suppose that more average defenders are only average because the shift has propped up their range artificially? Might we see far fewer of these so-called average defenders if some wash out when they have to play old school positions? I expect the impact will be limited except for those guys who really don't have the range at all, and most will be fine playing the same way other bat-first guys did in the olden days like Blauser and Jeter and so on. It'll be interesting to see how much actual difference the shift rules make. If a bunch of teams just start their middle infielders at the center line and have them slide back to shift positions then nothing will be different, but if no one does I wonder if the bar for SS and 2B defense will be raised.
   3. The Duke Posted: February 20, 2023 at 12:31 AM (#6117937)
Andrus is one of those guys who could sneak up to "if not HOF, at least someone to talk about". If he had a nice finish he could add another 500 hits and 6-8 WAR. Aren't too many 40 WAR, 2500 hit careers. He's already in the top 500 WAR and could get close to top 300. For hits he's already top 300 and could move close to top 100.
   4. JJ1986 Posted: February 20, 2023 at 07:08 AM (#6117942)
Andrus is one of those guys who could sneak up to "if not HOF, at least someone to talk about".
Haha. No.
   5. BDC Posted: February 20, 2023 at 09:40 AM (#6117945)
One of my favorite players ever, but indeed, no. Closest complete careers to Andrus by OPS+ and PAs, ranked by dWAR ... the only HOFer is Mazeroski, and Andrus is not the Mazeroski of shortstops.

If you'd asked me offhand the most similar career, I would have said Royce Clayton. By BRef metrics Clayton was not quite as good a hitter, somewhat better as a defender – but they are similar: long-career glove men at SS.

Clayton was also never really a very good hitter at any point. Most of the guys on this list were, briefly; Templeton when young, White when old, Speier in his mid-20s, Andrus at ages 27-28. Then in April 2018, a pitch broke Andrus' elbow and he never really recovered as a hitter. But he may not have stayed an above-average hitter for long anyway; it's of course very common for guys to peak at 27-28.

Player              dWAR   PA OPSRbaser  HR RBI   BA Rfield      Pos
Bob Boone           25.8 8148   82    
-33 105 826 .254    105 *2H/357D
Roger Peckinpaugh   25.0 8396   87      6  48 740 .259    100    
*6H/3
Bill Mazeroski      24.0 8379   84     
-6 138 853 .260    148     *4H5
Frank White         22.0 8468   85      1 160 886 .255    122 
*46H5D/9
Bill Russell        19.5 8021   83     23  46 627 .263     73 69H874
/5
Chris Speier        17.7 8155   88    
-24 112 720 .246     33   65H4/3
Dick Groat          17.3 8180   89      5  39 707 .286     48  
*6H5/34
Garry Templeton     16.7 8208   87      6  70 728 .271     29  
*6H35/9
Maury Wills         12.2 8306   88     55  20 458 .281      0   
*65H/4
Orlando Cabrera     10.3 8255   84     28 123 854 .272      1  
*64H/5D
Elvis Andrus        10.0 8197   87     53  96 731 .270    
-15     *6HD
Tony Taylor          1.8 8501   88     14  75 598 .261    
-39 45H37/6D
Juan Pierre         
-1.9 8280   84     57  18 517 .295    -14    *87HD 


Provided by Stathead.com: View Stathead Tool Used
Generated 2/20/2023.
   6. Walt Davis Posted: February 20, 2023 at 02:39 PM (#6117970)
The shift ... The whole point of the shift was to move them to where balls were being hit. Forcing the ss to move back towards where fewer balls are hit isn't going to require greater defensive ability. Against lhb, the ss will be responsible for a bigger patch of grass but it's a patch where not many are hit.
   7. Nasty Nate Posted: February 20, 2023 at 03:02 PM (#6117972)
Forcing the ss to move back towards where fewer balls are hit isn't going to require greater defensive ability.
Why not? Doesn't it take more defensive ability to field balls that aren't close to you?
   8. DL from MN Posted: February 20, 2023 at 03:04 PM (#6117973)
Against lhb, the ss will be responsible for a bigger patch of grass but it's a patch where not many are hit.


I don't think there's anything in the rules against swapping your SS and 2B depending on the batter.
   9. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 20, 2023 at 03:08 PM (#6117974)

I don't think there's anything in the rules against swapping your SS and 2B depending on the batter.


Mid-inning swaps are explicitly outlawed in the new rules.
   10. The Duke Posted: February 20, 2023 at 03:45 PM (#6117979)
No mid inning swaps and no "running starts" during the windup to get into a shift position. Again, the biggest thing about the rule
Change is the "feet on the dirt rule". Geometry logic means that the range is cut down ALOT especially on the second base side but also at SS. If you played 2-3 ft onto the grass you've lost a lot of range no matter where you set up. There will be a lot more Texas leaguers now OR teams will have to move their OF in from the warning track which has become the OF set up du jour. That set up eliminated many double and triples. Teams will now have to make a decision on trade offs between outs that now become Texas leaguers and preventing extra base hits. I'm guessing they will bring the OF in. For pitchers, it's quite deflating to allow lots of cheap singles.
   11. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: February 20, 2023 at 04:00 PM (#6117982)
There will be a lot more Texas leaguers now OR teams will have to move their OF in from the warning track which has become the OF set up du jour.


Yea, there are no restrictions on OF shifts, I wonder how often, if ever, teams will use radical OF shifts, and if hitters try to take advantage of huge spaces in the OF due to those shifts.
   12. cardsfanboy Posted: February 20, 2023 at 05:12 PM (#6117989)
If you'd asked me offhand the most similar career, I would have said Royce Clayton.


Without quantifying for the type of player, and instead just similar position, value and hits, I would go with Renteria. Get rid of Renteria's 2009 year and they are pretty much tied in value. Had nearly concurrent seasonal war (with Renteria leading most of the time) Renteria was a guy who had an outside chance of being hof conversation, if he could have played well enough in his late 30's.

top 10 war for each
Renteria Andrus
5.6----------5.4
4.3----------4.2
4.2----------4.0
4.1----------3.6
3.2----------3.4
2.2----------3.1 (approximate Andrus 2022 season)
2.1----------2.9
1.5----------1.8
1.4----------1.7
1.1----------1.5
1.1----------1.2
0.9----------0.8
0.9----------0.6

0.8/0.6----------(none for Andrus yet, and this isn't included in my final tally's)

32.6--------33.5(career---not including Renteria's 2009)
6.9(4.7)-----5.8 waa (not including Renteria's 2009)(parentheses includes 2009)
Renteria does better at the better years, Andrus picks it up in the middle in the end, neither of them by war look to be a hofer.

Renteria career ended his age 34 season, Andrus is going into his age 33 season, but just put up a 3 war season so probably has 3 seasons in him if he wants (where he'll at least get a minor league invite if he wants) Renteria 2327 hits to 1997 for Andrus(who has averaged 127 the last two seasons) so it's unlikely Andrus gets 2500 or more hits, it's unlikely he breaks 40 war, etc so he's in the hall of good, but with zero gold gloves and those offensive numbers he just doesn't have anything anyone could champion him for.


   13. BDC Posted: February 20, 2023 at 05:29 PM (#6117990)
Interesting, fanboy – yes, Renteria was another of those players about whom people kept saying, but what if he gets a huge number of hits … except that kept getting less and less likely.

Andrus could hang on for a while, as you say, but this "move to second base" thing sounds ominous. It is usually the slide into utility status. Renteria (and Clayton too) were similar in that they hit OK for shortstops but not well enough to play other positions regularly, and so very rarely moved off SS. Andrus may not have much mileage left, especially in this era where, as JoeC notes, everybody seems to have a good shortstop.
   14. cardsfanboy Posted: February 20, 2023 at 05:36 PM (#6117991)
edit to 12: when I said this

Had nearly concurrent seasonal war (with Renteria leading most of the time)


I had messed up on my original table and listed Andrus 2022 as two separate years(which would have meant the 2.2 was against the 2.9, the 2.1 and 1.5 against back to back 1.8 etc.)

I just wanted to clarify that my original beginning was based upon an incorrect table.
   15. Walt Davis Posted: February 20, 2023 at 09:06 PM (#6118017)
Why not? Doesn't it take more defensive ability to field balls that aren't close to you?

Sure ... unless they're so far away from you there's no hope. SSs weren't moved to reduce the range requirements, they were moved to put them where balls were being hit that they weren't previously getting to.

But the data's out there somewhere. How many plays did the "3B" make when the shift was on? How many plays did the SS make against LHB when the shift wasn't on? What proportion of RHB PAs were shifted?

I will say I keep forgetting about the "must be on the dirt" part.
   16. The Duke Posted: February 21, 2023 at 12:47 AM (#6118026)
Andrus had a season that mostly matched his best seasons last year. Moving to a contender helped. He might have some gas left in the tank.
   17. sunday silence (again) Posted: February 21, 2023 at 12:36 PM (#6118058)
Sure ... unless they're so far away from you there's no hope. SSs weren't moved to reduce the range requirements, they were moved to put them where balls were being hit that they weren't previously getting to.


Hello Walt. I dont disagree but I thought you were going to add that the problem with nasty nate's contention is that because there are less balls hit to SS by LHB then there is less oppurtunities to gain any sort of fielding advantage over the rest of the league's SSs. So if say 5% of LHB ABs results in GB to SS, and say a modern day Ozzie gets to perhaps 7% more than an average SS, we're talking .35% out of perhaps 100 GBs hit to SS by LHB.

So he's getting to less than one GB a season vs an average SS playing in the now mandated SS spot. Its a de minimis issue he's not going to lead the league in DRS by saving 0.3 OAAs. As you say the only reason they were shifted to the right side of the diamond is cause more GBs are hit there.
   18. Walt Davis Posted: February 21, 2023 at 03:53 PM (#6118085)
#17: Yes, that's built into it. However that was part of it in the pre-shift era. If today's SS have less range than traditional BECAUSE they need to cover less ground in the shift (as opposed to because teams/players have decided they'd rather their SS hit 20+ HRs a year rather than catch an extra 20 GBs) then getting rid of the shift would return whatever incentives led teams to have rangier SS in the pre-shift era.

By definition, given positioning, greater range means greater defensive value. Also pretty much by definition, that "return on range" in a total hits/runs/outs perspective is maximized when the player is positioned where lots of balls are hit.

But of course part of the shift strategy was to "overload" the area where the most balls were hit. But I don't know that it's possible to genuinely "overload" in baseball. We see discretionary plays in the OF all the time where two OFs could have pretty easily have made the play. Even with the shift, we really never see that on the IF (pop-ups aside) -- there are of course balls that sometimes the 3B can cut-off from the SS where maybe the SS would have gotten the guy out too; similarly we see the 1B sometimes cut off plays from the 2B; you never really see the SS take a ball the 2B would have made the out on, shifted or not.

Now the 2B shifting to short RF was a pretty radical change in positioning and I can see how that might have substantial impact on the return on different defensive skills (i.e. maybe less range, more arm, less often required to turn the DP). But the SS in the shift was just playing SS with a different starting point. If it was useful for him to cover X feet in either direction in his traditional spot in the pre-shift days, then it should have been as or more useful (more opportunities) for him to cover X feet in either direction in his shifted spot.

The thinking appears to be that teams decided that they could now use SSs that covered only (X - y) feet in either direction because, in their shifted positions, they'd still get to the same number of GBs because they'd get more opportunities. This allowed SS to bulk up. But that only holds if teams decided that the outs lost to (-y) were worth less than the runs generated by the bulk ... and given the impact of (-y) on the number of outs lost should be lower with no shift (due to less opportunity), I don't see why they wouldn't continue to make the same tradeoff.

Mixed in with all of that is decreasing contact rates and decreasing G/F ratios -- IF defense (in an absolute sense) must be less important than it used to be. So why not keep your Dave Winfield at SS?

EDIT: Does "overload" need clarification? Obviously the idea of the shift was to put 3 IFs where you used to have 2 because that's where more balls were hit so you'd convert more outs than you used to. But that's not "overload" per se. What I mean is that you put Ozzie in the shifted SS spot and Pokey Reese in the shifted 2B spot then the edge of Ozzie's range to his left and Pokey's range to his right don't overlap (on a standard GB at least). So if you tell Ozzie to bulk up and he loses some range, you give up more hits because the Ozzie-Pokey blind spot is bigger. It's theoretically possible that such a small percentage of GBs are hit into the Ozzie-Pokey blind spot that reduced range for Ozzie really doesn't matter ... but that would probably also be true now that Ozzie has to start on the other side of 2B.
   19. sunday silence (again) Posted: February 22, 2023 at 08:59 PM (#6118245)
that's interesting, need more time to digest all that.

do we have any sort of working guesstimate on how much the radical shift may have impacted perceived defensive factors? are there any infielders we think are prime candidates to have been overrated by range factors?

As for outfielders, I dont think we see discretionary fly balls "all the time." Looking at Ashburn's and A.Jones numbers they seem to be the ones most likely to have benefitted. If we assume max. range +20 or so OAAs, then they probably made about 20 more catches that weren't hard ie. discretionary. So less than one a week, maybe one every ten days? does that stack up with our perceptions?

HELL, even better question: How much do we think batting average will improve now that the shift is gone? Walt, you did an excellent study a few years back and my recollection is that it wasnt really impacting ba but rather slug. for good LHB was impacted some. But then later you seemed to go away from that. Isnt that the million dollar question as we enter 2023? I mean they all hated the shift, it was hurting batters especially line drive hitters and now...how much will it help?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
greenback does not like sand
for his generous support.

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Hall of MeritReranking Pitchers 1893-1923: Ballot
(7 - 11:44pm, Oct 03)
Last: Rob_Wood

NewsblogJim Caple, former ESPN, national MLB writer, dies at 61
(6 - 11:14pm, Oct 03)
Last: base ball chick

NewsblogOMNICHATTER for the October Postseason 2023
(78 - 11:02pm, Oct 03)
Last: Tom and Shivs couples counselor

NewsblogWitt becomes first Royal in 30-30 club: 'No one like him'
(10 - 11:01pm, Oct 03)
Last: Lars6788

NewsblogOT - NBA Off-Pre-Early Thread for the end of 2023
(153 - 10:59pm, Oct 03)
Last: Tom and Shivs couples counselor

NewsblogFormer Dodgers star Trevor Bauer settles lawsuit with woman who first accused him of sexual assault
(11 - 6:48pm, Oct 03)
Last: baxter

NewsblogMiami Marlins’ Luis Arraez runs away with NL batting title, makes MLB history in process
(13 - 6:28pm, Oct 03)
Last: Cris E

NewsblogMets fire Buck Showalter after disappointing season
(36 - 5:35pm, Oct 03)
Last: sunday silence (again)

NewsblogMariners' Cal Raleigh apologizes for calling out team after season-ending loss
(11 - 4:56pm, Oct 03)
Last: bookbook

NewsblogAppreciating 4 all-time legends as they play their (potential) final games
(48 - 4:43pm, Oct 03)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogInside Colorado’s three decades of mediocre baseball
(6 - 3:23pm, Oct 03)
Last: Tom Nawrocki

NewsblogPhil Nevin out as Angels manager after missing playoffs again with Shohei Ohtani, Mike Trout
(13 - 3:03pm, Oct 03)
Last: Walt Davis

Sox TherapyRIP Tim Wakefield
(19 - 2:54pm, Oct 03)
Last: Jay Seaver

NewsblogOT Soccer - World Cup Final/European Leagues Start
(137 - 2:01pm, Oct 03)
Last: AuntBea odeurs de parfum de distance sociale

NewsblogCurve honor 'worst baseball player of all time'
(61 - 1:59pm, Oct 03)
Last: Tony S

Page rendered in 0.4766 seconds
48 querie(s) executed