User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3063 seconds
45 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Friday, June 10, 2022Son of Orioles owner sues family over control of team, reveals plans to sell
RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)
Posted: June 10, 2022 at 04:12 PM | 46 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: orioles |
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: Ohtani fans Trout to seal Japan's 3rd Classic championship
(21 - 3:49am, Mar 23) Last: Hombre Brotani Newsblog: Mets planning to shut down Jose Quintana for three months (13 - 3:16am, Mar 23) Last: Lizabeth Goolsby Newsblog: 2023 NBA Regular Season Thread (1256 - 1:52am, Mar 23) Last: Hombre Brotani Newsblog: MLB making small changes to pitch clock rules, memo says (12 - 12:47am, Mar 23) Last: Tin Angel Newsblog: Braves option Grissom to minors, clearing Arcia to start at SS (10 - 10:27pm, Mar 22) Last: Walt Davis Hall of Merit: Ranking Center Fielders in the Hall of Merit - Discussion Thread (76 - 10:14pm, Mar 22) Last: Chris Cobb Newsblog: “Friday Night Baseball” resumes on Apple TV+ on April 7 (6 - 9:49pm, Mar 22) Last: Hombre Brotani Newsblog: MLB's Rob Manfred pushes for more star pitchers in next WBC (9 - 9:26pm, Mar 22) Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick Newsblog: Record finish for World Baseball Classic (2 - 8:37pm, Mar 22) Last: depletion Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - Champions League Knockout Stages Begin (279 - 7:56pm, Mar 22) Last: SoSH U at work Newsblog: Phillies Release Mark Appel (17 - 5:59pm, Mar 22) Last: shoelesjoe Sox Therapy: Yoshida In The Spotlight (14 - 5:07pm, Mar 22) Last: Steve Balboni's Personal Trainer Hall of Merit: Reranking Center Fielders Ballot (9 - 1:12pm, Mar 22) Last: cookiedabookie Sox Therapy: The Rostah (170 - 9:34am, Mar 22) Last: Darren Newsblog: Spring training OMNICHATTER 2023 (148 - 9:13am, Mar 22) Last: cardsfanboy |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3063 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: June 10, 2022 at 04:43 PM (#6081041)exactly.
People focus way too much on taxes. To an unhealthy extent. When I decided to move to North Carolina, the most common comment I got from people was "Why would you move to a state with an income tax?"
"Clearly you've never seen how high property taxes are in 'income-tax free' Texas."
You think non-rich families don't have these issues? ######## will be ######## over $100,000 or $1B.
*If that $100K is filed as a married couple, then CA state income tax would go from $5,844 to $853. Adjust accordingly.
Yes. I moved from Florida. My taxes on my FL home were about the same as my NC home, but that's because of a homestead exemption. I was paying taxes on a ~$300,000 valuation (which I sold for close to $1 million) and bought a home for $800,000. So had I been paying market rate in FL, the taxes would have been much higher. My big savings was insurance. What I was paying in home and car insurance dropped by about $8,000 upon the move. 75% of that was dropping hurricane and flood insurance, but my auto insurance dropped by $2,000 for the same coverage. Still, not enough to make up for state taxes, but I don't care. I know my new home won't be (literally) under water in 10 years.
so not on the Outer Banks
:)
gives me shivers to think of the movie "Nights in Rodanthe" supposedly set there, with Richard Gere and Diane Lane.
reminds of Costner's "Message in a Bottle" - the whole thing goes nowhere for way too long, but you hope there's a twist - and then it's over. no twist worth waiting for. oof.
I think that M. Night guy had a movie like that. a mist or a fog or whatever and then - wait, that's it? really? can I get a refund?
Isn't it highly likely that $500K buys you way more house in TX than in CA? Also, isn't the CA property tax based on how long you've owned the house? I think new buyers pay significantly more than people who've been there for 20+ years.
Not me. I sadly live in NY, where we have high property tax AND high income tax. If it wasn't for family ties, I'd be gone tomorrow.
Yes. I have seen executives and business owners who spent way too much time, energy, and legal fees trying to optimize tax structures while the actual operations of their companies were being terribly mismanaged.
That being said, the tax code is unnecessarily complicated and encourages this type of inefficiency.
And, the average tax payer see precious little benefit in high tax states. The corruption and waste in NY, NJ, IL, etc. is legendary. The school districts in this country that spend the most per student are generally awful.
(John, how about adding "The Orioles will commit to building a long-term competitive team"?)
Regarding Prop 13, from what little I know about California politics, it seems to have been a good idea badly implemented. I do believe that it's wrong to force people out of homes they own because of a (paper) increase in their property's value (increasingly driven by speculators), and Prop 13 was an attempt to prevent that. I prefer income taxes over property taxes anyway; you can always afford to pay your income tax.
(okay, the Rams did that)
The school districts in this country that spend the most per student are generally awful.
Which districts spend the most per student?
EDIT: My bad, you asked about districts. Still, anyone who claims $ is everything should take a moment to examine the education catastrophe that is DC.
* There are probably issues with the accuracy of that list. For example, East Ramapo famously underfunded its public schools while spending a significant portion of their budget on services for the large number of local students (~75% of the district) who attend private religious schools.
If you go by district count, you'll get a bunch of small rich suburban districts on the East Coat mixed in with the awful urban districts. But New York City alone has more students than any 20 of those districts combined.
The big urban districts spend two or three times what an average suburban district spends in the Mid West or South or West, and gets far worse results.
I mean, New York State spends twice what Minnesota spends, and Minnesota has the highest SAT scores in the nation, while NY is #41. Wisconsin is #2 and also spends about half what NY spends.
Only 1% of Wisconsin students and 2% of Minnesota students take the SAT, while 55% of New York students take it. Think there's some selection bias there?
New York students significantly outperform Wisconsin and Minnesota students on the ACT, but only 9% of NY students take the ACT so I don't know how representative that is, either.
Anyway, I will stick by my earlier statement that there are many other factors that determine school quality besides money spent.
My bad, didn't realize they didn't take the SATs out there.
https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profiles
Here's a better sources showing MN schools perform better than NY basically across the board.
I would guess money means next to nothing, once you pass a very minimal threshold. What matters is discipline, high expectations, and parental involvement. Charters and parochial schools suggest this heavily.
So he landed $1.2B in corporate welfare, which makes him happy to stay in Baltimore until he can get another big swig of corporate welfare in the next runaround.
I live in Cerritos, CA, and in my local area school district, the big high school is Whitney High, ranked #14 nationally, the #2 high school is Cerritos High, a top #500 nationally ranked school. Not coincidentally, the typical home in Cerritos runs a bit over a million bucks. We shouldn't pretend infrastructure doesn't matter. Everything matters.
I'm pretty sure if you took the #1 school in an area, and the worst school, and swapped their student bodies (with parents of course) and changed nothing else, the formerly worse school would be near the top in short order, and the former #1 would be awful. Charters and parochial schools operate in inner cities with far, far less resources than the public schools and routinely trounce the regular public schools, and even a lot of suburban rich schools. If the kids and parents both don't care about education, they're effed, and the sooner you get them out of the schools so they don't harass and attack the students who do care, the better. Reform schools were a thing for a reason.
Lots of people disagree with me about expelling disruptive students. Many school have virtually eliminated suspensions and expulsions because they don’t correspond to preferred ideological quotas.
Well, at least I have no reason to feel guilty about ignoring the fundraising appeals of my old (parochial) high school.
Think how much money they could have saved if they'd realized the buildings needed only a single door!
My bad, didn't realize they didn't take the SATs out there.
I think the 2020 numbers were artificially depressed by the pandemic. But yes, the ACT is more common than the SAT in the Midwest in general.
The rest of it isn't really worth debating here.
Private schools get to kick out disruptive kids. Much, much harder to do in public schools.
Private schools don't have to pay for a lot of the special services. Private school students get those through the public schools. So not a fair comparison.
Well no, you wouldn't "argue" it, you'd just endlessly and incoherently assert it, and hand-wave away any contrary evidence on whatever thin pretext you thought up in the moment.
And I know this because you've comically set up your thin pretext in advance here - they don't lack infrastructure "if they have students and parents committed to learning." Wtf does that even mean? It's complete nonsense and just allows you to set up endless No True Scotsman rebuttals in advance. "Oh well, sure, that school's terrible, but the big problem here is that they don't have students and parents committed to learning, duh."
At my direction, we begged for corporate welfare, and got it. EAT IT.
Guarantee that the brother says the mother didn't write that.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main