User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.3314 seconds
48 querie(s) executed
| ||||||||
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Discussion
| ||||||||
Baseball Primer Newsblog — The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand Tuesday, June 28, 2022SOURCES: OVER 100 PLAYERS REJECT DRAFT COMBINE PHYSICAL; VOID DRAFT BONUS GUARANTEE
|
Login to submit news.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks. Hot TopicsNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for June 2023
(97 - 8:52pm, Jun 03) Last: Cowboy Popup Newsblog: Diamond Sports Group fails to pay Padres, loses broadcast rights (27 - 7:52pm, Jun 03) Last: McCoy Newsblog: Aaron Boone’s Rate of Ejections Is Embarrassing ... And Historically Significant (13 - 7:16pm, Jun 03) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: 2023 NBA Playoffs Thread (2546 - 6:31pm, Jun 03) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Report: Nationals' Stephen Strasburg has 'severe nerve damage' (5 - 5:45pm, Jun 03) Last: McCoy Sox Therapy: Lining Up The Minors (31 - 4:07pm, Jun 03) Last: villageidiom Newsblog: Jays pitcher Anthony Bass sorry for posting video endorsing anti-LGBTQ boycotts (101 - 3:35pm, Jun 03) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Economic boost or big business hand-out? Nevada lawmakers consider A’s stadium financing (12 - 3:33pm, Jun 03) Last: Howie Menckel Newsblog: Former Los Angeles Dodger Steve Garvey weighs U.S. Senate bid (24 - 3:23pm, Jun 03) Last: cookiedabookie Newsblog: Big Spending Begins To Pay Off For AL West-Leading Rangers (11 - 2:39pm, Jun 03) Last: Walt Davis Newsblog: OT Soccer Thread - The Run In (430 - 1:48pm, Jun 03) Last: Mefisto Newsblog: 8 big All-Star voting storylines to follow (26 - 11:54pm, Jun 02) Last: bjhanke Newsblog: MLB managers should be challenging a lot more in 2023 (4 - 10:22pm, Jun 02) Last: The Duke Newsblog: The Athletic: After 50 years, is this the San Diego Chicken’s last stand? [$] (14 - 8:23pm, Jun 02) Last: Dag Nabbit: Sockless Psychopath Hall of Merit: Reranking First Basemen: Discussion Thread (35 - 4:10pm, Jun 02) Last: bjhanke |
|||||||
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2021 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
| Page rendered in 0.3314 seconds |
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Walt Davis Posted: June 28, 2022 at 06:43 PM (#6084350)Basically it feels like the point is to reduce teams drafting players earlier than they are willing to spend on them, at the same time, the players who don't have leverage, are refusing the physical so that they might actually go higher than they are rated and not force the team to match the 75%, but still get a bigger payday than they would have if they were drafted where they should have gone.
So I think I'm the 45th best player and the 45th pick has a slot value of $X ... so if I'm the 45th best player, my draft bonus value to a team is, give or take, $X.
But I think I might get drafted earlier so a team can save some money on that slot for use elsewhere. OK, I take the physical and agree to 75% of slot. Now, no team will draft me in a slot where 75% is way over $X ... or will do so only if I was the only one silly enough to take the physica. So I haven't really increased my bonus. And if none of this happens and I get drafted 45th ... I now have to accept 75% of $X, costing myself 25%?
Under the new rules, teams will have physicals prior to drafting the players, make the decision better-informed. Players will need to submit to a physical prior to signing, so they aren't assuming all risk, but it also prevents them from getting "low-balled" due to lack of negotiating leverage post-draft.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main