San Diego Padres first baseman Eric Hosmer, who earlier rejected a trade to the Washington Nationals as part of the Juan Soto deal, is now heading to the Boston Red Sox, sources confirmed to ESPN on Tuesday.
As part of the deal, San Diego will be paying down a significant portion of the approximately $44 million remaining on Hosmer’s contract to the Red Sox, sources told ESPN’s Jeff Passan.
Sources told ESPN earlier Tuesday that Hosmer was to be part of the Padres’ package to acquire Soto and Josh Bell from the Washington Nationals, but Hosmer, as part of his contract, refused to remove Washington from his no-trade list
Hosmer, 32, is hitting .272 with 8 home runs and 40 RBIs this season. He agreed to a $144 million, eight-year deal with San Diego before the 2018 season, and he is owed about $7 million for the rest of this season and $13 million annually from 2023 to 2025.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. jimfurtadoMore Padres games will be viewed.
I really dislike Pham, and I really dislike Hosmer. #### me, what a shitty couple of days.
I assume the opposite.
Fangraphs doesn't like him as much. 107 WRC+, 0.4 WAR. Still a lot better than the Red Sox current 1B situation. :)
but OPS by month:
April 1.054
May .654
June .567
July .704
he's 108 OPS+ career, so that's about what you get.
Red Sox also trade Groome.
Max Ferguson
Hopefully these guys have some talent.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet">New Red Sox 2B/SS/CF Max Ferguson was the Padres 5th rd. pick in 2021 out of Tennessee. This year in 432 PA in A/A+: .221/.365/.358 w/6 HR, 55 SB, 17.4% BB & 23.4% K. Best tools are speed & defense. Needs to get stronger. Bat is light & has struggled since he was promoted to A+.— Ian Cundall (@IanCundall) August 2, 2022</blockquote> [removed][removed]
Hosmer is not great but as a backup for $5-$6 mil/yr behind Casas and as someone who can at least play the position defensively (and be maybe a touch below league average if pressed into full time duty), it’s fine. It’s not a sexy move, for sure. 1B and RF were chasms this year and sadly even Hosmer might be better.
This is a hedge move for 2023 (and I hope the $ coming from SD bears this out). Ideally Casas just comes up and rakes and Hosmer is a cheap Eyechart c.2004 option for 2023/2024 and cheap enough that if he truly craters they can eat the salary and release him.
Now Groome may well turn out ok and even be serviceable. But as said above he’s clearly well down the pecking order with the Red Sox and so Bloom turned him into something useful and basically free for the next 3 years.
Now, as to why he couldn’t spin JD into magic beans that’s different. But a DH only bat trending down all year isn’t an easy piece to move. Hill is still hurt and Eovaldi just back and Wacha only now rehabbing… the expiring P contracts weren’t really in a good place to unload.
That's actually a good deal for the Red Sox. 1B has been so, so bad for the Sox that Hosmer(who of course really defines the "if he's your answer, you're not asking the right question" joke) is a big improvement. Sure the offensive side will improve slightly, but apparently Hosmer can field, so there is that.
Also, for old school baseball viewers, he only strikes out like 17% of the time, so he's putting the ball in play!
It's just a place holder/cover for Casas move anyway and doesn't cost you anything. I have no issues with this.
In fact, Hosmer continues to hit lefties pretty well (.330 in 100 PAs this year), so you could see a Casas/Hosmer platoon before the end of the year.
I also appreciate that Bloom did not feel compelled to trade Eovaldi or Martinez for nothing, or next-to-nothing. The worst case with both is that they become FAs, the team offers the one-year qualifying offer, they (I presume) reject it, and then the team gets compensatory drafts picks for them. If the return on a trade isn't much better than the comp picks, then you probably don't make the trade.
Anyway, I'm not and have never been a Hosmer fan - who on this board would be at this point? - but I ultimately like this for Boston. The interesting part might be that Boston is still on the hook in future years and I doubt he stay a Sawk for the duration of the deal. 3.5 yrs of the minimum for ... 1.5?... years of Hosmer is meh but not bad.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main