Major League Baseball plans to return to London next year for the first time since 2019.
The league announced Thursday that the St. Louis Cardinals and Chicago Cubs will play a two-game series on June 24-25, 2023, at London Stadium. The NL Central rivals were supposed to play in London in 2020, but the games were canceled because of the coronavirus pandemic.
“The Cardinals are excited and honored to be a part of the London Series next year,” Cardinals chairman Bill DeWitt Jr. said in a release. “The Cardinals-Cubs rivalry is one of the best in sports, and it will be exciting to bring it to Europe for a new audience to experience.”
MLB last played in London in 2019, when the New York Yankees swept a two-game set against the Boston Red Sox in June at London Stadium. Those were also MLB’s first regular-season games played in Europe.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Walt Davis Posted: August 05, 2022 at 09:59 PM (#6090232)Of course one of them will go 4 for 5 with a triple, 2 doubles and a single, drive in 6 runs and Cards will win game 1 by a score of 6-4.
In game 2, the Cardinals starter, the newly recruited current Gloucester opening fast bowler, will be ejected from the game for trying to shine one side of the baseball to get some more swing on it.
This made me laugh out loud.
Anyway, I believe the sun sets in London at about the same local time as it does in Detroit or Seattle.
How about the Angels against the Mets?
I guess more because of its relative longitude than its latitude, Detroit sunsets are later than either. Though I imagine you get way more actual sunshine per day in the summer in Seattle. (If not so much London. Because of rain.)
Why should a new audience care about an existing rivalry? If whoever the EPL champion is were to play a game in the US against whoever their biggest rival is to determine once and for all which nation is the greatest on earth, I still wouldn't be bothered to care about it even if the game were played across the street from me.
Honestly it probably doesn't matter which team other than maybe the Yankees or Dodgers were playing in this thing as far as the fans over there are concerned.
Baseball is just a hard sport to showcase to a new audience. There are few opportunities for shocking displays of raw athleticism, for one. Plus offensive opportunities are equalized, so you could easily have a two-game set where Goldschmidt doesn't get a hit but the backup SS goes bananas. That makes it hard to hype the arrival of a star like Goldschmidt, whereas if the Bucks played a game in London you could reasonably expect him to get 20 points and a couple of awesome plays.
I don't know. He seems like a good athlete, but I don't know if Goldy would be able to drop 20 in an NBA game. At least not easily.
Yeah exactly, Detroit is way at the western end of its time zone, so for example, its sunset is 48 minutes later on June 24 than Boston despite being similar latitude and same time zone.
That's the same issue with Paris/London above.
Lol, somehow "Giannis" disappeared from that sentence.
Answering an internet prompt about the furthest N/S/E/W you've ever been, I was kind of shocked to learn that my answer for "north" was London and not Montreal. I've not been to London in the deep winter, but from my understanding it doesn't get cold the way Montreal does.
I got the impression that they're trying to market to Europe but will happily use the expats and tourists to make sure the stadium fills and the enterprise breaks even. I went to the previous London series as a tourist and it didn't feel like I was particularly surrounded by other Americans.
While Cubs-Cards is a classic rivalry in the Midwest, I don't imagine baseball fans outside the Midwest pay any real attention to when they match up. Althought neither has been relevant since the Reagan administration, Redskins-Cowboys probably still generates more buzz than Cubs-Cards. Most of London probably thinks St Louis is somewhere in France. I've been surprised that almost none of the Kiwis, Aussies and Brits I've met over here have made it to Chicago when they go to the US.
Don't get me wrong, I think baseball in London is a silly idea and the notion that it will ever catch on anywhere it hasn't already caught on I suspect is fanciful. I don't see how they could make expansion to Japan/Korea work, Mexico doesn't seem feasible anytime soon. But sure, if you can make an extra million playing a couple games in London a year, who am I to complain? I'm already used to watching baseball at 7 in the morning.
The selling point is this is the highest level of the sport and they are not watching an exhibition game, but a game that actually counts for something. (they probably won't know, but it's better than some random exhibition crap where you know you aren't going to get the best)
If I lived in London, I wouldn't go see Cubs/Cards though. Baseball's a relatively provincial game and without the necessary context, extremely boring. Others have touched on it above, but a baseball game isn't an appealing self-contained sporting vessel in the way most of the other big sports are. It's more a chapter in a long, running story. You can't really even watch a couple baseball games and tell who the good players are.
The main papers in England don't cover the running story of baseball, box scores, stats and the like.(*) I'm sure there are pockets of exceptions. It's obviously possible to be a baseball and MLB fan in London and the rest of the UK. I'd be curious as to the number of visits from England MLB.com gets, number of MLB.tv/MLB at bat subscriptions. Not sure if Sirius/XM is there and/or how many people listen to games through that (assuming they even can).
I doubt the numbers are high; in fact, I'd guess they're very low. But those are the places one would go for answers.
(*) With the start of the (big league) soccer season, I re-opened my Times of London and Independent subscriptions a couple days ago. There isn't really even a mention of baseball in them anywhere.
Sort of. The sun sets "later" in Paris because Paris sets their clocks a time zone to the east. Sunset is close to physically simultaneous in London and Paris (within ~20 minutes), but Paris's clocks are an hour ahead.
Late sunset in Paris is the same basis as in Detroit, yes - the city's physical location really should be a time zone later, but it clings to the earlier one for geopolitical reasons.
How is that sort of? Both examples are due to their relative positions in their time zones, not their relative latitudes.
Not quite. Almost the entire state of Michigan is in the Eastern time zone, and Detroit's on the eastern side of the state, so there are even later sunsets just about everywhere else in Michigan.
The sun sets at 9:55 p.m. in the summer in Ontonagon (which is also quite far north).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main